Bibliography

AagesonJ. W. Paul the Pastoral Epistles and the Early Church. lps. Peabody, ma: Hendrickson2008.

AbelF.-M. Grammaire du Grec Biblique. 2nd edition. Ebib. Paris: Gabalda1927.

AchtemeierP. J.J. B. Green and M. M. Thompson. Introducing the New Testament. Its Literature and Theology. Grand Rapids, mi: Eerdmans2001.

AdamsS. A. “The Relationships of Paul and Luke: Luke, Paul’s Letters, and the ‘We’ Passages in Acts.” In Paul and His Social Relations edited by S. E. Porter and C. D. Land125142. past 7. Leiden/Boston: Brill2013.

AdmoniW. Der deutsche Sprachbau. 4th edition. Munich: Beck1982.

AdradosF. R. Nueva Sintaxis del Griego Antiguo. Madrid: Gredos1992.

Alaichamy S. Discourse Structure and Hortatory Information in Colossians. PhD diss. University of Texas 1999.

AlandB.K. AlandJ. KaravidopoulosC. M. Martini and B. M. Metzger eds. Novum Testamentum Graece. 28th edition. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft2012.

AlbertzM. Die Entstehung des apostolischen Schriftenkanonsvolume i/2Die Botschaft des Neuen Testamentes. Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag1952.

AlfordH. The Epistles to Timotheus, Titus, and Philemonvolume 3The Greek Testament. 4th edition. Cambridge: Deighton & Bell1865.

AllanJ. A. “The ‘In Christ’ Formula in the Pastoral Epistles.” nts 10 (1963): 115121.

AllenD. L. “The Discourse Structure of Philemon: A Study in Text Linguistics.” In Scribes and Scriptures edited by D. A. Black7796. fs J. H. Greenlee. Winona Lake, in: Eisenbrauns1992.

AlviarJ. J. “Recent Advances in Computational Linguistics and Their Application to Biblical Studies.” nts 54.1 (2008): 139159.

AntonP. Exegetische Abhandlung der Pastoral-Briefe Pauli an Timotheum und Titum. Edited by J. A. Maier. Halle: Waysenhaus17531755.

AquinasT. In Omnes S. Pauli Apostoli Epistolas Commentaria. Edited by P. M. Maggiolo. 3 volumes. 7th edition. Turin: Marietti1929.

ArdilaA.F. Ostrosky-SolisM. Rosselli and C. Gómez. “Age-Related Cognitive Decline During Normal Aging: The Complex Effect of Education.” acn 15.6 (2000): 495513.

AugstG. and K. Müller. “Die schriftliche Sprache im Deutschen.” In Schrift und Schriftlichkeit edited by H. Günther and O. Ludwig1500–1506. hsk 10.2. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter1996.

BaarlinkH. ed. Inleiding tot het Nieuwe Testament. Kampen: Kok1989.

BaayenR. H. “On Frequency, Transparency and Productivity.” In Yearbook of Morphology 1992 edited by G. E. Booij and J. van Marle181208. Dordrecht: Kluwer1993.

BaayenR. H. “Quantitative Aspects of Morphological Productivity.” In Yearbook of Morphology 1991 edited by G. E. Booij and J. van Marle109149. Dordrecht: Kluwer1992.

BaayenR. H. and R. Lieber. “Productivity and English Derivation: A Corpus Based Study.” Lin 29.5 (1991): 801843.

BaconB. W. An Introduction to the New Testament. nth. London: Macmillan1907.

BadcockF. J. The Pauline Epistles and the Epistle to the Hebrews in their Historical Setting. London: spck1937.

BahnsenW. Erklärung des zweiten Timotheusbriefes nebst einer allgemeinen Einleitung zu den Pastoralbriefen überhauptvolume 1Die sogenannten Pastoralbriefe. Leipzig: Barth1876.

BakerP. Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press2010.

BakerP. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum2006.

BaljonJ. M. S. Inleiding op de boeken des nieuwen verbonds. Utrecht: Kemink1893.

BarentsenJ. Emerging Leadership in the Pauline Mission: A Social Identity Perspective on Local Leadership Development in Corinth and Ephesus. ptms. Eugene, or: Pickwick2011.

BarrG. K. Scalometry and the Pauline Epistles. JSNTSup 261. London/New York: T&T Clark2004.

BarrettC. K. The Pastoral Epistles. Oxford: Clarendon1963.

BarthF. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. 5th edition. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann1921.

BassetL. “Valeurs et emplois de la particule dite modale en grec ancien.” In In the Footsteps of Raphael Kühner. Proceedings from the International Commemoration of the 150th Anniversary of the Publication of Raphael Kühner’s Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache ii. Theil: Syntaxe edited by A. RijksbaronH. A.Mulder and G. C. Wakker2737. Amsterdam: Gieben1988.

BasslerJ. M. “Paul and His Letters.” In The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament edited by D. E. Aune373397. Malden, ma/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell2010.

BasslerJ. M. 1 Timothy 2 Timothy Titus. antc. Nashville, tn: Abingdon1996.

BauckhamR. “Pseudo-Apostolic Letters.” jbl 107.3 (1988): 469494.

BauerB. Kritik der paulinischen Briefe. 3 volumes. Berlin: Hempel18501852.

BauerT. J. Paulus und die kaiserzeitliche Epistolographie. wunt 276. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2011.

BauerW. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and other Early Christian Literature. Edited and revised by F. W. Danker. Translated and adapted by W. F. ArndtF. W. Gingrich and F. W. Danker. 3rd edition. Chicago, il: University of Chicago Press2000.

BaumA. D. “Semantic Variation within the Corpus Paulinum: Linguistic Considerations Concerning the Richer Vocabulary of the Pastoral Epistles.” TynB 59.2 (2008): 271292.

BaumA. D. Pseudepigraphie und literarische Fälschung im frühen Christentum. wuntii/138. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2001.

BaumgartenM. Die Ächtheit der Pastoralbriefe mit besonderer Rücksicht auf den neuesten Angriff von herrn Dr. Baur. Berlin: Dehmigke1837.

BaurF. C. Die sogenannten Pastoralbriefe des Apostels Paulus aufs neue kritisch untersucht. Stuttgart: Cotta1835.

BayerK. “Verteilung und Funktion der sogenannten Parenthesen in Texten gesprochener Sprache.” ds 1 (1973): 64115.

BaylesK. A. and A. W. Kaszniak. Communication and Cognition in Normal Aging and Dementia. London: Taylor & Francis1987.

BeamanK. “Coordination and Subordination Revisited: Syntactic Complexity in Spoken and Written Narrative Discourse.” In Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse edited by D. Tannen4580. pb 12. Norwood, nj: Ablex1984.

BeckJ. R. The Psychology of Paul: A Fresh Look at His Life and Teaching. Grand Rapids, mi: Kregel2002.

BeckJ. T. Erklärung der Zwei Briefe Pauli an Timotheus. Edited by J. Lindenmeyer. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann1879.

BeckhausJ. F. Specimen observationum critico-exegeticarum de vocabulis ἁπαξ λεγομένοις et rarioribus dicendi formulis in prima ad Timotheum epistola Paulina obviis authentiae ejus nihil detrahentibus. Linz: Jülicher1810.

BehnamB. “A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Metathesis in Azeri Language.” ijalel 1.2 (2012): 5664.

Beier P. Geiteilte Briefe? Eine kritische Untersuchung der neueren Teilungshypothesen zu den paulinischen Briefen. PhD diss. University of Halle 1984.

BekerJ. C. “Pastoral Letters.” In idb 3668675. Nashville, tn: Abingdon1962.

BekerJ. C. Heirs of Paul: Paul’s Legacy in the New Testament and in the Church Today. Minneapolis, mn: Fortress1991.

BelserJ. E. Die Briefe des Apostels Paulus an Timotheus und Titus. Freiburg: Herder1907.

BénétreauS. Les Épîtres Pastorales. 1 et 2 Timothée Tite. Vaux-sur-Seine: Édifac2008.

Berdot D. Exercitatio Theologica Exegetica in Epistolam S. Pauli ad Titum. PhD diss. University of Halle 1710.

Berenguer SánchezJ. A. “Distintos conceptos de partícula en la descripción lingüística.” rsel 22.1 (1992): 5576.

BergerC. and R. Calabrese. “Some Explorations in Initial Interaction and Beyond: Toward a Development Theory of Interpersonal Communication.” hcr 1.2 (1975): 99111.

BergerK. “Hellenistische Gattungen im Neuen Testament.” In anrw ii.25.210311432. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter1984.

BernardJ. H. The Pastoral Epistles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1899.

BertholdtL. Historischkritische Einleitung in sammtliche kanonische und apokryphische Schriften des alten und neuen Testaments. Erlangen: Palm1819.

BertrandE. Essai critique sur l’authenticité des Épitres Pastorales. Montauban: Granié1887.

BettenA. “Ellipsen, Anakoluthe und Parenthesen. Fälle für Grammatik, Stilistik, Sprechakttheorie oder Konversationsanalyse?” ds 4 (1976): 207230.

BetzE. Grammar and Interaction: Pivots in German Conversation. sdg 21. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pa: Benjamins2008.

BetzH. D. “The Literary Composition and Function of Paul’s Letter to the Galatians.” In The Galatians Debate edited by M. D. Nanos328. Peabody, ma: Hendrickson2002.

BeyerK. Satzlehrevolume 1Semitische Syntax im Neuen Testament. sunt 1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht1962.

BeyschlagW. Die christliche Gemeindeverfassung im Zeitalter des Neuen Testaments. Harlem: Bohn1874.

BiberD. “Corpus-Based and Corpus-Driven Analyses of Language Variation and Use.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis edited by B. Heine and H. Narrog193224. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press2015.

BiberD. “Methodological Issues Regarding Corpus-based Analyses of Linguistic Variation.” llc 5.4 (1990): 257269.

BiberD. Variation across Speech and Writing. 1988. ReprintCambridge: Cambridge University Press1995.

BirdA. E. “The Authorship of the Pastoral Epistles—Quantifying Literary Style.” rtr 56.3 (1997): 118137.

BirdM. “Reassessing a Rhetorical Approach to Paul’s Letters.” ExpTim 119.8 (2008): 374379.

BlackD. A. It’s Still Greek to Me: An Easy-to-Understand Guide to Intermediate Greek. Grand Rapids, mi: Baker1998.

BlassF.A. Debrunner and F. Rehkopf. Grammatik des neutestamentlichen Griechisch. 18th edition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht2001.

BlassF. and A. Debrunner. A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. Revised by R. W. Funk. Chicago, il/London: University of Chicago Press1961.

BleekJ. F. Einleitung in das Neue Testamentvolume 2Einleitung in die Heilige Schrift. Berlin: Reimer1862.

BlighM. C. “Seventeen Verses Written for Timothy (2 Tim 4:6–22).” ExpTim 109.12 (1998): 364369.

BlombergC. L. From Pentecost to Patmos: An Introduction to Acts through Revelation. Nashville, tn: Broadman & Holman2006.

BöhlG. Ueber die Zeit der Abfassung und den Paulinischen Charakter der Briefe an Timotheus und Titus. Ein Beitrag zum Erweise ihrer Aechtheit. Berlin: Enslin1829.

BoringE. M. An Introduction to the New Testament: History Literature Theology. Louisville, ky: Westminster John Knox Press2012.

BornemannE. and E. Risch. Griechische Grammatik. Frankfurt: Diesterweg1973.

BothaP. J. J. “Letter Writing and Oral Communication: Galatians,” in Orality and Literacy in Early Christianity193211. bpc 5. Eugene, or: Cascade2012.

BöttgerH. Die Hirtenbriefe des Apostels Paulus auf ihren historischen Standpunkt zurückgeführtvolume 4Beiträge zur historisch-kritischen Einleitung in die paulinischen Briefe. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht1837.

BoudouA. Saint Paul. Les Épitres Pastorales. vs 15. Paris: Beauchesne1950.

BowenW. E. The Dates of the Pastoral Epistles: Two Essays. London: Nisbet1900.

BradacJ. J. “Language Attitudes and Impression Formation.” In Handbook of Language and Social Psychology edited by H. Giles and W. P. Robinson387412. Chicester: Wiley1990.

BradacJ. J.A. Cargile and J. S. Hallett. “Language Attitudes: Retrospect, Conspect, and Prospect.” In The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology edited by W. P. Robinson and H. Giles137155. Chicester: Wiley2001.

BradacJ. J.A. Mulac and A. House. “Lexical Diversity and Magnitude of Convergent Versus Divergent Style Shifting: Perceptual and Evaluative Consequences.” lc 8.3 (1988): 213228.

BradacJ. J. and R. Wisegarver. “Ascribed Status, Lexical Diversity, and Accent: Determinants of Perceived Status, Solidarity, and Control of Speech Style.” jlsp 3.4 (1984): 239256.

BradacJ. J.C. W. Konsky and R. A. Davies. “Two Studies of the Effects of Linguistic Diversity upon Judgments of Communicator Attributes and Message Effectiveness.” cm 43.1 (1976): 7079.

BradacJ. J.J. A. CourtrightG. Schmidt and R. A. Davies. “The Effects of Perceived Status and Linguistic Diversity upon Judgments of Speaker Attributes and Message Effectiveness.” jp 93.2 (1976): 213220.

BradacJ. J.J. W. Bowers and J. A. Courtright. “Effects of Intensity, Immediacy and Diversity upon Receiver Attitudes toward a Belief-Discrepant Message and Its Source.” In Language: Social Psychological Perspectives edited by H. GilesW. P. Robinson and P. M. Smith217221. Oxford: Pergamon1980.

BradacJ. J.J. W. Bowers and J. A. Courtright. “Lexical Variations in Intensity, Immediacy and Diversity: An Axiomatic Theory and Causal Model.” In The Social and Psychological Contexts of Language edited by R. N. St. Clair and H. Giles193223. Hillsdale, nj: Erlbaum1980.

BradacJ. J.J. W. Bowers and J. A. Courtright. “Three Language Variables in Communication Research: Intensity, Immediacy, and Diversity.” hcr 5.3 (1979): 257269.

BradacJ. J.R. A. Davies and C. W. Konsky. “Studies on the Effects of Linguistic Diversity upon Judgments of Speaker Attributes and Message Effectiveness.” In volume 3Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Applied Linguistics edited by G. Nickel527537. Stuttgart: Hochschulverlag1976.

BradacJ. J.R. A. Davies and J. A. Courtright. “The Role of Prior Message Context in Judgments of High- and Low-Diversity Messages.” ls 20.4 (1977): 295307.

BradacJ. J.R. J. Desmond and J. I. Murdoch. “Diversity and Density: Lexically Determined Evaluative and Informational Consequences of Linguistic Complexity.” cm 44.4 (1977): 273283.

BroerI. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. 3rd edition. Würzburg: Echter2010.

BrownE. F. The Pastoral Epistles. London: Methuen1917.

BrownR. E. An Introduction to the New Testament. abrl. New York : Doubleday1997.

BroxN. Die Pastoralbriefe. 5th edition. rnt. Regensburg: Pustet1989.

BrücknerW. Die chronologische Reihenfolge in welcher die Briefe des Neuen Testaments verfasst sind. Harlem: Bohn1890.

BrugmannK. Griechische Grammatik. 3rd edition. Munich: Beck1900.

BrustonC. “Les dernières Épîtres de saint Paul pendant et après sa captivité.” rtqr 22.3 (1913): 243264.

BrysbaertM.M. StevensP. Mandera and E. Keuleers. “How Many Words do We Know? Practical Estimates of Vocabulary Size Dependent on Word Definition, the Degree of Language Input and the Participant’s Age,” FiP 7 (29July2016): 111accessed August 27 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116.

BultmannR. “Glossen im Römerbrief.” tlz 72 (1947): 197202.

BultmannR. “Pastoralbriefe.” In rgg 4993997. 2nd edition. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck1930.

BurkettD. An Introduction to the New Testament and the Origins of Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2002.

ByrskogS. “Co-Senders, Coauthors, and Paul’s Use of the First Person Plural.” znw 87.34 (1996): 230250.

CairdG. B. “Do Computers Count?” ExpTim 76.5 (1965): 176.

CamererR. “Über den ‘emphatischen Grundwert’ der Partikel ἄν.” Glotta 46.12 (1968): 106117.

CaragounisC. C. The Development of Greek and the New Testament. wunt 167. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2004.

CarringtonP. “The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles: Dr. Harrison’s Theory Reviewed.” atr 21.1 (1939): 3239.

CarsonD. A. and D. J. Moo. An Introduction to the New Testament. 2nd edition. Leicester: Apollos2005.

CasaliniN. Parole alla Chiesa. La tradizione Paolina nelle Lettere Pastorali. sbfa. Milano: ets2009.

ChafeW. “Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature.” In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy edited by D. Tannen3553. Norwood, nj: Ablex1982.

ChafeW. and J. Danielewicz. “Properties of Spoken and Written Language.” In Comprehending Oral and Written Language edited by R. Horrowitz and S. J. Samuels83113. New York: Academic Press1987.

ChenY.-S. and F. F. Leimkuhler. “A Type-Token Identity in the Simon-Yule Model of Text.” jasis 40.1 (1989): 4553.

CheshireJ. “Age- and Generation-Specific Use of Language.” In Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society edited by U. AmmonN. DittmarK. J. Mattheier and P. Trudgill15521563. hskii/2. 2nd edition. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter2005.

CheshireJ. “Age and Generation-Specific Use of Language.” In Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society edited by U. AmmonN. Dittmar and K. J. Mattheier760767. hskiii/1. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter1987.

ClarkD. J. “Discourse Structure in Titus.” bt 53.1 (2002): 101117.

ClemenC. Die Einheitlichkeit der paulinischen Briefe an Hand der bisher mit Bezug auf sie aufgestellten Interpolations- und Compilationshypothesen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht1894.

CollinsR. F. “Apropos the Integrity of I Thes.” In Studies on the First Letter to the Thessalonians edited by R. F. Collins96135. betl 66. Leuven: Peeters1984.

CollinsR. F. “Pastoralbriefe.” In rgg 6988991. 4th edition. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2003.

CollinsR. F. I & II Timothy and Titus. A Commentary. ntl. Louisville, ky: Westminster John Knox Press2002.

CollinsR. F. Letters That Paul Did Not Write: The Epistle to the Hebrews and the Pauline Pseudepigrapha. gns 28. Wilmington, de: Glazier1988. Reprint Eugene or: Wipf & Stock 2005.

ConderJ. The Literary History of the New Testament. London: Seeleys1850.

ConybeareW. J. and J. S. Howson. Volume 2The Life and Epistles of St. Paul. 7th edition. New York: Scribner1867.

CookD. “2 Timothy iv.6–8 and the Epistle to the Philippians.” jts 33.1 (1982): 168171.

CookD. “The Pastoral Fragments Reconsidered.” jts 35.1 (1984): 120131.

CossetteA. La richesse lexicale et sa mesure. tlq 53. Paris: Champion1994.

CothenetÉ. Les épîtres pastorales. 72. Paris: Cerf1990.

CotterellP. and M. Turner. Linguistics and Biblical Interpretation. Downers Grove, il: InterVarsity1989.

CouchoudP.-L. “La première edition de Saint Paul.” rhr 94 (1926): 242263.

CouchoudP.-L. “Reconstitution et classement des Lettres de Saint Paul.” rhpr 87 (1923): 831.

CouplandN.J. Coupland and H. Giles. Language Society and the Elderly: Discourse Identity and Ageing. Oxford: Blackwell1991.

CourtneyE. A Commentary on the Satires of Juvenal. ccs 2. Berkeley, ca: University of California Press2013.

CramerM. J. “Of the Peculiarities of the Pastoral Epistles.” jsble 7.2 (1887): 332.

CrednerK. A. Das Neue Testament nach Zweck Ursprung Inhalt für denkende Leser der Bibel. 2 volumes. Giessen: Ferber18411843.

CrednerK. A. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. Halle: Waysenhaus1836.

CrystalD. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed. Oxford: Blackwell2008.

CsernochM. Vocabulary Richness of Novels and their Adaptations. ml 24. New York: Lang2011.

CurtiusA. De tempore quo prior Pauli ad Timotheum Epistola exarata sit. Dümmler: Berolini1828.

DavidsonS. An Introduction to the Study of the New Testament. 2 volumes. London: Bagster1840.

DavidsonS. An Introduction to the Study of the New Testament. 2 volumes. 3rd edition. London: Paul, Trench & Trübner1894.

De AmbroggiP. Le Epistole Pastorali di S. Paolo a Timoteo e a Tito. sb. Turin/Rome: Marietti1953.

De BotK. and N. van der Hoeven. “Language and Ageing.” In The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics edited by J. Simpson124137. Abingdon/New York: Routledge2011.

De KruijfT. C. De Pastorale Brieven. Roermond: Romen1966.

De LestapisS. L’énigme des Pastorales de Saint Paul. Paris: Gabalda1976.

De MeloW. “The Language of Roman Comedy.” In A Companion to the Latin Language edited by J. Clackson321343. bcaw. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell2011.

De MorganE. Memoir of Augustus de Morgan. London: Longmans & Green1882.

De SaussureF. Cours de linguistique générale. Edited by C. BallyA. Sechehaye and A. Riedlinger. Lausanne/Paris: Payot1916.

De WetteW. M. L. Die Einleitung in das Neue Testament enthaltendvolume 2Lehrbuch der historisch kritischen Einleitung in die kanonischen Bücher des Neuen Testaments. Revised by H. Messner and G. Lünemann. 6th edition. Berlin: Reimer1860.

De ZwaanJ. Brieven van Paulus en Hebreeënvolume 2Inleiding tot het Nieuwe Testament. 2nd edition. Harlem: Bohn1948.

DeaneA. C. St. Paul and His Letters. London: Hodder & Stoughton1942.

Deissmann A. Licht vom Osten: Das Neue Testament und die neuentdeckten Texte der hellenistisch-römischen Welt. 4th edition. Tübingen: Mohr1923.

DelitzschF. “Zur kritischen Frage über die Pastoralbriefe.ˮ ZlTK 12.4 (1851): 722727.

DennistonJ. D. The Greek Particles. Revised by K. J. Dover. 2nd edition. 1954. Reprint Oxford: Clarendon 1978.

DerrettJ. D. M. “Naí (2 Cor. 1:19–20).” fn 4.8 (1991): 205209.

DeSilvaD. A. An Introduction to the New Testament. Downers Grove, il: InterVarsity/ Leicester: Apollos2004.

DesjardinsG. Authenticité et date des livres du Nouveau Testament. Paris: Lethellieux1900.

DibeliusM. and H. Conzelmann. The Pastoral Epistles. Translated by P. Buttolph and A. Yarbro. Hermeneia. Philadelphia, pa: Fortress1972.

DinwoodieC. “The Word, the Faith, and the Computer.” sjt 18.2 (1965): 204218.

DonelsonL. R. Pseudepigraphy and Ethical Argument in the Pastoral Epistles. hut 22. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck1986.

DornierP. Les Épitres Pastorales. SBib. Paris: Gabalda1969.

DoughtyD. J. “Pauline Paradigms and Pauline Authority.” jhc 1 (1994): 95128.

DoumergeP. Authenticité de la première épitre a Timothée. Strasbourg: Silbermann1856.

DuboisA. Étude critique sur lʼauthenticité de la première épitre à Timothée. Strasbourg: Silbermann1856.

DuffJ. “𝔓46 and the Pastorals: A Misleading Consensus?” nts 44.4 (1998): 578590.

DuhouxY. “Grec écrit et grec parlé: Une étude contrastive des particules aux Ve–IVe siècles.” In New Approaches to Greek Particles edited by A. Rijksbaron1548. ascp 7. Amsterdam: Gieben1997.

DuhouxY. “Les particules grecques: les situations homérique et mycénienne.” In Langue et langues. Hommage à Albert Maniet edited by Y. Duhoux1342. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters1998.

DuhouxY. “Les particules: une classe de mots à supprimer en grec ancien?” In Word Classes and Related Topics in Ancient Greek edited by E. CrespoJ. de la Villa and A. R. Revuelta519536. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters2006.

DuhouxY. “Quelques idées reçues, et néanmoins fausses, sur les particules grecques.” ac 66 (1997): 281288.

DulingD. C. The New Testament: History Literature and Social Context. 4th edition. Belmont, ca: Thomson & Wadsworth2003.

DunnJ. D. G. “The First and Second Letters to Timothy and the Letter to Titus.” In nib xi775880. Nashville, tn: Abingdon2000.

DunnJ. D. G. “The Formal and Theological Coherence of Romans.” In The Romans Debate edited by K. P. Donfried245250. 2nd edition. Peabody, ma: Hendrickson1991.

Durán LópezM. Á. “Las partículas griegas y las funciones de comunicación.” rsel 30.1 (2000): 4576.

DuránP.D. MalvernB. Richards and N. Chipere. “Developmental Trends in Lexical Diversity.” al 25.2 (2004): 220242.

EastonB. S. The Pastoral Epistles. New York: Scribner1947.

Ebojo E. B. A Scribe and His Manuscript: An Investigation Into the Scribal Habits of Papyrus 46 (P. Chester Beatty II—P. Mich. Inv. 6238). PhD diss. University of Birmingham 2014.

EgginsS. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. 2nd edition. London: Continuum2004.

EhrenspergerK. and J. B. Tucker eds. Reading Paul in Context: Explorations in Identity Formation. fs W. S. Campbell. lnts 428. London/New York: T&T Clark2010.

EhrmanB. D. Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics. Oxford: Oxford University Press2012.

EhrmanB. D. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. 6th edition. New York: Oxford University Press2016.

EichhornJ. G. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. 3 volumes. Leipzig: Weidmann18031814.

EllicottC. J. The Pastoral Epistles of St. Paul. 5th edition. London: Longmans & Green1883.

EllisE. E. “Pastoral Letters.” In dpl658666. Downers Grove, il: InterVarsity/Leicester: Apollos1993.

EllisE. E. “The Authorship of the Pastorals: A Résumé and Assessment of Current Trends.” EvQ 32.3 (1960): 151161.

EllisE. E. Paul and His Recent Interpreters. Grand Rapids, mi: Eerdmans1961. Reprint Eugene or: Wipf & Stock 2004.

EllisE. E. The Making of the New Testament Documents. Leiden/Boston: Brill2002.

EmeryO. “Linguistic Decrement in Normal Aging.” lc 6.12 (1986): 4764.

EngelmannM. Unzertrennliche Drillinge? Motivsemantische Untersuchungen zum literarischen Verhältnis der Pastoralbriefe. bznw 192. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter2012.

EnkvistN. E. “A Note on the Definition and Description of True Anacolutha.” In On Language: Rhetorica Phonologica Syntactica edited by C. Duncan-Rose and T. Vennemann315324. fs R. P. Stockwell. London: Routledge1988.

EppE. J. “Issues in the Interrelation of New Testament Textual Criticism and Canon.” In Perspectives on New Testament Textual Criticism: Collected Essays 1962–2004595638. NovTSup 116. Leiden: Brill2005.

ErwinH. and M. Oakes“Correspondence Analysis of the New Testament” University of Sunderlandaccessed August 11 2015http://pers-www.wlv.ac.uk/~in4326/papers/oakes_lrec_cam3.pdf.

EshbaughH. “Biblical Criticism and the Computer.” Per 13.1 (1972): 4754.

EslerP. F. Conflict and Identity in Romans: The Social Setting of Paul’s Letter. Minneapolis, mn: Fortress2003.

EvansonE. A Letter to Dr. Priestley’s Young Man; With a Postscript concerning the Rev. D. Simpson’s Essay in Answer to Evanson’s Dissonance and Volney’s Ruins. Ipswich: Jermyn1794.

EvansonE. The Dissonance of the Four Generally Received Evangelists and the Evidence of Their Respective Authenticity Examined. Ipswich: Jermyn1792.

EwaldH. Sieben Sendschreiben des Neuen Bundes übersetzt und erklärt. Göttingen: Dieterich1870.

FairbairnP. The Pastoral Epistles. Edinburgh: T&T Clark1874.

FalconerR. The Pastoral Epistles. Oxford: Clarendon1937.

FalconerT. Certain Principles in Evanson’s “Dissonance of the Four Generally Received Evangelists” Examined. Oxford: Oxford University Press1811.

FeeG. D. 1 and 2 Timothy Titus. nibc 13. Peabody, ma: Hendrickson1988. Reprint Grand Rapids mi: Baker 2011.

FeeG. D. The First Epistle to the Corinthians. 2nd edition. nicnt. Grand Rapids, mi/Cambridge: Eerdmans2014.

FeilmoserA. B. Einleitung in die Bücher des neuen Bundes. Innsbruck: Wagner1810.

FeineP. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. Revised by J. Behm. 10th edition. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer1954.

FenskeW. “Und wenn ihr betet …” (Mt. 65). Gebete in der zwischenmenschlichen Kommunikation der Antike als Ausdruck der Frömmigkeit. sunt 21. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht1997.

FeuilletA. “La doctrine des Épîtres Pastorales et leurs affinités avec l’œuvre lucanienne.” RThom 78.2 (1978): 181225.

FiehlerR.B. BardenM. Elstermann and B. Kraft. Eigenschaften gesprochener Sprache. Tübingen: Narr2004.

FineganE. Language: Its Structure and Use. 7th edition. Stamford, ct: Cengage Learning2015.

FinneyM. “Social Identity and Conflict in Corinth: 1 Corinthians 11.17–34 in Context.” In T&T Clark Handbook to Social Identity in the New Testament edited by J. B. Tucker and C. A. Baker273287. London: Bloomsbury2014.

FitzmyerJ. A. Romans. ab 33. New York: Doubleday1993.

FlattJ. F. Vorlesungen über die Briefe Pauli an Timotheus und Titus. Edited by C. F. Kling. Tübingen: Fues1831.

ForbesA. D. “Statistical Research on the Bible.” In abd 6185206. New York: Doubleday1992.

FordC. E. and S. A. Thompson. “Conditionals in Discourse: A Text-Based Study from English.” In On Conditionals edited by E. C. TraugottA. ter MeulenJ. S. Reilly and C. A. Ferguson353372. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1986.

FossumA. “Hapax Legomena in Plato.” ajp 52.3 (1931): 205231.

FosterP. “Who Wrote 2 Thessalonians? A Fresh Look at an Old Problem.” jsnt 35.2 (2012): 150175.

FowlerR. Linguistic Criticism. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press1996.

FraenkelJ. J. “A Question in Connection with Greek Particles.” Mn 13.3 (1947): 183201.

FreedE. D. The New Testament: A Critical Introduction. 2nd edition. Philadelphia, pa: Fortress1986.

FreunekS. Literarische Mündlichkeit und Übersetzung. Am Beispiel deutscher und russischer Erzähltexte. Berlin: Frank & Timme2007.

FuchsR. “Bisher unbeachtet—zum unterschiedlichen Gebrauch von ἀγαθός, καλός und καλῶς in den Schreiben an Timotheus und Titus.” ejt 15.1 (2006): 1533.

FuchsR. “Ist ‘die Agape das Ziel der Unterweisung’ (1. Tim 1,5)?—zum unterschiedlichen Gebrauch des ἀγαπ- und des φιλ-Wortstammes in den Schreiben an Timotheus und Titus.” JETh 18 (2004): 93125.

FuchsR. Unerwartete Unterschiede. Müssen wir unsere Ansichten über die Pastoralbriefe revidieren? bwm 12. Wuppertal: Brockhaus2003.

GagerJ. G. Reinventing Paul. New York: Oxford University Press2000.

GarrettP. Attitudes to Language. kts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2010.

GealyF. D. “The First and Second Epistles to Timothy and the Epistles to Titus.” In ib xi343551. Nashville, tn: Abingdon1955.

GeeraertsD. “Lexical Variation in Space.” In Theories and Methodsvolume 1Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation edited by P. Auer and J. E. Schmidt821837. hsk 30.1. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter2010.

GeeraertsD.G. Kristiansen and Y. Peirsman eds. Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. clr. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter2010.

GenadeA. A. Persuading the Cretans: A Text-Generated Persuasion Analysis of the Letter to Titus. Eugene, or: Wipf & Stock2011.

GeorgeC. H. “Greek Particles: Just a Literary Phenomenon?” In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek edited by S. Bakker and G. Wakker155169. ascp 16. Leiden/Boston: Brill2009.

GeröE.-C. “The Usage of ἄν and κε in Ancient Greek: Towards a Unified Description.” Glotta 76.34 (2000): 177191.

Gilchrist J. M. The Authorship and Date of the Pastoral Epistles. PhD diss. University of Manchester 1966.

Ginella F. G. De authentia epistolarum S. Pauli apostoli pastoralium. PhD diss. University of Breslau 1865.

GivónT. Syntax: An Introduction. 2nd edition. 2 volumes. Amsterdam: Benjamins2001.

GlaireJ. B. Volume 6Introduction historique et critique aux livres de l’Ancien et du Nouveau Testament. Paris: Mequignon1841.

GlaserT. Paulus als Briefroman erzählt. Studien zum antiken Briefroman und seiner christlichen Rezeption in den Pastoralbriefen. ntoa/sunt 76. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht2009.

GoguelM. Les épîtres pauliniennesvolume 2Introduction au Nouveau Testament. Paris: Leroux1926.

GoodG.-F. Authenticité des Épitres Pastorales. Montauban: Forestié1848.

GoodspeedE. J. An Introduction to the New Testament. Chicago, il: University of Chicago Press1937.

GourguesM. “La recherche sur les Pastorales à un tournant?” ScEs 61.1 (2009): 7386.

GourguesM. Les deux lettres à Timothée. La lettra à Tite. CbNT 14. Paris: Cerf2009.

GrantR. M. A Historical Introduction to the New Testament. Revised edition. New York: Simon & Schuster1972.

GrauR. F. Entwickelungsgeschichte des Neutestamentlichen Schriftthums. 3 volumes. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann1871.

GraystonK. and G. Herdan. “The Authorship of the Pastorals in the Light of Statistical Linguistics.” nts 6.1 (1959): 115.

GreenwoodH. H. “St Paul Revisited—A Computational Result.” llc 7.1 (1992): 4347.

GreenwoodH. H. “St Paul Revisited—Word Clusters in Multidimensional Space.” llc 8.4 (1993): 211219.

GuerikeH. E. F. Beiträge zur historisch kritischen Einleitung ins Neue Testament. Halle: Gebauer1828.

GuthrieD. New Testament Introduction. Revised edition. Leicester: Apollos1990.

GuthrieD. The Pastoral Epistles and the Mind of Paul. London: Tyndale1956.

GuthrieD. The Pastoral Epistles. 2nd edition. tntc. Leicester: InterVarsity1990.

HäfnerG. “Das Corpus Pastorale als literarisches Konstrukt.” tq 187.4 (2007): 258273.

HäfnerG. “Die Pastoralbriefe.” In Einleitung in das Neue Testament edited by M. Ebner and S. Schreiber450473. kst 6. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer2008.

HagnerD. A. The New Testament: A Historical and Theological Introduction. Grand Rapids, mi: Baker2012.

HallidayM. A. K. “Literacy and Linguistics: Relationships Between Spoken and Written Language.” In Analysing English in a Global Context: A Reader edited by A. Burns and C. Coffin181193. London/New York: Routledge2001.

HallidayM. A. K. “Spoken and Written Modes of Meaning.” In Comprehending Oral and Written Language edited by R. Horowitz and S. J. Samuels5582. San Diego, ca/London: Academic Press1987.

HallidayM. A. K. “Spoken and Written Modes of Meaning.” In Media Texts: Authors and Readers edited by D. Graddol and O. Boyd-Barrett5173. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters1994.

HallidayM. A. K. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 4th edition. London/New York: Routledge2014.

HallidayM. A. K. Spoken and Written Language. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press1989.

HammarströmG. “On Spoken Syntax.” In Syntax gesprochener Sprache edited by B. K. Halford and H. Pilch1926. Tübingen: Narr1990.

HänleinH. Studies in Authorship Recognition: A Corpus-Based Approach. New York: Lang1999.

HansenM.-B. M. The Function of Discourse Particles. A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French. pb 53. Amsterdam: Benjamins1998.

HansonA. T. “Eve’s Transgression: 1 Timothy 2.13–15,” in Studies in the Pastoral Epistles6577. London: spck1968.

HansonA. T. The Pastoral Epistles. ncb. Grand Rapids, mi: Eerdmans1982.

HansonA. T. The Pastoral Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1966.

HardingM. “Disputed and Undisputed Letters of Paul.” In The Pauline Canon edited by S. E. Porter129168. past 1. Leiden/Boston: Brill2004.

HardingM. Tradition and Rhetoric in the Pastoral Epistles. sbl 3. New York: Lang1998.

HardingM. What Are They Saying About the Pastoral Epistles? New York: Paulist Press2001.

HarrisM. J. Prepositions and Theology in the Greek New Testament. Grand Rapids, mi: Zondervan2012.

HarrisonE. F. Introduction to the New Testament. 2nd edition. Grand Rapids, mi: Eerdmans1971.

HarrisonP. N. “Important Hypotheses Reconsidered. III. The Authorship of the Pastoral Epistles.” ExpTim 67.3 (1955): 7781.

HarrisonP. N. Paulines and Pastorals. London: Villiers1964.

HarrisonP. N. The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles. London: Oxford University Press1921.

HarrisonS. J. Sermones Deorum: Divine Discourse in Virgil’s Aeneid.” In Colloquiual and Literary Latin edited by E. Dickey and A. Chahoud266280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2010.

HaselowA. Typological Changes in the Lexicon: Analytic Tendencies in English Noun Formation. TiEL 72. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter2011.

HaslerV. Die Briefe an Timotheus und Titus. zb 12. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag1978.

HausrathA. Der Apostel Paulus. 2nd edition. Heidelberg: Bassermann1872.

HellwigA. “Zur Funktion und Bedeutung der griechischen Partikeln.” Glotta 52.34 (1974): 145171.

HemsenJ. T. Der Apostel Paulus. Sein Leben Wirken und seine Schriften. Edited by F. Lücke. Göttingen: Dieterich1830.

HendriksenW. New Testament Commentary. I & II Timothy and Titus. 1957. Reprint Grand Rapids mi: Baker 2004.

HennigM. “The Kassel Corpus of Clause Linking.” In New Methods in Historical Corpora edited by P. BennettM. DurrellS. Scheible and R. J. Whitt207220. clip 3. Tübingen: Narr2013.

HennigM. “The Notion of Immediacy and Distance.” In Proximidade e Distância. Estudos sobra a Língua e a Cultura edited by M. Franco and B. Sieberg1532. Lisbon: Universidade Católica Editora 2011.

HenselsP. M. Nieuwtestamentisch Grieks: Een beknopte grammatica. Bussum: Coutinho2008.

HerdanG. “Scholarship and the Computer.” lqhr 34 (1965): 208217.

HerzerJ. “ ‘Das Geheimnis der Frömmigkeit” (1Tim 3,16). Sprache und Stil der Pastoralbriefe im Kontext hellenistisch-römischer Popularphilosophie—eine methodische Problemanzeige.” tq 187.4 (2007): 309329.

HerzerJ. “Abschied vom Konsens? Die Pseudepigraphie der Pastoralbriefe als Herausforderung an die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft.” tlz 129.12 (2004): 12671282.

HerzerJ. “Die Pastoralbriefe.” In Paulus Handbuch edited by F. W. Horn538542. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2013.

HerzerJ. “Fiktion oder Täuschung? Zur Diskussion über die Pseudepigraphie der Pastoralbriefe.” In Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen edited by J. FreyJ. HerzerM. JanssenC. K. Rothschild with M. Engelmann489536. wunt 246. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2009.

HerzerJ. “Juden—Christen—Gnostiker. Zur Gegnerproblematik der Pastoralbriefe.” btz 25.1 (2008): 143168.

HerzerJ. “Rearranging the “House of God”: A New Perspective on the Pastoral Epistles.” In Empsychoi LogoiReligious Innovations in Antiquity edited by A. HoutmanA. de Jong and M. Misset-Van de Weg547566. ajec 73. Leiden/Boston: Brill2008.

HerzerJ. “Was ist falsch an der „fälschlich so genannten Gnosis“? Zur Paulusrezeption des 1. Timotheusbriefes im Kontext seiner Gegnerpolemik.” ec 5 (2014): 6896.

HerzogE. Ueber die Abfassungszeit der Pastoralbriefe. Lucerne: Räber1872.

HesseF. H. Die Entstehung der neutestamentlichen Hirtenbriefe. Ein Versuch. Halle: Kaemmerer1889.

HeydenreichA. L. C. Die Pastoralbriefe Pauli erläutert. 2 volumes. Hadamar: neuen Gelehrten-Buchhandlung18261828.

HilgenfeldA. Historisch-kritische Einleitung in das Neue Testament. Leipzig: Fues1875.

HilliardA. E. The Pastoral Epistles of St. Paul. London: Rivingtons1919.

HincksM. Y. “The Authorship of the Pastoral Epistles.” jsble 16.12 (1897): 94117.

HitchcockF. R. M. “Latinity of the Pastorals.” ExpTim 39.8 (1928): 347352.

HitchcockF. R. M. “Philo and the Pastorals.” Her 56 (1940): 113135.

HitchcockF. R. M. “Tests for the Pastorals.” jts 30.2 (1929): 272279.

HoehnerH. W. “Did Paul Write Galatians?” In History and Exegesis edited by S.-W. Son150169. fs E. E. Ellis. New York/London: T&T Clark2006.

HoffmannR. J. Marcion: On the Restitution of Christianity. An Essay on the Development of Radical Paulinist Theology in the Second Century. aaras 46. Chico, ca: Scholars Press1984.

HofrichterP. “Strukturdebatte im Namen des Apostels. Zur Abhängigkeit der Pastoralbriefe untereinander und vom ersten Petrusbrief.” In Anfänge der Theologie edited by N. BroxA. FelberW. L. Gombocz and M. Kertsch101116. fs J. B. Bauer. Graz/Vienna/Cologne: Styria1987.

HolmesD. I. “Authorship Attribution.” ch 28.2 (1994): 87106.

HolmesD. I. “Vocabulary Richness and the Prophetic Voice.” llc 6.4 (1991): 259268.

HoltzG. Die Pastoralbriefe. 4th edition. thknt 13. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt1986.

HoltzmannH. J. Die Pastoralbriefe kritisch und exegetisch behandelt. Leipzig: Engelmann1880.

HoltzmannH. J. Lehbruch der historischkritischen Einleitung in das Neue Testament. 3rd edition. Freiburg: Mohr Siebeck1892.

HooverD. L. “Another Perspective on Vocabulary Richness.” ch 37.2 (2003): 151178.

HornF. W. ed. Paulus Handbuch. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2013.

HorowitzM. W. and J. B. Newman. “Spoken and Written Expression: An Experimental Analysis.” jasp 68.6 (1964): 640647.

HorrellD. G. An Introduction to the Study of Paul. 3rd edition. London: T&T Clark2015.

HortF. J. A. “The Pastoral Epistles,” in Judaistic Christianity130146. Cambridge/London: Macmillan1894.

HouldenJ. L. The Pastoral Epistles. I and II Timothy Titus. Harmondsworth: Penguin1976.

HöwelerM. “Diversity of Word Usage as a Stress Indicator in an Interview Situation.” jpr 1.3 (1972): 243248.

HübnerH. Corpus Paulinumvolume 2Vetus Testamentum in Novo. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht1997.

HugJ. L. Volume 2Einleitung in die Schriften des Neuen Testaments. Tübingen: Cotta1808.

HughesJ. J. Bits Bytes & Biblical Studies: A Resource Guide for the Use of Computers in Biblical and Classical Studies. Grand Rapids, mi: Zondervan1987.

HuizengaA. B. 1–2 Timothy Titus. Wis. Collegeville, mn: Liturgical Press2016.

HultgrenA. J. I–II Timothy Titus. acnt. Minneapolis, mn: Augsburg1984.

HumbertJ. Syntaxe grecque. 3rd edition. Paris: Klincksieck1972.

HutherJ. E. Kritisch exegetisches Handbuch über die Briefe an Timotheus und Titus. 4th edition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht1876.

HutsonC. R. “‘Saved through Childbearing’: The Jewish Context of 1 Timothy 2:15.” NovT 56.4 (2014): 392410.

HylandK. Discourse Studies Reader: Essential Excerpts. London: Bloomsbury2013.

ImmerA. Theologie des Neuen Testamentes. Bern: Dalp1877.

ImoW. “Elliptical Structures as Dialogical Resources for the Management of Understanding.” In Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential Syntactic and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation edited by S. GünthnerW. Imo and J. Bücker139151. lit. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter2014.

ItoA. “Paul the ‘Herald’ and the ‘Teacher’: Paul’s Self-Images within an Oral Milieu.” In Sacred Works: Orality Literacy and Religion edited by A. P. M. H. LardinoisJ. H. Blok and M. G. M. van der Poel351370. MnSupp 332; Leiden: Brill2011.

JacquierE. Histoire des livres du Nouveau Testament. 4 vols. 7th edition. Paris: Gabalda19031908.

JahandaríeK. Spoken and Written Language: A Multi-disciplinary Perspective. csipc. Stamford, ct: Ablex1999.

JamesJ. D. The Genuineness and Authorship of the Pastoral Epistles. London: Longmans & Green1906.

JannarisA. N. An Historical Greek Grammar Chiefly of the Attic Dialect. London1897. Reprint Hildesheim: Olms 1968.

JarošK. Das Neue Testament und seine Autoren. Eine Einführung. Cologne/Weimar/Vienna: Böhlau2008.

JarvisS. “Defining and Measuring Lexical Diversity.” In Vocabulary Knowledge: Human Ratings and Automated Measures edited by S. Jarvis and M. Daller1344. SiB 47. Amsterdam: Benjamins2013.

JaynesJ. T. “A Search for Trends in the Poetic Style of W. B. Yeats.” allc Journal 1.1 (1980): 1118.

JeffriesL. and D. McIntyre. Stylistics. ctl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2010.

JeremiasJ. Die Briefe an Timotheus und Titus. 12th edition. ntd 9. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht1981.

JeremiasJ. Die Briefe an Timotheus und Titus. ntd 9. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht1934.

JohnsonE. A Semantic and Structural Analysis of Ephesians. Dallas, tx: sil2008.

JohnsonL. T. Letters to Paul’s Delegates: 1 Timothy 2 Timothy Titus. ntc. Valley Forge, pa: Trinity Press International1996.

JohnsonL. T. The First and Second Letters to Timothy. ab 35A. New York: Doubleday2001.

JohnsonP. F. “The Use of Statistics in the Analysis of the Characteristics of Pauline Writing.” nts 20.1 (1973): 92100.

JohnsonW. “Studies in Language Behavior: I. A Program of Research.” pm 56.2 (1944): 115.

JordaanG. J. C. Ancient Greek Inside Out: The Semantics of Grammatical Constructions. Zürich/Berlin: lit2013.

JülicherA. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. 6th edition. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck1906.

JülicherA. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. Revised by E. Fascher. 7th edition. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck1931.

KaestliJ.-D. “Luke and the Pastoral Epistles: The Thesis of a Common Authorship.” In Luke’s Literary Achievement: Collected Essays edited by C. M. Tuckett110126. JSNTSup 116. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press1995.

KaltenböckG. “Spoken Parenthetical Clauses in English.” In Parentheticals edited by N. Dehé and Y. Kavalova2552. la 06. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pa: Benjamins2007.

KarakasisE. Terence and the Language of Modern Comedy. ccs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2005.

KarrisR. J. The Pastoral Epistles. ntm 17. Dublin: Veritas1979.

KaslS. V. and G. F. Mahl. “The Relationship of Disturbances and Hesitations in Spontaneous Speech to Anxiety.” jpsp 1.5 (1965): 425433.

KellyJ. N. D. The Pastoral Epistles. bntc. London: A&C >Black1963. Reprint Peabody ma: Hendrickson 2009.

KemperS. “Adults’ Diaries: Changes Made to Written Narratives Across the Life Span.” dp 13.2 (1990): 207223.

KemperS. “Geriatric Psycholinguistics: Syntactic Limitations of Oral and Written Language.” In Language Memory and Aging edited by L. L. Light and D. M. Burke5876. 1988. Reprint Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990.

KemperS. “Imitation of Complex Syntactic Constructions by Elderly Adults.” ap 7.3 (1986): 277287.

KemperS. “Life-Span Changes in Syntactic Complexity.” JG(B) 42.3 (1987): 323328.

KemperS. “Syntactic Complexity and the Recall of Prose by Middle-Aged and Elderly Adults.” ear 13.1 (1987): 4752.

KemperS. and R. E. Herman. “Age Differences in Memory-Load Interference Effects in Syntactic Processing.” JG(B) 61.6 (2006): 327332.

KemperS.L. H. GreinerJ. G. MarquisK. Prenovost and T. L. Mitzner. “Language Decline Across the Life Span: Findings From the Nun Study.” pa 16.2 (2001): 227239.

KemperS.R. E. Herman and C. Lian. “Age Differences in Sentence Production.” JG(B) 58.5 (2003): 260268.

KennyA. A Stylometric Study of the New Testament. Oxford: Clarendon1986.

KierspelL. Charts on the Life Letters and Theology of Paul. kcbt. Grand Rapids, mi: Kregel2012.

KlijnA. F. J. De brieven van Paulus aan Timoteüs Titus en Filemon. pnt. Nijkerk: Callenbach1994.

Klinker-De KlerckM. “The Pastoral Epistles: Authentic Pauline Writings.” ejt 17.2 (2008): 101108.

Klinker-De KlerckM. Herderlijke regel of inburgeringscursus? Een bijdrage aan het onderzoek naar de ethische richtlijnen in 1 Timoteüs en Titus. Zoetermeer: Boekencentrum2013.

KnabenbauerJ. Commentarius in S. Pauli Apostoli epistolas ad Thessalonicenses I et II ad Timotheum I et II ad Titum et Philemonem. Paris: Lethielleux1913.

KnappT. R. “The Rev. Mr. Morton and St. Paul.” dr 240 (1966): 354357.

KnappeW. Die Briefe an Timotheus und Titus. Leipzig/Hamburg: Schloessmann1937.

Knight iiiG. W. The Pastoral Epistles. Grand Rapids, mi: Eerdmans/Carlisle: Paternoster1992.

KnokeK. Der erste Brief an Timotheus und der Brief an Titusvolume 2Praktischtheologischer Kommentar zu den Pastoralbriefen des Apostels Paulus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht1889.

KnoxT. M. “The Computer and the New Testament.” seå 29 (1964): 111116.

KochP. “Orality in Literate Cultures.” In Writing Development: An Interdisciplinary View edited by C. Pontecorvo149171. swll 6. Amsterdam: Benjamins1997.

KochP. “Subordination, intégration syntaxique et ‘oralité’.” In La subordination dans les langues romanes edited by H. L. Andersen and G. Skytte1342. er 34. Copenhagen: Munksgaard1995.

KochP. and W. Oesterreicher. “Schriftlichkeit und Sprache.” In Schrift und Schriftlichkeit. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung edited by H. Günther and O. Ludwig587604. hsk 10.1. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter1994.

KochP. and W. Oesterreicher. Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania. Französisch Italienisch Spanisch. 2nd edition. ra 31. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter2011.

KoehlerF. Die Pastoralbriefe. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck1914.

KoellingH. Die allgemeinen Fragenvolume 1Der erste Brief Pauli an Timotheus auf’s Neue untersucht und ausgelegt. Berlin: Rother1882.

KoesterH. History and Literature of Early Christianityvolume 2Introduction to the New Testament. 2nd edition. Berlin: de Gruyter2000.

KöstenbergerA. J. and T. L. Wilder eds. Entrusted with the Gospel: Paul’s Theology in the Pastoral Epistles. Nashville, tn: Broadman & Holman2012.

Kotlińska-TomaA. Hellenistic Tragedy: Texts Translations and a Critical Survey. bcsm. London/New York: Bloomsbury2015.

KrausT. J. Hapax Legomena: Definition eines terminus technicus und Signifikanz für eine pragmatisch orientierte Sprachanalyse.” nts 59.4 (2013): 545564.

KrauseD. 1 Timothy. rnbc. London/New York: T&T Clark2004.

KrenkelM. Beiträge zur Aufhellung der Geschichte und der Briefe des Apostels Paulus. Braunschweig: Schwetschke1890.

KretschmarG. “Der paulinische Glaube in den Pastoralbriefen.” In Glaube im Neuen Testament edited by F. Hahn and H. Klein115140. fs H. Binder. bts 7. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener1982.

KreyerR. Introduction to English Syntax. tell 3. Frankfurt: Lang2010.

KrumbiegelF. Erziehung in den Pastoralbriefen. Ein Konzept zur Konsolidierung der Gemeinden. abg 44. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt2013.

KübelR. Pastoralbriefe, Hebräerbrief und Offenbarung Johannis volume 5Kurzgefasster Kommentar zu den heiligen Schriften Alten und Neuen Testamentes sowie zu den Apokryphen. Revised by E. Riggenbach and O. Zöckler. Munich: Beck1898.

KühnerR. and F. Blass. Elementar- und Formenlehrevolume i/2Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. 3rd edition. Hannover: Hahn1892.

KümmelW. G. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. 21st edition. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer1983.

KümmelW. G. Introduction to the New Testament. Revised and translated by H. C. Kee. 17th edition. Nashville, tn: Abingdon1973.

LabbéD.P. Thoiron and D. Serant eds. Études sur la richesse et les structures lexicales. tlq 40. Paris: Champion1988.

LandC. D. The Integrity of 2 Corinthians and Paul’s Aggravating Absence. ntm 36. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press2015.

LangenJ. Grundriss der Einleitung in das Neue Testament. Freiburg: Herder1868.

LaurentJ. C. M. Neutestamentliche Studien. Gotha: Perthes1866.

LeaT. D. and H. P. Griffin Jr. 1 2 Timothy Titus. nac 34. Nashville, tn: Broadman & Holman1992.

LedgerG. “An Exploration of Differences in the Pauline Epistles Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis.” llc 10.2 (1995): 8597.

LeeD. J. N. “The modal particles ἄν, κε, κα.” ajp 88 (1967): 4556.

LemmeL. Das echte Ermahnungsschreiben des Apostels Paulus an Timotheus. Ein Betrag zur Lösung des Problems der Pastoralbriefe. Breslau: Köhler1882.

LeoG. E. Pauli Epistola Altera ad Timotheum Graece. Cum Commentario Perpetuo. Leipzig: Koessling1850.

LeoG. E. Pauli Epistola Prima ad Timotheum Graece. Cum Commentario Perpetuo. Leipzig: Kayseri1837.

LeskaC. “Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Syntax gesprochener und geschriebener deutschen Gegenwartssprache.” bgds 87 (1965): 427461.

LevisonM.A. Q. Morton and W. C. Wake. “On Certain Statistical Features of the Pauline Epistles.” PhJ 3.2 (1966): 129148.

LewinT. The Life and Epistles of St. Paul. 2 volumes. New York: Scribner1875.

LibbyJ. A. “The Pauline Canon Sung in a Linguistic Key: Visualizing New Testament Text Proximity by Linguistic Structure, System, and Strata.” bagl 5 (2016): 122201.

LightfootJ. B. “The Date of the Pastoral Epistles,” in Biblical Essays397410. London: Macmillan1893.

LinnemannE. “Echtheitsfragen und Vokabelstatistik.” JETh 10 (1998): 87109.

LockW. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles. icc. Edinburgh: T&T Clark1924.

LoeweH. Die Pastoralbriefe des Apostels Paulus. Cologne: Roemke1929.

LöfflerJ. F. C. Kleine Schriften. 3 volumes. Weimar: Landes-Industrie-Comptoirs18171818.

LohseE. Die Entstehung des Neuen Testaments. 6th edition. tw 4. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer2001.

LoisyA. Les origines du Nouveau Testament. Paris: Nourry1936.

LoisyA. Remarques sur la littérature épistolaire du Nouveau Testament. Paris: Nourry1935.

LückeF. “Erinnerungen an Dr. Friedrich Schleiermacher.” tsk 7.4 (1834): 745813.

Lüdtke W. Untersuchungen zum Satzbau des Thukydides. PhD diss. University of Kiel 1930.

LuttenbergerJ. Prophetenmantel oder Bücherfutteral? Die persönlichen Notizen in den Pastoralbriefen im Licht antiker Epistolographie und literarischer Pseudepigraphie. abg 40. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt2012.

MacDonaldM. Y. The Pauline Churches: A Socio-Historical Study of Institutionalization in the Pauline and Deutero-Pauline Writings. sntsms 60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1988.

MackM. J. Kommentar über die Pastoralbriefe des Apostels Paulus. Tübingen: Osiander1836.

MahlG. F. “Disturbances and Silences in the Patient’s Speech in Psychotherapy.” jasp 53.1 (1956): 115.

MaierF. Die Hauptprobleme der Pastoralbriefe Pauli. BibZ iii/12. Münster: Aschendorff1910.

MalherbeA. J. “Paulus Senex.” ResQ 36.4 (1994): 197207.

MalinaB. J. and J. H. Neyrey. Portraits of Paul: An Archaeology of Ancient Personality. Louisville, ky: Westminster John Knox Press1996.

MalinaB. J. and J. J. Pilch. A Social-Science Commentary on the Letters of Paul. Minneapolis, mn: Fortress2006.

MalinaB. J. and J. J. Pilch. A Social-Science Commentary on the Deutero-Pauline Letters. Minneapolis, mn: Fortress2013.

MalvernD.B. RichardsN. Chipere and P. Durán. Lexical Diversity and Language Development: Quantification and Assessment. New York: Palgrave Macmillan2004.

MangoldW. Die Irrlehrer der Pastoralbriefe. Marburg: Elwert1856.

Marcheselli-CasaleC. Le Lettere Pastorali. Le due lettere a Timoteo e la lettera a Tito. soc 15. Bologna: edb1995.

MardagaH. “Hapax Legomena: A Neglected Field in Biblical Studies.” cbr 10.2 (2012): 264274.

MargueratD. ed. Introduction au Nouveau Testament. Son histoire son écriture sa théologie. 4th edition. MdB 41. Geneva: Labor et Fides2008.

MarianiB. Introductio in libros sacros Novi Testamenti. Rome: Herder1962.

MärkerJ. F. Die Stellung der drei Pastoralbriefe im dem Leben des Apostels Paulus. Henfling: Meiningen1861.

MarshallI. H. “The Pastoral Epistles in Recent Study.” In Entrusted with the Gospel: Paul’s Theology in the Pastoral Epistles edited by A. J. Köstenberger and T. L. Wilder268324. Nashville, tn: Broadman & Holman2012.

MarshallI. H. The Pastoral Epistles. icc. 1999. Reprint London: T&T Clark 2004.

MarxsenW. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. Eine Einführung in ihre Probleme. 4th edition. Gütersloh: Mohn1978.

MasseyP. T. “Cicero, the Pastoral Epistles, and the Issue of Pseudonymity.” ResQ 56.2 (2014): 6584.

MatthiesC. S. Erklärung der Pastoralbriefe mit besonderer Beziehung auf Authentie und Ort und Zeit der Abfassung Derselben. Greifswald: Mauritius1840.

MauriC. Coordination Relations in the Languages of Europe and Beyond. ealt 42. Berlin: de Gruyter2008.

MaxeyJ. A. From Orality to Orality: A New Paradigm for Contextual Translation of the Bible. bpc 2. Eugene, or: Wipf & Stock2009.

MayerH. H. Über die Pastoralbriefe. frlantiii/20. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht1913.

MayerR. G. “The Impracticability of Latin ‘Kunstprosa’.” In Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose edited by T. ReinhardtM. Lapidge and J. N. Adams195210. pba 129. New York: Oxford University Press2005.

MayerhoffE. T. Der Brief an die Colosser mit vohrnehmlicher Berücksichtigung der drei Pastoralbriefe kritisch geprüft. Berlin: Schultze1838.

McArthurH. K. “A Further Note on Paul and the Computers.” ExpTim 77.11 (1966): 350.

McArthurH. K. “Computer Criticism.” ExpTim 76.12 (1965): 367370.

McArthurH. K. “Kai Frequency in Greek Letters.” nts 15.3 (1969): 339349.

McCarthyM. Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1998.

McCarthyP. M. and S. Jarvis. “MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A Validation Study of Sophisticated Approaches to Lexical Diversity Assessment.” brm 42.2 (2010): 381392.

McEneryT. and A. Hardie. Corpus Linguistics: Method Theory and Practice. ctl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2012.

McNeileA. H. An Introduction to the Study of the New Testament. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon1953.

MeadeD. G. Pseudonymity and Canon. An Investigation into the Relationship of Authorship and Authority in Jewish and Earliest Christian Tradition. wunt 39. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck1986.

MealandD. L. “Computers in New Testament Research: An Interim Report.” jsnt 33.2 (1988): 97115.

MealandD. L. “Positional Stylometry Reassessed: Testing a Seven Epistle Theory of Pauline Authorship.” nts 35.2 (1989): 266286.

MeeksW. A. The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul. 2nd edition. New Haven, ct: Yale University Press2003.

MeinertzM. Die Pastoralbriefe des heiligen Paulus. 4th edition. hsnt 7. Bonn: Hanstein1931.

MerkelH. Die Pastoralbriefe. ntdix/1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht1991.

MerzA. Die fiktive Selbstauslegung des Paulus: Intertextuelle Studien zur Intention und Rezeption der Pastoralbriefe. ntoa/sunt 52. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht2004.

MetzgerB. M. “A Reconsideration of Certain Arguments Against the Pauline Authorship of the Pastoral Epistles.” ExpTim 70.3 (1958): 9194.

MetzgerB. M. The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin Development and Significance. Oxford: Clarendon1987.

MetzgerW. Die letzte Reise des Apostels Paulus. Beobachtungen und Erwägungen zu seinem Itinerar nach den Pastoralbriefen. AzT 59. Stuttgart: Calwer1976.

MichaelisW. “Pastoralbriefe und Wortstatistik.” znw 28 (1929): 6976.

MichaelisW. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. 3rd edition. Bern: Haller1961.

MichaelisW. Pastoralbriefe und Gefangenschaftsbriefe. Zur Echtheitsfrage der Pastoralbriefe. nf I/6. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann1930.

MichaelsonS. and A. Q. Morton. “Last Words: A Test of Authorship for Greek Writers.” nts 18.2 (1971): 192208.

MichaelsonS. and A. Q. Morton. “The New Stylometry: A One-word Test of Authorship.” cq 22.1 (1972): 89102.

MillerG. R. “Variations in the Verbal Behavior of a Second Speaker as a Function of Varying Audience Responses.” sm 31.2 (1964): 109115.

MillerJ. D. The Pastoral Letters as Composite Documents. sntsms 93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1997.

MillerJ. and R. Weinert. Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. 1998. Reprint Oxford: Clarendon 2009.

MinchinE. “Poet, Audience, Time, and Text: Reflections on Medium and Mode in Homer and Virgil.” In Between Orality and Literacy: Communication and Adaptation in Antiquity edited by R. Scodel267288volume 10Orality and Literacy in the Ancient World. MnSupp 367. Leiden/Boston: Brill2014.

MitchellM. M. “New Testament Envoys in the Context of Greco-Roman Diplomatic and Epistolary Conventions: The Example of Timothy and Titus.” jbl 111.4 (1992): 641662.

MitchellM. M. Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation: An Exegetical Investigation of the Language and Composition of 1 Corinthians. hut 27. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck1991.

MoffattJ. An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament. 3rd edition. Edinburgh: T&T Clark1918.

MontgomeryD. C.E. A. Peck and G. G. Vining. Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. 5th edition. Hoboken nj: Wiley2012.

Moody SmithD. “The Pauline Literature.” In It is Written: Scripture Citing Scripture edited by D. A. Carson and H. G. M. Williamson265291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1988.

MooreJ. R. “Computer Analysis and the Pauline Corpus: A Case of Deus ex Machina.” BSac 80 (1973): 4149.

MorgenthalerR. Statistik des neutestamentlichen Wortschatzes. 3rd edition. Zürich: Gotthelf1982.

MortonA. Q. “Once. A Test of Authorship Based on Words which are not Repeated in the Sample.” llc 1.1 (1986): 18.

MortonA. Q. “Statistical Analysis and New Testament Problems.” In The Authorship and Integrity of the New Testament edited by K. AlandD. GuthrieA. Q. MortonJ. A. T. RobinsonG. BornkammA. M. G. Stephenson and M. H. Shepherd Jr.4060. tc 4. London: spck1965.

MortonA. Q. “The Authorship of Greek Prose.” jrss(A) 128.2 (1965): 169233.

MortonA. Q. “The Authorship of the Pauline Corpus.” In The New Testament in Historical and Contemporary Perspective edited by H. Anderson and W. Barclay209235. fs G. H. C. Macgregor. Oxford: Blackwell1965.

MortonA. Q. Literary Detection: How to Proof Authorship and Fraud in Literature and Documents. New York: Scribner1978.

MortonA. Q. and J. McLeman. Christianity in the Computer Age. New York: Harper & Row1964.

MortonA. Q. and J. McLeman. Paul the Man and the Myth: A Study in the Authorship of Greek Prose. London: Hodder & Stoughton1966.

MottS. C. “Greek Ethics and Christian Conversion: The Philonic Background of Titus II 10–14 and III 3–7.” NovT 20.1 (1978): 2248.

MouleC. F. D. “The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles: A Reappraisal.” bjrl 47.2 (1965): 430451.

MouleC. F. D. An Idiom-Book of New Testament Greek. 2nd edition. 1959. Reprint Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1971.

MounceW. D. The Pastoral Epistles. wbc 46. Nashville, tn: Nelson2000.

MülkeM. Der Autor und sein Text: Die Verfälschung des Originals im Urteil antiker Autoren. ualg 93. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter2008.

MüllerK. “Schreibe wie du sprichst!” Eine Maxime im Spannungsfeld von Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit. Eine historische und systematische Untersuchung. tvs 12. Frankfurt: Lang1990.

MüllerW. G. “Iconicity and Rhetoric: A Note on the Iconic Force of Rhetorical Figures in Shakespeare.” In The Motivated Sign: Iconicity in Language and Literature 2 edited by O. Fischer and M. Nänny305322. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pa: Benjamins2001.

MuñozF. G. H. “Hapax Legomena in the “Speeches of Apollodoros” and Their Relation to the Corpus Demosthenicum.” In Fakes and Forgers of Classical Literature. Ergo Decipiatur! edited by J. Martínez187193. Metaforms 2. Leiden/Boston: Brill2014.

MunroW. Authority in Paul and Peter: The Identification of a Pastoral Stratum in the Pauline Corpus and 1 Peter. sntsms 45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1983.

Murphy-O’ConnorJ. “2 Timothy Contrasted with 1 Timothy and Titus.” rb 98.3 (1991): 403418.

Murphy-O’ConnorJ. Paul the Letter-Writer: His World His Options His Skills. gns 41. Collegeville, mn: Liturgical Press1995.

Murphy-O’ConnorJ. Paul: A Critical Life. Oxford: Clarendon1996.

Murphy-O’ConnorJ. St. Paul’s Corinth. Texts and Archaeology. 3rd edition. Collegeville, mn: Liturgical Press2002.

Murphy-O’ConnorJ. St. Paul’s Ephesus. Texts and Archaeology. Collegeville, mn: Liturgical Press2008.

NägeliT. Der Wortschatz des Apostel Paulus. Beitrag zur sprachgeschichtlichen Erforschung des Neuen Testaments. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht1905.

NariyamaS. “Subject Ellipsis in English.” jp 36.2 (2004): 237264.

Nauck W. Die Herkunft des Verfassers der Pastoralbriefe. Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Auslegung der Pastoralbriefe. PhD diss. University of Göttingen 1950.

NeanderA. Geschichte der Pflanzung und Leitung der christlichen Kirche durch die Apostel als selbstständiger Nachtrag zu der allgemeinen Geschichte der christlichen Religion und Kirche. 2 volumes. Hamburg: Perthes1832.

NeudeckerC. G. Lehrbuch der historisch-kritischen Einleitung in das Neue Testament. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel 1840.

NeudorferH.-W. Der erste Brief des Paulus an Timotheus. hta. Wuppertal: Brockhaus2004.

NeumannK. J. The Authenticity of the Pauline Epistles in the Light of Stylostatistical Analysis. sblds 120. Atlanta, ga: Scholars Press1990.

NevalainenT. “English Newsletters in the 17th Century.” In Text Types and Corpora edited by A. FischerG. Tottie and H. M. Lehmann6776. fs U. Fries. Tübingen: Narr2002.

NgewaS. M. 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus. abcs. Grand Rapids, mi: Zondervan2009.

NieboerM. C. “The Statistical Analysis of A. Q. Morton and the Authenticity of the Pauline Epistles.” ctj 5.1 (1970): 6480.

NongbriB. “2 Corinthians and Possible Material Evidence for Composite Letters in Antiquity.” In Collecting Early Christian Letters: From the Apostle Paul to Late Antiquity edited by B. Neil and P. Allen5467. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2015.

NordenE. Die antike Kunstprosa: vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance. 10th edition. 2 volumes. 1898. Reprint Leipzig: Teubner 1995.

NormanS.S. Kemper and D. Kynette. “Adults’ Reading Comprehension: Effects of Syntactic Complexity and Working Memory.” JG(B) 47.4 (1992): 258265.

NussbaumerM. Was Texte sind und was sie sein sollen. Ansätze zu einer sprachwissenschaftlichen Begründung eines Kriterienrasters zur Beurteilung von schriftlichen Schülertexten. rgl 119. Tübingen: Niemeyer1991.

O’DonnellM. B. “Linguistic Fingerprints or Style by Numbers? The Use of Statistics in the Discussion of Authorship of New Testament Documents.” In Linguistics and the New Testament: Criticial Junctures edited by S. E. Porter and D. A. Carson206262. JSNTSup 168. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press1999.

O’DonnellM. B. Corpus Linguistics and the Greek of the New Testament. ntm 6. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press2005.

O’NeillJ. C. “Paul Wrote Some of All, But Not All of Any.” In The Pauline Canon edited by S. E. Porter169188. past 1. Leiden/Boston: Brill2004.

O’RourkeJ. J. “Some Considerations about Attempts at Statistical Analysis of the Pauline Corpus.” cbq 35.4 (1973): 483490.

O’RourkeJ. J. “De analysi mathematica librorum Biblicorum.” vd 42.6 (1964): 273284.

OakesM. P. Literary Detective Work on the Computer. nlp 12. Amsterdam: Benjamins2014.

OberlinnerL. “Öffnung zur Welt oder Verrat am Glauben? Hellenismus in den Pastoralbriefen.” In Der neue Mensch in Christus. Hellenistische Anthropologie und Ethik im Neuen Testament edited by J. Beutler135163. Freiburg/Basel/Vienna: Herder2001.

OberlinnerL. Der erste Timotheusbrief der zweite Timotheusbrief. htknt. 1994–1995. Reprint Freiburg/Basel/Vienna: Herder 2002.

OdenT. C. First and Second Timothy and Titus. Interpretation. 1989. Reprint Louisville ky: Westminster John Knox Press 2012.

OesterreicherW. “Historizität—Sprachvariation, Sprachverschiedenheit, Sprachwandel.” In Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien. Ein internationales Handbuch edited by M. Haspelmath15541595. hsk 20.2. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter2001.

OesterreicherW. “Types of Orality in Text.” In Written Voices Spoken Signs: Tradition Performance and the Epic Text edited by E. Bakker and A. Kahane190214. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press1997.

OestreichB. Performanzkritik der Paulusbriefe. wunt 296. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2012.

OpasL. L. “A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Style in Samuel Beckett’s Prose Works.” In Research in Humanities Computing. Selected Papers from the ALLC/ACH Conference edited by N. Ide81114. rhc 4. Oxford: Clarendon1996.

OrchardB. “Ellipsis and Parenthesis in Ga 2:1–10 and 2 Th 2:1–12.” In Paul de Tarse. Apôtre du notre temps edited by L. de Lorenzi249258. Ben 1. Rome: Abbaye de S. Paul1979.

OréalE. “Sur la fonction argumentative de quelques particules Grecque.” Lalies 17 (1997): 229247.

OrtnerH. Text und Emotion. Theorie Methode und Anwendungsbeispiele emotions-linguistischer Textanalyse. est 15. Tübingen: Narr2014.

OttoK. W. Die geschichtliche Verhältnisse der Pastoralbriefe aufs Neue untersucht. Leipzig: Teubner1860.

PáezM. “Bibliography about Greek Particles (1935–2010).” Syntaktika 42 (2012): 343.

PalmerL. R. The Latin Language. London: Faber & Faber1954. Reprint Norman ok: University of Oklahoma Press 1988.

ParryR. S. J. The Pastoral Epistles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1920.

PaschkeB. A. “The cura morum of the Roman Censors as Historical Background for the Bishop and Deacon Lists of the Pastoral Epistles.” znw 98.1 (2007): 105119.

PatschH. “Die Angst vor dem Deuteropaulinismus. Die Rezeption des kritischen “Sendschreibens” Friedrich Schleiermachers über den 1. Timotheusbrief im ersten Jahrfünft.” ztk 88 (1991): 451477.

PatziaA. G. and A. J. Petrotta. Pocket Dictionary of Biblical Studies. Downers Grove, il: InterVarsity2002.

PeakeA. S. A Critical Introduction to the New Testament. London: Duckworth1909.

PennebakerJ. W. and L. D. Stone. “Words of Wisdom: Language Use Over the Life Span.” jpsp 85.2 (2003): 291301.

PeppardM. “‘Poetry’, ‘Hymns’, and ‘Traditional Material’ in New Testament Epistles or How to Do Things with Indentations.” jsnt 30.3 (2008): 319342.

PereltsvaigA. Languages of the World: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2012.

PerkinsP. “Pastoral Epistles.” In Eerdmans Commentary on the Bible edited by J. D. G. Dunn and J. W. Rogerson14281446. Grand Rapids, mi: Eerdmans2003.

PerrinN. and D. C. Duling. The New Testament: An Introduction. 2nd edition. New York: hbj1982.

PervoR. I. “Romancing an Oft-Neglected Stone: The Pastoral Epistles and the Epistolary Novel.” jhc 1 (1994): 2547.

PervoR. I. The Making of Paul: Constructions of the Apostle in Early Christianity. Minneapolis, mn: Fortress2010.

PfleidererO. “Die Hirtenbriefe.” In Protestanten-Bibel Neuen Testamentes edited by P. W. Schmidt and F. von Holtzendorff832868. Leipzig: Barth1872.

PietersenL. K. The Polemic of the Pastorals: A Sociological Examination of the Development of Pauline Christianity. JSNTSup 264. London: T&T Clark2004.

PiñeroA. and J. Peláez. El Nuevo Testamento. Introducción al estudio de los primeros escritos cristianos. Córdoba: El Almendro1995.

PittsA. W. “Style and Pseudonymity in Pauline Scholarship.” In Paul and Pseudepigraphy edited by S. E. Porter and G. P. Fewster113152. past 8. Leiden/Boston: Brill2013.

PlagI.C. Dalton-Puffer and R. H. Baayen. “Morphological Productivity across Speech and Writing.” jell 3.2 (1999): 209228.

PlanckH. L. Bemerkungen über den ersten Paulinischen Brief an den Timotheus in Beziehung auf das kritische Sendschreiben von Hrn. Prof. Fr. Schleiermacher. Göttingen: Röwer1808.

PlatoGorgias. Volume vi/3Platon Werke. Übersetzung und Kommentar. Translated by J. Dalfen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht2004.

PlettH. F. “Figures of Speech.” In Encyclopedia of Rhetoric edited by T. O. Sloane309314. Oxford: Oxford University Press2001.

PlittJ. T. Die Pastoralbriefe. Berlin: Schultze1872.

PlummerA. The Pastoral Epistles. Toronto: Tract1888.

PollatschekM. A. and Y. T. Radday. “Vocabulary Richness and Concentration.” In Genesis: An Authorship Study in Computer Assisted Linguistics edited by Y. T. Radday and H. Shore191214. AnBib 103. Rome: Pontifical Institute Press1985.

PooleM. E. and T. W. Field. “A Comparison of Oral and Written Code Elaboration.” ls 19.4 (1976): 305311.

PorterS. E. “Linguistics and Biblical Interpretation,” in Linguistic Analysis of the Greek New Testament: Studies in Tools Methods and Practice8392. Grand Rapids, mi: Baker2015.

PorterS. E. “Prominence: An Overview.” In The Linguist as Pedagogue: Trends in the Teaching and Analysis of the Greek New Testament edited by S. E. Porter and M. B. O’Donnell4574. ntm 11. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press2009.

PorterS. E. “Studying Ancient Languages from a Modern Linguistic Perspective: Essential Terms and Terminology.” fn 2 (1989): 147