in Tenses in Vergil's Aeneid

Adam E. 1998. Tense and Aspect in Roman Historiographic Narrative: a Functional Approach to the Prose of the Memoria Rerum Gestarum. Chicago (Dissertation University of Chicago).

Adema S.M. 2005. ‘The Tense of Speech Indications in Vergil’s Aeneid’ in: G. Calboli (ed.) Papers on Grammar IX Latina Lingua! Roma 419–431.

Adema S.M. 2007a. ‘Discourse Modes and Bases in Vergil’s Aeneid’ in: R.J. Allan M. Buijs (eds) The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts 42–64 Leiden.

Adema S.M. 2007b. ‘Temporal bases and the use of the narrative infinitive in the Aeneid’ in: G. Purnell J. Denooz (eds) Ordre et cohérence en Latin 7–18 Liège.

Adema S.M. 2008. Discourse Modes and Bases: A Study of the Use of Tenses in Vergil’s Aeneid. Amsterdam (Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).

Adema S.M. 2009. ‘Discourse Modes and Bases: The use of tenses in Vergil’s Aeneid and Livy’s Ab Urbe Condita’ Belgian Journal of Linguistics 23 133–146.

Adema S.M. 2013. ‘No boundaries in Time or space Nec Metas Rerum Nec Tempora’ in J. Heirman & J. Klooster (eds) Ideologies of Lived Space Gent 143–158.

Adema S.M. 2014. ‘A Comma in Aeneid XMnemosyne 67.5 828–832.

Adema S.M. 2017. Speech and Thought in Latin War Narratives: Words of Warriors. Leiden.

Albrecht M. Von. 1970. ‘Zu Virgil’s Erzähltechnik: Beobachtungen zum Tempusgebrauch in der AeneidGlotta 48 219–229.

Albrecht M. Von. 1999. Roman Epic: An interpretative Introduction Leiden.

Allan R.J. de Jong I.J. & de Jonge C.C. 2017. ‘From Enargeia to Immersion: The Ancient Roots of a Modern Concept’ Style 51.1 34–51.

Allan R.J. 2007. ‘Sense and Sentence Complexity. Sentence Structure Sentence Connection and Tense-aspect as Inidicators of Narrative Mode in Thucydides’ Histories’ in: R.J. Allan M. Buijs (eds) The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts 93–121 Leiden.

Allan R.J. 2009. ‘Towards a Typology of the Narrative Modes in Ancient Greek: Text types and narrative structure in Euripidean messenger speeches’ in S.J. Bakker & G.C. Wakker (eds) Discourse Cohesion in Greek Leiden 171–204.

Almeida M.J. 1995. ‘Time in Narratives’ in: J.F. Duchan G.A. Bruder L.E. Hewitt (eds) Deixis in Narrative. A Cognitive Science Perspective Hillsdale New Jersey & York 159–189.

Anderson T.M. 1976. Early Epic Scenery. Homer Virgil and the Medieval Legacy. Ithaca and London.

Austin R.G. 1955. P. Virgili Maronis: Aeneidos Liber Quartus Oxford.

Austin R.G. 1964. P. Virgili Maronis: Aeneidos Liber Secundus Oxford.

Austin R.G. 1971. P. Virgili Maronis: Aeneidos Liber Primus Oxford.

Austin R.G. 1977. P. Virgili Maronis: Aeneidos Liber Sextus Oxford.

Axelson B. 1945. Unpoetische Wörter. Ein Beitrag zur Kentniss der Lateinischen Dichtersprache Lund.

Bakker E.J. 1997a. ‘Verbal Aspect and Mimetic Description in Thucydides’ in: E. Bakker (ed.) Grammar as Interpretation Leiden 7–54.

Bakker E.J. 1997b. Poetry in Speech Orality and Homeric Discourse Ithaca and London.

Bakker E.J. 2001. ‘Similes Augment and the Language of Immediacy’ in: J.Watson (ed.) Speaking Volumes Leiden 1–23.

Bakker E.J. 2005. Pointing at the Past. From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics Cambridge MA & London.

Bal M.G. 1985. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative Toronto.

Bal M.G. 1997. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative completely revised and expanded 2nd edition Toronto.

Barchiesi A. 1997. ‘Virgilian Narrative: Ecphrasis’ in: C. Martindale (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Virgil Cambridge 271–281.

Becker A.S. 1995. The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis Lanham.

Block E. 1982. ‘The Narrator speaks: Apostrophe in Homer and Virgil’ TAPA 7–22.

Bolkestein A.M. 1987. ‘Discourse Functions of Predications: the Background/ Foreground Distinction and Tense and Voice in Latin Main and Subordinate Clauses.’ in: J. Nuyts G. De Schutter (eds) Getting one’s Words into Line: On Word Order and Functional Grammar Dordrecht 163–178.

Bolkestein A.M. 2000. ‘Discourse Organization and Anaphora in Latin’ in: S. Herring P. van Reenen L. Schosler (eds) Textual Parameters in Older Languages Amsterdam Philadelphia 107–137.

Boogaart R.J.U. 1999. Aspect and Temporal Ordering. A Contrastive Analysis of Dutch and English Amsterdam.

Boogaart R.J.U. 2004. ‘Aspect and Aktionsart’ in: G. Booij C. Lehmann J. Mugdan. S. Skopeteas (eds) Morphology An internation handbook on Inflection and Word-formation 2 Berlin New York 1165–1180.

Chafe W.L. 1979. ‘The Flow of Thought and the Flow of Language’ in: T. Givón (ed.) Syntax and Semantics Discourse and Syntax 12 New York San Fransisco Ithaca 159–182.

Chafe W.L. 1994. Discourse Consciousness and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing Chicago.

Chausserie-Laprée J. 1969. L’ expression narrative chez les historiens latin: Histoire d’ un style Paris.

Cohn D. 1999. The Distinction of Fiction Baltimore.

Comrie B.S. 1978. Aspect Cambridge.

Comrie B.S. 1985. Tense Cambridge.

Conington J. & Nettleship H. 1963. The works of Virgil IIIIII Hildesheim.

Conte G. 2009. Vergilius Aeneis (Bibliotheca scriptorum graecorum et romanorum teubneriana) Berlin.

Couper-Kuhlen E. 1989. ‘Foregrounding and Temporal Relations in Narrative Discourse’ in: A. Schopf (ed.) Essays on Tensing in English Volume II: Time Text and Modality Tübingen 7–29.

Cutrer M. 1994. Time and Tense in Narrative and Everyday Language San Diego (Dissertation: University of California).

Dahl Ö. 2000. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe New York Berlin.

Dahl Ö. 2013. ‘How telicity creates time’. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 21.1 45–76.

Dalbera J. 2016. ‘Infinitif et narration: analyse dans deux romans latins’ in: P. Poccetti (ed.) LATINITATIS RATIONES: Descriptive and Historical Accounts for the Latin Language Berlin 200–213.

Damsteegt Th. 2005. ‘The Present Tense and Internal Focalization of Awareness’ Poetics Today 26.1 39–78.

De Carvalho P. 1984. ‘Sur le présent latin: esquisse d’ une théorie morphosémantique du verbe latin’ Revue des Études Latines 62 357–376.

De Jong I.J.F. 2014. Narratology and classics: a practical guide Oxford.

De Jong I.J.F. 2015. ‘Pluperfects and the Artist in Ekphrases: From the Shield of Achilles to the Shield of Aeneas (and Beyond)’ Mnemosyne 68.6 889–916.

Depraetere I. 1995. ‘On the Necessity of Distinguishing between (Un)boundedness and (A)telicity’ Linguistics and Philosophy 18 1–19.

Depraetere I. 1996. ‘Foregrounding in English Relative Clauses’ Linguistics 34 699–731.

Dik S.C. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar. Part I: The Structure of the Clause Edited by K. Hengeveld Berlijn.

Dingel J. 1997. Kommentar zum 9. Buch der Aeneid Virgils Heidelberg.

Dressler W. 1970. ‘Zum historischen Präsens im Lateinischen (eine Replik [to Kravar 1969])’ Ziva Antika Godiste XX 95–97.

Dry H. 1981. ‘Sentence aspect and the Movement of Narrative Time’ Text: an interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 1 233–240.

Dry H. 1983. ‘The Movement of Narrative Time’ Journal of Literary Semantics 19–53.

Duckworth F. 1966. Foreshadowing and Suspense in the Epics of Homer Apollonius and Vergil New York.

Eden P.T. 1975. A commentary on Virgil Aeneid VIII Leiden.

Effe B. 2004. Epische Objektivität und subjectives Erzählen. ‘Auktoriale’ Narrativik von Homer bis zum römischen Epos der Flavierzeit Trier.

Elsner K. 1973. ‘Vordergrund und Hintergrund im Lateinischen?’ Der Altsprachliche Unterricht 16.2 56–61.

Fairclough H.R. 1999. Virgil Eclogues Georgics Aeneid 1&2 Cambridge Ma (Loeb).

Farron S.G. 1973. The Imperfect Indicative Tense in Latin Narrative Colombia.

Fauconnier G.R. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language Cambridge Ma.

Fleischman S. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance Cambridge.

Fleischman S. 1985. ‘Discourse Functions of Tense-Aspect oppositions in Narrative: toward a theory of Grounding’ Linguistics: an Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences 23 851–882.

Fleischman S. 1989. ‘Temporal Distance: a basic Linguistic Metaphor’ Studies in Language 13 1–50.

Fleischman S. 1990. Tense and Narrativity London.

Fleischman S. 1991a. ‘Toward a Theory of Tense-Aspect in Narrative Discourse’ in: J. Gvozdanovic Th.A.J.M. Janssen in collab. with Östen Dahl (eds) The Function of Tense in Texts Amsterdam 75–98.

Fleischman S. 1991b. ‘Verb Tense and Point of View in Narrative’ in: S. Fleischman & L.R. Waugh (eds) Discourse-pragmatics and the verb: the evidence from Romance London 26–54.

Fludernik M. 2003. ‘Chronology Time Tense and Experientiality in Narrative’ Language and Literature 12.2 117–134.

Fordyce C.J. 1977. P. Virgili Maronis: Aeneidos libri VIIVIII Oxford.

Fowler D.P. 1990. ‘Deviant Focalisation in Virgil’s Aeneid’ The Cambridge Classical Journal 36 42–63.

Fowler D.P. 1991. ‘Narrate and Describe: The Problem of Ekphrasis’ The Journal of Roman Studies 81 25–35.

Fowler D.P. 1997. ‘Virgilian Narrative: Storytelling’ in: C. Martindale (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Virgil Cambridge 259–270.

Fratantuono L.M. 2007. Madness unchained: a reading of Virgil’s Aeneid. Lanham.

Genette G. 1969–1972. Figures IIV Paris.

Genette G. 1980. Narrative Discourse An essay in method Ithaca New York.

Genette G. 1988. Narrative Discourse revisited New York.

Gils L.W. van. 2009. Argument and Narrative. A discourse analysis of ten Ciceronian Speeches. Amsterdam (Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).

Gils L.W. van I.J.F. de Jong & C.H.M. Kroon (eds). 2018. Thermopylae Cannae and beyond. Textual Strategies in War Narrative Leiden.

Gils L.W. van & C.H.M. Kroon. To app. ‘Involving the audience. A cognitive-linguistic account of the historic present tense in Latin historiography’ in: J. Deveraux and P. Meineck (ed.) Routledge Companion to Classics and Cognitive Theory. Routledge.

Gils L.W. van & C.H.M. Kroon. 2018. ‘Narrative strategies in the battle of Cannae’ in: L.W. van Gils I.J.F. de Jong & C.H.M. Kroon (eds) Thermopylae Cannae and beyond. Textual Strategies in War Narrative. Leiden.

Görler W. 1982. ‘Beobachtungen zu Virgils Syntax’ Würzburger Jahrbücher zur Altertumswissenschaft 8 69–81.

Görler W. 1985. ‘Eineide: La lingua’ in: Enciclopedia Virgiliana 2 Roma 262–278.

Görler W. 1986. ‘Kontrastierende Szenenpaare: Indirekte ‘Präsenz des Autors’ in Virgils AeneidRheinisches Museum für Philologie 129 285–305.

Gransden K.W. 1976. Aeneid book VIII by Virgil Cambridge.

Gransden K.W. 1984. Virgil’s Iliad an essay on Epic Narrative Cambridge.

Gransden K.W. 1991. Aeneid book XI by Virgil Cambridge.

Griffin J. 1986. Virgil Oxford.

Hamon Philippe. 1993 [1981]. Du Descriptif Paris.

Hardie P.R. 1993. Virgil Aeneid book 9 Cambridge (Cambridge University Press)

Hardie P.R. 1997. ‘Virgil and Tragedy’ in: C. Martindale (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Virgil Cambridge 312–326.

Hardie P.R. 2009. ‘Fame’s Narratives. Epic and Historiography’ in: J. Grethlein and A. Rengakos (eds) Narratology and Interpretation Berlin New York 555–572.

Harrison S.J. 1991. Virgil Aeneid 10 Oxford.

Haverling G. 2002. ‘On the Semantic Functions of the Latin Perfect’ in: A.M. Bolkestein C.H.M. Kroon H. Pinkster H.W. Remmelink & R. Risselada (ed.) Theory and Description in Latin Linguistics. Selected papers from the XIth International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics Amsterdam 153–168.

Haverling G. 2010. ‘Actionality tense and viewpoint’ in: P. Cuzzolin P. Baldi (eds) New perspectives on historical Latin syntax vol. 2 Constituent syntax: adverbial phrases adverbs mood tense. Berlin & New York 277–523.

Heffernan J.A.W. 1993. Museum of Words. The Poetics of Ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery Chicago London.

Heinze R. 1915. Virgils epische Technik 3. Auflage Leipzig Berlin.

Henry J. 1873 (1972). Aeneidea or Critical Exegetical and Aesthetical Remarks on the Aeneid New York.

Herman D. 2002. Story Logic Lincoln and London.

Herman D. 2009. Basic Elements of Narrative Chichester.

Highet G. 1972. The Speeches in Virgil’s Aeneid Princeton.

Hinds S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext. Dynamics of Approproation in Roman Poetry Cambridge.

Hinrichs E. 1986. ‘Temporal Anaphora in Discourse’ Linguistics and Philosphy 9 63–82.

Hopper P.J. 1979. ‘Aspect and Foregrounding in Discourse’ in: T. Givón (ed.) Syntax and Semantics Volume 12: Discourse and Syntax New York 213–241.

Hopper P.J. 1982. ‘Aspect between Discourse and Grammar: an introductory essay for the volume’ in: P.J. Hopper (ed.) Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics & Pragmatics. Containing the contributions to a symposium on Tense and Aspect held at UCLA May 1979 Typological Studies in Language Volume 1 Amsterdam & Philadelphia 3–18.

Hornsby R.A. 1970. Patterns of Action in the Aeneid. An Interpretation of Virgil’s Epic Similes Iowa City.

Horsfall N. 1995. ‘Style Language and Metre’ in: N. Horsfall (ed.) A Companion to the Study of Virgil Leiden 217–248.

Horsfall N. 2000. Virgil Aeneid 7: a Commentary Leiden.

Horsfall N. 2003. Virgil Aeneid 11: a Commentary Leiden.

Horsfall N. 2008. Virgil Aeneid 2: a Commentary Leiden.

Jong I.J.F. de. 1987. Narrators and Focalizers: the Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. Amsterdam.

Jong I.J.F. de. 2001. A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge.

Jong I.J.F. de. 2004. ‘Homer’ in: I. de Jong R. Nünlist and A. Bowie (eds) Narrators Narratees and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature. Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative Leiden 13–24.

Jong I.J.F. de and R. Nünlist. 2007. Time in Ancient Greek Literature. Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative Leiden.

Kamp H. & Reyle U. 1993. ‘Tense and Aspect’ in: From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language Formal logic and Discourse representation theory. Studies in Linguistics and philosophy 42 Dordrecht 483–690.

Kamp H. & Rohrer C. 1983. ‘Tense in Texts’ in: R. Bauerle C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (eds) Meaning Use and Interpretation of Language Berlin New York 250–269.

Koller H. 1951. ‘Praesens Historicum und erzählendes Imperfekt’ Museum Helveticum 8 63–99.

Koopman N. 2014. Ancient Greek ekphrasis: Between description and narration Amsterdam (Dissertation University of Amsterdam).

Kravar M. 1969. ‘Vidske osobine latinskoga perfekta. [The aspectual peculiarities of the Latin perfect.]’ Zhiva Antika 9 137–150.

Krifka M. Pelletier F.J. Carlson G.N. ter Meulen A. Link G. Chierchia G. 1995. ‘Genericity: an introduction’ in: G.N. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (eds) The Generic Book Chicago 1–123.

Kroon C.H.M. & Risselada R. 2004. ‘Iamque dies infanda aderat: time management en de geschiedenis van een narratieve techniek’ Lampas 37 191–202.

Kroon C.H.M. & Rose P.J. 1996. ‘Atrociter corruptus? The use of ‘narrative’ tenses in Ammianus Marcellinus’ Res Gestae.’ in: R. Risselada et al. (eds) On Latin. Linguistic and literary studies in honour of Harm Pinkster Amsterdam 71–89.

Kroon C.H.M. (in prep.). ‘Narrating the Unnarratable. Narrative Structure in the Pisonian Conspiracy (Tacitus A. 15.47–74)’.

Kroon C.H.M. 1992. ‘Discourse connectives and discourse type: the case of Latin at’ in: J. Herman (ed.) Linguistic studies on Latin Amsterdam 303–315.

Kroon C.H.M. 1995. Discourse particles in Latin: a study of nam enim autem and at Amsterdam.

Kroon C.H.M. 1998. ‘Discourse particles tense and the structure of Latin narrative texts’ in: R. Risselada (ed.) Latin in Use Amsterdam 37–61.

Kroon C.H.M. 2000. ‘Het ene verhaal is het andere niet. Een taalkundige kijk op teksttype in de Latijnse literatuur’ Lampas 33 211–238.

Kroon C.H.M. 2002. ‘How to write a ghost story? A linguistic view on narrative modes in Pliny Ep. 7.27’ in: L. Sawicki and D. Shalev (eds) Donum Grammaticum. Studies in Latin and Celtic linguistics in honour of Hannah Rosén Leuven 189–200.

Kroon C.H.M. 2006. ‘De fotograaf vertelt Tekstsamenhang in Ovidius’ Metamorphosen’ Lampas 39 226–245.

Kroon C.H.M. 2007. ‘Discourse Modes and the Use of Tenses in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’ in: R.J. Allan M. Buijs (eds) The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts Leiden 65–92.

Kühner R. & Gerth B. 1898. Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache Hannover & Leipzich.

Kühner R. & Stegmann C. & Thierfelder A. 1912. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache Hannover & Leipzig.

Labov W. 1972. ‘The Transformation of Experience in Narrative Syntax’ in: Language in the Inner City Philadelphia 354–396.

Labov W. & Waletzky J. 1997. ‘Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience’. Journal of Narrative & Life History 7(1–4) 3–38.

Laird A. 1999. Powers of Expression Expressions of Power: Speech Presentation and Latin Literature Oxford.

Langacker R. 2001. ‘The English Present Tense’ English Language and Linguistics 5.2 251–272.

Lausberg H. 1990. Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik. Stuttgart.

Leumann M. & Hofmann J.B. & Szantyr A. 1972. Lateinische Grammatik. Zweiter Band: Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik München.

Longrée D. S. Mellet. 2017. ‘A text structure indicator and two topological methods: New ways for studying Latin historic narratives’ Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32.3 577–590.

Lord A. 1953. ‘Homer’s Originality: Oral Dictated Texts’ Transactions of the American Philolgical Association 124–134.

Lord A. 1960. The Singer of Tales Cambridge MA.

Mack S. 1978. Patterns of Time in Virgil Hamden.

Mackail J.W. 1930. The Aeneid Edited with introduction and commentary by J.W. Mackail Oxford.

Margolin U. ‘Simultaneity in Narrative’ Paragraph 18. in: Hühn Peter et al. (eds): The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg. [view date: 21 Jan 2014]

Mellet S. 1985. ‘Présent de narration et parfait dans le conte de Psyché’ Revue des études latines 63 148–160.

Mellet S. 1988. L’ imparfait de l’ indicatif en latin classique. Temps aspect modalité. Étude synchronique dans une perspective énonciative Paris (Dissertation Paris-Sorbonne Société pour l’ information grammaticale).

Mellet S. 1996. ‘Pour un nouveau regard sur dum’ in: A. Bammesbergere F. Heberlein (eds) Akten des VIII. Internationalen Kolloquiums zur lateinischen Linguistik Heidelberg 308–321.

Mellet S. 1998. ‘Imparfait et discours rapporté’ in: C.M. Ternes D. Longrée (ed.) Oratio soluta—oratio numerosa Luxembourg 116–125.

Mellet S. Joffre M.-D. Serbat G. 1994. Grammaire fondamentale du latin: Le signifié du verbe Louvain.

Moens M. 1987. Tense aspect and temporal reference. Edinburgh (Dissertation University of Edinburgh).

Mosher H. 1991. ‘Towards a Poetics of Descriptized Narration’ Poetics Today 3 425–445.

Mynors R.A.B. 1969. P. Virgili Maronis Opera Oxford.

Nagy G. 1992. ‘Homeric Questions’ Transactions of the American Philological Association 122 17–60.

Nagy G. 1996. Poetry as performance: Homer and beyond Cambridge.

Norden E. 1957. P. Virgilius Maro Aeneid Buch VI 4. Auflage Darmstadt.

Norden E. 1999. ‘Virgil’s Aeneid in the Light of its own Time’ in: P.R. Hardie. (ed.) Virgil. Critical Assesments of Classical Authors Volume III Oxford 114–172.

Oldsjö F. 2001. Tense and Aspect in Caesar’s Narrative Uppsala.

Orlandini A. 1996. ‘1 2 3 videor: analyse d’ un prédicat polysémique’ in: A. Bammesbergere F. Heberlein (eds) Akten des VIII. Internationalen Kollquiums zur lateinischen Linguistik Heidelberg 415–427.

Osseforth M.H.J.G. 2017. Friendship in Saint Augustine’s Confessions: Between social convention and Christian morals. Amsterdam (Dissertation Vrije Universtiteit Amsterdam).

Otis B. 1964. Virgil. A study in Civilized Poetry Oxford.

Page T.E. 1894. ‘Notes on Virgil Aeneid 2.353 and Eur. Bacchae 506’ Classical Review 8 203–204.

Page T.E. 1931. Aeneid: books IXII P. Virgilius Maro; ed. with introd. and notes by T.E. Page London.

Palmer L.R. 1977. The Latin Language London.

Parsons T. 2002. ‘Eventualities and narrative progression’ Linguistics and Philosophy 25 681–699.

Partee B. 1984. ‘Nominal and Temporal Anaphora’ Linguistics and Philosophy 7 243–286.

Pease A.S. 1967. P. Virgili Maronis: Aeneidos Liber Quartus Darmstadt.

Perrochat P. 1932. L’ infinitif de narration an latin. Paris.

Pinkster H. 1983. ‘Tempus Aspect and Aktionsart in Latin (Recent Trends 1961–1981)’ Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt (ANRW) 29 270–319.

Pinkster H. 1990. Latin Syntax and Semantics London.

Pinkster H. 1998a. ‘Is the Latin Present the unmarked neutral Tense in the System?’ in: R. Risselada (ed.) Latin in Use Amsterdam 63–83.

Pinkster H. 1998b. ‘The use of Narrative Tenses in Apuleius’ Amor and Psyche’ in: M. Zimmerman (ed.) Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass II: Cupid and Psyche 103–111 Groningen

Pinkster H. 1999. ‘The Present Tense in Virgil’s AeneidMnemosyne 52 705–717.

Pinkster H. 2015. The Oxford Latin Syntax: Volume 1: the Simple Clause (Vol. 1). Oxford.

Pöschl V. 1950. Die Dichtkunst Virgils. Bild und Symbol in der Aeneid Wiesbaden.

Prince G. 1978. ‘Le discours attributif et le récit’ Poétique 35 305–313.

Prince G. 1982. Narratology Berlin.

Putnam M.C.J. 1998. Virgil’s Epic Designs: Ekphrasis in the Aeneid New Haven.

Quinn K. 1963. ‘The Tempo of Virgilian Epic’ in: Quinn (ed.) Latin Explorations London 198–238.

Quinn K. 1968. Virgil’s Aeneid: a critical description London.

Radice B. 1969. Plinius. Letters Volumes III. Harvard (Loeb).

Ravenna G. 1985. ‘Ekphrasis’ in: Enciclopedia Virgiliana Roma 183–185.

Reichenbach H.F.H.G. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic Toronto.

Reinmuth O.W. 1933. ‘Virgil’s use of interea. A study of the treatment of Contemporaneous Events in Roman epic’ American Journal of Philology 104 323–329.

Ricoeur P. 1984. Time and Narrative. Vol. 1 Chicago.

Ricoeur P. 1985. Time and Narrative. Vol. 2 Chicago.

Ricoeur P. 1988. Time and Narrative. Vol. 3 Chicago.

Rieks R. 1981. ‘Die Gleichnisse Virgils’ Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 312 1011–1110.

Rijksbaron A. 2012. ‘The imperfect as the tense of substitutionary perception’ in: P. da Cunha Corrêa M. Martinho J.M. Macedo & A. Pinheiro Hasegawa (eds) Hyperboreans: essays in Greek and Latin poetry philosophy rhetoric and linguistic São Paulo 331–375.

Risselada R. & Kroon C.H.M. 1998. ‘The discourse functions of Iam’ in: B. García-Hernández (ed.) Estudios de linguistica Latina Madrid 429–445.

Risselada R. 1991. ‘Passive Perspective and Textual Cohesion’ in: R. Coleman (ed.) New Studies in Latin linguistics Amsterdam/Philadelphia 400–414.

Risselada R. 1996. ‘And now for something completely different? Temporal Discourse Markers: Latin nunc and English now’ in: J.R. de Jong A.M. Bolkestein (eds) On Latin: Linguistic and Literary Studies in honour of Harm Pinkster Amsterdam 105–125.

Risselada R. 1997. ‘Bacchanalia & pragmatiek: textuele samenhang in Livius 39.9–14.3’ Lampas 30 101–122.

Rohrer C. 1977. On the Logical Analysis of Tense and Aspect Tübingen.

Rohrer C. 1978. Papers on Tense Aspect and Verb Classification Tübingen.

Rose P. 2013. A Commentary on Augustine’s De cura pro mortuis gerenda: Rhetoric in Practice. Leiden.

Rosén H. 1980. ‘ ‘Exposition und Mitteilung’—The imperfect as a thematic tense-form in the letters of Pliny’ in: On Moods and Tenses of the Latin Verb: Two essays dedicated to H.J. Polotsky on the occasion of his seventyfifth birthday Munchen 27–48.

Rosén H. 1995. ‘The Latin Infinitivus Historicus revisited’ Mnemosyne 48 536–564.

Ross D.O. 1975. Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus Elegy and Rome Cambridge.

Rossi A. 2004. Contexts of war: manipulation of genre in Virgilian battle narrative. Ann Arbor.

Schlicher J.J. 1914a. ‘The Historical Infinitive I: its simple form (infinitivus impotentiae)’ Classical Philology 9 279–294.

Schlicher J.J. 1914b. ‘The Historical Infinitive II: Its Literary Elaboration’ Classical Philology 9 374–394.

Schlicher J.J. 1915. ‘The Historical Infinitve III: Imitation and Decline’ Classical Philology 10 54–74.

Schlicher J.J. 1931. ‘Historical Tenses and their Functions in Latin’ Classical philology 26 46–59.

Schrickx J. 2009. ‘Namque als Variante von nam?’ Mnemosyne 62 250–271.

Schwartz F.R. 2002. Lucans Tempusgebrauch. Textsyntax und Erzählkuns Frankfurt am Main.

Serbat G. 1976. ‘Les temps du verbe en Latin’ Revue des Études Latines 53 308–352.

Sicking C.M.J. & Stork P. 1997. ‘The Grammar of the so-called Historical Present in Ancient Greek’ in: E. Bakker (ed.) Grammar as Interpretation Leiden 131–168.

Smith C.S. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect Dordrecht.

Smith C.S. 2003. Modes of Discourse. The Local Structure of Texts Cambridge.

Stanzel F. 1982. Theorie des erzählens. Göttingen.

Suerbaum W. 1999. Virgils Aeneid Epos zwischen Geschichte und Gegenwart Stuttgart.

Szantyr A. 1970. ‘Bemerkungen zum Aufbau der Virgilischen Ekphrasis’ Museum Helveticum 27 28–40.

Sznajder L. 1996. ‘Sur la concurrence entre présents historiques et infinitifs de narration chez les historiens latins’ in: H. Rosén (ed.) Aspects of Latin. Papers from the Seventh International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics Jerusalem April 1993 Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft Innsbruck 307–321.

Tarrant R.J. 2012. Virgil: Aeneid XII Cambridge.

Thome G. 1979. Gestalt und Funktion des Mezentius bei Virgil—mit einem Ausblick auf die Schlussszene der Aeneid Frankfurt am Main Bern Las Vegas.

Toolan M. 1998. Language in literature: An introduction to stylistics London.

Torrego E. 2010. ‘Función textual y literaria de la pasiva en la Eneida de Virgilio’ in: Actas del XII Congreso Español de Estudios Clásicos volume II Madrid 195–227.

Touratier C. 1983. ‘Analyse d’ un système verbal (les morphèmes grammaticaux du verbe latin)’ in: H. Pinkster (ed.) Latin linguistics and linguistic theory: Proceedings of the 1st international colloquium on Latin Linguistics Amsterdam April 1981 Amsterdam & Philadelphia 261–281.

Touratier C. 1994. ‘Les morphemes du verbe’ in: Syntaxe Latin Louvain 91–129.

Touratier C. 1994. Syntaxe latine Louvain.

Touratier C. 1996. ‘Les Temps dans un récit (Virgile Ecloga 7.1–20)’ in: R. Risselada J.R. de Jong and A.M. Bolkestein (eds) On Latin: Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honour of Harm Pinkster Amsterdam 163–172.

Vendler Z. 1967. ‘Verbs and Time’ in: Z. Vendler (ed.) Linguistics in Philosophy 66.2 Ithaca New York 97–121.

Viljamaa T. 1983. Infinitive of Narration in Livy: A study in Narrative Techniques Turku.

Viti C. 2010. ‘The non-literal use of tenses in Latin with particular reference to the praesens historicum’. Revue de linguistique latine du Centre Alfred Ernout 5: online.

Vuillaume M. 1994. ‘Le repérage temporal dans les textes narratifs’ Langages 112 92–105.

Weinrich H. 1964. Tempus besprochene und erzählte Welt Stuttgart.

Williams G. 1983. Technique and Ideas in the Aeneid New Haven.

Williams R.D. 1961. ‘The Function and Structure of Virgil’s Catalogue in Aeneid 7’ The Classical Quarterly 11.2 146–153.

Williams R.D. 1962. P. Virgili Maronis: Aeneidos Liber tertius Oxford.

Williams R.D. 1973. The Aeneid of Virgil London.

Wisse J. 1996. ‘The presence of Zeno. The date of Philodemus’ On Rhetoric and the use of the ‘citative’ and ‘reproducing’ present in Latin and Greek’ in: R. Risselada et al. (eds) On Latin. Linguistic and literary studies in honour of Harm Pinkster Amsterdam 173–202.

Tenses in Vergil's Aeneid

Narrative Style and Structure


Table of Contents




All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 30 30 4
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

Related Content