Get Access to Full Text

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

The High Stakes of Testing

Exploring Student Experience with Standardized Assessment through Governmentality

Series:

Table of Contents
Index Card
References
  • About PARCC. (2015). Retrieved March 9 2015 from http://www.parcconline.org/about-parcc

  • About PARCC. (2016). Retrieved November 16 2016 from http://www.parcconline.org/about/states

  • AlbersP.HarsteJ. C. & VasquezV. M. (2015). Critical and multimodal literacy curricula. Negotiating Spaces for Literacy Learning: Multimodality and Governmentality115129. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AlpertB. (1991). Students’ resistance in the classroom. Anthropology & Education Quarterly22(4) 350366. doi:

  • American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE) and FAQ. (n.d.). Retrieved March 27 2017from http://edtpa.aacte.org/faq#51

  • AmreinA. & BerlinerD. (2002). An analysis of some unintended and negative consequences of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Studies Laboratory Education Policy Studies Research Unit (SEPSL-02110125-EPRU).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Atlas. (2015 July 2). No Child Left Behind. Retrieved October 20 2015from http://atlas.newamerica.org/no-child-left-behind-overview

  • AttickD. & BoylesD. (2016). Pearson learning and the ongoing corporatization of public education. Journal of Thought50(1–2) 519.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BattersS. M. (2011). Care of the self and the will to freedom: Michel Foucault, critique and ethics. Senior Honors Projects. Paper 231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BeasleyT. (2009). Governmentaity of youth: Beyond cultural studies. In M. A. PetersA. BeasleyM. OlssenS. Maurer & S. Weber (Eds.) Governmentality studies in education (pp. 165199). RotterdamThe Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BeattieH. (2012). Amplifying student voice: The missing link in school transformation. Management in Education26(3) 158160. doi:

  • BourkeR. & LoveridgeJ. (2014). Exposing the divide between assessment and the point of learning through student voice. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies49(2) 149161.Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lewisu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com /docview/1639632801?accountid=12073

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BraggS. (2007). “Student voice” and governmentality: The production of enterprising subjects? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education28(3) 343358. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BurroughsN. F.KearneyP. & PlaxT. G. (1989). Compliance-resistance in the college classroom. Communication Education38214228.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CarlsonD. L. (2009). Producing entrepreneurial subjects: Neoliberal rationalities and portfolio assessment. In M. A. PetersA. BesleyM. OlssenS. Maurer & S. Weber (Eds.) Governmentality studies in education (pp. 257269). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carlsson-PaigeN. (2013). A guide for parents: Advocating for your child in the early years. Retrieved from http://www.nancycarlsson-paige.org/ECE-Brochure-8.20.13.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CarspeckenP. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • CheskyN. Z. & GoldsteinR. A. (2016). Whispers that echo: Girls’ experiences and voices in news media reports about STEM education reform. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies14(2) 130157. Retrieved from http://www.jceps.com/archives/3080

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ClementsM. (n.d.). Edunators—Helping teachers overcome obstacles and focus on learning. The importance of reflection in education. Edunators. Retrieved November 24 2013from http://www.edunators.com/index.php/becoming-the-edunator/step-5-reflecting-for-learning/the-importance-of-reflection-in-education

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE). (2000). Assessment and accountability in the fifty states: 1999–2000 Illinois. Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/sites/default/files/assessmentprofile/921_il.pdf

    • Export Citation
  • Cook-SatherA. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry36(4) 359390. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CormackP. & ComberB. (2013). High-stakes literacy tests and local effects in a rural school. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy36(2) 7889.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CrowderZ. & KonleS. (2015). Gumbo ya-ya or, what Pearson can’t hear: Opt-out, standardized testing, and student surveillance. The High School Journal98(4) 285289. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeanM. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

  • DeFurS. & KorinekL. (2010). Listening to student voices. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas83(1) 15. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.

  • DieraC. (2016). Democratic possibilities for student voice within schools undergoing reform: A student counterpublic case study. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies14(2) 217235. Retrieved from http://www.jceps.com/archives/3094

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FieldingM. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change2123141.

  • FieldingM. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal30(2) 295311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FlewittR. & Roberts-HolmesG. (2015). Regulatory gaze and ‘non-sense’ phonics testing in early literacy. In M. HamiltonR. HeydonK. Hibbert & R. Stooke (Eds.)Negotiating spaces for literacy learning: Multimodality and governmentality (pp. 95113). London: Continuum. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FontaineC. & LuttrelleW. (2015). Re-centring the role of care in young people’s multimodal literacies: A collaborative seeing approach. In M. HamiltonR. HeydonK. Hibbert & R. Stooke (Eds.)Negotiating spaces for literacy learning: Multimodality and governmentality (pp. 4356). London: Bloomsbury Books. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FoucaultM. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.)Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 109133). New York, NY: Pantheon.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FoucaultM. (1981). Omnes et singulatim: Towards a criticism of ‘political reason.’ In S. McMurrin (Ed.)The Tanner lectures in human values volume 2 (pp. 223254). Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FoucaultM. (1981). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.)Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader (pp. 5178). Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rainbow (Eds.)Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 201226). Brighton: Harvester.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FoucaultM. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality: With two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault (G. BurchellC. Gordon & P. MillerEds.). ChicagoChicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FoucaultM. (1995). Discipline and punish (A. SheridanTrans. 1977). New York, NY: Random House.

  • FoucaultM. (1997). Michel Foucault: ‘Society must be defended.’ New York, NY: Picador.

  • FreireP. (2010). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.

  • GirouxH. (2003). Public pedagogy and the politics of resistance: Notes on a critical theory of educational struggle. Educational Philosophy and Theory35(1) 516.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GordonC. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. BurchellC. Gordon & P. Miller (Eds.)The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality: With two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault (pp. 151). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GorlewskiD. A. (2012). Using standards and high-stakes testing for students: Exploiting power with critical pedagogy. Standardizing Effective Pedagogical Practices236250.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GorlewskiJ. A. (2012). Teaching from the test: Using high-stakes assessments to enhance student learning Using Standards and High-Stakes Testing for Students: Exploiting power with critical pedagogy225235.

    • Export Citation
  • GrahamL. J. (2009). The special branch: Governing mentalities through alternative-site placement. In M. A. PetersA. BesleyM. OlssenS. Maurer & S. Weber (Eds.) Governmentality studies in education (pp. 235256). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HamiltonM.HeydonR.HibbertK. & StookeR. (2015). Introduction. In M. HamiltonR. HeydonK. Hibbert & R. Stooke (Eds.) Negotiating spaces for literacy learning: Multimodality and governmentality (pp. 114). London: Continuum. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HarkinsM. J. & SingerS. (2009). The conundrum of large scale standardized testing: Making sure every student counts. Journal of Thought44(1–2) 7790. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HeydonR. (2015). Multimodality and governmentality in kindergarten literacy curricula. In M. HamiltonR. HeydonK. Hibbert & R. Stooke (Eds.)Negotiating spaces for literacy learning: Multimodality and governmentality (pp. 5776). London: Bloomsbury. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HibbertK. (2015). The secret of ‘will’ in new times: Assessment affordances of a cloud curriculum. In M. HamiltonR. HeydonK. Hibbert & R. Stooke (Eds.)Negotiating spaces for literacy learning: Multimodality and governmentality (pp. 5776). London: Bloomsbury. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HopeA. (2015). Governmentality and the ‘selling’ of school surveillance devices. The Sociological Review63840857. doi:

  • HoutM.ElliotS. & FruehS. (2012). Do high stakes tests improve learning? Issues in Science and Technology29(1) 3338.

  • HowardT. C. (2001). Telling their side of the story: African-American students’ perceptions of culturally relevant teaching. The Urban Review33(2) 131149. Retrieved from

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IannoneP. & SimpsonA. (2013). Students’ perceptions of assessment in undergraduate mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education15(1) 1733.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Illinois General Assembly. (n.d.). Full Text of SB3412. Retrieved October 6 2015from http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/fulltext.asp?DocName=&SessionId=85&GA=98&DocTypeId=SB&DocNum=3412&GAID=12&LegID=80716&SpecSess=&Session=

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • illinoisreportcard.com. (n.d.). Retrieved March 26 2017 from https://www.illinoisreportcard.com/District.aspx?districtId=07016127502

  • Illinois State Board of Education Meeting. (2014June 18). Retrieved October 12 2015 from http://www.isbe.net/board/meetings/2014/jun/packet.pdfs

  • JolleyS. A. (2014). How have we been standardized? Let me count the ways. English Journal104(2) 80.

  • JonesB. & EgleyR. (2007). Learning to take tests or learning for understanding? Teachers’ beliefs about test-based accountability. The Educational Forum71(3) 232248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KarpS. (2016). ESSA: NCLB repackaged. Rethinking Schools30(3) 1819. Retrieved from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/30_03/30-3_karp.shtml

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KearnsL. (2011). High-stakes standardized testing and marginalized youth: An examination of the impact on those who fail. Canadian Journal of Education34(2) 113130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KincheloeJ. L. (2008). Critical pedagogy primer (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

  • LeistynaP. (2007). Corporate testing: Standards, profits, and the demise of the public sphere. Teacher Education Quarterly34(2) 5984.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LemkeT. (2002). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism14(3) 4964. doi:

  • LeskoN. (2001). Act your age: A cultural construction of adolescence. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.

  • MartinL. H.GutmanH. & HuttonP. H. (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MayoC. (2005). Testing resistance: Busno‐cratic power, standardized tests, and care of the self. Educational Philosophy and Theory37(3) 357363. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McDermottM. (2015). Predators, colonizers, and corporate-model reform. In M. McDermottP. RobertsonR. Jensen & C. Smith (Eds.) An activist handbook for the education revolution (pp. 115). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McDermottM. (2015). Who we are. In M. McDermottP. RobertsonR. Jensen & C. Smith (Eds.)An activist handbook for the education revolution (pp. 1738). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McintyreD.PedderD. & RudduckJ. (2005). Pupil voice: Comfortable and uncomfortable learnings for teachers. Research Papers in Education20(2) 149168. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MerriamS. B. & TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MillerJ. J. (2013). A better grading system: Standards-based, student-centered assessment. English Journal103(1) 111118. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lewisu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1442779325?accountid=12073

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MillhamR. A. (2012). The race to somewhere: Experiential education as an argument for not teaching to the test. In J. Gorlewski & D. Girlewsk (Eds.)Using standards and high-stakes testing for students: Exploiting power with critical pedagogy (pp. 178194). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MinarechováM. (2012). Negative impacts of high-stakes testing. Journal of Pedagogy/Pedagogický Casopis3(1) 82100. doi:

  • MitraD.MannB. & HlavacikM. (2016). Opting out: Parents creating contested spaces to challenge standardized tests. Education Policy Analysis Archives24(31) 123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NadesanM. (2009). Governing autism: Neoliberalism, risk, and technologies of the self. In M. A. PetersA. BesleyM. OlssenS. Maurer & S. Weber (Eds.) Governmentality studies in education (pp. 235256). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. (n.d.). Retrieved September 30 2016from http://www.maine.gov/doe/accountability/documents/meec_7-20-12_Indicators.pdf

    • Export Citation
  • NeillM. (2016). The testing resistance and reform movement. Monthly Review67(10) 828.

  • New Schools. (1999April 1). Alternatives to standardized tests. Retrieved March 31 2017from http://www.newschools.org/news/alternatives-to-standardized-tests/

    • Export Citation
  • NiescheR. (2015). Governmentality and my school: School principals in societies of control. Educational Philosophy and Theory47(2) 133145. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America. (2015January 6). Every student succeeds act. Retrieved from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-114s1177enr/pdf/BILLS-114s1177enr.pdf

    • Export Citation
  • PhillippoK. & GriffinB. (2016). “If you don’t score high enough then that’s your fault”: Student civic dispositions in the context of competitive school choice policy. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies14(2) 6795. Retrieved from http://www.jceps.com/archives/3066

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PinkwaterD. (n.d.). The hare and the pineapple. Retrieved from http://usny.nysed.gov/docs/the-hare-and-the-pineapple.pdf

  • RavitchD. (2012June 5). The pearsonizing of the American mind. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/BridgingDifferences/2012/06/the_pearsonizing_of_the_americ.html

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RavitchD. (2016January 19). Exclusive: Lamar Alexander’s staff explains ESSA: Part I. Retrieved from http://dianeravitch.net/2016/01/19/exclusive-lamar-alexanders-chief-of-staff-explains-essa-part-1/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ReayD. (2006). ‘I’m not seen as one of the clever children’: Consulting primary school pupils about the social conditions of learning. Educational Review58(2) 171181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RobinsonC. & TaylorC. (2009). Student voice: Theorising power and participation. Pedagogy Culture & Society17(2) 161175. doi:

  • RotherhanA. J. (2012May 4). What everyone missed on the pineapple question. Time. Retrieved from http://ideas.time.com/2012/05/04/what-everyone-missed-on-the-pineapple-question/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SalviaJ.YsseldykeJ. E. & BoltS. (2017). Assessment in special and inclusive education (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • San PedroT. J. (2015). Silence as shields: Agency and resistance among Native American students in the urban southwest. Research in the Teaching of English50(2) 132153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchaefferB. (2012). Resistance to high-stakes testing spreads. District Administration48(8) 3442.

  • SchaefferB. (2018February 20). Pearson’s history of testing problems. Retrieved from http://www.fairtest.org/pearsons-history-testing-problems

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ScheurichJ. (1994). Policy archaeology: A new policy studies methodology. Journal of Education Policy9(4) 297316.

  • SchneiderM. K. (2015). Common core dilemma: Who owns our schools? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

  • SchneiderM. (2016March 18). ESSA is designed to quell opting out. It won’t work [Web log comment]. Retrieved from https://deutsch29.wordpress.com/2016/03/18/essa-is-designed-to-quell-opting-out-it-wont-work/

    • Export Citation
  • ShepherdB. (2015November 24). Bob Shepherd: Ditch the Common Core and CC tests. Retrieved November 27 2015from http://dianerativich.net/2015/11/24/bob-shepherd-ditch-coomon-core-and-cc-tests/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ShieldsC. M. (2013). Transformative leadership in education: Equitable change in an uncertain and complex world. New York, NY: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmithC. (2015). Changing the narrative. In M. McDermottP. RobertsonR. Jensen & C. Smith (Eds.)An activist handbook for the education revolution (pp. 3956). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmithT. (2018 February 9). Illinois state board of education. Retrieved from https://www.isbe.net/Documents/20180209-Letter-Future-of-PARCC.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmithW. C. (2014). The global transformation toward testing for accountability. Education Policy Analysis Archives22(116). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22.1571

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmytheS. (2015). Beyond essential skills: Creating spaces for multimodal text production within Canada’s ‘minimal proficiency’ policy regime. Negotiating Spaces for Literacy Learning: Multimodality and Governmentality5776. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SonuD.GorlewskiJ. & ValléeD. (2016). Editorial: Learn, by listening to the child in neoliberal schools. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies14(2) 113. Retrieved from http://www.jceps.com/archives/3053

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StaffI. (2016 March 13). Bell curve. Retrieved from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bell-curve.asp

  • SternbergR. J. (2016). Testing for better and worse. Kappan98(4) 6671.

  • StickneyJ. (2009). Casting teachers into education reforms and regimes of inspection: Resistance to normalization through self-governance. In M. A. PetersA. BesleyM. OlssenS. Maurer & S. Weber (Eds.) Governmentality studies in education (pp. 235256). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StraussV. (2015March 11). Is a new day really dawning with no child left behind’s successor law? The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2016/03/11/is-a-new-day-really-dawning-with-no-child-left-behinds-successor-law/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StraussV. (2015October 24). Confirmed: Standardized testing has taken over our schools. But who’s to blame? Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2015/10/24/confirmed-standardized-testing-has-taken-over-our-schools-but-whos-to-blame/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.7914fe905154

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Students at the Center. (n.d.). Student-centered assessment guide: Exhibitions. Retrieved November 16 2015from http://www.studentsatthecenter.org/resources/student-centered-assessment-guide-exhibitions

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TaylorC. & RobinsonC. (2009). Student voice: Theorising power and participation. Pedagogy Culture & Society17(2) 161175. doi:

  • ThomasP. L. (2012). Using standards and high-stakes testing for students: Exploiting power with critical pedagogy. Speaking Empowerment to Crisis: Unmasking Accountability through Critical Discourse4254566.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Title I—Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged. (2005June 21). Retrieved October 6 2015 from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg2.html

  • ToshalisE. & NakkulaM. (2012). Motivation, engagement, and student voice. The Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review78(1) 2935.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TuckE. & GorlewskiJ. (2015). Racist ordering, settler colonialism, and edTPA: A participatory policy analysis. Educational Policy30(1) 197217. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TurnipseedS. & Darling-HammondL. (2015). Accountability is more than a test score. Education Policy Analysis Archives2311. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1986

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Opt Out. (n.d.). Letter for Requesting Portfolio Assessment. Retrieved October 26 2015from http://unitedoptout.com/essential-guides/letter-for-requesting-portfolio-assessment/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United States of America Executive Office of the President. (2015December). Every student succeeds act: A progress report on elementary and secondary education. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/files/documents/ESSA_Progress_Report.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WaxmanH. C. & HuangS. (1997). Classroom instruction and learning environment differences between effective and ineffective urban elementary schools for African American students. Urban Education32(4) 744.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • XiaoY. & CarlessD. (2013). Illustrating students’ perceptions of English language assessment: Voices from China. RELC Journal44 (3) 319340. Retrieved from http://rel.sagepub.com.ezproxy.lewisu.edu/content/44/3/319.full.pdf htm

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • ZipinL. & BrennanM. (2009). Analysing secondary school strategies in changing times: The insights and gaps of a governmentality lens. In M. A. PetersA. BesleyM. OlssenS. Maurer & S. Weber (Eds.) Governmentality studies in education (pp. 235256). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 29 29 2
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
Related Content