(Un)boundedness Effects of the Nominal Root in Noun-Incorporating Verbs: Insight from Romanian

in Towards a Theory of Denominals
Get Access to Full Text

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



In Chapter 2, on the basis of a personal corpus of Romanian denominals, I tested Harley’s (2005) hypothesis that there is a correlation between the (un)boundedness of the nominal root and the (a)telicity of the corresponding denominal. The results of this investigation show that Harley’s (2005) correlation fails to account for a considerable number of verbs, and that incorporating mass nouns does not seem to have a clear atelic effect. This suggests that one should look for a different explanation of telicity, possibly lying in the role played by s-syntax (the elements the verbs combine with in the sentence) or the predicates occurring in the internal structure of a denominal, apart from the nominal root (e.g. CAUSE, as causes usually have results).