Free access
References

Adelman, James S., Gordon D. A. Brown, and José F. Quesada. 2006. Contextual diversity, nor word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science 17(9), 814823.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Ambridge, Ben, Anne Theakston, Elena V. M. Lieven, and Michael Tomasello. 2006. The distributed learning effect for children’s acquisition of an abstract grammatical construction. Cognitive Development 21(2), 174193.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Anderson, John R. 2009. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (7th ed). New York: Worth.

Aslin, Richard N. and Elissa L. Newport. 2012. Statistical learning: From acquiring specific items to forming general rules. Current Directions in Psychological Science 21(3), 170176.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics with R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Baayen, R. Harald. 2010. Demythologizing the word frequency effect: A discriminative learning perspective. The Mental Lexicon 5(3), 436461.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Ball, Linden J., Jaswinder Shoker, and Jeremy N. V. Miles. 2010. Odour-based context reinstatement effects with indirect measures of memory: The curious case of rosemary. British Journal of Psychology 101(4), 655678.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Balota, David A. and Daniel H. Spieler. 1998. The utility of item level analyses in model evaluation: a reply to Seidenberg and Plaut. Psychological Science 9(3), 238240.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Barnwell, Brendan B. 2014. Effects of Nonlinguistic Context on Language Production. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.

Bartlett, F.C. 1932 (1967). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Beckner, Clay, Nick C. Ellis, Richard Blythe, John Holland, Joan Bybee, Jinyun Ke, Morten H. Christiansen, Diane Larsen-Freeman, William Croft, and Tom Schoenemann. 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system: position paper. Language Learning 59 (Suppl. 1), 126.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Bernolet, Sarah, Timothy Colleman, and Robert Hartsuiker. 2014. The ‘sense boost’ to dative priming: evidence for sense-specific verb-structure links. Journal of Memory and Language 76(1), 113126.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice. 2016. What corpus-based Cognitive Linguistics can and cannot expect from neurolinguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4), 493505.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Bock, J. Kathryn. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18(3), 355387.

Bowker, Lynne and Jennifer Pearson. 2002. Working with Specialized Language: A Practical Guide to Using Corpora. London: Routledge.

Boyd, Jeremy K. and Adele E. Goldberg. 2011. Learning what not to say: the role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language 87(1), 5583.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering, Simon P. Liversedge, Andrew J. Stewart, and Thomas P. Urbach. 1995. Syntactic priming: investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24(6), 489506.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4), 711733.

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, Joan and Clay Beckner. 2009. Usage-based theory. In Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 827856. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Bybee, Joan and Paul J. Hopper. 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Bybee, Joan and James L. McClelland. 2005. Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. The Linguistic Review 22(2–4), 381410.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Bybee, Joan and Sandra A. Thompson. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistics Society 23, 6585.

Callies, Marcus. 2013. Agentivity as a determinant of lexico-grammatical variation in L2 academic writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(3), 357390.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Casenhiser, Devin M. and Adele E. Goldberg. 2005. Fast mapping of a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science 8(6), 500508.

Cattell, James M. 1886. The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind XI. 6365.

Chang, Franklin., Gary S. Dell, J. Kathryn Bock, and Zenzi Griffin. 2000. Structural priming as implicit learning: a comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29(2), 217229.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Christiansen, Morten H. and Nick Chater. 2016. Creating Language: Integrating Evolution, Acquisition, and Processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Clark, Andy. 2013. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(3), 181204.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2008. Words as constructions. In Vyvyan Evans and Stephanie S. Pourcel (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, 201223. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2016. Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4), 479491.

Demberg, Vera and Frank Keller. 2008. Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity. Cognition 109(2), 193210.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Divjak, Dagmar S., Natalia Levshina, and Jane Klavan. 2016. Cognitive linguistics: looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4), 447463.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Doğruöz, A. Seza and Stefan Th. Gries. 2014. Spread of on-going changes in an immigrant language: Turkish in the Netherlands. In Martin Pütz, Justyna Robinson, and Monika Reif (eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Social and Cultural Variation on Cognition and Language Use, 161185. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Dunn, James. 2018. Multi-unit association measures: moving beyond pairs of words. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23(2), 183215.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Durham, Mercedes. 2011. I think (that) something’s missing: Complementizer deletion in non-native emails. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 1(3), 421445.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Ebbinghaus, Hermann. 1885. Memory: A contribution to Experimental Psychology. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

Ellis, Nick C. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing and acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2), 143188.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Ellis, Nick C. 2006. Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics 27(1), 124.

Ellis, Nick C. and Rita Simpson-Vlach. 2005. An academic formulas list (AFL): extraction, validation, prioritization. Paper presented at Phraseology 2005, Université Catholique Louvain-la-Neuve.

Ellis, Nick C., Rita Simpson-Vlach and Carson Maynard. 2007. The processing of formulas in native and L2 speakers: psycholinguistic and corpus determinants. Paper presented at the Symposium on Formulaic Language, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee.

Ellis, Nick C., Ute Römer, and Matthew Brook O’Donnell. 2016. Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Fidelholtz, James L. 1975. Word frequency and vowel reduction in English. Chicago Linguistic Society 11, 200213.

Firth, John R. 1957. Papers in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Forster, Kenneth I. and Susan M. Chambers. 1973. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12(6), 627635.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Francom, Jerid. 2009. Experimental Syntax: Exploring the Effect of Repeated Exposure to Anomalous Syntactic Structure: Evidence from Rating and Reading Tasks. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.

Gablasova, Dana., Vaclav Brezina, and Tony McEnery. 2017. Exploring learner language through corpora: comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information. Language Learning 67(S1), 130154.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Geeraerts, Dirk. 2006. Methodology in cognitive linguistics. In Gitte Kristiansen, Michel Achard, René Dirven and Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, 2149. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Glenberg, Arthur M. 1976. Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired- associate and recognition memory paradigms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15(1), 115.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Glenberg, Arthur M. 1979. Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory and Cognition 7(2), 95112.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Godden, Duncan R. and Alan D Baddeley. 1975. Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology 66(3), 325331.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Goldberg, Adele E., Devin M. Casenhiser, and Nitya Sethuraman. 2004. Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 15(3), 289316.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Gómez, Rebecca L. 2002. Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science 13(5), 431436.

Gries, Stefan Th. 2006. Exploring variability within and between corpora: some methodological considerations. Corpora 1(2), 109151.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Gries, Stefan Th. 2010. Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora: further explorations. In Stefan Th. Gries, Stefanie Wulff, and Mark Davies (eds.), Corpus Linguistic Applications: Current Studies, New Directions, 197212. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Gries, Stefan Th. 2012. Frequencies, probabilities, association measures in usage-/exemplar-based linguistics: some necessary clarifications. Studies in Language 36(3), 477510.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Gries, Stefan Th. 2015. More (old and new) misunderstandings of collostructional analysis: on Schmid and Küchenhoff (2013). Cognitive Linguistics 26(3), 505536.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Gries, Stefan Th. 2018. On over- and underuse in learner corpus research and multifactoriality in corpus linguistics more generally. Journal of Second Language Studies 1(2), 276308.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Gries, Stefan Th. 2019. 15 years of collostructions: some long overdue additions/corrections (to/of actually all sorts of corpus-linguistics measures). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24(3), 385412.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Gries, Stefan Th. and Allison S. Adelman. 2014. Subject realization in Japanese conversation by native and non-native speakers: exemplifying a new paradigm for learner corpus research. In Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New Empirical and Theoretical Paradigms, 3554. Cham: Springer.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Gries, Stefan Th. and Sandra C. Deshors. 2014. Using regressions to explore deviations between corpus data and a standard/target: two suggestions. Corpora 9(1), 109136.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Gries, Stefan Th. and Stefanie Wulff. 2005. Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3, 182200.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Gries, Stefan Th. and Stefanie Wulff. 2009. Psycholinguistic and corpus linguistic evidence for L2 constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7, 163186.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Gries, Stefan Th. forthcoming. Priming of syntactic alternations by learners of English: an analysis of sentence-completion and collostructional results. In Jesse A. Egbert and Paul Baker (eds.), Using corpus methods to triangulate linguistic analysis, 219238. New York and London: Routledge.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Halliday, Michael A. K. 2005. Computational and Quantitative Studies. London and New York: Continuum.

Hardie, Andrew. 2008. message # 12240 to Corpora List, 14 August 2008.

Harris, Zelig S. 1970. Papers in Structural and Transformational Linguistics. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Hawkins, John A. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Horton, William S. 2007. The influence of partner-specific memory associations on language production: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(7), 11141139.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Howes, Davis H. and Richard L. Solomon. 1951. Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology 41(6), 401410.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Huttenlocher, Janellen and Lorraine F. Kubicek. 1983. The source of relatedness effects on naming latency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9(3), 486496.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Jaeger, T. Florian. 2010. Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61(1), 2362.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Jaeger, T. Florian. 2011. Corpus-based research on language production: information density and reducible subject relatives. In Emily M. Bender and Jennifer E. Arnold. (eds.), Language from a Cognitive Perspective: Grammar, Usage, and Processing. Studies in honor of Tom Wasow, 161197. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Jaeger, T. Florian and Neal Snider. 2008. Implicit learning and syntactic persistence: surprisal and cumulativity. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Conference, 10611066.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Jaeger, T. Florian and Neal E. Snider. 2013. Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition 127(1), 5783.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Kaschak, Michael P., Timothy J. Kutta, and J. Leah Jones. 2011. Structural priming as implicit learning: cumulative priming effects and individual differences. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 18(6), 11331139.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Kelly, Michael H. 1986. On the Selection of Linguistic Options. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.

Lachman, Roy. 1973. Uncertainty effects on time to access the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology 99(2), 199208.

Lachman, Roy, Juliet Popper Shaffer, and Deborah Hennrikus. 1974. Language and cognition: effects of stimulus codability, name-word frequency, and age of acquisition on lexical reaction time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13(6), 613625.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Lakoff, George. 1991. Cognitive versus generative linguistics: how commitments influence results. Language and Communication 11(1–2), 5362.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, Ronald W. 2016. Working toward a synthesis. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4), 465477.

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1992. Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In Jan Svartvik (ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4–8 August, 105–122. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Lester, Nicholas A. 2019. That’s hard: Relativizer use in spontaneous L2 speech. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5(1), 132.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Lester, Nicholas A., Daniel Baum, and Tirza Biron. forthcoming. Phonetic duration of nouns depends on de-lexicalized syntactic distributions: Evidence from naturally occurring conversation. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Lester, Nicholas A. and Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín. 2017. Syntactic flexibility in the noun: evidence from picture naming. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 25852590.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Lester, Nicholas A., Laurie B. Feldman, and Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín. 2017. You can take a noun out of syntax …: Syntactic similarity effects in lexical priming. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 25372542.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Linzen, Tal and T. Florian Jaeger. 2015. Uncertainty and expectation in sentence processing: evidence From subcategorization distributions. Cognitive Science 40(6), 13821411.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

McDonald, Scott A. and Richard C. Shillcock. 2001. Rethinking the word frequency effect: the neglected role of distributional information in lexical processing. Language and Speech 44(3), 295323.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

McEnery, Tony and Andrew Wilson. 1996. Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Meyer, Charles F. 2002. English Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nesset, Tore. 2016. Does historical linguistics need the cognitive commitment? Prosodic change in East Slavic. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4), 573585.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2006a. Grammar and usage: a response to Gregory R. Guy. Language 82(2), 399404.

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2006b. On Gahl and Garnsey on grammar and usage. Language 82(4), 705706.

Oldfield, R. and A. Wingfield. 1965. Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A(17), 273281.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Onnis, Luca., Padraic Monaghan, Morten H. Christiansen, and Nick Chater. 2004. Variability is the spice of learning, and a crucial ingredient for detecting and generalizing in nonadjacent dependencies. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 26, 16781683.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Parker, Amanda., Henny Ngu, and Helen J. Cassaday. 2001. Odour and Proustian memory: Reduction of context-dependent forgetting and multiple forms of memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology 15(2), 159171.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Pickering, Martin J. and Holly P. Branigan. 1998. The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 39(4), 633651.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Pickering, Martin J. and Simon Garrod. 2013. An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(4), 329347.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Rescorla, Robert A. 1988. Behavioral studies of Pavlovian conditioning. Annual Review of Neuroscience 11(1), 329352.

Rescorla, Robert A. and Allen R. Wagner. 1972. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Abraham H. Black and William F. Prokasy (eds.), Classical Conditioning II: Current Theory and Research, 6499. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Rowland, Caroline F., Franklin Chang, Ben Ambridge, Julian M. Pine, and Elena V. M. Lieven. 2012. The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition 125(1), 4963.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Rumelhart, David E., Geoffrey E. Hinton, Ronald J. Williams. 1986. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 323(6088), 533536.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Saffran, Jenny R., Richard N. Aslin, and Elissa L. Newport. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274(5294), 19261928.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Savage, Ceri., Elena V. M. Lieven, Anna Theakston, and Michael Tomasello. 2006. Structural priming as implicit learning in language acquisition: The persistence of lexical and structural priming in 4-year-olds. Language Learning and Development 2(1), 2749.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Scheepers, Christoph. 2003. Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition 89(3), 179205.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2010. Does frequency in the text instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system? In Dylan Glynn and Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven Approaches, 101133. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Schneider, Ulrike. forthcoming. ΔP as a measure of collocation strength. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory.

Schooler, Lael J., and John R. Anderson. 1997. The role of process in the rational analysis of memory. Cognitive Psychology 32(3), 219250.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Schuchardt, Hugo. 1885. Über die Lautgesetze: Gegen die Junggrammatiker. Berlin: Oppenheim.

Seidenberg, Mark S. and Mayellen C. MacDonald. 1999. A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science 23(4), 569588.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Smith, Nathaniel and Roger Levy. 2013. The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition 128(3), 302319.

Smith, Steven M. 1979. Remembering in and out of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 5(5), 460471.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Smith, Steven M. 1985. Background music and context-dependent memory. The American Journal of Psychology 98(4), 591603.

Smith, Steven M., Fred R. Heath, and Edward Vela. 1990. Environmental context-dependent homophone spelling. The American Journal of Psychology 103(2), 229242.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Snider, Neal. 2009. Similarity and structural priming. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science, 815820.

Spieler, Daniel H. and David A. Balota. 1997. Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science 8, 411416.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Stubbs, Michael. 1993. British traditions in text analysis: From Firth to Sinclair. In Mona Baker, F. Francis, and Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, 146. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2005. Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-linguistic analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1), 113150.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2006. Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English. A Corpus Study at the Intersection of Variationist Sociolinguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Discourse Analysis. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Jennifer Smith. 2005. No momentary fancy! The zero ‘complementizer’ in English dialects. English Language and Linguistics 9(2), 289309.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Teubert, Wolfgang. 2005. My version of Corpus Linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(1), 113.

Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony Mulac. 1991. The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15(3), 237251.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Torres Cacoullos, Rena and James A. Walker. 2009. On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: A variationist study of that. Linguistics 47(1), 143.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Trautscholdt, Martin. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Association der Vorstellungen. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leipzig.

Wills, Andy J. 2009. Prediction errors and attention in the presence and absence of feedback. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18, 95100.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Wulff, Stefanie. 2016. A friendly conspiracy of input, L1, and processing demands: That-variation in German and Spanish learner language. In Lourdes Ortega, Andrea E. Tyler, Hae In Park, and Mariko Uno (eds.). The Usage-based Study of Language Learning and Multilingualism, 115136. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Wulff, Stefanie, Nicholas Lester, and Maria T. Martinez-Garcia. 2014. That-variation in German and Spanish L2 English. Language and Cognition 6, 271299.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Wulff, Stefanie, Stefan Th. Gries, and Nicholas Lester. 2018. Optional that in complementation by German and Spanish learners. In Andrea Tyler and Carol Moder (eds.), What is Applied Cognitive Linguistics? Answers from Current SLA Research, 99120. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Wulff, Stefanie and Stefan Th. Gries. forthcoming. Explaining individual variation in learner corpus research: Some methodological suggestions. In Bert Le Bruyn and Magali Paquot (eds.), Learner Corpora and Second Language Acquisition Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation