Chapter 13 Adjudication of Presidential Election Disputes in Zambia

In: Democracy and Electoral Politics in Zambia
Author:
O’Brien Kaaba
Search for other papers by O’Brien Kaaba in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Elections allow people to select leaders and to hold those leaders accountable. But this can only be done in an environment that does not vitiate the people’s free will and choice and in a political environment that is not lopsided and free of violence, corruption and cheating. Once these vices assail an election, there is always a possibility that the election result does not reflect the will of the people. Those aggrieved may wish to seek redress. This chapter, therefore, looks at one form of redress, adjudication, available to a person aggrieved with presidential election results. The chapter sets out the legal framework for the adjudication of disputed presidential election results and then discusses how the courts have in concrete cases resolved the disputes.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 427 162 32
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Views & Downloads 6 0 0