Editors:
David Carter
Search for other papers by David Carter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Rachel Foxley
Search for other papers by Rachel Foxley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Liz Sawyer
Search for other papers by Liz Sawyer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Type:
Chapter
Pages:
287

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00
Add to Cart
Redeem Access Token
  • Collapse
  • Expand
Series:  Brill's Companions to Philosophy: Ancient Philosophy, Volume: 8 and  Brill's Companions to Philosophy, Volume: 8
Cover Brill's Companion to the Legacy of Greek Political Thought
E-Book ISBN:
9789004679344
Publisher:
Brill
Print Publication Date:
16 Sep 2024
Front Matter
Introduction
Part 1 The Reproduction of Greek Political Thought
Part 2 Greek Thought in New Environments
Part 4 Greek Thought and the Potential for Dissent
Back Matter

  • Cromartie, Alan (2016), ‘Epieikeia and conscience’, in Lorna Hutson (ed.), Oxford Handbook to Early Modern English Literature and Law. Oxford

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Donahue, Charles Jr (2001), ‘Ius in the subjective sense in Roman law: reflections on Villey and Tierney’, in A Ennio Cortese, ed. D. Maffei, vol. 1. Rome, 506–30

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Englard, Izhak (2009), Corrective and Distributive Justice: from Aristotle to Modern Times. Oxford

  • Filmer, Sir Robert (1991), Patriarcha and other writings, ed. Johann P. Sommerville. Cambridge

  • Grotius, Hugo (1662), De veritate Christianae religionis. Amsterdam

  • Grotius, Hugo (1631), De jure belli ac pacis. Amsterdam

  • Grotius, Hugo (1724), Le droit de la guerre et de la paix, tr. Jean Barbeyrac. Amsterdam

  • Grotius, Hugo (1990), Defensio fidei Catholicae de satisfactione Christi adversus Faustum Socinum senensem, ed. Edwin Rabbie, tr. Hotze Mulder. Assen/Maastricht

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Haggenmacher, Peter (1983), Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste. Geneva

  • Hobbes, Thomas (1983), De cive: the Latin version, ed. Howard Warrender. Oxford

  • Hobbes, Thomas (2012), Leviathan, ed. Noel Malcolm, 2 vols. Oxford

  • Lactantius (2003), Divine Institutes, tr. Anthony Bowen and Peter Garnsey. Liverpool

  • Locke, John (1975), An essay concerning human understanding, ed. P. H. Nidditch. Oxford

  • Locke, John (1988), Two treatises of government, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge

  • O’Donovan, Oliver and O’Donovan, Joan Lockwood (2004), Bonds of Imperfection: Christian Politics Past and Present. Grand Rapids MI

  • Rawls, John (1972), A Theory of Justice. Oxford

  • Rawls, John (1999), Collected Papers, ed. Samuel Freeman. Cambridge MA

  • Suarez, Francisco (1613), Tractatus de legibus ac Deo legislatore. Lyons

  • Tierney, Brian (1997), The Idea of Natural Rights. Grand Rapids MI

  • Tuck, Richard (1999), The Rights of War ond Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford

  • Adler, E. (2016), Classics, the Culture Wars, and Beyond. Michigan

  • Adler, M (1977), A Philosopher at Large London

  • Beam, A. (2008), A Great Idea at the Time: The rise, fall and curious afterlife of the Great Books. New York

  • Bernal, M. (1987), Black Athena: the Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization. Piscataway NJ

  • Bloom, A. (1987), The Closing of the American Mind. New York

  • Brown, P. (2003), ‘Tempora mutantur’, Oxford Today 15.2

  • Carr, E. H. (1939), The Twenty Years Crisis. London

  • Clay, J. S. (2003), ‘The real Leo Strauss’, New York Times, 7 June 2003

  • Condren, C. (1985), The Status and Appraisal of Classical Texts. Princeton

  • Deutsch, K. L. and Murley, J. A. (eds) (1999), Leo Strauss, the Straussians, and the American Regime. Lanham MD

  • Drury, S. B. (1988), The Political Ideas of Leo Strauss. Basingstoke

  • Drury, S. B. (1999), Leo Strauss and the American Right. Basingstoke

  • Erskine, J. (1915), The Moral Obligation to be Intelligent and Other Essays. New York

  • Erskine, J. (1948), My Life as a Teacher. Philadelphia and New York

  • Hacker, A. (1954), ‘Capital and carbuncles: the great books reappraised’, APSR 48.3: 775–786

  • Hanson, V. D. and Heath, J. (1998), Who Killed Homer? The Demise of Classical Education and the Recovery of Greek Wisdom. New York

  • Hardwick, L. and Stray, C. (2007), A Companion to Classical Receptions. Malden MA

  • Hirsch, E. D. (1987), Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. Boston

  • Hutchins, R. M. (1936), The Higher Learning in America, New Haven

  • Hutchins, R. M. (1943), Education for Freedom. Baton Rouge

  • Hutchins, R. M. (1952), The Great Conversation. Chicago

  • Kagan, D. (1965), The Great Dialogue: History of Greek Political Thought from Homer to Polybius. New York and London

  • Kirk, R. (1974), The Roots of American Order. Washington

  • Lacy (2008), ‘Dreams of a democratic culture: revising the origins of the great books idea, 1869–1921’, Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 7.4: 397–441

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Livingstone, R. W. (1916), A Defence of Classical Education, London

  • Livingstone, R. W. (1921) (ed.), The Legacy of Greece. Oxford

  • Livingstone, R. W. (1923), The Pageant of Greece. Oxford

  • Livingstone, R. W. (1938), Portrait of Socrates. Oxford

  • Livingstone, R. W. (1943), Education for a World Adrift. Cambridge

  • Livingstone, R. W. (1943), Thucydides. Oxford

  • Livingstone, R. W. (1944), Plato and Modern Education. Cambridge

  • Livingstone, R. W. (1952), Education and the Spirit of the Age. Oxford

  • Livingstone, R. W. (1960), The Influence of the Greek and Hebraic Traditions on Western Ideals. London

  • Minowitz, P. (2009), Straussophobia: Defending Leo Strauss against Shadia Drury and Other Accusers. Lexington

  • Monoson, S. (2011), ‘The making of a democratic symbol: the case of Socrates in North American popular media 1941–1955’, Classical Receptions Journal 3.1: 46–76

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Monoson, S. (2016), ‘Aesop said so: ancient wisdom and radical politics in 1930s NY’, Classical Receptions Journal 8.1: 90–113

  • Morson, G. S. (2011), The Words of Others: from Quotation to Culture. New Haven

  • Morson, G. S. (2012), The Long and the Short of it: from Aphorism to Novel. Stanford

  • Nelson, E. (2009), The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought. Cambridge

  • Norton, A (2004), Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire. New Haven

  • Roche, H. (2013), ‘ “Anti-enlightenment”: national socialist educators’ troubled relationship with humanism and the philhellenist tradition’, Publications of the English Goethe Society 82.3:193–207

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sawyer, L. (2014), ‘Thucydides in modern political rhetoric” in N. Morley and C. Lee (eds), A Handbook to the Reception of Thucydides. Malden MA

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Skinner, Q. (1969), ‘Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas’, History and Theory 8.1: 3–53

  • Strauss, L. (1952), Persecution and the Art of Writing. Glencoe IL

  • Strauss, L. (1964), The City and Man. Chicago and London

  • Weldon, T. D. (1936), ‘Scrutiny of Modern Greats’, in E. W. F. Tomlin (ed.) (1936), “Scrutiny of Modern Greats,” Scrutiny (March) 344–358

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zimmern, A. E. (1921), ‘Political thought’, in R. W. Livingstone (ed.) (1921), 321–54

  • Zuckerberg, D (2018), Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age. Cambridge MA

  • Bigaj, J. (2002), ‘The impact of evolutional interpretation of Platonism and of Wincenty Lutosławski’s (1863–1954) stylometric method on progress in the studies of ancient philosophy’, Organon 31: 232–38

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Borzym, S. (1984), Bergson a przemiany światopoglądowe w Polsce. Wrocław-Warszawa

  • Borzym, S., Floryńska, H., Skarga, B. and Walicki, A. (1983), Zarys dziejów filozofii polskiej 1815–1918. Warszawa

  • Brandwood, L. (1990), The Chronology of Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge

  • Cottam, K. J. (1978), Bolesław Limanowski (1835–1935). New York

  • Daszyk, K. K. (1993), Osobliwy Podolak. Kraków

  • Davis, H. and Burges, G. (tr.) (1901), Plato: The Republic and Statesman. New York

  • Dillon, J. and Brisson, L. (eds) (2010), Plato’s Philebus. Sankt Augustin

  • Dzieduszycki, W. (1880), Wykłady o pierwszej filozofii. Warszawa

  • Dzieduszycki, W. (1908), ‘Gruszki na wierzbie’, Przegląd Powszechny 100: 395–419

  • Dzieduszycki, W. (1914), Historya filozofii, vol. 1. Brody-Lwów

  • Finamore, J. and Berchman, R. (eds) (2014), Metaphysical Patterns in Platonism: Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance, and Modern Times. Dilton Marsh

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Garewicz, J., ‘Kilka uwag o badaniu recepcji filozofii’, in Legowicz (1979), 103–7

  • Handelsman, M. (1937), Historycy. Portrety i profile. Warszawa

  • Jarra, E. (1918), Idea Państwa u Platona i jej dzieje. Warszawa

  • Legowicz, J. (ed.) (1979), Wybrane zagadnienia z historii filozofii polskiej na tle filozoficznej umysłowości europejskiej. Wrocław-Warszawa

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Limanowski, B. (1871), ‘Marzyciele. Studjum socjologiczne’, Gazeta Literacka 1.6: 8–10

  • Limanowski, B. (1871a), ‘Marzyciele. Studjum socjologiczne (Ciąg dalszy)’, Gazeta Literacka 1.7: 9–11

  • Limanowski, B. (1871b), ‘Marzyciele. Studjum socjologiczne (Ciąg dalszy)’, Gazeta Literacka 1.8: 10–12

  • Limanowski, B. (1871c), ‘Marzyciele. Studjum socjologiczne (Ciąg dalszy)’, Gazeta Literacka 1.9: 7–10

  • Limanowski, B. (1872), ‘Studjum socjologiczne. Plato i jego Rzeczpospolita’, Na dziś 2: 87–117

  • Limanowski, B. (1872a), ‘Studyum socjologiczne. Plato i jego Rzeczpospolita’, Na dziś 3: 212–27

  • Limanowski, B. (1875), ‘Prawa Platona’, in Sobótka. Księga zbiorowa na uczczenie pięćdziesięcioletniego jubileuszu Seweryna Goszczyńskiego. Lwów, 491–500

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Limanowski, B. (1957), Pamiętniki (1835–1870). Warszawa

  • Limanowski, B. (1958), Pamiętniki (1870–1907). Warszawa

  • Lutosławski, W. (1888), Erhaltung und Untergang der Staatsverfassungen nach Plato, Aristoteles und Machiavelli. Breslau

  • Lutosławski, W. (1897), The Origin and Growth of Plato’s Logic. New York–Bombay

  • Lutosławski, W. (1899), Platon jako twórca idealizmu. Warszawa

  • Maciejewska, M. and Owczarski, W. (eds) (2018), Censorship, Politics and Oppression, Gdańsk

  • Meyer, P. (1897), ‘Lutosławski’s Theorie der Stylometrie auf die Platonische Frage angewendet’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 110: 171–217

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mróz, T. (2010), ‘Philebus interpreted by Paul Natorp and Wincenty Lutosławski’ in Dillon and Brisson (2010), 382–89

  • Mróz, T. (2011), ‘Some remarks on the nineteenth-century studies of the Euthyphro in Poland’, Peitho: examina antiqua 1: 191–202

  • Mróz, T. (2012), ‘On the reception of Plato’s political ideas in Polish philosophy of the first half of the 20th century’, Problemos 81: 124–30

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mróz, T. (2014), ‘Wincenty Lutosławski Platonic Studies: Plato as an inspiration for Polish messianism’, in Finamore and Berchman (2014), 185–98

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mróz, T. (2016), Selected Issues in the History of Polish Philosophy. Vilnius

  • Mróz, T. (2018), ‘Scottish–Polish cooperation on Plato at the turn of the twentieth century’, Journal of Scottish Philosophy 16.2: 125–45

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mróz, T. (2018a), ‘Polish studies on Plato under the oppression of censorship: Lutosławski–Lisiecki–Witwicki’ in Maciejewska and Owczarski (2018), 137–48

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mróz, T. (2021), Plato in Poland 1800–1950. Types of Reception – Authors – Problems. Baden-Baden

  • Mylik, M. (2005), Stefan Pawlicki. Warszawa

  • Pawlicki, S. (1917), Historya filozofii greckiej, vol. 2. Kraków

  • Pawłowski, A. (2004), ‘Wincenty Lutosławski (1863–1954): a forgotten father of stylometry’, Glottometrics 8: 83–9

  • Pawłowski, A. (2008), ‘Les aspects linguistiques dans l’oeuvre scientifique de Wincenty Lutosławski’, Organon 37, 149–62

  • Pawłowski, A. and Pacewicz, A. (2004), ‘Wincenty Lutosławski (1863–1954). Philosophe, helléniste ou fondateur sous-estimé de la stylométrie’, Historiographia Linguistica 31.2–3 : 423–47

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Popper, K. R. (1945), The Open Society and its Enemies. London

  • Sinko, T. (1925), Hellenizm Juliusza Słowackiego. Warszawa

  • Śliwa, M. (2004), ‘Bolesław Limanowski – twórca i badacz idei społecznych’, Annales Academiae Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Politologica II 22: 3–13

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Żechowski, Z.A. (1964), Socjologia Bolesława Limanowskiego, Poznań

  • Adams, S. (ed.) (2014), Cornelius Castoriadis: Key Concepts. London

  • Adams, S. and Smith, J.C.A. (eds.) (2019), Social Imaginaries: critical interventions. London

  • Althusser, L. et al. (2016), Reading Capital: the Complete Edition, tr. B. Brewster and D. Fernbach. London

  • Arendt, H. (1998), The Human Condition. Chicago

  • Árnason, J.P. and Murphy, P. (eds) (2001), Agon, Logos, Polis: the Greek Achievement and its Aftermath. Stuttgart

  • Azoulay, V. (2014a), ‘Repolitiser la Cité Grecque, Trente Ans Après’, Annales, 69 (3), 689–719

  • Azoulay, V. (2014b), ‘Repenser le politique en Grèce ancienne’, Annales, 69 (3), 605–26

  • Azoulay, V. and Ismard, P. (eds) (2011), Clisthène et Lycurgue d’Athènes: autour du politique dans la cité classique. Paris

  • Badiou, A. (1999), Manifesto for Philosophy, tr. N. Madarasz. Albany

  • Badiou, A. (2011), [1998], Metapolitics, tr. J. Barker. London

  • Badiou, A. (2012), La République de Platon: dialogue en un prologue, seize chapitres et un épilogue. Paris

  • Ball, T. and Bellamy, R. (eds), (2003), The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge

  • Blokker, P. (2019), ‘Political and Constitutional Imaginaries’, in Adams and Smith, (2020), 111–44

  • Bosteels, B. (2010), ‘Archipolitics, parapolitics, metapolitics’, in Deranty, (2010), 80–92

  • Bottici, C. (2007), A Philosophy of Political Myth. Cambridge

  • Bottici, C. (2014), Imaginal Politics: images beyond imagination and the imaginary. New York

  • Busino, G. (ed.), (1989), Autonomie et Autotransformation de la Société: la philosophie militante de Cornelius Castoriadis. Genève

  • Cartledge, P. (2016), ‘Finley’s democracy: a study in reception (and non-reception)’, in Jew, Osborne, and Scott, (2016), 210–26

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Castoriadis, C. (1979), Le Contenu du Socialisme. Paris

  • Castoriadis, C. (1983a), [1975], L’Institution imaginaire de la Société, fifth edn. Paris

  • Castoriadis, C. (1983b), ‘The Greek polis and the creation of democracy’, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 9.2: 79–115

  • Castoriadis, C. (1987), [1975], The Imaginary Institution of Society, tr. K. Blamey. Cambridge

  • Castoriadis, C. (1988–93), Political and Social Writings, ed. D. A. Curtis. 3 vols. Minneapolis

  • Castoriadis, C. (1991a), ‘The Greek polis and the creation of democracy’, in Castoriadis (1991b), 81–123

  • Castoriadis, C. (1991b), Philosophy, Politics, Autonomy, tr. D. A. Curtis. New York

  • Castoriadis, C. (1996), ‘The Athenian democracy: true and false questions’, in Lévêque and Vidal-Naquet (1996), 119–27

  • Castoriadis, C. (1997a), ‘The imaginary: creation in the social-historical domain’, in Castoriadis, (1997d), 3–18

  • Castoriadis, C. (1997b), ‘The Greek and the modern political imaginary’, in Castoriadis (1997d), 84–107

  • Castoriadis, C. (1997c), ‘The Retreat from autonomy: postmodernism as generalized conformity’, in Castoriadis, (1997d), 32–43

  • Castoriadis, C. (1997d), World in Fragments: Writings on Politics, Society, Psychoanalysis, and The Imagination, tr. D. A. Curtis. Stanford

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Castoriadis, C. (2001), ‘Aeschylean anthropogony and Sophoclean self-creation of Anthropos’, in J. P. Arnason and P. Murphy (2001), 138–54

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Castoriadis, C. (2002), [1999], On Plato’s Statesman, tr. D. A. Curtis. Stanford

  • Castoriadis, C. (2004), Ce Qui Fait la Grèce 1: D’Homère à Héraclite, ed. E. Escobar, M. Gondicas and P. Vernay. Paris

  • Castoriadis, C. (2008), Ce Qui Fait la Grèce 2: La cité et les lois, ed E. Escobar, M. Gondicas and P. Vernay. Paris

  • Castoriadis, C. (2011), Ce Qui Fait la Grèce 3: Thucydide, la force et le droit, ed E. Escobar, M. Gondicas and P. Vernay. Paris

  • Chambers, S. A. (2013), The Lessons of Rancière. New York

  • Chou, M. (2010), ‘Democracy in an age of tragedy: democracy, tragedy and paradox’, Critical Horizons, 11 (2), 289–313

  • Chou, M. (2012), Greek Tragedy and Contemporary Democracy. New York

  • Curtis, D. A. (ed.), (1997), The Castoriadis Reader. Oxford

  • Davis, O. (2010), Jacques Rancière. Cambridge

  • Delcroix, I. (2006), ‘Agir, c’est créer. Penser la démocratie en compagnie de Hannah Arendt et Cornélius Castoriadis’, in Klimis and van Eynde (2006), 223–56

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Deleuze, G. (1969), Logique du Sens. Paris

  • Deranty, J.-P. (ed.), (2010), Jacques Rancière: key concepts. Durham

  • Deranty, J.-P. and Ross, A. (eds) (2012), Jacques Rancière and the Contemporary Scene: the Philosophy of Radical Equality. London

  • Dikeç, M. (2007), Badlands of the Republic: Space, Politics, and Urban Policy. Oxford

  • Dosse, F. (2014), Castoriadis: Une Vie. Paris

  • Elliott, A. (2004), Social Theory since Freud: Traversing Social Imaginaries. London

  • Estlund, D. M. (2008), Democratic Authority: a Philosophical Framework. Princeton

  • Euben, J. P. (2000), ‘Arendt’s Hellenism’, in D. Villa (2000), 151–64

  • Fénelon, F. de S. de L. M. (1994), [1699], Telemachus, Son of Ulysses, tr. P. Riley. Cambridge

  • Finley, M. I. (1973), Democracy Ancient and Modern. London

  • Fontana, B. (ed.) (1988), Constant: Political writings. Cambridge

  • Gottraux, P. (1997), ‘Socialisme ou barbarie’: un engagement politique et intellectuel dans la France de l’après-guerre. Lausanne

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Graeber, D. (2013), The Democracy Project. London

  • Gregorio, F. (2006), ‘Le germe grec dans la philosophie de Castoriadis’, in Klimis and van Eynde, (2006), 45–61

  • Habermas, J. (1987), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, tr. F. Lawrence. Cambridge

  • Habermas, J. (2015), [2013], The Lure of Technocracy, tr. C. Cronin. Cambridge

  • Held, D. (2006), Models of Democracy. Stanford

  • Heller, A. (1989), ‘With Castoriadis to Aristotle; from Aristotle to Kant; from Kant to us’, in Busino (1989), 161–71

  • Irigaray, L. (1985), [1974], Speculum of the Other Woman, tr. G. C. Gill. Ithaca

  • James, I. (2012), The New French Philosophy. Cambridge

  • Jew, D., Osborne, R., and Scott, M. (eds) (2016), M. I. Finley: an Ancient Historian and his Impact. Cambridge

  • Kantorowicz, E. H. (1957), The King’s Two Bodies; a Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton

  • Kasimis, D. (2018), The Perpetual Immigrant and the Limits of Athenian Democracy. Cambridge

  • Kateb, G. (1995), ‘The questionable influence of Arendt (and Strauss)’, in Kielmansegg, Mewes, and Glaser-Schmidt (1995), 29–43

  • Keyt, D. (1991), ‘Aristotle’s theory of distributive justice’, in Keyt and Miller (1991), 238–78

  • Keyt, D. and Miller, F. D. (eds) (1991), A Companion to Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford

  • Kielmansegg, P., Mewes, H., and Glaser-Schmidt, E. (1995), Hannah Arendt and Leo Strauss: German Émigrés and American Political Thought After World War II. Cambridge

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Khilnani, S. (1993), Arguing Revolution: the Intellectual Left in Postwar France. New Haven

  • Khilnani, S. (2003) ‘French Marxism – existentialism to structuralism’, in T. Ball and R. Bellamy (2003), 299–318

  • Klimis, S. (2014), ‘Tragedy’, in S. Adams (2014), 205–18

  • Klimis, S. and Eynde, L. van (eds) (2006), L’imaginaire selon Castoriadis: thèmes et enjeux. Bruxelles

  • Klooger, J. (2009), Castoriadis: Psyche, Society, Autonomy. Leiden

  • Kristeva, J. (1977), Polylogue. Paris

  • Labelle, G. (2001), ‘Two refoundation projects of democracy in contemporary French philosophy’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 27 (4): 75–103

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lane, M. S. (1999), ‘Plato, Popper, Strauss and Utopianism: Open Secrets?’, HPQ, 16 (2): 119–42

  • Lane, M. S. (2001), Plato’s Progeny: How Plato and Socrates Still Captivate the Modern Mind. London

  • Lefort, C. (1988), [1986], Democracy and Political Theory, tr. D. Macey. Cambridge

  • Lefort, C. (2007a), ‘Démocratie et avènement d’un “lieu vide”’, in C. Lefort, (2007b), 461–9

  • Lefort, C. (2007b), Le Temps Présent: écrits 1945–2005. Paris

  • Leonard, M. (2005), Athens in Paris: Ancient Greece and the Political in Post-War French Thought. Oxford

  • Leonard, M. (ed.) (2010), Derrida and Antiquity. Oxford

  • Lévêque, P. and Vidal-Naquet, P. (1996), [1964], Cleisthenes the Athenian, tr. D. A. Curtis. Amherst NY

  • Lloyd, G. E. R. (1966), Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought. Cambridge

  • Loraux, N. (1976), ‘Problèmes Grecs de la Démocratie Moderne’, Critique 32 (355 (Décembre)): 1276–87

  • Loraux, N. (1993), ‘Éloge d’anachronisme en histoire’, Le Genre Humain (27): 23–39

  • Loraux, N. (2001), [1997], The Divided City: On Memory and Forgetting in Ancient Athens, tr. C. Pache and J. Fort. New York

  • Loraux, N. (2006), [1993], The Invention of Athens, tr. A. Sheridan. New York

  • Marchart, O. (2007), Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh

  • Marshall, D. L. (2010), ‘The polis and its analogues in the thought of Hannah Arendt’, Modern Intellectual History, 7 (1): 123–49

  • May, T. (2008), The Political Thought of Jacques Rancière: Creating Equality. Edinburgh

  • May, T. (2009), ‘Rancière in South Carolina’, in Rockhill and Watts (2009), 105–19

  • Mecchia, G. (2009), ‘The classics and critical theory in postmodern France’, in G. Rockhill and P. Watts (2009), 67–82

  • Méchoulan, E. (2009), ‘Sophisticated continuities and historical discontinuities, or, why not Protagoras?’, in Rockhill and Watts (2009), 55–66

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Memos, C. (2014), Castoriadis and Critical Theory: Crisis, Critique and Radical Alternatives. Basingstoke

  • Miller, P. A. (2016), Diotima at the Barricades: French Feminists Read Plato. Oxford

  • Mouzakitis, A. (2013), ‘Chaos and creation in Castoriadis’s interpretation of Greek thought’, in Straume and Baruchello (2013), 31–48

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mufti, A. R. (2003), ‘Reading Jacques Rancière’s Ten Theses on Politics: after September 11th’, Theory and Event, 6 (4)

  • Nippel, W. (2016), ‘Finley’s impact on the continent’, in Jew, Osborne and Scott, (2016), 270–87

  • Nordmann, C. (2006), Bourdieu, Rancière: la politique entre sociologie et philosophie. Paris

  • Norman, L. F. (2011), The Shock of the Ancient: Literature and History in Early Modern France. Chicago

  • Panagia, D. (2010), ‘“Partage du sensible”: the distribution of the sensible’, in Deranty (2010), 95–103

  • Partenie, C. (ed.) (2009), Plato’s Myths. Cambridge

  • Pébarthe, C. (2012), ‘Faire l’histoire de la démocratie athénienne avec Cornelius Castoriadis’, REA, 114 (1): 139–57

  • Poirier, N. (2011), L’Ontologie Politique de Castoriadis: création et institution. Paris

  • Poirier, N. (2015), Cornelius Castoriadis et Claude Lefort: l’expérience démocratique. Lormont

  • Popper, K. R. (1966), [1945], The Open Society and Its Enemies. Volume One: the Spell of Plato, fifth edn. London

  • Rae, G. (2020), Poststructuralist Agency: the subject in twentieth-century theory. Edinburgh

  • Rancière, J. (1991), [1987], The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation, tr. K. Ross. Stanford

  • Rancière, J. (1995), La Mésentente: politique et philosophie. Paris

  • Rancière, J. (1996), ‘Le concept d’anachronisme et la vérité de l’historien’, L’Inactuel, 6, 53–68

  • Rancière, J. (1998), ‘Dix thèses sur la politique’, (1998), 223–54

  • Rancière, J. (1999), [1995], Dis-agreement: Lolitics and Philosophy, tr. J. Rose. Minneapolis

  • Rancière, J. (2001), ‘Ten theses on politics’, Theory and Event, 5 (3)

  • Rancière, J. (2003), [1983], The Philosopher and his Poor, tr. A. Parker. Durham

  • Rancière, J. (2006), [2005], Hatred of Democracy, tr. S. Corcoran. London

  • Rancière, J. (2007), [1983], Le Philosophe et ses Pauvres. Paris

  • Rancière, J. (2009), Dissensus: on Politics and Aesthetics, tr. S. Corcoran. London

  • Rancière, J. (2011), [1974], Althusser’s Lesson, tr. E. Battista. London

  • Riesbeck, D. J. (2016), Aristotle on Political Community. Cambridge

  • Ross, K. (2002), May ’68 and its Afterlives. Chicago

  • Rockhill, G. and Watts, P. (eds) (2009), Jacques Rancière: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Durham

  • Rowett, C. (2016), ‘Why the philosopher kings will believe the noble lie’, OSAP 50: 67–101

  • Ruprecht, L. A. (2001), ‘Why the Greeks’, in Arnason and Murphy (2001), 29–55

  • Schaap, A. (2011), ‘Enacting the right to have rights: Jacques Rancière’s critique of Hannah Arendt’, European Journal of Political Theory, 10 (1): 22–45

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schaap, A. (2012), ‘Hannah Arendt and the Philosophical Repression of Politics’, in Deranty and Ross (2012), 145–66

  • Schnapp, A. and Vidal-Naquet, P. (eds) (1969), Journal de la Commune Étudiante: textes et documents, novembre 1967-juin 1968. Paris

  • Schofield, M. (2009), ‘Fraternité, inégalité, la parole de Dieu’, in C. Partenie (2009), 101–15

  • Schrift, A. D. (2006), Twentieth-century French Philosophy: Key Themes and Thinkers. Malden

  • Smith, J.C.A. (2019), ‘History, Civilizations, Imaginaries’, in Adams and Smith (2019), 77–110

  • Smith, S. B. (ed.), (2009), The Cambridge Companion to Leo Strauss. Cambridge

  • Straume, I. S. and Baruchello, G. (eds) (2013), Creation, Rationality and Autonomy: Essays on Cornelius Castoriadis. Copenhagen

  • Strauss, L. (1977), The City and Man. Chicago

  • Strauss, L. (1989), The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism. An Introduction to the Thought of Leo Strauss: Essays and Lectures, ed. T. L. Pangle. Chicago

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stavrakakis, Y. (2007), The Lacanian Left: Psychoanalysis, Theory, Politics. Edinburgh

  • Taylor, C. (2004), Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham

  • Tompkins, D. P. (2016), ‘The Making of Moses Finley’, in Jew, Osborne and Scott (2016), 13–30

  • Trott, A. M. (2012), ‘Rancière and Aristotle: parapolitics, part-y politics, and the institution of perpetual politics’, Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 26 (4): 627–46

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vernant, J.-P. (1960), ‘Le mythe hésiodique des races. Essai d’analyse structurale’, RHR, 157: 21–54

  • Vernant, J.-P. (1982), [1962], The Origins of Greek Thought. Ithaca

  • Vidal-Naquet, P. (1989), ‘Souvenirs à Batons Rompus: sur Cornelius Castoriadis et Socialisme ou Barbarie’, in G. Busino, (1989), 17–26

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vidal-Naquet, P. (1998), Mémoires: le trouble et la lumière, 1955–1998, vol 2. Paris

  • Vidal-Naquet, P. (2002), ‘Foreword: Castoriadis and the Statesman’, in Castoriadis (2002), xiii–xviii

  • Villa, D.R. (ed.) (2000), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge

  • Zuckert, C. (2009), ‘Strauss’s return to premodern thought’, in Smith (2009), 93–118

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 32 32 3
Full Text Views 1 1 0
PDF Views & Downloads 0 0 0