18 Lycurgus of Sparta in the Imperial Age: Plutarch, Pausanias, and Lucian

In: Plutarch and his Contemporaries
Author:
Martina Gatto
Search for other papers by Martina Gatto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

This paper investigates Lycurgus’ representation in imperial literature using a comparative approach, focusing primarily on Plutarch, Pausanias, and Lucian.

Pausanias gives a general overview of Lycurgus in his historical introduction to Laconia, following the Herodotean model closely. A general comparison between Plutarch and Pausanias sheds light on some interesting differences between the two accounts. For instance, Pausanias places Lycurgus in the Agiad royal house, following Herodotus, whereas Plutarch prefers the more well-known Euripontid genealogy. Moreover, according to Pausanias, Lycurgus substituted the human sacrifice with the whipping of ephebes, saving some young Spartans from certain death. Though Plutarch greatly stresses Lycurgus’ generosity, he expresses no knowledge of the substitution concerning this deadly ritual.

Lucian’s Anαcharsis, on the other hand, represents one of the rare cases in which topical motifs related to Sparta’s ideal representation are criticized and even mocked: this “reversal” humour involves the practices of the agoge and their inventor, Lycurgus. Through a technique repeatedly used by Lucian, Solon is asked a series of questions and listens to objections from the barbarian Anacharsis which often sound comical because they are expressed from an unusual point of view. Lucian and Pausanias, then, offer different perspectives on Lycurgus. The chapter compares their outlooks with the standard, idealized image of Plutarch’s Lycurgus.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 227 177 10
Full Text Views 5 2 1
PDF Views & Downloads 9 4 1