Chapter 7 Perfect Performance with Technology

In: Technology and Learning
Authors:
Rosemary Sage
Search for other papers by Rosemary Sage in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Riccarda Matteucci
Search for other papers by Riccarda Matteucci in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

The Top Hat Survey (2020, https://tophat.com/teaching-resources) of 3,500 Higher Education American and Canadian students finds only 8% deem online learning satisfactory for them. Informal discussions with British students show a similar result. They miss the bonding coming from learning together in the same space, but suggest that the way content is communicated is a big factor. A survey carried out by the Association for Project Management (2020) identifies communication, engagement and management as the vital workplace competencies to survive and thrive. Professor Steven Pinker (September 2021) has also been tweeting this message in response to the Woke movement silencing people. However, communication is rarely a subject for formal study as there are few people trained in its use. This chapter considers how technology supports both learning of content and the development of communication competencies. It defines and locates these before looking at how to present information via technology in ways that are effective. The problems that people have with online learning are mostly to do with how content is presented and delivered.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Technology and Learning

Issues Vital to Address

  • Association for Project Management. (2020). Salary and market trends survey 2020: APM research report. https://www.apm.org.uk/media/44073/apm_salary_and_market_trends_survey_2020_report.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bradbury, N. A. (2016). Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more? Advanced Physiological Education, 40(1), 509513. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00109.2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keyton, J. (2002). Communicating in groups: Building relationships for effective decision making (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

  • Keyton, J. (2010). Case studies for organizational communication: Understanding communication processes. Oxford University Press.

  • Keyton, J. (2011). Communication and organizational culture: A key to understanding work experience. Sage.

  • Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Wadsworth.

  • Sage, R. (2000). Class talk: Successful learning through effective communication. Bloomsbury.

  • Sage, R. (2020). Speechless: Understanding education. Buckingham University Press.

  • Sage, R., Rogers, J., & Cwenar, S. (2012). A communication course for teachers: Research on the impact on practice. IDIAL EU Project 2009–2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schaffhauser, D. (2020, November 16). Survey: Interactive, in-class engagement makes a difference to students. Campus Technology. https://campustechnology.com/articles/2020/11/16/survey-interactive-in-class-engagement-makes-a-difference-to-students.aspx

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wallach, G. P., & Miller, L. (1988). Language intervention and academic success. Little, Brown.

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 81 68 9
Full Text Views 1 1 1
PDF Views & Downloads 3 1 1