The 2022 Chat Takeover!

Giving ChatGPT3 a Go To Assess Education for Us

In: Technology and Learning
Authors:
Riccarda Matteucci
Search for other papers by Riccarda Matteucci in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Rosemary Sage
Search for other papers by Rosemary Sage in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Type:
Chapter
Pages:
258–287
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004688612_020

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00
Add to Cart
Redeem Access Token

Abstract

Since the book was started in 2022, the new OpenAI has become a big name in technology. This artificial intelligence (AI) company has made realistic image generators, 3D-model creators and now (Generative Pretrained Transformer 3) ChatGPT3, ChatGPT4, ChatGPT Craiyon, with power to pass legal exams, write themed articles and even code full websites. It has produced college essays, drafted legal contracts, written poetry and songs and even a government report, providing a useful personal assistant. In January 2024, the Japanese author Rie Kudan won the top prize award for literature for her novel Tokyo Sympathy Tower and she admitted to have used the Chat GPT3 to write most parts. Only at 1 year old this tool is already winning a prize a human being would take a lifetime to achieve. As educators we should take this news seriously and reflect on its effects. These AI s do not think like humans. They are known as large language models (LLM) and have read huge amounts of data equivalent to billions of documents. Calculating what patterns of words or images are plausible they make response to their demands with impressive results. ChatGPT has people talking about AI power. The company has announced a major upgrade to the software behind ChatGPT. While the programme has been running on technology known as GPT3, now GPT4 is launching, so these two systems are the internet’s best-known language-processing AI models. Since ChatGPT was announced, it has been banned in some schools and colleges to avoid cheating, but utilised by major companies like Microsoft. Now, a pay-to-use version called ChatGPT Pro is available. This offers users added benefits for $20 a month, including priority access, faster load times and now entry to GPT4. What is ChatGPT? How does it work? Is this really the future of AI? We have attempted to answer these questions and provide examples and analysis in Appendix A of our ChatGPT experiences, soon after the November 2022 launch. As this innovation is likely to quickly change the format of teaching, we are inserting information on how it is used as the background for technology and learning.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Technology and Learning

Issues Vital to Address

Cover Technology and Learning
E-Book ISBN:
9789004688612
Publisher:
Brill
Print Publication Date:
25 May 2024

  • Bratsberg, B., & Rogeberg, O. (2018). Flynn effect and its reversal are both environmentally caused. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. National Library of Medicine.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dahmani, L., & Bohbot, V. (2020). Habitual use of GPS negatively impacts spatial memory during self-guided navigation. Scientific Reports, 10, Article ID: 6310.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Flynn, J. (2012). Are we getting smarter? Rising IQ in the twenty-first century. CUP.

  • Haidt, J. (2023). The teenage mental-health epidemic began around 2012. New York University.

  • InfoQ. (2020). OpenAI announces GPT-3 AI language model with 175 billion parameters. https://www.infoq.com/news/2020/06/openai-gpt3-language-model/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kaczmarek, B., & Stencel, M. (2018). Third mode of thinking. The New Educational Review, 53(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2018.53.3.24

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kobel, N. (2023). GPT-4 shouldn’t worry anybody – We just need to be better. https://www.itpro.co.uk/technology/artificial-intelligence-ai/370292/gpt-4-shouldnt-worry-anybody-we-just-need-to-be-better

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Oppenheimer, R. (1965). The trinity test. Atomic Archives.

  • Papenfuss, M. (2023, March 17). Creepy Microsoft Bing Chatbot urges Tech Columnist to leave his wife. https://www.google.com

  • PR Newswire. (2023, April 4). Survey Finds 6 in 10 hiring managers have received more high quality applications since ChatGPT launch. Resume Builder.com. https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Raine, L., Anderson, J., & Vogels, E. (2021). Experts doubt ethical AI design will be broadly adopted as the norm within the next decade. http://www.pewresearch.org

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Romero, A. (2021). Understanding GDP3. https://towardsdatascience.com/understanding-gpt-3-in-5-minutes-7fe35c3a1e52

  • Sage, R. (2000). Class talk: Successful learning through effective communication. Bloomsbury.

  • Sage, R., Sage, L., & Kaczmarek, B. (2023). A UK study of thinking and language expression. The New Educational Review.

  • World Bank. (2019). The education crisis: Being in school is not the same as learning.

  • Xiang, C. (2023, March 30). Man dies by suicide after talking with AI Chatbot. https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkadgm/man-dies-by-suicide-after-talking-with-ai-chatbot-widow-says

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bhopal, K. (2001). Intercultural communication and the media. Sage Publications.

  • Chen, Y., & Starosta, W. J. (1998). Intercultural communication competence in the workplace. Sage Publications.

  • Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (1997). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication. Sage Publications.

  • Kuo, Y.-H., & Hu, P.-J. (2015). The challenges and strategies of intercultural communication in the classroom. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 44(2), 123–138.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Liu, Y., & Rigg, J. (2012). Intercultural communication in multinational corporations. Routledge.

  • Lin, J., Fang, X., & Lin, Z. (2017). The challenges of intercultural communication in healthcare settings. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 46(3), 227–239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2017). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication. Routledge.

  • Hall, E. T. (2017). The hidden dimension. Anchor.

  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8.

  • Kim, Y. Y. (2015). Communication and cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. Routledge.

  • Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., McDaniel, E. R., & Roy, C. S. (2016). Intercultural communication: A reader. Cengage Learning.

  • Gudykunst, W. B. (2017). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication. Sage Publications.

  • Kim, Y. Y. (2016). Communication and cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. Routledge.

  • Martin, J., & Nakayama, T. (2022). Intercultural communication in contexts (8th ed. Prek-12 Higher-Ed). McGraw Hill.

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 630 617 329
Full Text Views 9 9 3
PDF Views & Downloads 4 2 0