Chapter 2 India’s National Green Tribunal

Quo Vadis?

In: Environmental Courts and Tribunals in Asia-Pacific
Author:
Gitanjali Nain Gill
Search for other papers by Gitanjali Nain Gill in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

This chapter considers India’s National Green Tribunal (‘NGT’) quo vadis (where are you going?), tracing its journey through the lens of the core values evaluative performance framework from an ‘outsider’ perspective. The International Framework for Court Excellence (‘IFCE’) promotes ten interlinked and interdependent core values that support courts to deliver justice and quality court services. These core values are equality before law, accessibility, fairness, impartiality, judicial independence, competence, integrity, transparency, timeliness, and certainty. These values, as the hallmarks of effective judiciaries, are a repository of both power and procedure within the decision-making process to secure access to environmental justice.

India’s NGT is officially described as a ‘specialized body equipped with necessary expertise to handle environmental disputes involving multi-disciplinary issues’. This chapter critically analyses the effectiveness of the NGT in adhering to and promoting the core values in its performance, processes, and working practices to deliver environmental justice. It acknowledges the importance of first looking backward before looking forward thereby avoiding the trap of failing to learn the lessons of history.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Environmental Courts and Tribunals in Asia-Pacific

Best Practices, Challenges and the Way Forward

Series:  Brill's Asian Law Series, Volume: 13
  • Amirante, D., ‘Environmental Courts in Comparative Perspective: Preliminary Reflections on the National Green Tribunal of India’, (2012) 29(2) Pace Environmental Law Review, pp. 44169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anleu, S. Roach & Mack, K., ‘Impartiality and emotion in judicial work’ in Handbook for Judicial Officers (Judicial Commission of New South Wales, 2021), pp. 4753.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anonymous, ‘“Wholly Disappointed”- sc Stays ngt Order Forming Panel on Assam’s Baghjan Oil Well Fire’ (2021), available at: https://www.firstpost.com/india/wholly-disappointed-sc-stays-ngt-order-forming-panel-on-assams-baghjan-oil-well-fire-9770701.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anonymous, ‘Congress Raises Issue of Appointment of Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel as ngt Chairman in Lok Sabha’ (2018), available at: https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2018/jul/26/congress-raises-issue-of-appointment-of-justice-adarsh-kumar-goel-as-ngt-chairman-in-lok-sabha-1848938.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blavatnik School of Government, ‘Building Integrity’ (2017), available at: https://integrity.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/integrity/documents/media/institutional_integrity_manifesto_bi_workshop.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chowdhury, N. & Srivastava, N., ‘The National Green Tribunal in India: examining the question of jurisdiction’ (2018) 21(2) Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 190216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • cm Recommendation (2010) cm/Rec12 on Judges: Independence, Efficiency and Responsibilities.

  • Danelski, D., ‘Conflict and its Resolution in the Supreme Court’ (1967) 11(1) Journal of Conflict Resolution, pp. 7186.

  • Department for the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, Independence and Impartiality of the Judicial System: Thematic Factsheet (Council of Europe, 2020).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Divan, S. & Rosencranz A., Environmental Law and Policy in India: Cases and Materials (Oxford University Press, 2022).

  • Dutta, R., ‘Ministerial Panel questioning ngt mandate, but forgets the body is always on centre’s side’ (2020), available at: https://theprint.in/opinion/ministerial-panel-questioning-ngt-mandate-but-forgets-the-body-is-always-on-centres-side/571184/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dutta, R., ‘Woes of the ngt: Are the Recent Appointments Unconstitutional?’ (2019), available at: https://www.barandbench.com/columns/new-appointments-national-green-tribunal-unconstitutional-judicial-independence.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Commission, Quality of Public Administration: A Toolbox for Practitioners (European Commission’s Inter-service group on Public Administration Quality and Innovation, 2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fraser, N., ‘Recognition without Ethics?’ (2001) 18(2–3) Theory, Culture & Society, pp. 2142.

  • Galanter, M. & Ram, V., ‘Suo motu intervention and the Indian judiciary’ in G. N. Rosenberg et al. (eds.) A Qualified Hope: The Indian Supreme Court and Progressive Social Change (Cambridge University Press, 2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gill, G.N., ‘Environmental justice in India: The National Green Tribunal and Expert Members’ (2016) 5(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 175205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gill, G.N., ‘Mapping the Power Struggles within the National Green Tribunal of India: The Rise and Fall?’ (2020) 7(1) Asian Journal of Law and Society, pp. 85126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gill, G.N., ‘National Green Tribunal and the Environment’ in P. Cullet, S. Koonan & L. Bhullar, Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Natural Resources Law in India (Oxford University Press, 2023) (forthcoming).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gill, G.N., ‘Precautionary Principle, its Interpretation and Application by the Indian Judiciary: “When I Use a Word It Means Just What I Choose It to Mean – Neither More Nor Less” Humpty Dumpty’ (2019) 21 (4) Environmental Law Review, pp. 292308.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gill, G.N., ‘The International Outreach of the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales: Diffusion in India’ in E. Fisher & B. Preston (eds.), An Environmental Court in Action: Function, Doctrine and Process (Hart, 2022), pp. 11332.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gill, G.N., ‘The National Green Tribunal: Evolving Adjudicatory Dimensions’ (2019) 49(2–3) Environmental Policy and Law, pp. 15362.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gill, G.N., Environmental Justice in India: The National Green Tribunal, (Routledge, 2017).

  • Groves, M., ‘Clarity and Complexity in the Bias Rule’ (2021) 44(2) Melbourne University Law Review, pp. 565601.

  • International Consortium for Court Excellence, International Framework for Court Excellence (3rd ed, 2020), available at: https://www.courtexcellence.com/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kamp, G.N.V., ‘The Conditioning Role of Judicial Independence in the Exercise of Judicial Review’ (2021) 9(2) Journal of Law and Courts, pp. 26182.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirby, N., ‘Institutional Integrity: Its Meaning and Value’ (2022) 25 Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, pp. 80934.

  • Knoppers, L.L., Constructing Cromwell: Ceremony, Portrait, and Print, 1645–1661 (Cambridge University Press, 2000).

  • Law Commission of India, 186th Report on Proposal to Constitute Environment Courts (2003).

  • Legal India, sc Slams Poor Facilities for Green Tribunal’ (2012), available at: https://www.legalindia.com/news/sc-slams-poor-facilities-for-green-tribunal.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mazoomdar, J., ‘Against environmental clearances: Green tribunal cited delay in filing as reason to dismiss every second plea’ (2021), available at: https://indianexpress.com/article/india/green-tribunal-cited-delay-in-filing-as-reason-to-dismiss-every-second-plea-7208897/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Preston, B.J., ‘Benefits of Judicial Specialization in Environmental Law: The Land and Environment Court of New South Wales as a Case Study’ (2012) 29 Pace Environmental Law Review, pp. 396440.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Preston, B.J., ‘Characteristics of Successful Environmental Courts’ (2014) 26(3) Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 36593.

  • Preston, B.J., ‘The Many Facets of a Cutting-Edge Court: A Study of the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales’ in E. Fisher and B. Preston (eds.), An Environmental Court in Action: Function, Doctrine and Process (Hart, 2022), pp. 128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ramesh, J., ‘Turning a Decade Old, ngt Faces Some Tough Questions?’ (The Hindu, 2020), available at: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/turning-a-decade-old-ngt-faces-some-tough-questions/article62194300.ece.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ramesh, M., ‘Nearly a Decade Old, Is the ngt Losing Its Bite?’ (2019), available at:https://thewire.in/environment/nearly-a-decade-old-is-the-national-green-tribunal-losing-its-bite.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rengarajan, S. et al., ‘National Green Tribunal of India – an observation from environmental judgements’ (2018) 25(12) Environmental Science and Pollution Research, pp. 113138.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosencranz, A. & Goyal, M., ‘Some Questions about Justice Goel’s Tenure at the ngt (2018), available at: https://thewire.in/environment/national-green-tribunal-chief-adarsh-goel.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosencranz. A. & Sahu, G., ‘Assessing the National Green Tribunal after Four Years’ (2014) 5 Journal of Indian Law and Society, pp. 191200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sahu, G., ‘Whither the ngt?’ (2019), available at: https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/environment/whither-the-national-green-tribunal--66879.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schlosberg, D., Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movement and Nature (Oxford University Press, 2007).

  • Schrefler, L., ‘Reflections on the Different Roles of Expertise in Regulatory Policy Making’ in M. Ambrus et al. (eds), The Role of ‘Experts’ in International and European Decision-Making Processes: Advisors, Decision Makers or Irrelevant Actors? (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 6381.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sheahan, T., ‘Use of adr in the New South Wales and in the Land and Environment Court’ (Australasian Conference of Planning and Environment Courts and Tribunals, 2010), available at: https://www.lec.nsw.gov.au/lec/publications-and-resources/judicial-speeches-and-papers.html#Past2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shrader-Frechette, K., Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy (Oxford University Press, 2002).

  • Shrivastava, K.S., ‘Green Tribunal Gets Short Shrift’ (Down to Earth, 2012), available at: http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/green-tribunal-gets-short-shrift-38426.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shrotria, S., ‘Environmental justice: Is the National Green Tribunal of India effective?’ (2015) 17(3) Environmental Law Review, pp. 16988.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stein, L.P., ‘Specialist Environmental Courts: the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, Australia’ (2002) 4(1) Environmental Law Review, pp. 525.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations Environment Programme, Environmental Courts and Tribunals: A Guide for Policymakers (2022), available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/environmental-courts-and-tribunals-2021-guide-policy-makers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations Environment Programme, Environmental Rule of Law: First Global Report (2019), available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/assessment/environmental-rule-law-first-global-report#:~:text=NAIROBI%E2%80%94%2024%20January%202019%20%E2%80%93%20The,over%20the%20last%20four%20decades.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Commentary on the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct, available at: https://www.unodc.org/documents/nigeria/publications/Otherpublications/Commentry_on_the_Bangalore_principles_of_Judicial_Conduct.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warnock, C., ‘The Land and Environment Court of New South Wales: Normative Legitimacy and Adjudicative Integrity’ in E. Fisher & B. Preston (eds.), An Environmental Court in Action: Function, Doctrine and Process (Hart, 2022), 289306.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Abhisht Kusum Gupta v Government of nct 2021 scc OnLine ngt 854.

  • a.p.Pollution Control Board v.m. v. Nayudu (1999) 2 scc 718; (2001) 2 scc 62.

  • Ashok Kumar v Government of nct 2016 scc OnLine ngt 3563.

  • Ashwini Kumar Dubey v Union of India, ngt Judgment, 18 January 2022.

  • Asim Sarode v. Maharashtra Pollution Control Board,ngt Judgment, 6 September 2014.

  • Bhopal Gas Peedith Mahila Udyog Sangathan v. Union of India (2012) 8 scc 326.

  • Bonani Kakkar v Oil India Limited (2020) scc OnLine ngt 954.

  • Citizens for Green Doon v Union of India, ngt Order, 8 October 2018.

  • Citizens for Green Doon v Union of India (2021) scc OnLine scc 1074.

  • Compliance of Municipal Solid Waste Management Rules 2016, ngt Order, 30 August 2018.

  • Court on its own motion v. State of Karnataka, ngt Order, 6 December 2018.

  • C. Murugan v. Member Secretary Karnataka (2015) scc OnLine ngt 8.

  • Director General (Road Development)nhaiv Aam Aadmi Lokmanch (2021) 11 scc 566.

  • Federation of Rainbow Warriors v Union of India,ngt Order, 21 August 2018.

  • Forward Foundation v State of Karnataka, ngt Judgment, 10 September 2015.

  • Gajubha Jadeja Jesar v Union of India 2022 scc OnLine sc 993.

  • Goa Foundation vngt, Principal Bench air 2023 Bom 1 (fb).

  • Goa Foundation v. Union of India, ngt Judgment, 18 July 2013.

  • Golden Straight Corporation v Nipponykk (The ‘Golden Victory’) [2007] ukhl 12.

  • Gurpreet Singh Bagga v. Ministry of Environment and Forests (2016) scc OnLine ngt 92.

  • Hanuman Laxman Aroskar v Union of India (2019) scc OnLine 441.

  • Hariram Singh v State of Biharngt Order, 14 January 2019.

  • Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (1986) 3 scc 212.

  • Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v National Ganga River Basin Authority,ngt Judgment, 10 December 2015 (Ganges river).

  • In re: News item published in The Tribune dated 16.01.2023 titled “Joshimath disaster a warning for Mussoorie”, ngt Order, 31 January 2023.

  • In Re: Gas Leak atlgPolymers Chemical Plant inr. rVenkatapuram Village Visakhapatnam in Andhra Pradesh, ngt Order, 8 May 2020.

  • Jan Chetna v. MoEFF, ngt Judgment, 9 February 2012.

  • Jitendra Singh v MoEFF &cc (2020) 20 scc 581.

  • Jitendra Singh v MoEFF &cc (2019) scc OnLine ngt 878.

  • Kantha Vibhag Yuva Koli Samaj Parivartan Trust v State of Gujarat (2022) scc OnLine sc 120.

  • Kishan Lal Gera v. State of Haryana 2015 all (i) ngt reporter (2) (delhi) 286.

  • Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Bar Association v Union of India (2022) scc OnLine 639.

  • Mahendra Pandey v Union of India, ngt Judgment, 8 December 2017.

  • Manoj Mishra v. Union of Indiangt Order, 26 July 2018.

  • Mantri Techzone (P) Ltd v Forward Foundation (2019) 18 scc 494.

  • Manoj Misra v Union of India, ngt Judgment, 13 January 2015 (Yamuna river).

  • M. C. Mehta v. Union of India (1986) 2 scc 176.

  • MoEF V Nirma Ltd, Supreme Court Order, 4 August 2014.

  • M/S Sterlite Industries v Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, ngt Judgment, 8 August 2013.

  • Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v Ankita Sinha (2021) scc OnLine sc 897.

  • ngtBar Association (Western Zone) v Union of India (2018) scc OnLine sc 3798.

  • North East Affected Area Development Society v Union of India 2015 scc OnLine ngt 1564.

  • Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti v Union of India, ngt Judgment, 22 February 2021.

  • Rajeev Suri vdda 2021 scc OnLine sc 7.

  • Roger Mathew v. South India Bank Ltd (2019) scc OnLine sc 1456.

  • R (Nadarajah and Abdi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] ewca Civ 1363.

  • R. R. Raja v State of Jharkhandngt Order, 3 May 2019.

  • Samir Mehta v Union of India, ngt Judgment, 2 August 2016.

  • Sandeep Mittal v MoEFF&cc,ngt Judgment, 1 February 2021.

  • Sanghar Zuber Ismail v MoEFF &cc (2021) scc OnLine sc 669.

  • Society for Protection of Environment and Biodiversity v. Union of India, ngt Judgment, 8 November 2017.

  • S Pugazhendhi v Tamil Nadu State Pollution Control Board, ngt Judgment, 5 March 2021.

  • Sridevi Datla v Union of India (2021) 5 scc 321.

  • State of Meghalaya v All Dimasa Students Union (2019) 8 scc 197.

  • State ofm.pv Centre for Environment Protection Research and Development (2020) scc OnLine sc 687.

  • State ofupv Uday Education and Welfare Trust (2022) scc OnLine sc 1469.

  • Talli Gram Panchayat v Union of India (2022) scc OnLine sc 902.

  • Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board v Sterlite Industries (2019) 19 scc 479.

  • Tanaji Balasaheb Gambhire v. Union of India (2016) scc OnLine ngt 4213.

  • Tejinder Kumar Jolly v State of Uttarkhand (2021) scc OnLine sc 1077.

  • t.n.Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India, Supreme Court Order, 5 November 2015.

  • Tribunal on its Own Motion v Secretary of State, ngt Judgment, 4 April 2014.

  • Union of India v. R. Gandhi (2010) 6 s.c.r 857.

  • Ultimate V Carbon v District Environmental Engineer (2021) 10 scc 655.

  • Vardhman Kaushik v Union of India and Sanjay Kulshreshtha v Union of India, ngt Judgment, 7 April 2015.

  • Vimal Bhai v. Union of India High Court of Delhi M 15895/2005 in wp(C) 17682/2005.

  • Wilfred J v Ministry of Environment and Forests, ngt Judgment, 17 July 2014.

  • Ministry of Environment and Forests Notification, May 2011, s.o.1003 E. 100.

  • Ministry of Environment and Forests Notification, 17 August 2011, s.o.1908 E.

  • MoEFCC, Government of India, Notification, 17 August 2011, so 1908 E.

  • ngt/pb/157/2013/331, 20 December.

  • ngt/pb/266/2013/281.

  • ngt/pb/Pr/cb/97/2014/M78.

  • ngt/pb/266/2015/299.

  • Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience and other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2017 (Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance vide notification dated 1 June 2017).

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 62 62 2
Full Text Views 3 3 0
PDF Views & Downloads 9 9 0