Chapter 4 The New Zealand Environment Court

Past, Present, and Future

In: Environmental Courts and Tribunals in Asia-Pacific
Authors:
Laurie Newhook
Search for other papers by Laurie Newhook in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ceri Warnock
Search for other papers by Ceri Warnock in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alan Webb
Search for other papers by Alan Webb in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

This chapter provides a comprehensive account of the legal character of the specialist Environment Court of New Zealand. It explains the origins of the Court and addresses in detail its current powers and functions, including the processes that it employs to foster access to environmental justice. The New Zealand Government is currently proposing significant reforms to resource management law. The chapter provides an overview of the proposed changes and explains how they are likely to alter the functions of the Court. Some proposals are likely to increase access to the Court, but the Government has also proposed reducing the Court’s role in resolving disputes concerning the content of local resource management plans. Whilst it is unusual in other jurisdictions for courts to play a role in crafting plans and policy instruments, this function has been a feature of the New Zealand Environment Court and its predecessors for almost a century, and the current proposals risk diminishing access to justice in the New Zealand context. The chapter critiques the current proposals and concludes by speculating how the Court might adapt to address future legal and environmental challenges, so remaining relevant in a changing world.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Environmental Courts and Tribunals in Asia-Pacific

Best Practices, Challenges and the Way Forward

Series:  Brill's Asian Law Series, Volume: 13
  • Dalziel, Lianne, ‘Housing Intensification – one size does not fit all’ (Otago Daily Times, 20th September 2022) available at: https://www.odt.co.nz/star-news/star-opinion/lianne-dalziel-housing-intensification-one-size-does-not-fit-all.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Farmer, JA, ‘Town Planning Policy and the Law – A Trip in Wonderland with the Chief Justice’ [1970] nzlj 542.

  • Gill, Gitanjali Nain, ‘Environmental Justice in India: The National Green Tribunal and Expert Members’ (2016) 5 Transnational Environmental Law 175.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grant, Malcolm, Environmental Court Project: Final Report (detr, 2000).

  • Kirkpatrick, David and Ceri Warnock ‘Do We Need Judges in Order to Resolve Environmental Disputes?’ New Zealand Law Societycle: Environmental Law Intensive (nzls cle, October 2021, online conference).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kos, Stephen, ‘Public Participation in Environmental Adjudication: Some Further Reflections’ (2017) 29(2–3) Environmental Law and Management 60.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McNicholas, Marie, ‘Uncertainty Lingers After Court Downgrade Retreat’ (Farmers Weekly Plus, June 2013).

  • Newhook, Laurie, ‘The Constitution, work, powers and practices in trial and pre-trial work of the Environment Court of New Zealand’ (International Forum of Environment Judges, iucn ael Colloquium, Oslo, June 2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newhook, Laurie, David Kirkpatrick and John Hassan, ‘Issues with Access to Justice in the Environment Court of New Zealand’ (2017) 29 (2–3) Environmental Law and Management, 125.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nolan, Derek et al., ‘An Experiment with Expediency: The Unitary Plan Process for Auckland’ [2012] Resource Management Journal 11.

  • Palmer, Kenneth A, ‘Environment Court Reform – More than the Court under Threat?’ (rmla, 25 June 2013).

  • Palmer, Kenneth A, Planning and Development Law in New Zealand (Law Book Company 1984).

  • Pring, George and Catherine Pring, Greening Justice: Creating and Improving Environmental Courts and Tribunals (World Resources Institute 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosenberg, G, ‘Planning Principles in the Light of Appeal Board Decisions’ [1966] nzlj 467.

  • Severinsen, Greg, Reform of the Resource Managament System: A Model for the Future – Synthesis Report (Environmental Defence Society, 2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Somerville, Royden, ‘rmla Salmon Lecture 2022 – Resource Management: The next thirty years’ (Wellington Club, Wellington, 16 June 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warnock, Ceri and Maree Baker-Galloway, Focus on Resource Management Law, (LexisNexis, 2015).

  • Warnock, Ceri and Ole Pedersen, ‘Environmental Adjudication: Mapping the Spectrum and Identifying the Fulcrum’ (2017) Public Law 643.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warnock, Ceri, ‘Differing Conceptions of Environmental Democracy in New Zealand Resource Management Law’ (2016) Australian Environment Review, 253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warnock, Ceri, ‘Environment and the Law: The Normative Force of Context and Constitutional Challenges’ (2020) 32 Journal of Environmental Law 365.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warnock, Ceri, ‘Reconceptualising the Role of the New Zealand Environment Court’ (2014) 26(3) Journal of Environmental Law 507.

  • Warnock, Ceri, Environment Courts and Tribunals: Powers, Integrity, and the Search for Legitimacy (Hart Bloomsbury, 2021).

  • Williams, Martin and Simon Berry, ‘Reform of the Environment Court – does it make sense?’ (rmla, 14 June 2013).

  • Brookers Resource Management Compendium (Thomson Reuters, 20/10/22).

  • Environment Court of New Zealand Annual Report (Wellington, 2018).

  • Ministry for the Environment & Stats nz (2022) New Zealand’s Environmental Reporting Series: Environment Aotearoa 2022.

  • Ministry for the Environment ‘National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 Intensification Fact Sheet’ (MfE, July 2020).

  • Ministry for the Environment, Improving our Resource Management System: A Discussion Document (Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, February 2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ministry for the Environment, Report of the Minister for the Environment’s Technical Advisory Group (Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, February 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • New Zealand Law Commission, Delivering Justice for All (nzlc Wellington, 2004).

  • Resource Management Review Panel, New Directions for Resource Management in New Zealand (Resource Management Review Panel, 2020).

  • Baker-Galloway, M. et al., Environmental Law Intensive (New Zealand Law Society, 2021).

  • Gordon, B. et al., Brookers Resource Management (Thomson Reuters, 2022).

  • Grant, M. Environmental Court Project: Final Report (Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions, 2000).

  • Ministry for the Environment & Stats nz, Environment Aotearoa 2022 (Ministry for the Environment, 2022).

  • Ministry for the Environment, ‘National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 Intensification Fact Sheet’ (Ministry for the Environment, 2020).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ministry for the Environment, Improving our Resource Management System: A Discussion Document (Ministry for the Environment, 2013).

  • Ministry for the Environment, Report of the Minister for the Environment’s Technical Advisory Group (Ministry for the Environment, 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ministry of the Environment, National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 (Ministry of the Environment, 2020).

  • New Zealand Environment Court, Annual Review by Members of the Court (Environment Court, 2018).

  • Palmer, K.A. Planning and Development Law in New Zealand (Law Book Company, 1984).

  • Pring, G. & C. Pring, Greening Justice: Creating and Improving Environmental Courts and Tribunals (The Access Initiative, 2009).

  • Severinsen, G. Reform of the Resource Managament System: A Model for the Future – Synthesis Report (Environmental Defence Society Incorporated, 2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warnock, C. & M. Baker-Galloway, Focus on Resource Management Law (LexisNexis nz Limited, 2015).

  • Warnock, C. Environment Courts and Tribunals: Powers, Integrity, and the Search for Legitimacy (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021).

  • Auckland Council v Lau [2016] NZEnvC 103.

  • Environmental Defence Society Inc v New Zealand King Salmon Co Ltd [2014] 1 nzlr 593 (nzsc).

  • Eyre Community Environmental Safety Society Inc v Canterbury Regional Council and another [2020] NZEnvC 138.

  • Ideal Laundry Ltd v Petone Borough [1957] nzlr 1038 (nzsc).

  • Lal’s Transport Ltd v Auckland Council [2011] 16 elrnz 637 (nzhc).

  • McGuire v Hastings District Council [2002] nzlr 577 (Privy Council).

  • Ngati Paoa Trust Board v Kennedy Point Boatharbour Ltd [2022] NZEnvC 12.

  • Powell v Dunedin City Council [2004] 3 nzlr 721 (ca, Wellington).

  • Re an application by Waiheke Marinas Limited [2015] NZEnvC 218.

  • Stark v Auckland Regional Council [1994] nzlr 614 (hc), p. 617.

  • Farmer, J.A.Town Planning Policy and the Law – A Trip in Wonderland with the Chief Justice’ (1970) New Zealand Law Journal, pp. 542547.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gill, G.N.Environmental Justice in India: The National Green Tribunal and Expert Members’ (2016) 5(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 175205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kós, S. ‘Public Participation in Environmental Adjudication: Some Further Reflections’ (2017) 29(2–3) Environmental Law and Management.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newhook, L., D. Kirkpatrick & J. Hassan, ‘Issues with Access to Justice in the Environmental Court of New Zealand’ (2017) 29(2–3) Environmental Law and Management, pp. 125134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nolan D. et al., ‘An Experiment with Expediency: The Unitary Plan Process for Auckland’ (2012) 11 Resource Management Journal, pp. 1113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosenberg, G.Planning Principles in the Light of Appeal Board Decisions’ (1966) New Zealand Law Journal, pp. 467471.

  • Warnock, C. & O.W. Pedersen, ‘Environmental Adjudication: Mapping the Spectrum and Identifying the Fulcrum’ (2017) Public Law, pp. 643666.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warnock, C. ‘Differing Conceptions of Environmental Democracy in New Zealand Resource Management Law’ (2016) 31 Australian Environment Review, pp. 253258.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warnock, C.Environment and the Law: The Normative Force of Context and Constitutional Challenges’ (2020) 32(3) Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 365389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Warnock, C.Reconceptualising Specialist Environmental Courts and Tribunals’ (2017) 37(3) Legal Studies, pp. 391417.

  • Warnock, C.Reconceptualising the Role of the New Zealand Environment Court’ (2014) 26 Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 507518.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011 (nz).

  • Commissions of Inquiry Act 1908.

  • Constitution Act 1986 (nz).

  • covid-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting) Act 2020.

  • District Court Rules 2014.

  • Environment Act 1986.

  • Resource Management (Enabling Housing Supply and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2021.

  • Resource Management Act 1991.

  • Resource Management Amendment Act 1996.

  • Town and Country Planning Act 1977.

  • 299 nzpd 689.

  • 299 nzpd 742.

  • 299 nzpd 799.

  • 347 nzpd 1587.

  • 375 nzpd 3589.

  • 416 nzpd 5223.

  • Environment Court of New Zealand, About the Environment Court. Available at: https://www.environmentcourt.govt.nz/about/commissioners/.

  • Environment Court of New Zealand, Practice Note 2023 (2023). Available at: https://www.environmentcourt.govt.nz/about/practice-note/.

  • Halsbury’s Laws of England (4th ed.), vol.10.

  • Herald, N.Z. ‘Lianne Dalziel: ‘Housing Intensification – One Size Does Not Fit All’ (Otago Daily Times, 20th September 2022). Available at: https://www.odt.co.nz/star-news/star-opinion/lianne-dalziel-housing-intensification-one-size-does-not-fit-all.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McNicholas, M. ‘Uncertainty Lingers after Court Downgrade Retreat’ (Farmers Weekly Plus, 2013).

  • Newhook, L. ‘The Constitution, Work, Powers and Practices in Trial and Pre-Trial Work of the Environment Court of New Zealand’. Conference paper presented at the ‘International Forum of Environmental Judges’, Oslo, 21 June 2016. Available at:https://www.environmentcourt.govt.nz/assets/IUCNAEL-Judges-forum-June-2016.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Otago Regional Council, Otago Regional Council Water Permits Plan Change and Omnibus Plan Change – Call in . Available at: https://www.epa.govt.nz/database-search/rma-applications/view/NSP000045.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Palmer, K.A. ‘Environmental Court Reform – More than the Court under Threat?’ (Resource Management Law Association, 2013).

  • Resource Management Review Panel, New Directions for Resource Management in New Zealand (Resource Management Review Panel, 2020), available at: https://environment.govt.nz/assets/Publications/Files/rm-panel-review-report-web.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Somerville, R. rmla Salmon Lecture 2021 – Resource Management Law – the Next 30 Years’ (2016). Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmqrnsemGno.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williams, M. & S. Berry, ‘Reform of the Environment Court – Does it Make Sense?’ (Resource Management Law Association, 2013).

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 63 63 10
Full Text Views 3 3 0
PDF Views & Downloads 9 9 0