Chapter 9 South Asian Perspectives on Environmental Courts and Tribunals

Prospects and Challenges

In: Environmental Courts and Tribunals in Asia-Pacific
Author:
Kokila Konasinghe
Search for other papers by Kokila Konasinghe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

The eight tropical countries of the South Asian region are well-known for their significant biodiversity spreading across a range of ecosystems. The region has constantly encountered a myriad of environmental challenges, which have required expedient solutions, including comprehensive legislative frameworks, cognizant administrative decisions and eco-centric judicial interpretations. The uniqueness of these common environmental problems requires imminent, suitable legal solutions to protect and promote environmental safeguards in the region. The chapter explores the significant role played by Environmental Courts and Tribunals (ECTs) within the South Asian region in the face of such environmental challenges. In exploring this issue, a doctrinal methodology with qualitative data analysis is adopted. The chapter first explores the environmental significance and vulnerability of the South Asian region to unprecedented environmental challenges. It is followed by a comparative analysis of the ECTs in three South Asian jurisdictions: India, Bangladesh and Pakistan. The comparative analysis in this section concentrates on factors such as jurisdiction and procedure, judicial expertise, access to justice and other challenges, and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms relating to Environmental Courts. The chapter concludes by providing the prospects and challenges of incorporating such best practices within the South Asian region.

Kokila Konasinghe is a Professor of Law and Head of the Department, Department of Public and International Law, Faculty of Law, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka. She is the founding Director of Centre for Environmental Law and Policy (CELP) at University of Colombo. She is a member of the Commonwealth Futures Climate Research Cohort 2021–2022 of the Association of Commonwealth Universities and represented the official delegation of Sri Lanka at the United Nations Climate Change COP 27, in Egypt. Her book chapters and research articles have appeared in locally and internationally reputed journals and publications.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Environmental Courts and Tribunals in Asia-Pacific

Best Practices, Challenges and the Way Forward

Series:  Brill's Asian Law Series, Volume: 13
  • Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981.

  • Bangladesh Environment Conservation Act No. 1 of 1995.

  • Bangladesh Environment Courts Act, 2010.

  • Biological Diversity Act, 2002.

  • Environment (Protection) Act.

  • Forests (Conservation) Act, 1980.

  • Kenya Environment and Land Court Act of 2011.

  • National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (No.19 of 2010) (ngt Act, 2010).

  • Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997.

  • Public Liability Insurance Act, 1981.

  • The Constitution of India, 1950.

  • Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

  • Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977.

  • a.p.Pollution Control Board v.m.v.Nayudu (1999) 2 scc 718.

  • Bhopal Gas Peedith Mahila Udyog Sangathan v. Union of India (2012) 8 scc 326.

  • Court on its own motion v. State of Karnataka, Original Application 125/2017, ngt 6 December 2018.

  • Forward Foundation & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors., Original Application No. 222/2014, ngt Judgment, 10 September 2015.

  • Gram Panchayat Totu [Mafthai] v State of Himachal Pradesh, Original Application No. 2 of 2011, ngt Judgment 11 October 2011.

  • Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (1986) 3 scc 212.

  • m. cMehta v. Kamal Nathair 2002 sc 1997.

  • m.c.Mehta v. Union of India (1986) 2 scc 176.

  • m.p.Patil v. Union of India,ngt Judgment, Appeal No. 12 of 2012, ngt 13 March 2014.

  • m.rPollution Control Board v. Staller House, Original Application No. 160 (thc) 8 August 2013.

  • Manoj Misra v.uoi& Ors, Original Application No. 6 of 2012 and m.a. Nos. 967/2013 & 275/2014, ngt Judgment dated 13 Jan 2015.

  • Ms. Betty C. Alvares v. The State of Goa & Ors., In Application No.63 of 2012, 14 Feb. 2014.

  • Subhash Kumar v. State. of Bihar (1991) 1 scc 598.

  • t.n. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India, Supreme Court Order, 5 Nov. 2015.

  • The Goa Foundation Anr v. Union of India Ors, m.a. No. 49 of 2013 in Original Application No. 26 of 2012, 18 July 2013.

  • Tribunal on its own Motion v. District Collector, Sivaganga District 2014 scc On Line 1450; Also see Original Application No. 16 of 2013, ngt 4 April 2014; Tribunal on its own Motion v. Union of India 2014 scc OnLine 1433; Tribunal on its own Motion v. Govt. of nctof Delhi Order 30 August 2018.

  • Vellore citizen’s welfare forum v. Union of Indiaair 1986 sc 2715.

  • Asian Judges Network on Environment, Background Paper – South Asia Judicial Conference on Environment and Climate Change (2016).

  • European Union, ‘Executive Summary’ (2018) Larger Than Tigers – Asia Regional Report.

  • Guidelines for the Development of National Legislation on Access to Information, Public Participation and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters adopted by the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme in decision ss. xi/5, part A of 26 February 2010 (“Bali Guidelines”).

  • Law Commission of India, One Hundred Eighty Sixth Report on Proposal to Constitute Environment Courts, (2003).

  • The Lok Sabha Debates, 15 March 2010 available at: <https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/758418/1/1503_IV.pdf>.

  • Ministry of Environment and Forests Notification, May 2011, s.o.1003 E.

  • Ministry of Environment and Forests Notification, 17 August 2011, s.o.1908 E.

  • ngt/pb/266/2013/281, 2 December 2013 (office order).

  • ngt/pb/157/2013/331, 20 December 2013 (office order).

  • ngt/pb/Pr/cb/97/2014/M78, 29 November 2014 (office order); ngt/pb/266/2016/299, 16 April 2016 (office order).

  • Ahsan I. & S.A. Khawaja, Development of Environmental Laws and Jurisprudence in Pakistan, (Asian Development Bank, 2013).

  • Asian Development Bank, ‘Environmental Governance and the Courts in Asia’ (2012) Law and Policy Reform Brief No .1 .

  • Asian Development Bank, South Asia Conference on Environmental Justice (Philippines, 2013).

  • Faruque, A.A. Environmental Law: Global and Bangladesh Context (New Warsi Book Corporation, 2017).

  • Gupta A. et. al., ‘Science Networks’, in F. Biermann & P. Pattberg (eds.), Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered (The mit Press, 2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huber, P. Galileo’s Revenge: Junk Science in the Court Room (Basic Books, 1991).

  • Pring G. & C. Pring, Environmental Courts and Tribunals: A Guide for Policymakers (United Nations Environmental Programme, 2016).

  • Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (Rio Declaration), adopted by the UN Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), 3–14 June 1992, a/Conf.151/5/Rev.1,14 June 1992.

  • Sathe, S.P. Judicial Activism in India Transgressing Borders and Enforcing Limits (Oxford University Press, 2012).

  • Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment, in Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, (Finland), 15 Dec. 1972, UN Doc. a/Conf.48/14/Rev.1.Books.

  • Sulistiawati L.Y. et al. ‘Environmental Courts and Tribunals – 2021; A Guide for Policymakers’ (United Nations Environmental Programme, 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chilbule D. & S. Kumar, ‘Study on The Implementation of National Green Tribunal: Issues And Challenges’ (2022) 6(6) Journal of Positive School Psychology , pp. 65856591.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gill, G.N.Environmental Justice in India: The National Green Tribunal and Expert MembersTransnational Environmental Law (2016) 5(1), pp. 175205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gill, G.N.Human Rights and the Environment in India: Access through Public Interest Litigation’ (2012) 14(3) Environmental Law Review , pp. 20018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khosla, M.Addressing Judicial Activism in the Indian Supreme Court: Towards an Evolved Debate’ (2009) 32(1) Hastings International and Comparative Law Review , pp. 55100.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lau, M. ‘The Role of Environmental Tribunals in Pakistan: Challenges and Prospects’ (2018) Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law Online , available at: <https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/32989/1/Lau_The%20Role%20of%20Environmental%20Tribunals%20in%20Pakistan%20-%20Challenges%20and%20Prospects_AAM.pdf>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moog, R.Delays in the Indian Court System: Why the Judges don’t take Control’ (1992) 16(1) Justice System Journal, pp. 1936.

  • Peiris, G.L.Public Interest Litigation in the Indian Subcontinent: Current Dimensions’ (1991) 40(1) International and Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 6690.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Preston, B. ‘The Use of Restorative Justice for Environmental Crime’ (2011) 35 Criminal Law Journal .

  • Preston, B.J.Characteristics successful environmental courts and tribunals’ (2014) 26 (3) Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 365393.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robinson, N. A. ‘Ensuring Access to Justice through Environmental courts’ (2012) 29 Pace Environmental Law Review , pp. 363395.

  • Setalvad, M.C.The Common Law in India’ (1961) 10(1) International & Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 206209.

  • Bhan and M. Rohatgi, ‘Legal Systems in India: Overview’ , available at: <https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-017-5278?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true#:~:text=The%20Indian%20legal%20system%20is,judge%20to%20perform%20inquisitorial%20functions>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Choudhary, A. A.Nothing has changes since 1872, decrees tough to execute, says Supreme Court’ (The Times of India, 2022). available at: <https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/nothing-has-changed-since-1872-decrees-tough-to-execute-says-supreme-court/articleshow/89189293.cms>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Union Forum of Judges for the Environment, available at: <https://www.eufje.org/>.

  • ‘Habiganj Environment Court orders DoE to take steps against harms caused by brick kilns’ (The Daily Star, November 21 2023) available at: <https://www.thedailystar.net/environment/news/habiganj-environment-court-orders-doe-take-steps-against-harms-caused-brick-kilns-2235186>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hossain, M. Z. ‘Revisiting Enforcement of the Environment Court: A Contextual Analysis’ (Lawyers Club Bangladesh, 5 June, 2020) available at: <https://lawyersclubbangladesh.com/en/2020/06/05/revisiting-enforcement-of-the-environment-court-a-contextual-analysis/>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Islam, M. T. ‘Access to justice for marginalised rural victims across South Asia: Issues and challenges’ (2020) available at: <https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/southasia/2020/06/08/access-to-justice-for-the-marginalised-rural-people-across-south-asia-issues-and-challenges/>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miah, M. K. ‘Effective functioning of Environment Court’ (The Daily Star, 2015), available at: <https://www.thedailystar.net/law-our-rights/effective-functioning-environment-court-131956>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ministry of Law and Justice, ‘Environmental Protection Tribunal’ (Government of Pakistan, 2023) available at: <https://molaw.gov.pk/Detail/ZDIzYmE2MWMtYTk3ZS00ZDFiLTllMDktZjVjOGVlZGYwMmU3>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Green Tribunal, available at: <https://greentribunal.gov.in/>.

  • Roy, D. ngt working with just 6 members instead of at least 21, zonal benches vacant for 2 yrs now’ (The Print, 2019) available at: <https://theprint.in/environment/ngt-working-with-6-members-instead-of-at-least-21-zonal-benches-vacant-for-2-yrs-now/314616/>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sajal, I.A. ‘Common People’s Access to the Environment Courts of Bangladesh: An Appraisal’ (bdld, 2015) available at: <https://bdlawdigest.org/environment-court-act-2010.html>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 171 171 13
Full Text Views 3 3 0
PDF Views & Downloads 8 8 0