Chapter 1 From Clustering to Interpretation: Lexical Differences in Light of Linguistic Features in the Enochic Texts from Qumran

In: The Aramaic Books of Enoch and Related Literature from Qumran
Author:
Mathias Coeckelbergs
Search for other papers by Mathias Coeckelbergs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00
  • Collapse
  • Expand

The Aramaic Books of Enoch and Related Literature from Qumran

Proceedings of the International Online Conference Organized by the Center for the Study of Second Temple Judaism of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, in Cooperation with Enoch Seminar, 20–22 October 2020

Series:  Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism, Volume: 216
  • Boyarsky, Abraham, and Paweł Góra. “A Comparative Statistical Dynamical Analysis of Hebrew Texts.” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 4 (2000): 293295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Choi, Jonathan J. “The Aramaic of Daniel: Its Date, Place of Composition and Linguistic Comparison with Extra-Biblical Texts.” PhD diss., Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, 1994.

  • Cook, Edward M.Qumran Aramaic, Corpus Linguistics, and Aramaic Retroversion.” DSD 21 (2014): 356384.

  • Coxon, Peter W.The Distribution of Synonyms in Biblical Aramaic in the Light of Official Aramaic and the Aramaic of Qumran.” RevQ 9 (1978): 497512.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cross, Frank M., and Richard J. Saley. “A Statistical Analysis of The Textual Character of 4QSamuela (4Q51).” DSD 13 (2006): 4654.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Díez Merino, Luis. “The Adverb in Qumran Aramaic.” Pages 121 in Studies in Qumran Aramaic. Edited by Takamitsu Muraoka. AbrNSup 1. Louvain: Peeters, 1992.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eep Talstra Centre for Bible and Computer, http://etcbc.nl.

  • Fassberg, Steven E.Hebraisms in the Aramaic Documents from Qumran.” Pages 4869 in Studies in Qumran Aramaic. Edited by Takamitsu Muraoka. AbrNSup 1. Louvain: Peeters, 1992.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fassberg, Steven E.Salient Features of the Verbal System in the Aramaic Dead Sea Scrolls.” Pages 6578 in Aramaica Qumranica. Edited by Katell Berthelot and Daniel Stökl Ben Ezra. STDJ 94. Leiden: Brill, 2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greenfield, Jonas C., and Michael Sokoloff. “The Contribution of Qumran Aramaic to the Aramaic Vocabulary.” Pages 7898 in Studies in Qumran Aramaic. Edited by Takamitsu Muraoka. AbrNSup 1. Louvain: Peeters, 1992.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gzella, Holger. “Dating the Aramaic Texts from Qumran: Possibilities and Limits.” RevQ 24 (2009): 6178.

  • Joosten, Jan. “L’araméen de Qumran entre l’araméen d’empire et les Targumim: L’emploi de la préposition ‘Devant’ pour exprimer le respect dû au roi et à Dieu.” Pages 8397 in Aramaica Qumranica. Edited by K. Berthelot and D. Stökl Ben Ezra. STDJ 94. Leiden: Brill, 2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kenny, Anthony. A Stylometric Study of the New Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.

  • Larson, Erik W.The Relation between the Greek and Aramaic Texts of Enoch.” Pages 434444 in The Dead Sea Scrolls: Fifty Years after Their Discovery 1947–1997. Edited by Lawrence H. Schiffman, Emanuel Tov, and James C. VanderKam. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 2000.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Masterson, Karen J. An Information-Theoretic Approach to the Analysis of Semitic Texts. PhD diss. University of California at Los Angeles, 1994.

  • Parry, Donald W.Linguistic Profile of the Nonbiblical Qumran Texts: A Multidimensional Approach.” Pages 217241 in From 4QMMT to Resurrection. Edited by Florentino García Martínez, Anette Steudel, and Eibert Tigchelaar. STDJ 61. Leiden: Brill, 2006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Radday, Yehuda T.Two Computerized Statistical-Linguistic Texts Concerning the Unity of Isaiah.” JBL 89 (1970): 319324.

  • Radday, Yehuda T. The Unity of Isaiah in the Light of Statistical Linguistics. Hildesheim: Gerstenberg, 1973.

  • Schattner-Rieser, Ursula. L’araméen des manuscrits de la mer Morte. 1. Grammaire. Lausanne: Editions du Zèbre, 2004.

  • Sichel, Helmut S.Word Frequency Distributions and Type-Token Characteristics.” Mathematical Scientist 11 (1986): 4572.

  • Starr, John. Classifying the Aramaic Texts from Qumran: A Statistical Analysis of Linguistic Features. LSTS 89. London: T&T Clark, 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stefanovic, Zdravko. The Aramaic of Daniel in the Light of Old Aramaic. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1992.

  • Tanaka-Ishii, Kumiko, and Shunsuke Aihara. “Computational Constancy Measures of Texts – Yule’s K and Rényi’s Entropy.” Computational Linguistics 41 (2013): 481502.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tov, Emanuel. Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible. 2nd revised ed. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2001.

  • Ulrich, Eugene Charles. “The Qumran Biblical Scrolls – The Scriptures of Late Second Temple Judaism.” Pages 6787 in The Dead Sea Scrolls in their Historical Context. Edited by Timothy H. Lim et al.London: T&T Clark, 2000.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 60 45 7
Full Text Views 2 1 0
PDF Views & Downloads 12 3 0