Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
In Euripides’ Heracles the chorus has a fundamental role in defending Hercules’ status as a demi-god, yet the old men of Thebes are strangely a lot closer to Amphitryon than to the hero and cannot bear the violence of the madness and retreat in the second half of the play. In this modern version, the violence of the madness is moderated, but the problems related to the status of the hero are no less important. And once again the chorus has a fundamental role, not only by describing the new scenarios of each labour, much like the original chorus, but by poking around and questioning the identity of the hero time and again. As true celebrity journalists the chorus are not by anyone’s side, Hercules ignores them, yet they will have their role until the very end. And, as easily as they were ready to destroy the hero, they will be the ones to announce his true nature. This chapter examines how the chorus is fundamental to the dramatic structure and how it helps the audience to focus on the essential question (both of this play and the Euripides’ original): what is the true nature of the hero?
Barlow, S.A. (1996) Euripides: Heracles, Warminster: Aris & Phillips.
Billings, J., Budelmann, F., and Macintosh, F. (eds) (2013) Choruses, Ancient and Modern, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bond, G.W. (1981) Euripides: Heracles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eastman, H. (2010) Hercules (unpublished play script).
Eastman, H. (2013) ‘Chorus in contemporary British theatre’, in Billings, Budelmann and Macintosh (eds), 363–376.
Foley, H. (2003) ‘Choral identity in Greek tragedy’, Classical Philology 98.1: 1–30.
Frade, S. (2023) Heracles and Athenian Propaganda: Politics, Imagery and Drama. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Goldhill, S. (2007) How to Stage Greek Tragedy Today, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hardwick (2010) ‘Helen Eastman, Theatre Director in interview with Lorna Hardwick (Milton Keynes, 18th May 2009)’, in Practitioners Voices in Classical Reception Studies, Issue 2: 33–46 (http://www.open.ac.uk/arts/research/pvcrs/2010/eastman).
Loraux, N. (1986) The Invention of Athens: the funeral oration in the classical city, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Mastronarde, D.J. (1994) Euripides: Phoenissae, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mastronarde, D.J. (1999), ‘Knowledge and authority in the choral voice of Euripidean tragedy’, Syllecta Classica 10.1: 87–104.
Parry, H. (1965) ‘The second stasimon of Euripides’ Heracles (637–700)’, American Journal of Philology 86.4: 363–374.
Riley, K. (2008) The Reception and Performance of Euripides’ Herakles: reasoning madness, Oxford: OUP.
Silk, M. (1998) ‘Style, voice and authority in the choruses of Greek drama’, in Riemer, P. and Zimmermann, B. (eds) Der Chor im antiken und modernen Drama, Stuttgart: JB Metzler, 1–26.
Stafford, E.J. (2012) Herakles, Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge.
Swift, L.A. (2010) The Hidden Chorus: echoes of genre in tragic lyric, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zeitlin, F. (1990) ‘Thebes: Theater of Self and Society in Athenian Drama’, in Winkler, J.J. (ed.) Nothing to Do With Dionysos. Athenian drama in its social context, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 130–167.
Ziolkowski, J.E. (1981) Thucydides and the Tradition of Funeral Speeches at Athens, New York: Arno Press.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 49 | 49 | 16 |
Full Text Views | 2 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Statement | Cookie Settings | Accessibility | Legal Notice | Copyright © 2016-2024
Copyright © 2016-2024