Chapter 8 Metatextual Dimensions of Multimodal Literacy Engagement

Identity, Community, and Activism in Digital Textual Ecosystems

In: Handbook of Research in Online Learning
Author:
Amir Kalan
Search for other papers by Amir Kalan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Type:
Chapter
Pages:
196–220
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004702813_008

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00
Add to Cart
Redeem Access Token

Abstract

This chapter explores the metatextual dimensions of multimodal literacy engagement. As digital multimodality turns into a major component of everyday writing practices, alongside addressing questions about new textual formats, it is important to ask how text production is shaped by digital identity practices and virtual communities. To this end, this article focuses on how multimodal writing can help broaden our understanding of (a) text ownership, (b) learner identity, (c) community, and (d) sociopolitical involvement through writing. Drawing from qualitative research conducted in an online English grammar course at a major Canadian university, the article delves into the complex interplay of digital remixing, replication, and textual sharing, revealing their profound impact on students’ online identities and power relations in multimodal writing ecosystems.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Cover Handbook of Research in Online Learning
E-Book ISBN:
9789004702813
Publisher:
Brill
Print Publication Date:
25 Sep 2024
Front Matter
Chapter 1 Lessons Learned in Conducting a Systematic Review in Online Learning
Chapter 2 The Study of Adult Learners in Distance Education
Chapter 3 Theories and Models to Frame, Inform, and Stimulate Online Learning
Chapter 4 What We Know about Online Teacher Education
Chapter 5 A Responsive, Consultative Professional Development Model for Online Engagement
Chapter 6 Active Learning by Design
Chapter 7 An Integrative Review of Adult Learners’ Informal Learning in Online Settings
Chapter 9 21 Years of Worldwide Learning Online
Chapter 10 A Critical Review of Two Automated Adaptive Teaching Systems in Mathematics and Chemistry
Chapter 11 Automated Analysis and Visualization of Online Learning Experiences and Engagement
Chapter 12 Evidence-based Practices for Developing a Community of Inquiry
Chapter 13 Pre-service Teachers’ Preparation for Teaching Online
Chapter 14 Micro Investment, Big Reward
Chapter 15 Selecting Media and Methods to Facilitate Blended Learning
Chapter 16 The Impact of Digital Learning on Racially Minoritized and Poverty-Affected College Students
Chapter 17 Remote Academic Advising for Colleges and Universities
Chapter 18 Online Mentoring in the Digital Age
Chapter 19 Mental Fatigue in Online Learning
Chapter 20 Analysis of Patterns in Time for Evaluating Online Instruction
Chapter 21 The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning
Chapter 22 Exploring the Impact of E-Texts on Student Learning in Online Education
Chapter 23 Supporting AI-Enhanced Active Online Learning Experiences
Chapter 24 Student Perceptions of Learning with Instructional AI Assistance in Online Discussions
Chapter 25 Gamification for Higher Education Applications
Chapter 26 Developing a Quality Assurance Approach for an Online Professional Military Education Institution
Chapter 27 Skills for Student Success in Online Learning
Back Matter

  • Alexander, J. (2008). Media convergence: Creating content, questioning relationships. Computers and Composition, 25(1), 1–8.

  • Alim, H. S., Rickford, J. R., & Ball, A. F. (Eds.). (2016). Sociolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race. Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Anitha, S., Marine, S., & Lewis, R. (2020). Feminist responses to sexual harassment in academia: Voice, solidarity, and resistance through online activism. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 4(1), 9–23.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Apperley, T. H., & Clemens, J. (2017). Flipping out: Avatars and identity. In J. Gackenbach & J. Bown (Eds.), Boundaries of self and reality online (pp. 41–56). Academic Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ballenger, C. (2009). Puzzling moments, teachable moments: Practicing teacher research in urban classrooms. Teachers College Press.

  • Bazerman, C. (2016). What do sociocultural studies of writing tell us about learning to write? In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 11–23). Guilford Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Boughey, C., & McKenna, S. (2016). Academic literacy and the decontextualised learner. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning (CriSTaL), 4(2), 1–9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bullingham, L., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2013). ‘The presentation of self in the online world’: Goffman and the study of online identities. Journal of Information Science, 39(1), 101–112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bunch, G. C., & Martin, D. (2021). From “academic language” to the “language of ideas”: A disciplinary perspective on using language in K-12 settings. Language and Education, 35(6), 539–556.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Burke, L., (2020). Adaptation in the age of media convergence. Adaptation, 13(2), 270–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apaa021

  • Butin, D. W. (2007). Justice-learning: Service-learning as justice-oriented education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40(2), 177–183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Christensen, L. (2009). Teaching for joy and justice: Re-imagining the language arts classroom. Rethinking Schools Publication.

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research in the next generation. Teachers College Press.

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge.

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Delaney, K. K. (2015). Dissonance for understanding: Exploring a new theoretical lens for understanding teacher identity formation in borderlands of practice. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16(4), 374–389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • DeVoe, K. M. (2010). “You’ll never guess who I talked to!”: Tweeting at conferences. The Reference Librarian, 51(2), 167–170.

  • Djonov, E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2018). The power of semiotic software: A critical multimodal perspective. In J. Flowerdew, & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 566–581). Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Djonov, E., & Zhao, S. (Eds.). (2014). Critical multimodal studies of popular discourse. Routledge.

  • Drennon, C. E., & Cervero, R. M. (2002). The politics of facilitation in practitioner inquiry groups. Adult Education Quarterly, 52(3), 193–209.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Erstad, O., Gilje, Ø., & de Lange, T. (2007). Re-mixing multimodal resources: multiliteracies and digital production in Norwegian media education. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(2), 183–198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224–1239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Flores, N. (2021). Raciolinguistic genealogy as method in the sociology of language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2021(267–268), 111–115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Flower, L. (2008). Community literacy and the rhetoric of public engagement. SIU Press.

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos Trans.). Continuum.

  • Freire, P. (1987). The importance of the act of reading. In P. Freire & D. P. Macedo (Eds.), Literacy: Reading the word & the world (pp. 5–11). Bergin & Garvey Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Grapin, S. (2019). Multimodality in the new content standards era: Implications for English learners. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 30–55.

  • Ghobadi, S., & Clegg, S. (2015). “These days will never be forgotten…”: A critical mass approach to online activism. Information and Organization, 25(1), 52–71.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Giroux, H. A., Lankshear, C., McLaren, P., & Peters, M. (1996). Counternarratives: Cultural studies and critical pedagogies in postmodern spaces. Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Harrison, A. K. (2018). Ethnography. Oxford University Press.

  • Heap, J. L. (1989). Writing as social action. Theory into Practice, 28(2), 148–153.

  • Hesse, D. (2019). Journals in composition studies, thirty-five years after. College English, 81(4), 367–396.

  • Higgins, L., Long, E., & Flower, L. (2006). Community literacy: A rhetorical model for personal and public inquiry. Community Literacy Journal, 1(1), 9–42.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7–30.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Howard, R. M. (2001). Collaborative pedagogy. In G. Tate, A. Rupiper, & K. Schick (Eds.), A guide to composition pedagogies (pp. 54–70). Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hull, G. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261.

  • Hyland, K. (2008). Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing. English Text Construction, 1(1), 5–22.

  • Janks, H. (2009). Sharing writing, sharing names. In A. Carter, T. M. Lillis, & S. Parkin (Eds.), Why writing matters: Issues of access and identity in writing research and pedagogy (pp. 167–168). John Benjamins Pub.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. Routledge.

  • Janks, H. (2012). The importance of critical literacy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(1), 150–163.

  • Janks, H. (2013). Critical literacy in teaching and research. Education Inquiry, 4(2), 225–242.

  • Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241–267.

  • Kalan, A. (2014). A practice-oriented definition of post-process second language writing theory. TESL Canada Journal, 32(1), 1–18.

  • Kalan, A. (2021a). Negotiating writing identities across languages: Translanguaging as enrichment of semiotic trajectories. TESL Canada Journal, 38(2), 63–87.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kalan, A. (2021b). Sociocultural and power-relational dimensions of multilingual writing: Recommendations for deindustrializing writing education. Multilingual Matters.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kalan, A., Jafari, P., & Aghajani, M. (2019). A collaborative practitioner inquiry into societal and power-relational contexts of an activist writing community’s textual events. International Journal of Action Research, 15(1), 62–80.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kalan, A., & Troberg, M. (2016). Mobilizing practitioner action research to foster critical pedagogy in a large online undergrad university course. ARNA (Action Research Network of the Americas) Conference Proceedings (pp. 1–21).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kennedy, H. (2006). Beyond anonymity, or future directions for internet identity research. New Media & Society, 8(6), 859–876.

  • Krause, K. L. D. (2014). Challenging perspectives on learning and teaching in the disciplines: The academic voice. Studies in Higher Education, 39(1), 2–19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). Digital remix: The art and craft of endless hybridization [Paper presentation], The International Reading Association Pre-Conference Institute, Toronto, Canada.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lawson, D. (2008). Blurring the boundaries: Ethical considerations for online research using synchronous CMC forums. In H. Nemati (Ed.), Information security and ethics: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 3321–3339). IGI Global.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lee, L. (1998). Modulation. DVD. Caipirinha Productions Inc., Cultures of Resistance Films.

  • Leu, D. J., Slomp, D., Zawilinski, L., & Corrigan, J. A. (2016). Writing research through a New Literacies lens. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 41–53). Guilford Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lloyd, M., Skyring, C., & Fraser, D. (2017). Online personas: Who we become when we learn with others online. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 6(2), 152–183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lytle, S. L. (2000). Teacher research in the contact zone. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 691–719). Erlbaum.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mackey, M., & Shane, M. (2013). Critical multimodal literacies: Synergistic options and opportunities. In K. Hall, T. Cremin, B. Comber, & L. C. Moll (Eds.), International handbook of research on children’s literacy, learning, and culture (pp. 15–27). Wiley-Blackwell.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Martell, C. C., Carney, M. M., Marin, K. A., & Hashimoto-Martell, E. A. (2021). Whose research counts? Teacher research and the practitioner-academic divide. The Teacher Educator, 56(4), 399–426.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Marwick, A. (2013). Online identity. In J. Harley, J. Burgess, & A. Bruns (Eds.), Companion to new media dynamics (pp. 355–364). Blackwell.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mathieu, P., Parks, S., & Rousculp, T. (Eds.). (2012). Circulating communities: The tactics and strategies of community publishing (Ser. Cultural studies/pedagogy/activism). Lexington Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Matsuda, P. K., & Tardy, C. M. (2007). Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 235–249.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mayaba, N. N., Ralarala, M. K., & Angu, P. (2018). Student voice: Perspectives on language and critical pedagogy in South African higher education. Educational Research for Social Change, 7(1), 1–12.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McCaughey, M., & Ayers, M. D. (Eds.). (2003). Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice. Psychology Press.

  • Miller, D. (2011). Tales from Facebook. Polity.

  • Mills, K. A. (2009). Multiliteracies: Interrogating competing discourses. Language and Education, 23(2), 103–116.

  • Morrell, E. (2006). Critical participatory action research and the literacy achievement of ethnic minority groups. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 55, 1–18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nash, B. (2018). Exploring multimodal writing in secondary English classrooms: A literature review. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 17(4), 342–356.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nelson, N., & Castello, M. (2012). Academic writing and authorial voice. In M. Castelló, & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 33–52). Emerald.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.

  • Nystrand, M., Greene, S., & Wiemelt, J. (1993). Where did composition studies come from? An intellectual history. Written Communication, 10(3), 267–333.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Panthee, R. K. (2014). Re/Designing online platforms by citizen designers and its contribution to the digital writing and research. In M. Limbu & B. Gurung (Eds.), Emerging pedagogies in the networked knowledge society: Practices integrating social media and globalization. IGI Global.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Palmeri, J. (Ed.). (2012). Remixing composition: A history of multimodal writing pedagogy. SIU Press.

  • Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201–230.

  • Plant, R. (2004). Online communities. Technology in Society, 26(1), 51–65.

  • Poletti, A., & Rak, J. (Eds.). (2014). Identity technologies: Constructing the self online. University of Wisconsin Press.

  • Prior, P. A. (2001). Voices in text, mind and society: Sociohistoric accounts of discourse acquisition and use. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 55–81.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Qin, Y. (2018). Chinese college students’ management of their online identities [Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham]. Nottingham Theses.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ramlal, A., & Augustin, D. S. (2020). Engaging students in reflective writing: An action research project. Educational Action Research, 28(3), 518–533.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richards, K. A. R., & Hemphill, M. A. (2018). A practical guide to collaborative qualitative data analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 225–231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rosa, J., & Flores, N. (2017). Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society, 46(5), 621–647.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Scanlon, P. M. (2003). Student online plagiarism: How do we respond? College Teaching, 51(4), 161–165.

  • Selber, S., & Selber, S. A. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. SIU Press.

  • Selfe, C. L., & Selfe, R. J. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication, 45(4), 480–504.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Simon, R., & Kalan, A. (2016). Adolescent literacy and collaborative inquiry. In K. A. Hinchman, & D. A. Appleman (Eds.), Adolescent literacy: A handbook of practice-based research (pp. 398–420). Guilford Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Smith, B. E., Pacheco, M. B., & Khorosheva, M. (2021). Emergent bilingual students and digital multimodal composition: A systematic review of research in secondary classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 33–52.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Street, B. V. (2003). What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sun, B., & Layne, H. (2020). Literature review on adolescence in and out of school literacy practices: Global and local perspective (NIE Working Paper Series No. 16). National Institute of Education.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tardy, C. (2012). Current conceptions of voice. In K. Hyland, & C. Sancho Guinda (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 34–48). Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thomas, A. (2007). Youth online: Identity and literacy in the digital age. Peter Lang.

  • Thompson, C. (2005). ‘Authority is everything’: A study of the politics of textual ownership. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1), 1–12.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thompson, N. (2016). Anti-discriminatory practice: Equality, diversity and social justice. Macmillan International Higher Education.

  • Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67.

  • Troberg, M., & Kalan, A. (2021). Large online undergraduate courses: The demise of critical pedagogy? In A. Gagne, A. Kalan, & S. Herath (Eds.), Critical action research challenging the neoliberal constriction of education: Pushing back and moving forward. Peter Lang.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Trimbur, J. (2020). Grassroots literacy and the written record. Multilingual Matters.

  • Van Mieghem, A., Verschueren, K., Petry, K., & Struyf, E. (2020). An analysis of research on inclusive education: A systematic search and meta review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(6), 675–689.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vie, S. (2021). The invisible labor of social media pedagogy: A case study of #teamrhetoric community-building on twitter. Computers and Composition, 60, 1–12.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weisser, C. R., & Dobrin, S. I. (Eds.). (2012). Ecocomposition: Theoretical and pedagogical approaches. SUNY Press.

  • Wilks, Y. (2004). On the ownership of text. Computers and the Humanities, 38, 115–127.

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 89 89 1
Full Text Views 4 4 0
PDF Views & Downloads 10 10 0