Chapter 12 Evidence-based Practices for Developing a Community of Inquiry

In: Handbook of Research in Online Learning
Authors:
Jennifer C. Richardson
Search for other papers by Jennifer C. Richardson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Holly Fiock
Search for other papers by Holly Fiock in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Larisa Olesova
Search for other papers by Larisa Olesova in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Stefan Stenbom
Search for other papers by Stefan Stenbom in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Type:
Chapter
Pages:
276–306
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004702813_012

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00
Add to Cart
Redeem Access Token

Abstract

Widely recognized as a valuable model for designing and developing online courses, the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework conceptualizes the online learning experience as a dynamic interplay between three key elements: social presence, teaching presence, and cognitive presence. This chapter provides background on the CoI framework and how it is conceptually situated. Current research related to the CoI, the three presences, empirical methods, and disciplinary differences are also discussed. Meanwhile, there is a great deal of research to date that uses the CoI as a lens, and many include practical implications, yet there has been limited guidance (Fiock, 2020; Garrison, 2017, Richardson et al., 2012) readily available for designers looking to create an online community of inquiry with the CoI guiding principles in mind. This chapter revisits the seven design principles and synthesizes evidence-based approaches for each that can be practically implemented.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Cover Handbook of Research in Online Learning
E-Book ISBN:
9789004702813
Publisher:
Brill
Print Publication Date:
25 Sep 2024
Front Matter
Chapter 1 Lessons Learned in Conducting a Systematic Review in Online Learning
Chapter 2 The Study of Adult Learners in Distance Education
Chapter 3 Theories and Models to Frame, Inform, and Stimulate Online Learning
Chapter 4 What We Know about Online Teacher Education
Chapter 5 A Responsive, Consultative Professional Development Model for Online Engagement
Chapter 6 Active Learning by Design
Chapter 7 An Integrative Review of Adult Learners’ Informal Learning in Online Settings
Chapter 8 Metatextual Dimensions of Multimodal Literacy Engagement
Chapter 9 21 Years of Worldwide Learning Online
Chapter 10 A Critical Review of Two Automated Adaptive Teaching Systems in Mathematics and Chemistry
Chapter 11 Automated Analysis and Visualization of Online Learning Experiences and Engagement
Chapter 13 Pre-service Teachers’ Preparation for Teaching Online
Chapter 14 Micro Investment, Big Reward
Chapter 15 Selecting Media and Methods to Facilitate Blended Learning
Chapter 16 The Impact of Digital Learning on Racially Minoritized and Poverty-Affected College Students
Chapter 17 Remote Academic Advising for Colleges and Universities
Chapter 18 Online Mentoring in the Digital Age
Chapter 19 Mental Fatigue in Online Learning
Chapter 20 Analysis of Patterns in Time for Evaluating Online Instruction
Chapter 21 The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning
Chapter 22 Exploring the Impact of E-Texts on Student Learning in Online Education
Chapter 23 Supporting AI-Enhanced Active Online Learning Experiences
Chapter 24 Student Perceptions of Learning with Instructional AI Assistance in Online Discussions
Chapter 25 Gamification for Higher Education Applications
Chapter 26 Developing a Quality Assurance Approach for an Online Professional Military Education Institution
Chapter 27 Skills for Student Success in Online Learning
Back Matter

  • Abbitt, J. T., Boone, W. J. (2021). Gaining insight from survey data: an analysis of the community of inquiry survey using Rasch measurement techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33, 367–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09268-6

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Akcaoglu, M., & Lee, E. (2016). Increasing social presence in online learning through small group discussions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2293

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Akyol, Z., & Garrison, R. D. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3.66

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Alwafi, E. M. (2022). Designing an online discussion strategy with learning analytics feedback on the level of cognitive presence and student interaction in an online learning community. Online Learning, 26(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3065

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Anderson, T. (2021). Introduction to the community of inquiry model and interactions. Social presence and interaction in e-learning. EDEN NAP Webinar. https://www.edenonline.org/eden_conference/socialpresence-and-interaction-in-e-learning/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Boston, W., Diaz, S. R., Gibson, A. M., Ice, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2009). An exploration of the relationship between indicators of the community of inquiry framework and retention in online programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 67–83. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/journals/journal-asynchronous-learning-networks/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bozkurt, A., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2021). Trends and patterns in distance education (2014–2019): A synthesis of scholarly publications and a visualization of the intellectual landscape. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5381

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Caskurlu, S. (2018). Confirming the subdimensions of teaching, social, and cognitive presences: A construct validity study. Internet and Higher Education, 39, 1–12.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Caskurlu, S., Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., & Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2022, October). The relationship between cognitive presence in online learning and students’ learning and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Las Vegas, NV.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Caskurlu, S., Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., & Kozan, K. (2021). The qualitative evidence behind the factors impacting online learning experiences as informed by the community of inquiry framework: A thematic synthesis. Computers & Education, 165, 104111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104111

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Castellanos Reyes, D. (2023). Evolution of social presence: Longitudinal network analyses of online learning peer Interactions from a social learning analytics perspective [Doctoral Thesis, Purdue University Graduate School, Purdue University]. https://doi.org/10.25394/PGS.23576778.v1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, H.-L., & Chang, C.-Y. (2017). Integrating the SOP2 model into the flipped classroom to foster cognitive presence and learning achievements. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 274–291.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, B., DeNoyelles, A., Patton, K., & Zydney, J. (2017). Creating a community of inquiry in large-enrollment online courses: An exploratory study on the effect of protocols within online discussions. Online Learning, 21(1), 165–188.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, Y., Lei, J., & Cheng, J. (2019). What if online students take on the responsibility: Students’ cognitive presence and peer facilitation techniques. Online Learning, 23(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1348

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Corich, S., Hunt, K., & Hunt, L. (2006). Computerised content analysis for measuring critical thinking within discussion forums. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/700

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Darabi, A., Arrastia, M. C., Nelson, D. W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2011). Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00392.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • de Leng, B. A., Dolmans, D. H., Jöbsis, R., Muijtjens, A. M., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2009). Exploration of an e-learning model to foster critical thinking on basic science concepts during work placements. Computers & Education, 53(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. D.C. Heath and Co.

  • Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2018). Online educators’ recommendations for teaching online: Crowdsourcing in action. Open Praxis, 10(1), 79–89. https://openpraxis.org/index.php/OpenPraxis/article/view/721/421

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Farrow, E., Moore, J., & Gasevic, D. (2019). Analysing discussion forum data: A replication study avoiding data contamination. In The 9th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (pp. 170–179), Tempe, AR, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303779

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fiock, H., & Garcia, H. (2019, November). How to give your students better feedback with technology. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/how-to-give-your-students-better-feedbackwith-technology/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fiock, H., Maeda, Y., & Richardson, J. C. (2021). Instructor impact on differences in teaching presence scores in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(3), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i3.5456

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In Encyclopedia of distance learning (2nd ed. pp. 352–355). IGI Global.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Garrison, D. R. (2015). Thinking collaboratively: Learning in a community of inquiry. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740751

  • Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Garrison, D. R. (2018, October 23). Shared metacognition. The community of Inquiry. https://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/editorial16

  • Garrison, D. R. (2023, April 18). CoI effectiveness and future development. The Community of Inquiry. https://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/editorial40

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gašević, D., Adesope, O., Joksimović, S., & Kovanović, V. (2015). Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gibbs, W. J. (2006). Visualizing interaction patterns in online discussions and indices of cognitive presence. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 18(1), 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032723

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jan, S., Vlachopoulos, P., & Parsell, M. (2019). Social network analysis and online learning in communities in higher education: A systematic literature review. Online Learning, 23(1), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1398

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jansson, M., Hrastinski, S., Stenbom, S., & Enoksson, F. (2021). Online question and answer sessions: How students support their own and other students’ processes of inquiry in a text-based learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 51, 100817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100817

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jansson, M., & Stenbom, S. (2023). Students’ teaching presence – How students organize, facilitate, and direct one-to-one online tutoring sessions. Proceedings of the ICDE World Conference, Costa Rica.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jarvenpaa, S., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jimoyiannis, A., Tsiotakis, P., & Roussinos, D. (2012). Blogs in higher education: Analysing students’ participation and presence in a community of blogging. In The Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference e-Learning.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jo, I., Park, Y., & Lee, H. (2017). Three interaction patterns on asynchronous online discussion behaviours: A methodological comparison. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(2), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12168

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kanuka, H., Rourke, L., & Laflamme, E. (2007). The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00620.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koehler, A. (2020). Team agreement. Purdue Repository for Online Teaching and Learning. https://www.purdue.edu/innovativelearning/tools-resources/portal/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koehler, A., Cheng, Z., Fiock, H., Janakiraman, S., Wang, H., & Chartier, K. (2022). Examining students’ use of online case-based discussions to support problem solving: Considering individual and collaborative experiences. Computers & Education, 179, 104407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104407

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koehler, A., & Meech, S. (2022). Ungrading learner participation in a student-centered learning experience. TechTrends, 66(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00682-w

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Waters, Z., Gašević, D., Kitto, K., Hatala, M., & Siemens, G. (2016, April). Towards automated content analysis of discussion transcripts: A cognitive presence case. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 15–24). https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883950

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2014). Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kreijns, K., Xu, K. & Weidlich, J. (2022). Social presence: Conceptualization and measurement. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 139–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09623-8

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Krippendorff, K. H. (2003). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.

  • Leach, L. (2016). Exploring discipline differences in student engagement in one institution. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(4), 772–786.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lee, J., Soleimani., F., Irish, I., Hosmer, J. Soylu, M. Y., Finkelberg, R., & Chatterjee, S. (2022). Predicting cognitive presence in at-scale online learning: MOOC and for-credit online course environments. Online Learning, 26(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3060

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lim, J., & Richardson, J. C. (2021). Predictive effects of undergraduate students’ perceptions of social, cognitive, and teaching presence on affective learning outcomes according to disciplines. Computers & Education, 161, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013152030261X?via%3Dihub

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press.

  • Lowenthal, P. R., & Parscal, T. (2008). Teaching presence online facilitates meaningful learning. The Learning Curve, 3(4), 1–2. http://www.patricklowenthal.com/publications/TeachingPresenceFacilitatesLearning.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lowenthal, P. R., & Snelson, C. (2017). In search of a better understanding of social presence: An investigation into how researchers define social presence. Distance Education, 38(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1324727

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lowenthal, P. R., & Trespalacios, J. (2022). Classroom community and time: Comparing student perceptions in traditional vs. accelerated online courses. Online Learning, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.3498

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Maranna, S., Willison, J., Joksimovic, S., Parange, N., & Costabile, M. (2022). Factors that influence cognitive presence: A scoping review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7878

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McKlin, T. E. (2004). Analyzing cognitive presence in online courses using an artificial neural network [Doctoral Thesis, Georgia State University Graduate School, Georgia State University].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morueta, R. T., López, P. M., Gómez, Á. H., & Harris, V. W. (2016). Exploring social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry to perform higher cognitive tasks. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Neto, V., Rolim, V., Cavalcanti, A. P., Lins, R. D., Gasevic, D., & Ferreiramello, R. (2021). Automatic content analysis of online discussions for cognitive presence: a study of the generalizability across educational contexts. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(3), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2021.3083178

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Oh, E. G., Huang, W. H. D., Mehdiabadi, A. H., & Ju, B. (2018). Facilitating critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: Comparison between peer-and instructor-redirection. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9180-6

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Olesova, L., Slavin, M., & Lim, J. (2016). Exploring the effect of scripted roles on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. Online Learning Journal, 20(4), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i4.1058

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ostashewski, N., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2022). Participant experience in an inquiry-based massive open online course. Commonwealth of Learning. https://doi.org/10.56059/11599/4132

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Park, H., & Shea, P. (2020). A ten-year review of online learning research through co-citation analysis. Online Learning, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peacock, S., & Cowan, J. (2019). Promoting sense of belonging in online learning communities of inquiry at accredited courses. Online Learning, 23(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1488

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pozzi, F., Ceregini, A., Ferlino, L., & Persico, D. (2016). Dyads versus groups: Using different social structures in peer review to enhance online collaborative learning processes. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2107

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Redmond, P. (2014). Reflection as an indicator of cognitive presence. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.46

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richardson, J. C., & Alsup, J. (2015). From the classroom to the keyboard: How seven teachers created their online teacher identities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 142–167. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1814

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richardson, J. C., Arbaugh, B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Ice, P., Swan, K., & Garrison, D. R. (2012). Using the community of inquiry framework to inform effective instructional design. In L. Moller & J. Huett (Eds.), The next generation of education (pp. 97–125). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1785-9_7

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8–22.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richardson, J. C., & Ice, P. (2010). Investigating students’ level of critical thinking across instructional strategies in online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richardson, J. C., Ice, P., & Swan, K. (2009). Tips and techniques for integrating social, teaching, & cognitive presence into your courses. Poster session presented at the Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, WI.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richardson, J. C., Koehler, A. A., Tagare, D., Urena-Rodriquez, L., Xu, Q., Zhang, Z., Fiock, H., Long, Y., & Duha, M. S. (2023, April 14). Community of inquiry design decisions across disciplines [Conference presentation]. AERA 2023, Chicago, IL, United States.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning. Computers and Human Behavior, 71, 402–417. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richardson, J. C., Sadaf, A., & Ertmer, P. (2013). Relationship between types of question prompts and critical thinking in online discussions. In Z. Akyol & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice (pp. 197–222). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7.ch011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richardson, J. C., Swan, K., Lowenthal, P., & Ice, P. (2016). Social presence in online learning: Past, present, and future. Global Learn 2016, Limerick, Ireland. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/172799

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sadaf, A., & Olesova, L. (2017). Enhancing cognitive presence in online case discussions with questions based on the practical inquiry model. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1267525

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sadaf, A., & Olesova, L. (2020). Exploring the relationship between interaction and the structure of questions in online discussions using learning analytic. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 23(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2020-0004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sadaf, A., Wu, T., & Martin, F. (2021). Cognitive presence in online learning: A systematic review of empirical research from 2000 to 2019. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100050

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Satar, H. M., & Akcan, S. (2018). Pre-service EFL teachers’ online participation, interaction, and social presence. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 157–183. https://doi.org/10125/44586

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shea, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2022) Building bridges to advance the community of inquiry framework for online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089989

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.

  • Smith, G. G., Torres-Ayala, A. T., & Heindel, A. J. (2008). Disciplinary differences in E-learning instructional design. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 22(3), 63–88. https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/91

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stenbom, S. (2018). A systematic review of the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stenbom, S., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Hrastinski, S. (2016). Emotional presence in a relationship of inquiry: The case of one-to-one online math coaching. Online Learning, 20(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i1.563

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stephens, G. E., & Roberts, K. L. (2017). Facilitating collaboration in online groups. Journal of Educators Online, 14(1), 1–16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133614

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stewart, M. K. (2017). Communities of inquiry: A heuristic for designing and assessing interactive learning activities in technology-mediated FYC. Computers and Composition, 45, 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2017.06.004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Swan, K. (2020a). Journaling with students. Purdue Repository for Online Teaching and Learning. https://www.purdue.edu/innovativelearning/tools-resources/portal/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Swan, K. (2020b). Teaching and learning in post-industrial distance education. In An introduction to distance education (pp. 67–89). Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Swan, K. P., Richardson, J. C., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Ben Arbaugh, J. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-mentor, 2, 88–94.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Themeli, C., & Bougia, A. (2016). Tele-proximity: Tele-community of inquiry model. Facial cues for social, cognitive, and teacher presence in distance education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(6), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2453

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tirado, R., Hernando, Á., & Aguaded, J. I. (2015). The effect of centralization and cohesion on the social construction of knowledge in discussion forums. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(3), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745437

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tzelepi, M., Petroulis, I., & Papanikolaou, K. (2019). Investigating gamification and learning analytics tools for promoting and measuring communities of inquiry in Moodle courses. In The International Conference in methodologies and intelligent systems for technology enhanced learning (Vol. 1007, pp. 89–96). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23990-9_11

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wang, Y. M., & Chen, V. D. T. (2008). Essential elements in designing online discussions to promote cognitive presence: A practical experience. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 157–177. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3-4.1690

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Warner, A. G. (2016). Developing a community of inquiry in a face-to-face class: How an online learning framework can enrich traditional classroom practice. Journal of Management Education, 40(4), 432–452. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/1052562916629515

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Waters, Z., Kovanović, V., Kitto, K., & Gašević, D. (2015). Structure matters: Adoption of structured classification approach in the context of cognitive presence classification. In Proceedings of the 11th Asia In-formation Retrieval Societies Conference (pp. 227–238). Brisbane, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28940-3_18

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Valverde-Berrocoso, J., del Carmen Garrido-Arroyo, M., Burgos-Videla, C., & Morales-Cevallos, M. B. (2020). Trends in educational research about e-Learning: A systematic literature review (2009–2018). Sustainability, 12(12), 5153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125153

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xu, S., Luo, H., & Tan, Y. (2018). Re-examining the community of inquiry framework from the perspective of learning analytics. In 2018 13th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yilmaz, R. (2020). Enhancing community of inquiry and reflective thinking skills of undergraduates through using learning analytics-based process feedback. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 909–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12449

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zydney, J. M., deNoyelles, A., & Seo, K. (2012). Creating a community of inquiry in online environments: An exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions. Computers & Education, 58(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 96 96 11
Full Text Views 2 2 0
PDF Views & Downloads 8 8 0