Chapter 15 Selecting Media and Methods to Facilitate Blended Learning

A Systematic Approach based on Skill Level, Content Stability, Cost, and Instructional Strategy

In: Handbook of Research in Online Learning
Authors:
Atsusi “2c” Hirumi
Search for other papers by Atsusi “2c” Hirumi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
George R. Bradford
Search for other papers by George R. Bradford in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Leanne Rutherford
Search for other papers by Leanne Rutherford in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Like others, the US Army is examining the use of emerging instructional technologies, such as but not limited to blended learning (BL) to optimize training. The problem is there are neither established formulas nor published algorithms for determining which aspects of a course to put online and to administer face-to-face (f2f) to facilitate blended learning. To address the problem, a team of Instructional Designers examined existing training and formulated, tested, refined, and transferred a process for analyzing and nominating specific aspects of military intelligence (MI) coursework for either residential (f2f) and/or distributed (online) delivery.

The resulting process consisted of three basic stages that addressed five primary questions, including Stage 1: Basic Instructional Mode Selection. “What aspects of a course should be nominated for blended learning (BL), conventional classroom learning (f2f), or distance learning (dL)?” Stage 2a: Primary dL Delivery System Selection. “For those aspects nominated for dL, what primary system should be used to deliver the contents?” Stage 2b: Primary F2F Instructional Setting Selection. “For those aspects nominated for f2f instruction, what primary settings should be used to deliver the contents?” Stage 3a: Instructional Strategy Selection. “What instructional strategy should be used to design and deliver the coursework?” Stage 3b: Media and Communication Tool Selection. “What specific media and telecommunications tools should be used to facilitate dL, f2f, and BL coursework?”

The process seeks to optimize training by addressing (a) basic skills and knowledge using distributed learning (dL) technologies, and (b) higher-order thinking skills in conventional, face-to-face (f2f) classroom settings. Three additional factors were considered for making media selection decisions including cost, stability, and instructional strategy.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Alvarez, S. (2005). Blended learning solutions. In B. Hoffman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational technology.

  • Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bershin, J. (2004). The blended book of learning. Pfeiffer.

  • Biggs, J. B. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment, Higher Education, 32, 118.

  • Biggs, J. B. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at University. Open University Press. (Original work published 1999)

  • Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2006). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longman.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 2129.

  • Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

  • Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1997). Grounded practice in the design of learning systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 101117.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirumi, A. (2002a). A framework for analyzing, designing, and sequencing planned e-learning interactions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 141160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirumi, A. (2002b). The design and sequencing of e-learning interactions: A grounded approach. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(1), 1927.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirumi, A. (2006). A framework for analyzing and designing e-learning interactions. In C. Juwah (Ed.), Interactivity and interactions in distance and online education (pp. 4672). Kogan Page.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirumi, A. (2021). IAMSE 2021—plenary session: Top 10 ways an instructional designer can help you define the new normal, medical science educator. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01400-0

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hirumi, A., Daroowalla, F., & Ratliff, M. (2021, November 2–6). Transdisciplinary model for advancing evidence-based medical education. Concurrent session presented at the annual Association for Educational Communication and Technology Convention.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause. http://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer.

  • Li, K., & Keller, J. M. (2018). Use of the ARCS model in education: a literature review. Computers in Education, 122, 5462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Salomon, G. (1979). Media and symbol systems as related to cognition and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 131148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.131

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 41 41 13
Full Text Views 1 1 0
PDF Views & Downloads 6 6 0