Chapter 16 The Impact of Digital Learning on Racially Minoritized and Poverty-Affected College Students

A Literature Review

In: Handbook of Research in Online Learning
Author:
Laura DaVinci
Search for other papers by Laura DaVinci in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

This chapter examines literature that assesses the effectiveness of digital learning in decreasing equity gaps and its impact on specific student populations. Specifically, the literature review focuses on college students identifying as Black, Latino, Indigenous, and first-generation students, along with those hailing from low-income backgrounds. The chapter uses a broad definition of digital learning: the use of technology to enable pedagogical practices and strategies in the teaching and learning process for student success. Digital learning includes a broad range of curricular models, content, and communication tools, design strategies, instruction that personalizes instruction for students, and student support services for students across all learning modalities, including face-to-face, blended, and online learning environments. This literature review looks at studies from 2010 to 2023 and does not include emergency remote instruction during the lockdown and shelter stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, as the variables of that situation—such as illness, trauma, and lack of digital learning tools and broadband access—do not exist in the data collected during normal campus operations. Notably, this chapter presents the range of student impacts focused on specifically designed curriculum and pedagogy for online and blended classes and the use of educational technology across all modalities.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Alli, N., Rajan, R., & Ratliff, G. (2016). How personalized learning unlocks student success. EDUCAUSE Review, 51(2), 1221. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2016/3/how-personalized-learning-unlocks-student-success

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bailey, A., Vaduganathan, N., Henry, T., Laverdiere, R., & Pugliese, L. (2018). Making digital learning work: Success strategies from six leading universities and community colleges. Boston Consulting Group. https://edplus.asu.edu/sites/default/files/BCG-Making-Digital-Learning-Work-Apr-2018%20.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bannert, M., Sonnenberg, C., Mengelkamp, C., & Pieger, E. (2015). Short- and long-term effects of students’ self-directed metacognitive prompts on navigation behavior and learning performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 293306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.038

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bernard, D., & Lowe, T. (2019). Impostor syndrome, black college students and how administrators can help. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 36, 40. https://www.diverseeducation.com/campus-climate/article/15105156/impostor-syndrome-black-college-students-and-how-administrators-can-help

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berry, T. L., Dellinger, J., Fox, K., Makkar, A., & McBratney, J. (2020). Learning analytics strategy toolkit. Every learner everywhere. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/learning-analytics-strategy-toolkit/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bharadwaj, P., Shaw, C., NeJame, L., Martin, S., Janson, N., & Fox, K. (2023). Time for class – 2023. Tyton Partners. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/time-for-class-2023/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Binning, K. R., Kaufmann, N., McGreevy, E. M., Fotuhi, O., Chen, S., Marshman, E., Kalender, Z. Y., Limeri, L., Betancur, L., & Singh, C. (2020). Changing social contexts to foster equity in college science courses: An ecological-belonging intervention. Psychological Science, 31(9), 10591070. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620929984

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2013). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from a six-campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94111. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21728

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bussell, T. L. (2020). The relationship of instructional technology to minority student successful course completion at a regional university in the rural southwest. Texas A&M University. https://digitalcommons.tamuc.edu/etd/30/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buzzetto-Hollywood, N. A., Wang, H. C., Elobeid, M., & Elobaid, M. E. (2018). Addressing information literacy and the digital divide in higher education. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 14, 7793. https://doi.org/10.28945/4029

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Byrd, C. M. (2016). Does culturally relevant teaching work? An examination from student perspectives. SAGE Open, 6(3), 215824401666074. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016660744

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clark, S., & Jones, L. (2020). A team-based approach to redesigning developmental math courses at Oregon State University. Every Learner Everywhere. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/a-team-based-approach-to-redesigning-developmental-math-courses-at-oregon-state-university/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clark, S., & O’Sullivan, P. (2020). Case study: Oregon State University. Every Learner Everywhere. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/case-study-oregon-state-university-osu/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooney, C. (2017). What impacts do OER have on students? Students share their experiences with a health psychology OER at New York City College of Technology. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 155178. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3111

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DaVinci, L. (2023). The impact of digital learning on minoritized and poverty-affected college students: A literature review. Every Learner Everywhere. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/the-impact-of-digital-learning-on-minoritized-and-poverty-affected-college-students-a-literature-review/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, V. (2023). Equity in a world of artificial intelligence. WICHE Cooperative for Educational Technologies. https://wcet.wiche.edu/frontiers/2023/04/20/strongequity-in-a-world-of-ai/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Brey, C., Zhang, A., & Duffy, S. (2022). Digest of education statistics, 2020. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Brey, C., Zhang, A., & Duffy, S. (2023). Digest of Education Statistics, 2020. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031), 862864. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201783

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dierker (AE), L., Alexander, J., Cooper, J., Selya, A., Rose, J., & Dasgupta, N. (2016). Engaging diverse students in statistical inquiry: A comparison of learning experiences and outcomes of under-represented and non-underrepresented students enrolled in a multidisciplinary project-based statistics course. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2016.100102

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dodge, B., Whitmer, J., & Frazee, J. P. (2015). Improving undergraduate student achievement in large blended courses through data-driven Interventions. LAK ’15: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, March, 412413. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723657

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dynarski, S. (2018). Online courses are harming the students who need the most help. The New York Times, 19. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/business/online-courses-are-harming-the-students-who-need-the-most-help.html

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dziuban, C., Howlin, C., Moskal, P., Johnson, C., Parker, L., & Campbell, M. (2018). Adaptive learning: A stabilizing influence across disciplines and universities. Online Learning, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i3.1465

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Johnson, C., & Evans, D. (2017). Adaptive learning: A tale of two contexts. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 4(1). https://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol4/iss1/3

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eddy, S. L., & Hogan, K. A. (2014). Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 453468. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI). (2017). 7 things you should know about adaptive learning. https://library.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2017/1/eli7140.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fautch, J. M. (2019). Adaptive learning technology in general chemistry: Does it support student success? In enhancing retention in introductory chemistry courses: Teaching practices and assessments. ACS Symposium Series, 91104. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1330.ch006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fischer, C., Zhou, N., Rodriguez, F., Warschauer, M., & King, S. (2019). Improving college student success in organic chemistry: Impact of an online preparatory course. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(5), 857864. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b01008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fleming, R., Stoiber, L. C., Pfeiffer, H. M., Kienzler, S. E., Fleming, R. R., Pedrick, L. E., Barth, D. J., & Reddy, D. M. (2016). Using U-pace instruction to improve the academic performance of economically disadvantaged undergraduates. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(4), 304313. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12133

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fox, K., Vignare, K., Yuan, L., Tesene, M., Beltran, K., Schweizer, H., Brokos, M., & Seaborn, R. (2021). Strategies for implementing digital learning infrastructure to support equitable outcomes: A case-based guidebook for institutional leaders. Every Learner Everywhere. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/strategies-for-implementing-digital-learning-infrastructure-to-support-equitable-outcomes/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 84108415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Freire, D. S., & Hurd, N. M. (2023). Discrimination and mental health outcomes among underrepresented college students: The role of sense of belonging at predominantly white institutions. Emerging Adulthood, 11(3), 654668. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968231166967

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.

  • Greenberg, K. P. (2015). Rubric use in formative assessment: A detailed behavioral rubric helps students improve their scientific writing skills. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 211217.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hampton, M., & Means, B. (2020). Economics at Cuyahoga Community College. Every Learner Everywhere. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/case-study-economics-at-cuyahoga-community-college/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harkness, S. S. J. (2015). How a Historically Black College University (HBCU) established a sustainable online learning program in partnership with Quality Matters. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(3), 198209. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2015.1057440

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, R. B., Mack, M. R., Bryant, J., Theobald, E. J., & Freeman, S. (2020). Reducing achievement gaps in undergraduate general chemistry could lift underrepresented students into a “hyperpersistent zone.” Science Advances, 6(24). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5687

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heikoop, W. (2013). Blended identities: Identity work, equity and marginalization in blended learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(1), 5367. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.1.53

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning, Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 15671579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hickey, D. T., Robinson, J., Fiorini, S., & Feng, Y. (2020). Internet-based alternatives for equitable preparation, access, and success in gateway courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 44, 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100693

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holiday, T., O’Sullivan, P., & Adams, S. (2020). Adaptive courseware implementation guide. Every Learner Everywhere. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/adaptive-courseware-implementation-guide/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • House, A., Means, B., Peters Hinton, V., Boyce, J., Wetzel, T., & Wang, S. (2018). Next generation courseware challenge evaluation. SRI International.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ikebuchi S. (2023). Accessing education: Equity, diversity, and inclusion in online learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 49(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28349

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Inclusive access improves grades while cutting costs. (n.d.-a). McGraw Hill. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzETuT-C95s

  • Ingram, C. W., Mintz, E., & Teodorescu, D. (2019). Using adaptive learning courseware as a high-impact practice to improve students’ learning outcomes in general chemistry II at an HBCU. AAC&U Peer Review, Winter/Spring, 3841.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jaggars, S. S., Edgecombe, N., & Stacey, G. W. (2013). What we know about online course outcomes. Research Overview. Community College Research Center, Columbia University.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson, N., Seaman, J., & Poulin, R. (2022). Defining different modes of learning: resolving confusion and contention through consensus. Online Learning, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i3.3565

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, S. J., & Long, V. M. (2013). Learning equity between online and on-site mathematics courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(1).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joosten, T., Cusatis, R., & Harness, L. (2019). A cross-institutional study of instructional characteristics and student outcomes: Are quality indicators of online courses able to predict student success? Online Learning, 23(4), 354378. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.1432

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joosten, T., Harness, L., Poulin, R., Davos, V., & Baker, M. (2021). Research review: Educational technologies and their impact on student success for racial and ethnic groups of interest. WICHE Cooperative for Educational Technologies (WCET) https://wcet.wiche.edu/resources/research-review-educational-technologies-and-their-impact-on-student-success-for-racial-and-ethnic-groups-of-interest/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joosten, T., Weber, N., Baker, M., Schletzbaum, A., & McGuire, A. (2021). Planning for a blended future: A research-driven guide for educators. Every Learner Everywhere Network. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/planning-for-a-blended-future/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaupp, R. (2012). Online penalty: The impact of online instruction on the Latino-white achievement gap. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 19(2), 311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kincey, S., Farmer, E., Wiltsher, C., McKenzie, D., & Mbiza, S. (2019). Chalkboard to digital media: The evolution of technology and its relationship to minority students’ learning experiences. The Journal of Faculty Development, 33(1), 6576.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koch, A. K., & Drake, B. M. (2018). Digging into the disciplines I: Accounting for failure—the impact of principles of accounting courses on student success and equitable outcomes. Gardner Institute. John N. Gardner Institute for Excellence in Undergraduate Education, 14.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kumi-Yeboah, A., Dogbey, J., & Yuan, G. (2017). Online collaborative learning activities: The perceptions of culturally diverse graduate students. Online Learning, 21(4), 528. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1277

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kurzweil, M., & Rossman, D. (2018, January 29). Faculty collaboration and technology in the liberal arts: Lessons from a Teagle grant program. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.306354

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LaPlaca, G., & Dobek, K. (2021). APLU Adapt 2021: How to use data in the classroom. APLU and Every Learner Everywhere. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/aplu-adapt-2021-how-to-use-data-in-the-classroom/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Littenberg-Tobias, J., & Reich, J. (2020). Evaluating access, quality, and equity in online learning: A case study of a MOOC-based blended professional degree program. The Internet and Higher Education, 47, 100759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100759

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, M., McKelroy, E., Corliss, S. B., & Carrigan, J. (2017). Investigating the effect of an adaptive learning intervention on students’ learning. Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 65(6), 16051625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9542-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGuire, R. (2022). Toward ending the monolithic view of “underrepresented students”: Why higher education must account for racial, ethnic, and economic variations in barriers to equity. Every Learner Everywhere. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/toward-ending-the-monolithic-view-of-underrepresented-students/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McIntosh, R. D., Fowler, E. A., Lyu, T., & Della Sala, S. (2019). Wise up: Clarifying the role of metacognition in the Dunning-Kruger effect. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 148(11), 18821897. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000579

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Olderog, A. (2021, October 12). Bridging the equity gap – are innovation and technology the equalizer or the divider? Getting Smart. https://www.gettingsmart.com/2021/09/10/bridging-the-equity-gap-are-innovation-and-technology-the-equalizer-or-the-divider/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O’Sullivan, P., Forgette, C., Monroe, S., & England, M. T. (2020). Student perceptions of the effectiveness of adaptive courseware for learning. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 7(1), 70100. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol7/iss1/5/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parker, A. G., Santos, J., & Dancy, K. (2021). Online isn’t optional. Student polling on access to Internet and devices. Institute for Higher Education Policy. https://www.ihep.org/publication/online-isnt-optional/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petrović, J., Pale, P., & Jeren, B. (2017). Online formative assessments in a digital signal processing course: Effects of feedback type and content difficulty on students learning achievements. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 30473061.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rau, M. A., Kennedy, K., Oxtoby, L., Bollom, M., & Moore, J. W. (2017). Unpacking “active learning”: A combination of flipped classroom and collaboration support is more effective but collaboration support alone is not. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(10), 14061414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reddy, D., Fleming, R., Pfeiffer, H., Jirovec, D., Pedrick, L., & Barth, D. (2013). U-Pace instruction improves student success by integrating content mastery and amplified assistance. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED540734.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Renick, T. (2018). Closing the achievement gap with technology. International Educator, 27(3), 5052.

  • Rivas-Drake, D., Syed, M., Umaña-Taylor, A., Markstrom, C., French, S., Schwartz, S. J., Lee, R., & Ethnic and Racial Identity in the 21st Century Study Group. (2014). Feeling good, happy, and proud: A meta-analysis of positive ethnic-racial affect and adjustment. Child Development, 85, 77102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Salvo, S. G., Welch, B., & Shelton, K., (2019). African American males learning online: Promoting academic achievement in higher education. Online Learning, 23(1), 2236. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1390

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seeking educational equity through redesign initiatives at Columbus State Community College. (n.d.-b). McGraw Hill. https://ottoportfolio.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/mcgraw-hill-case-study-sample.pdf

  • Shi, Y., Yang, H., MacLeod, J., Zhang, J., & Yang, H. H. (2020). College students’ cognitive learning outcomes in technology-enabled Active Learning Environments: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(4), 791817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119881477

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shieh, R. S., Chang, W., & Liu, E. Z.-F. (2011). Technology Enabled Active Learning (TEAL) in introductory physics: Impact on genders and achievement levels. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.905

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Snyder, J. J., Sloane, J. D., Dunk, R. D. P., & Wiles, J. R. (2016). Peer-led team learning helps minority students succeed. PLoS Biology, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002398

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sotto-Santiago, S. (2019). Time to reconsider the word minority in academic medicine. Journal of Best Practices in Health Professions Diversity, 12(1), 7278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stone, C. (2022). From the margins to the mainstream: The online learning rethink and its implications for enhancing student equity. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 139149. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8136

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tesene, M., & Charleston, K. (2020). Case Study Northern Arizona University. Association of Public & Land-grant Universities and Every Learner Everywhere. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/case-study-northern-arizona-university/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones, L., Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., … Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, Technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 64766483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Canegem, T., Van Houtte, M., & Demanet, J. (2022). Grade retention: A pathway to solitude? A cross-national multilevel analysis of the effects of being retained on students’ sense of belonging. Comparative Education Review, 66(4), 664687. https://doi.org/10.1086/721649

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vignare, K. (2020). Current issues in emerging elearning, APLU special issue on implementing adaptive learning at scale. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 7(1). https://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol7/iss1/7

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vignare, K., Tesene, M., & Lorenzo, G. (2020). Case study: University of Louisville (UofL). Every Learner Everywhere. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/case-study-university-of-louisville/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wladis, C., Conway, K., & Hachey, A. C. (2017). Using course-level factors as predictors of online course outcomes: A multi-level analysis at a US urban community college. Studies in Higher Education, 42(1), 184200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1045478

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. (2014). Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas, Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 633659. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2014.0028

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yarnall, L., Means, B., & Wetzel, T. (2016). Lessons learned from early implementations of adaptive courseware. SRI International.

  • Yuan, L., NeJame, L., Fox, K., Dorn, H., & Nguyen, A. (2022). Time for class – 2022. Tyton Partners. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/resources/time-for-class-2022/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 36 36 3
Full Text Views 2 2 0
PDF Views & Downloads 6 6 0