Chapter 14 Enduring Concepts and Pluralistic Perspectives for Educating through Designerly Thinking, Doing and Acting towards Positive World Futures

In: A Collection of Dreams about the Future of Technology Education
Author:
Kay Stables
Search for other papers by Kay Stables in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Abdulla, D. (2017). Design otherwise: Towards a locally-centric design education curricula in Jordan. University of London.

  • Aoki, T. T. (2005). Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki (W. F. Pinar & R. L. Irwin, Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Archer, L. B., Baynes, K., & Langdon, R. (1976). Design in general Education: Part one summary of findings. Royal College of Art, Department of Design Research.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Archer, B. (1992). The nature of research in design and design education. In B. Archer, K. Baynes & P. Roberts (Eds.), The nature of research into design and technology education (pp. 714). Loughborough University of Technology.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balaram, S. (2011). Thinking design. Sage.

  • Baynes, K. (2010). Models of change: the impact of ‘designerly thinking’ on people’s lives and the environment: seminar 4 … modelling and society. Loughborough University. Online resource. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/6092

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borg, K. (2006). What is sloyd? A question of legitimacy and identity. Tidskrift: Journal of Research in Teacher Education (2–3), 3451.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Claxton, G., Lucas, B. & Webster, R., (2010). Bodies of Knowledge: How the learning sciences could transform practical and vocational education. Edge Foundation.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DES/WO. (1989). Design and Technology for ages 5–16, Department for Education and Science, HMSO.

  • Dakers, J. (2022). A nomadic pedagogy about technology: Teaching the ongoing process of becoming ethnotechnologically literate. Brill.

  • DfE. (2015). Design and Technology GCSE subject content. Department for Education, Gov.UK.

  • Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press.

  • Escobar, A. (2007). Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise. Cultural Studies, 21:2–3, 179210, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162506

  • Flowers, J. (1998). Problem solving in Technology Education: A Taoist perspective. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 2026.

  • Flowers, J. (2010). The Problem in Technology Education (A Definite Article). Journal of Technology Education, 21(2), 1020.

  • Fry, T. (2012). Becoming human by design. Berg.

  • Gumbo, M. (2020). Teaching technology in “Poorly Resourced” contexts. In P. J. Williams & D. Barlex (Eds.), Pedagogy for Technology Education in Secondary Schools. (pp. 283296). Contemporary Issues in Technology Education, Springer Nature

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Irwin Irwin, T., Kossoff, G., Tonkinwise, C., & Scupelli, P. (2015). Transition Design 2015 A new area of design research, practice and study that proposes design-led societal transition toward more sustainable futures. School of Design Carnegie Melon University.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keirl, S. (2015). Global ethics, sustainability, and design and technology education. In K. Stables & S. Keirl (Eds.), Environment, Ethics and Cultures: Design and Technology education’s contribution to sustainable global futures (pp. 1532). Sense Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465491.

  • Mao, B. (1998). Incomplete Manifesto for growth. Bruce Man Studio. http://www.brucemaudesign.com/4817/112450/work/incomplete-manifesto-for-growth

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Orr, D. W. (2002). The nature of design: ecology, culture and human intention. New Oxford University Press.

  • O’Sullivan, N. (2023). Our Everyday: The Intangible Yet Tangible Tensions Between Commonality, Contrast, and Co-operation within Design Education. Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington. Conference contribution. https://doi.org/10.25455/wgtn.22650766

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Papanek, V. (1971). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. Thames and Hudson.

  • Princen, T. (2010). Treading Softly: Paths to Ecological Order. MIT Press.

  • Walker, S. (2010). Sermons in stones: argument and artefact for sustainability. Les Ateliers de l’ethique, 5(2), 101116

  • Whitehead, A. N., (1929). The aims of education and other essays. The Free Press.

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 44 44 9
Full Text Views 1 1 0
PDF Views & Downloads 2 2 0