Chapter 28 Whose Idea Is It Anyway?

Designing with Generative AI

In: A Collection of Dreams about the Future of Technology Education
Authors:
Alice Schut
Search for other papers by Alice Schut in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Christian Detweiler
Search for other papers by Christian Detweiler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Type:
Chapter
Pages:
323–334
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004710948_028

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00
Add to Cart
Redeem Access Token
  • Collapse
  • Expand

A Collection of Dreams about the Future of Technology Education

A Festschrift in Honour of Marc J. de Vries

Series:  International Technology Education Studies, Volume: 21
Cover A Collection of Dreams about the Future of Technology Education
E-Book ISBN:
9789004710948
Publisher:
Brill
Print Publication Date:
19 Dec 2024
Front Matter
Chapter 1 Introduction to This Festschrift for Marc J. de Vries
Chapter 2 A Most Unusual Philosopher
Chapter 3 A Vision of Technology Education; A USA Perspective
Chapter 4 The Role of Technology Education in Facing the World of Tomorrow
Chapter 5 From Capitalist Vision to Curriculum Crisis
Chapter 6 Back to the Future
Chapter 7 Empowering Students to Bridge the Gap into a Knowledge-Driven Technological Realm
Chapter 8 Technological Concepts and Technical Contexts for Technology Education
Chapter 9 The Wisdom, Power and Promise of Marc J. de Vries’ Thoughts
Chapter 10 A Technology Curriculum for 2030 and Beyond
Chapter 11 The Design Concept/Methodology – A Personal Professional Voyage
Chapter 12 A New Future for Technology Education in Wales
Chapter 13 Developing a New Technology Curriculum for an Urban Setting
Chapter 14 Enduring Concepts and Pluralistic Perspectives for Educating through Designerly Thinking, Doing and Acting towards Positive World Futures
Chapter 15 Wood Cloud: A composition of Intensity for Collaborative Learning
Chapter 16 Food as an Aspect of Technology Education in the 21st Century
Chapter 17 Why It Is Essential That (Ethno)Technological Literacy Is Embodied into STEM and STEAM Education
Chapter 18 Technology Education in Context
Chapter 19 Who Are We Fooling with Schooling?
Chapter 20 The Genesis of Contemporary Technology Education
Chapter 21 Design Learning at the Limits of Pedagogy
Chapter 22 Directions for Technology Education in Finland
Chapter 23 Talking Technology into the Future
Chapter 24 A Strategy for Moral Formation of Professionals
Chapter 25 Family Prospects and the Oblate Spheroid
Chapter 26 Technology Ethics at Work
Chapter 27 Technology and Tradition
Chapter 29 Adapting the Design and Technology Curriculum
Chapter 30 Nurturing Design and Technological Thinking
Chapter 31 Opportunities Won
Chapter 32 Did You Know That Marc Is a Language Genius in Swedish?
Chapter 33 Personal Gratitude Letter to Marc de Vries
Chapter 34 A Journey of Global Impact in Technology Education
Chapter 35 Converging on Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity
Chapter 36 Some Selected Memories of PATT
Chapter 37 Getting Inspired for the Future
Back Matter

  • Amoore, L. (2019). Cloud ethics : algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others.

  • Baber, C. (2023). Tool use and creativity. The Routledge International Handbook of Creative Cognition (pp. 570–584). Routledge.

  • Barlex, D. (2007). Creativity in school design & technology in England: a discussion of influences. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-0006-x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Blom, N. (2022). Design cognition in design and technology classrooms. In A. Hardy (Ed.), Debates in Design and Technology Education (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003166689

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Blom, N., & Bogaers, A. (2020). Using Linkography to investigate students’ thinking and information use during a STEM task. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9489-5

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davis, N., Hsiao, C.-Pi., Singh, K. Y., Li, L., Moningi, S., & Magerko, B. (2015). Drawing Apprentice. Proceedings of the 2015 ACMSIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, 185–186. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2764555

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dorst, K. (2003). Understanding Design. BIS Publishers.

  • Epstein, Z., Hertzmann, A., Herman, L., Mahari, R., Frank, M. R., Groh, M., Schroeder, H., Smith, A., Akten, M., Fjeld, J., Farid, H., Leach, N., Pentland, A., & Russakovsky, O. (2023). Art and the science of generative AI: A deeper dive. Science. 380(6650), 1110–1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh4451

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Franceschelli, G., & Musolesi, M. (2021). Creativity and Machine Learning: A Survey. http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.02726

  • Goldschmidt, G. (2016). Linkographic Evidence for Concurrent Divergent and Convergent Thinking in Creative Design. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162497

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Haupt, G. (2015). Learning from experts: fostering extended thinking in the early phases of the design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(4), 483–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9295-7

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design Fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 3–11.

  • Jovanovic, M., & Campbell, M. (2022). Generative Artificial Intelligence: Trends and Prospects. Computer, 55(10), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2022.3192720

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kim, J., Maher, M. Lou, & Siddiqui, S. (2021). Studying the Impact of AI-based Inspiration on Human Ideation in a Co-Creative Design System. Proceedings of the ACMIUI 2021 Workshops.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Liapis, A., Yannakakis, G. N., & Togelius, J. (2013). Sentient Sketchbook: Computer-Aided Game Level Authoring. International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lipton, Z. C., & Steinhardt, J. (2019). Troubling Trends in Machine Learning Scholarship. Queue, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3317287.3328534

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Magnusson, T. (2019). Sonic Writing. Bloomsbury Publishing.

  • McDyer, M., Buckley, J., Dunbar, R., Blom, N., & Seery, N. (2023). Problematising and unpacking the uncertainty of design within technology education. PATT40: The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings. https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/PATT40/article/view/1531

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McLellan, R., & Nicholl, B. (2009). “If i was going to design a chair, the last thing i would look at is a chair”: Product analysis and the causes of fixation in students’ design work 11–16 years. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9107-7

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Menary, R. (2012). Cognitive practices and cognitive character. Philosophical Explorations, 15(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2012.677851

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moreno, D. P., Hernández, A. A., Yang, M. C., Otto, K. N., Hölttä-Otto, K., Linsey, J. S., Wood, K. L., & Linden, A. (2014). Fundamental studies in Design-by-Analogy: A focus on domain-knowledge experts and applications to transactional design problems. Design Studies, 35(3), 232–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.11.002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nicholl, B., & McLellan, R. (2007). “Oh yeah, yeah you get a lot of love hearts. The year 9s are notorious for love hearts. Everything is love hearts”. Fixation in pupils’ design and technology work (11–16 years). Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 12(1), 34–44.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Runco, M. A. (2023). AI can only produce artificial creativity. Journal of Creativity, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100063

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schut, A., Klapwijk, R., Gielen, M., van Doorn, F., & de Vries, M. (2019). Uncovering early indicators of fixation during the concept development stage of children’s design processes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09528-2

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vartiainen, H., & Tedre, M. (2023). Using artificial intelligence in craft education: crafting with text-to-image generative models. Digital Creativity, 34(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2023.2174557

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics