Chapter 29 Adapting the Design and Technology Curriculum

A Framework for Evaluation and Evolution

In: A Collection of Dreams about the Future of Technology Education
Author:
Alison Hardy
Search for other papers by Alison Hardy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Type:
Chapter
Pages:
335–350
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004710948_029

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00
Add to Cart
Redeem Access Token
  • Collapse
  • Expand

A Collection of Dreams about the Future of Technology Education

A Festschrift in Honour of Marc J. de Vries

Series:  International Technology Education Studies, Volume: 21
Cover A Collection of Dreams about the Future of Technology Education
E-Book ISBN:
9789004710948
Publisher:
Brill
Print Publication Date:
19 Dec 2024
Front Matter
Chapter 1 Introduction to This Festschrift for Marc J. de Vries
Chapter 2 A Most Unusual Philosopher
Chapter 3 A Vision of Technology Education; A USA Perspective
Chapter 4 The Role of Technology Education in Facing the World of Tomorrow
Chapter 5 From Capitalist Vision to Curriculum Crisis
Chapter 6 Back to the Future
Chapter 7 Empowering Students to Bridge the Gap into a Knowledge-Driven Technological Realm
Chapter 8 Technological Concepts and Technical Contexts for Technology Education
Chapter 9 The Wisdom, Power and Promise of Marc J. de Vries’ Thoughts
Chapter 10 A Technology Curriculum for 2030 and Beyond
Chapter 11 The Design Concept/Methodology – A Personal Professional Voyage
Chapter 12 A New Future for Technology Education in Wales
Chapter 13 Developing a New Technology Curriculum for an Urban Setting
Chapter 14 Enduring Concepts and Pluralistic Perspectives for Educating through Designerly Thinking, Doing and Acting towards Positive World Futures
Chapter 15 Wood Cloud: A composition of Intensity for Collaborative Learning
Chapter 16 Food as an Aspect of Technology Education in the 21st Century
Chapter 17 Why It Is Essential That (Ethno)Technological Literacy Is Embodied into STEM and STEAM Education
Chapter 18 Technology Education in Context
Chapter 19 Who Are We Fooling with Schooling?
Chapter 20 The Genesis of Contemporary Technology Education
Chapter 21 Design Learning at the Limits of Pedagogy
Chapter 22 Directions for Technology Education in Finland
Chapter 23 Talking Technology into the Future
Chapter 24 A Strategy for Moral Formation of Professionals
Chapter 25 Family Prospects and the Oblate Spheroid
Chapter 26 Technology Ethics at Work
Chapter 27 Technology and Tradition
Chapter 28 Whose Idea Is It Anyway?
Chapter 30 Nurturing Design and Technological Thinking
Chapter 31 Opportunities Won
Chapter 32 Did You Know That Marc Is a Language Genius in Swedish?
Chapter 33 Personal Gratitude Letter to Marc de Vries
Chapter 34 A Journey of Global Impact in Technology Education
Chapter 35 Converging on Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity
Chapter 36 Some Selected Memories of PATT
Chapter 37 Getting Inspired for the Future
Back Matter

  • Axell, C., & Boström, J. (2023). Unveiling Biases: An Exploration of ChatGPT-3.5-generated ‘Technology Stories’. In: The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Axell, C., & Boström, J. (2021). Technology in children’s picture books as an agent for reinforcing or challenging traditional gender stereotypes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31, 27–39.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Barlex, D., Steeg, T., & Givens, N. (2020). Teaching about disruption: A key feature of new and emerging technologies. In A. Hardy (Ed.), Learning to Teach Design and Technology in the Secondary School (pp. 137–154). Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Barrow, T. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Issue. FutureMinds.

  • Benjamin, H. R. W. (2004). The saber-tooth curriculum. McGraw-Hill.

  • Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640.

  • Black, P.J., & Harrison, G. (1985). In place of confusion: technology and science in the school curriculum: a discussion paper. Nuffield-Chelsea Curriculum Trust and the National Centre for School.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Broens, R. C. J. A. M., & de Vries, M.J. (2003). Classifying technological knowledge for presentation to mechanical engineering designers. Design Studies, 24(5), 457–471.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bushe, G. R., & Marshak, R. J., 2015. Dialogic organization development : the theory and practice of transformational change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dakers, J. R. (2005). The hegemonic behaviorist cycle. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 111–126.

  • Davies, S. (2022). Managing curriculum change. Debates in Design and Technology Education.

  • Department for Education and Science and the Welsh Office. (1988). National Curriculum Design and Technology Working Group Interim Report. DES.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Department for Education, & Gibb, N. (2015). The purpose of education (speech). Education Reform Summit. Department for Education.

  • Department of Education. (2013). The National Curriculum in England Framework Document (July 2013). Department of Education.

  • Gibson, K. (2008). Technology and technological knowledge: A challenge for school curricula. Teachers and Teaching, 14(1), 3–15.

  • Gumbo, M. (2022). Teaching for technological justice: Embracing indigenous designs. In A. Hardy (Ed.), Debates in Design and Technology Education (2nd ed., pp. 194–208). Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hardy, A. (2024). AI in D&T Education: A New Design Instrument, a Disruptor and a pedagogy. Talking D&T.

  • Hardy, A.L. (2015). What’s D&T for? Gathering and comparing the values of design and technology academics and trainee teachers. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 20(2), 10–21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hardy, A., & Taylor, J. (2024). Creativity in the Classroom with AI Technology: a conversation with Joanne Taylor about PATT40 [online]. Talking D&T. Available at: https://www.buzzsprout.com/288393/episodes [Accessed March 1, 2024].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hellard, A. (2023). Engaging object agency: new ways of design learning and being for young people in the museum. The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023, 1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hill, A. M. (1998). Problem Solving in Real-Life Contexts: An Alternative for Design in Technology Education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(3), 203–220.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Keirl, S. (2007). The politics of technology curriculum. In D. Barlex (Ed.), Design and technology for the next generation (pp. 60–73). Cliffeco Communications.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kimbell, R., & Stables, K. (2008). Researching design learning: issues and findings from two decades of research and development. Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Layton, D. (1992a). Values and design and technology. Loughborough University.

  • Layton, D. (1992b). Values in Design and Technology. In C. Budgett-Meakin (Ed.), Make the Future Work (pp. 36–53). Harlow, England: Longman.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Martin, M. (1999). Exploring values in design and technology. In D. Lawton, J. Cairns & R. Gardner (Eds.), Values and the curriculum; the school context (pp. 199–207). Curriculum Studies Academic Group.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mawson, B. (2003). Beyond The Design Process’: An alternative pedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(2), 117–128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McCormick, R., 1997. Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1), 141–159.

  • McCormick, R. (1990). Technology and the National Curriculum: the creation of a ‘subject’ by committee? The Curriculum Journal, 1(1), 39–51.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Prasojo, L. D., Idi, A., & Hamidah, A. (2019). Curriculum reform in Indonesia: Moving from an exclusive to inclusive curriculum. CEPS Journal, 9(2), 53–72.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Prajapat, B., Sinclair, R., & Hardy, A. (2022). How do we do race in design and technology? In A. Hardy (Ed.), Debates in Design and Technology Education (2nd ed., pp. 45–61) Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Prime, G. M. (1993). Values in technology: Approaches to learning. Design & Technology Teaching, 26(1), 30–36.

  • Priniski, S. J., Hecht, C. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2018). Making Learning Personally Meaningful: A New Framework for Relevance Research. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 11–29.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ringvold, T. A., Strand, I., Haakonsen, P., & Strand, K. S. (2023). AI Text-to-Image Generation in Art and Design Teacher Education: A Creative Tool or a Hindrance to Future Creativity? In: The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Trimingham, R. (2008). The role of values in design decision-making. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 13(2), 37–52.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Turnbull, W. (2002). The place of authenticity in technology in the New Zealand curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(1), 23–40.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • van As, F. (2019). An Exploratory Evaluation of a South African Project-Based Curriculum Module Focused on Authentic Technological Practice Utilizing Student Portfolios and an Open-Ended Questionnaire. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(1), 107–121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. Van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum Landscapes and Trends (pp. 1–10). Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vincenti, W.G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • de Vries, Marc J. (2005). Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers. Springer.

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks.

  • Williams, P. J. (2007). Stakeholders in Technology Education. In J. de Vries Marc, R. Custer, & J. R. Dakers (Eds.), Analyzing Best Practices in Technology Education (pp. 179–190). Sense Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 51 51 8
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Views & Downloads 0 0 0