Introduction Celebrating Diverse Perspectives on STEAM Education

In: STEAM Education
Authors:
Yichien Cooper
Search for other papers by Yichien Cooper in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Alice Lai
Search for other papers by Alice Lai in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00
  • Collapse
  • Expand

STEAM Education

Intersections and Thresholds

  • Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 4047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2012.11519167

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bertling, J. G., & Moore, T. C. (2021). The U.S. K–12 art education curricular landscape: A nationwide survey. Studies in Art Education, 62(1), 2346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2020.1858007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooper, Y. (2013). Curriculum connections: Mapping integrating arts framework for diverse learnings. International Journal of Arts Education, 11(1), 184199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 陳怡倩. (2016). 課程設計: 統整藝術課程設計的思維與趨勢 [On integrated curriculum design]. Hungyeh Publishing Co.

  • 陳怡倩. (2017a). 統整的力量 [The power of integrated curriculum: The core of STEAM education]. Hunan Publishing Co.

  • 陈怡倩. (2017b). STEAM的A来看美国的STEAM教育 [The role of A in STEAM education],香港美术教育, 1, 49.

  • 陈怡倩. (2018). 透析STEAM教育的核心理论. [Theories behind STEAM education]. 中国中小学美术, 131(July), 5255.

  • Cooper, Y. (2022). The use of time in media arts education: Stories from Taiwan. In A. Knochel & S. Osamu (Eds.), Global media arts: Mapping perspectives of media arts in education. (pp. 307322). Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drake, S., & Burns, R. (2004). Meeting standards through integration curriculum. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301. (2015). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1177

  • Gaskins, N. R. (2021). Techno-vernacular creativity and innovation: Culturally relevant making inside and outside of the classroom. MIT Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gess, A. H. (2017). STEAM education: Separating fact from fiction. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 77(3), 3941.

  • Gettings, M. (2016). Putting it all together: STEAM, PBL, scientific method, and the studio habits of mind. Art Education, 69(4), 1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1176472

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herro, D., Quigley, C., & Cian, H. (2019). The challenges of STEAM instruction: Lessons from the field. Action in Teacher Education, 41(2), 172190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2018.1551159

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hetland, L. (2007). Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. Teachers College Press.

  • Hogan, J., Hetland, L., Jaquith, D., & Winner, E. (2018). Studio thinking from the start: The K‒8 art educator’s handbook. Teachers College Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kraehe, A. M. (2018). Disciplinary borderlands. Art Education, 71(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2018.1414528

  • Lai, A., & Cooper, Y. (2016). Untangling gender divides through girly and gendered visual culture. Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 36, 96107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lai, A., & Cooper, Y. (2023). We are VR girls: Becoming engaged citizens through STEAM-integrated projects. In M. Bae-Dimitriadis & O. Ivashkevich (Eds.), Teaching civic participation with digital media in art education: Critical approaches for classrooms and communities (pp. 151164). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003402060-14

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

  • National Art Education Association. (2022, June 1). NAEA position statement on STEAM education. https://www.arteducators.org/advocacy-policy/articles/552-naea-position-statement-on-steam-education

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Next Generation Science Standards. (2013, April 10). Appendix G ‒ Crosscutting concepts. https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/Appendix%20G%20-%20Crosscutting%20Concepts%20FINAL%20edited%204.10.13.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pekarik, A. J., Schreiber, J. B., Hanemann, N., Richmond, K., & Mogel, B. (2014). IPOP: A theory of experience preference. Curator, 57(1), 527. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12048

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rivet, A. E., Weiser, G., Lyu, X., Li, Y., & Rojas-Perilla, D. (2016). What are Crosscutting Concepts in science? Four metaphorical perspectives. In C. K. Looi, J. L. Polman, U. Cress, and Reimann, P. (Eds.), Transforming learning, empowering learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), V. 2, (pp. 970973). International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rolling, J. H. (2016). Reinventing the STEAM engine for art + design education. Art Education, 69(4), 47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1176848

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sousa, D. A., & Pilecki, T. (2018). From STEM to STEAM: Brain-compatible strategies and lessons that integrate the arts (2nd ed.). Corwin. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544357393

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Venkatesh, V., Ruprecht, L., & Ferede, M. K. (2023). Arts education: An investment in quality learning. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386034

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Winner, E. (2022). An uneasy guest in the schoolhouse: Art education from colonial times to a promising future. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190061289.001.0001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 100 100 29
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Views & Downloads 4 4 4