Chapter 7 Reflections on the Design of a STEAM Curriculum for 12- to 14-Year-Old Girls

In: STEAM Education
Authors:
Eliza Pitri
Search for other papers by Eliza Pitri in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Maria Evagorou
Search for other papers by Maria Evagorou in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Agni Stylianou-Georgiou
Search for other papers by Agni Stylianou-Georgiou in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

In this chapter we reflect on the process of designing and implementing a STEAM curriculum for 12- to 14-year-old girls. The first cycle of the curriculum was designed and implemented in 2021 during a four-day summer school in Cyprus, involving a range of activities and problem-solving inquiry for designing uniforms for scientists in a variety of STEM professions. Based on findings, a new version was designed and implemented in summer 2022 to help students work on the problem of using color to support scientists in improving their well-being in their workspace. Lessons learned from the process of designing and implementing the curriculum included using a driving problem to guide activities, introducing activities that captured students’ interests, explaining to students the design process and engaging them with it, and adding entrepreneurship activities. We highlight four pedagogical principles applied in the STEAM curriculum: learning with a purpose, gaining empowerment and agency, engaging in immersive learning, blending the STEAM disciplines through design thinking, and embracing uncertainty and risk taking. Keywords

  • Collapse
  • Expand

STEAM Education

Intersections and Thresholds

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press.

  • Baggett, A., & Macapia, C. (2020). Vending delight with elementary students. Art Education, 73(6), 3742. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2020.1785798

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity in teaching. In J. C. Kaufman, V. P. Glăveanu, & J. Baer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (pp. 549564). Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beghetto, R. A. (2018). What if? Building students’ problem solving skills through complex challenges. Association for Supervision and Curriculum. (ED586941) ERIC.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Beautiful risks: Having the courage to teach and learn creatively. Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2021). Creativity in K–12 schools. In R. J. Sternberg & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Creativity: An introduction (pp. 224241). Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bilgin, A. S., Molina Ascanio, M., Milanovic, I., Kirsch, M., Beernaert, Y., Scicluna Bugeja, D., Noriega, M., Farrugia, J., Evagorou, M., Molina, P., Kapoor, K., Malmberg, B., Trullàs, M., Pedralli, M., Neuberg, C., Koliakou, I., Magid-Podolsky, S., Herrero, B., Christou, E., … Gras-Velázquez, A. (2022). STEM female leaders—The way forward to reduce the gender gap in STEM fields. SCIENTIX. https://kavitakapoor.org/Bilgin_et_al_2022_STEM_Female_Leaders_STNS.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 13731388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690500498419

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Calabrese-Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68103. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308641

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, C., Tomsovic, K., & Aydeniz, M. (2014). Filling the pipeline: Power system and energy curricula for middle and high school students through summer programs. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 29(4), 18741879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2293752

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Craft, A. (2001). Possibility thinking: From what is to what might be. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in Education (pp. 4561). Continuum.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row.

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). Activity and happiness: Towards a science of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 1(1), 3842. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.1993.9686377

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship: Report to the European Commission of the Expert Group on Science Education. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777.12626

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. MIT Press.

  • Gettings, M. (2016). Putting it all together: STEAM, PBL, scientific method, and the studio habits of mind. Art Education, 69(4), 1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1176472

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Habig, B., Gupta, P., Levine, B. & Adams, J. (2020). An informal science education program’s impact on STEM major and STEM career outcomes. Research in Science Education, 50, 10511074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9722-y

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heeg, D., Smith, T., & Avraamidou, L. (2022). Children’s experiences and self-identification with science in the context of an out-of-school STEM program. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4), Article em2091. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11888

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hunter-Doniger, T. (2021). Forming artist/scientist habits. Art Education, 74(2), 1621. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2020.1852376

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jemison, M. (2002, February). Teach arts and sciences together [Video]. TED Conferences. https://www.ted.com/talks/mae_jemison_teach_arts_and_sciences_together?language=en

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kitchen, J. A., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2018). The impact of college- and university-run high school summer programs on students’ end of high school STEM career aspirations. Science Education, 102(3), 529547. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21332

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kleiner, F. S. (2020). Gardner’s art through the ages: A global history (16th ed.). Cengage Learning.

  • McGarry, K. (2018). Making partnerships with STEAM. Art Education, 71(2), 2834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2018.1414535

  • Melfi, T. (Director). (2016). Hidden figures [Film]. 20th Century Fox.

  • Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H.-H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K–12 STEM education. In S. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. E. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices (pp. 3560). Purdue University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq7bh.7

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pitri, E., & Stylianou-Georgiou, A. (2022). Boundaries in artmaking—Windows to expression. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2019). An educator’s guide to STEAM: Engaging students using real-world problems. Teachers College Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reed, S. K. (2016). The structure of ill-structured (and well-structured) problems revisited. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 691716. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10648-015-9343-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Resnick, M., & Rosenbaum, E. (2013). Designing for tinkerability. In M. Honey & D. Kantor (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 163181). Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sousa, D. A., & Pilecki, T. (2018). From STEM to STEAM: Brain-compatible strategies and lessons that integrate the arts. Corwin.

  • Watson, A. D. (2016). Revving up the STEAM engine. Art Education, 69(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1178032

  • Wieselmann, J. R., Roehrig, G. H., & Kim, J. N. (2020). Who succeeds in STEM? Elementary girls’ attitudes and beliefs about self and STEM. School Science and Mathematics, 120(5), 297308. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12407

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yakman, G. (2010). What is the point of STEAM? A brief overview. Academia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327449281_What_is_the_point_of_STEAM-A_Brief_Overview

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 171 171 4
Full Text Views 1 1 1
PDF Views & Downloads 1 1 1