Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Andaloro, G., Donzelli, V., & Sperandeo‐Mineo, R. M. (1991). Modelling in physics teaching: The role of computer simulation. International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 243‒254. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130303
Ardiny, H., & Khanmirza, E. (2018, October). The role of AR and VR technologies in education developments: Opportunities and challenges. In 2018 6th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (pp. 482‒487). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
Baker, W. M., Lusk, E. J., & Neuhauser, K. L. (2012). On the use of cell phones and other electronic devices in the classroom: Evidence from a survey of faculty and students. Journal of Education for Business, 87(5), 275‒289. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/08832323.2011.622814
Bayraktar, S. (2001). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 173‒188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2001.10782344
Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., & Lee, G. (2014) A survey of augmented reality. Foundations and Trends in Human‒Computer Interaction, 8(2‒3), 73‒272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000049
Blake, C., & Scanlon, E. (2007). Reconsidering simulations in science education at a distance: Features of effective use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(6), 491‒502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00239.x
Carmigniani, J., & Furht, B. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview. In B. Furht (Ed.), Handbook of augmented reality (pp. 3–46). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6_1
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2011). Universal design for learning guidelines. Version 2.0. Author.
Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449‒462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9
Cokelez, A., & Dumon, A. (2005). Atom and molecule: Upper secondary school French students’ representations in long-term memory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(3), 119‒135.
Crotty, M., & Crotty, M. F. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage.
Elements 4D interactive blocks. (2024). Kickstarter. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/daqri/elements-4d-interactive-blocks
Ellington, H. (1981). Games and simulations in science education. Nichols Publishing Company.
Engel, G., & Green, T. (2011). Cell phones in the classroom: Are we dialing up disaster? TechTrends, 55(2), 39‒45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0482-z
Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 (2015). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1177
Flick, L. B. (1993). The meanings of hands-on science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 4(1), 1‒8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02628851
Gil‐Perez, D., & Carrascosa, J. (1990). What to do about science “misconceptions.” Science Education, 74(5), 531‒540. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/sce.3730740504
Gilroy, M. (2004). Invasion of the classroom cell phones. The Education Digest, 69(6), 56‒60.
Goff, E. E., Mulvey, K. L., Irvin, M. J., & Hartstone-Rose, A. (2018). Applications of augmented reality in informal science learning sites: A review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 433‒447. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/189101/
Johnson, D. M., Wardlow, G. W., & Franklin, T. D. (1997). Hands-on activities versus worksheets in reinforcing physical science principles: Effects on student achievement and attitude. Journal of Agricultural Education, 38(3), 9‒17. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1997.03009
Kamenetz, A. (2019, October 31). It’s a smartphone life: More than half of US children now have one. National Public Radio: Ideastream Public Media https://www.npr.org/2019/10/31/774838891/its-a-smartphone-life-more-than-half-of-u-s-children-now-have-one
King-Sears, M. (2009). Universal design for learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(4), 199‒201. https://doi.org/10.2307/27740372
Kularbphettong, K., Roonrakwit, P., & Chutrtong, J. (2018, July). Effectiveness of enhancing classroom by using augmented reality technology. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 125‒133). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93882-0_13
Levy Nahum, T., Mamlok‐Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Taber, K. S. (2010). Teaching and learning the concept of chemical bonding. Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 179‒207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2010.504548
McMahon, D. D., Cihak, D. F., Wright, R. E., & Bell, S. M. (2016). Augmented reality for teaching science vocabulary to postsecondary education students with intellectual disabilities and autism. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(1), 38‒56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1103149
Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality‒virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, 282‒292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.197321
Muhammad, M. (2022, November). Review of trends in learning media of augmented reality integrated with STEM approach to improve students’ creative thinking skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2377(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2377/1/012084
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191‒196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191
Plunkett, K. N. (2019). A simple and practical method for incorporating augmented reality into the classroom and laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(11), 2628‒2631. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00607
Rafiq, K. R. M., & Hashim, H. (2018). Augmented reality game (ARG), 21st century skills and ESL classroom. Journal of Educational and Learning Studies, 1(1), 29‒34. http://dx.doi.org/10.32698/0232
Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136‒153. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
Sahin, S. (2006). Computer simulations in science education: Implications for Distance Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(4), Article 12. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED494379.pdf
Sanii, B. (2019). Creating augmented reality USDZ files to visualize 3D objects on student phones in the classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(1), 253‒257. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00577
Satterthwaite, D. (2010). Why are ‘hands-on’ science activities so effective for student learning? Teaching Science, 56(2), 7‒10 (EJ907322). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?redir=http%3a%2f%2fwww.asta.edu.au%2fresources%2fteachingscienceSchneider, J., Patfield, M., Croft, H., Salem, S., & Munro, I. (2020). Introducing augmented reality technology to enhance learning in pharmacy education: A pilot study. Pharmacy, 8(3), 109. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fpharmacy8030109
Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., Croker, S., & Härtig, H. (2016). What students learn from hands‐on activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 980‒1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21320
Tillman, D., Alvidrez-Aguirre, V., Kim, S. J., & An, S. (2019). Teachers’ conceptions of the pedagogical potential for classroom-based augmented reality. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 28(4), 411‒434. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/182417/
Virata, R. O., & Castro, J. D. L. (2019, January). Augmented reality in science classroom: Perceived effects in education, visualization and information processing. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning (pp. 85‒92). https://doi.org/10.1145/3306500.3306556
Vygotsky L. (1986). Thought and language. (A. Kozulin, Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published 1934)
Walker, Z., McMahon, D. D., Rosenblatt, K., & Arner, T. (2017). Beyond Pokémon: Augmented reality is a universal design for learning tool. SAGE Open, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017737815
Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41‒49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7), Article 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
Autenrieth, R., Lewis, C., & Butler-Perry, K. (2017). Long-term impact of the enrichment experiences in engineering (E3) summer teacher program. Journal of STEM Education, 18(1), 25–31.
Berg, R. E. (1991). Pendulum waves: A demonstration of wave motion using pendula. American Journal of Physics, 59(2), 186‒187. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16608
Boice, K. L., Jackson, J. R., Alemdar, M., Rao, A. E., Grossman, S., & Usselman, M. (2021). Supporting teachers on their STEAM journey: A collaborative STEAM teacher training program. Education Sciences, 11(3), Article 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030105
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Roger, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P‒12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x
Brueningsen, C., Brueningsen, E., & Bower, B. (1997). Math and science in motion: Activities for middle school. Texas Instruments Incorporated.
Burchat, P. (2007). Lecture 2: Dimensional analysis - from biology to cosmology. Stanford University. https://web.stanford.edu/~rpam/dropoff/Phys041N/lecture2_dimanalysis.pdf
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards.pdf
Dubson, M., & Rouinfar, A. (2021). Pendulum lab. University of Colorado Boulder. https://phet.colorado.edu/sims/html/pendulum-lab/latest/pendulum-lab_en.html
Flaten, J. A., & Parendo, K. A. (2001). Pendulum waves: A lesson in aliasing. American Journal of Physics, 69(7), 778‒782. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1349543
Glassmeyer, D., Hsieh, K., & Nguyen, L. (2018, December). Integrating STEAM in the arts classroom: Examining student knowledge and teacher reflections [Paper presentation]. The 2018 International Conference and Exhibition on Art and Design, National Pingtung University, Pingtung City, Taiwan.
Grodoski, C. (2018). Visualizing data in art education: Research, practice, and advocacy. Art Education, 71(2), 36‒45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2018.1414537
Harvard Natural Sciences Lecture Demonstrations. (2010, June 9). Pendulum waves [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/yVkdfJ9PkRQ
Henriksen, D., Mehta, R., & Mehta, S. (2019). Design thinking gives STEAM to teaching: A framework that breaks disciplinary boundaries. In M. S. Khine & S. Areepattamannil (Eds.), STEAM education (pp. 57‒78). Springer.
Hsieh, K., Glassmeyer, D., & Nguyen, L. (2019). The collaborative teaching and learning: High school STEAM project-based learning and lantern design. International Journal of Arts Education, 17(1), 33‒67.
McLeod, K., Steele, M., & Brown, S. (2015, February). Design features and outcomes in common core professional development for high school: Functions and modeling [Paper presentation]. Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators Annual Conference, Orlando, FL, United States.
National Art Education Association. (2022, June 1). NAEA position statement on STEAM education. https://www.arteducators.org/advocacy-policy/articles/552-naea-position-statement-on-steam-education
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Author.
National Science Board. (2022). Science and engineering indicators 2022. National Science Foundation Report 430. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/
Neale, V. (2017). Closing the gap: The quest to understand prime numbers. Oxford University Press.
Nutov, L. (2021). Integrating visual arts into the mathematics curriculum: The case of pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 1‒11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103218
Pavelich, L. (2011, September 23). Fun with dimensional analysis 1 – Simple pendulum. Scrub Physics. https://leepavelich.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/fun-with-dimensional-analysis-1-simple-pendulum/
Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31‒43. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
Presmeg, N. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 205‒236). Sense.
Sholihah, U., & Maryono, M. (2020). Students’ visual thinking ability in solving the integral problem. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 5(2), 175‒186.
Suganda, E., Latifah, S., Irwandani, I., Sari, P. M., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). STEAM and environment on students’ creative-thinking skills: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1796(1), 1‒9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012101
Tayebi, A., Gómez, J., & Delgado, C. (2021). Analysis on the lack of motivation and dropout in engineering students in Spain. IEEE Access, 9, 66253‒66265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3076751
Von Worley, S. (Oct. 5, 2012). Dance, factors, dance: A variation on [Brent] Yorgey’s factorization diagrams. http://www.datapointed.net/visualizations/math/factorization/animated-diagrams/
Wijaya, P. A., & Widodo, A. (2021, March). Virtual experiment of simple pendulum to improve students’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), Article 012133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012133
Yorgey, B. (2012, Oct. 5). Factorization diagrams. The math less traveled. https://mathlesstraveled.com/2012/10/05/factorization-diagrams/
Ball, M. (2021, June). Framework for the metaverse [Foreword to The metaverse primer]. https://www.matthewball.vc/all/forwardtothemetaverseprimer
Brown, S., & Bousalis, R. (2018). Curriculum integration in contemporary teaching practice: Emerging research and opportunities. IGI Global.
Buczynski, S., Ireland, K., Reed, S., & Lacanienta, E. (2012). Communicating science concepts through art: 21st-century skills in practice. Science Scope, 35(9), 29−35 (EJ996843). ERIC.
Chowdhury, M. (2022, May 27). 8 skills that can’t be replaced by robots and automation. Analytics Insight. https://www.analyticsinsight.net/8-skills-that-cant-be-replaced-by-robots-and-automation/
Compuchild. (2023). Inclusion and equality through STEAM programs for kids. https://compuchild.com/blog/inclusion-and-equality-through-steam-programs-for-kids
Debroy, A. (2017, October 7). What is STREAM education & why is It gaining popularity? EdTechReview. https://edtechreview.in/trends-insights/insights/2968-what-is-stream-education
Fu, Y. (n.d.). Snow Yunxue Fu. https://snowyunxuefu.com/home.html
Fontcuberta, J. (Ed.). (2015). The post-photographic condition: Le Mois de la Photo a Montreal, international biennial of the contemporary image. Kerber.
Hanhardt, J. G., & Hakuta, K. (2012). Nam June Paik: Global visionary. Smithsonian American Art Museum.
Hare, T. (2016, January 18). Turn STEM to STEAM with the design thinking process. The Art of Education University. https://theartofeducation.edu/2016/01/18/turn-stem-to-steam-with-the-design-thinking-process/
Hart, C. (n.d.). Claudia Hart. https://claudiahart.com/
Hepworth, K. J., & Canon, C. (2018). Improving science students’ data visualizations: A STEAM-based approach. Dialectic, 2(1), 48−78. https://doi.org/10.3998/dialectic.14932326.0002.104
Ho, H. (2018). DSLCollection: A collection of Chinese contemporary art. https://www.dslbook.com/dslbook/
Hultén, P., & Königsberg, F. (Eds.). (1966). 9 Evenings: Theatre and engineering [Exhibition program]. The Foundation for Contemporary Performance Arts, Inc. https://monoskop.org/images/5/5d/9_Evenings_Theater_and_Engineering_1966.pdf
Lathan, J. (n. d.). Why STEAM is so important to 21st century education. University of San Diego online. https://onlinedegrees.sandiego.edu/steam-education-in-schools/#STEAM
Nissani, M. (1995). Fruits, salads, and smoothies: A working definition of interdisciplinarity. The Journal of Educational Thought, 29(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.11575/jet.v29i2.52385
NYU Tisch. (n.d.). Photography & Imaging. https://tisch.nyu.edu/photo
O’Doherty, B. (2006). New York: 9 armored nights. In C. Morris (Ed.). 9 evenings reconsidered: Art, theatre, and engineering, 1966 (pp. 79–81). MIT List Visual Arts Center. (Original essay published 1966)
Rapoza, K. (2022, October 21). The metaverse is failing, but this is one investment that will not die. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2022/10/21/the-metaverse-is-failing-but-this-is-one-investment-that-will-not-die/
Rhode Island School of Design. (2014, May 7). Rhode Island School of Design launches STEAM map to demonstrate global activity and support for the movement. https://www.risd.edu/news/for-press/press-releases/rhode-island-school-design-launches-steam-map-demonstrate-global
Stahl, A. (2021, March 10). How AI will impact the future of work and life. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ashleystahl/2021/03/10/how-ai-will-impact-the-future-of-work-and-life/
Sudderth, A. (n.d.). A guide for interdisciplinary teaching and learning. Rethink together. https://xqsuperschool.org/rethinktogether/interdisciplinary-teaching-and-learning/
The skeletons of Washington Square. (October 12, 2021). Washington Square Park Blog. https://www.washingtonsquareparkblog.com/2021/10/12/skeletons-washington-square/
Vasagar, J. (2014, May 19). Countries that excel at problem-solving encourage critical thinking. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/e512db9c-c643-11e3-ba0e-00144feabdc0
Young, K. (2019, July 3). Why creativity is important for all jobs, even in STEM. Silicon Republic. https://www.siliconrepublic.com/advice/creativity-jobs-stem-automation-ai
Bers, M. U. (2021). Coding as a playground: Programming and computational thinking in the early childhood classroom (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Buganza, T., Bellis, P., Magnanini, S., Press, J., Shani, A. B., Trabucchi, D., Verganti, R., & Zasa, F. P. (2023). Storymaking and organizational transformation: How the co-creation of narratives engages people for innovation and transformation. Routledge.
Bunda, T., Heckenberg, R., Snepvangers, K., Phillips, L. G., Lasczik, A., & Black, A. L. (2019). Storymaking belonging. Art/Research International, 4(1), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.18432/ari29429
Compton, M. K., & Thompson, R. C. (2018). StoryMaking: The maker movement approach to literacy for early learners. Redleaf Press.
Denning, P. J., & Tedre, M. (2019). Computational thinking. The MIT Press.
Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience. Perigee Books. (Original work published 1934).
Families Learning Together (n.d.). https://fltsmtx.wp.txstate.edu/
Fuglestad, T. (2022). Make it, move it, flip it. SchoolArts, 121(7), 36–37.
Graham, M. A. (2021). The disciplinary borderlands of education: Art and STEAM education. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 44(4), 769–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2021.1926163
Grover, S. (2022). Computational thinking today. In A. Yadav & U. D. Berthelsen (Eds.), Computational thinking in education: A pedagogical perspective (pp. 18–40). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003102991
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2018). Computational thinking: A competency whose time has come. In S. Sentance, E. Barendsen, & C. Schulte (Eds.), Computer science education: Perspectives on teaching and learning in school (pp. 19–38). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350057142.ch-003
Guidry, L. (2022, March 27). If you are given a cookie …. Scratch. https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/664121832/
Hafeli, M. (2015). Exploring studio materials: Teaching creative art making to children. Oxford University Press.
Heller, R. (1992). Ruth Heller’s how to hide a butterfly & other insects. Grosset & Dunlap.
Johnston, K., Kervin, L., & Wyeth, P. (2022). STEM, STEAM and makerspaces in early childhood: A scoping review. Sustainability, 14(20), Article 13533. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013533
Justice, S. (2016). Learning to teach in the digital age: New materialities and maker paradigms in schools. Peter Lang.
Justice, S. (2019). Interface: The transformative potential of computational making. NAEA News, 61(5), 20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01606395.2019.1657759
Justice, S. (2020). Designing the social interface: More than social, more than material. In A. D. Knochel, C. Liao, & R. M. Patton (Eds.), Critical digital making in art education (pp. 61‒74). Peter Lang.
Justice, S. (2024). Engineering joy: Toying with process in expanded media arts. In T. Hunter-Doniger & N. Walkup (Eds.), STEAM education: Transdisciplinarity of art in the curriculum (pp. 118‒129). Routledge.
Justice, S., & Assaf, L. (2020). Exploring early childhood teachers’ abilities to identify computational thinking precursors to strengthen computer science in classrooms [Abstract]. National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2006595
Kafai, Y. B., & Proctor, C. (2022). A revaluation of computational thinking in K–12 education: Moving toward computational literacies. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x211057904
Knochel, A. D., & Patton, R. M. (2015). If art education then critical digital making: Computational thinking and creative code. Studies in Art Education, 57(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2015.11666280
Kuby, C. R., & Rucker, T. G. (2016). Go be a writer!: Expanding the curricular boundaries of literacy learning with children. Teachers College Press.
Leonard, N. (2021). Emerging artificial intelligence, art and pedagogy: Exploring discussions of creative algorithms and machines for art education. Digital Culture & Education, 13(1), 20‒41.
Mohanty, K. (2022). Media arts [Co-editor’s letter]. SchoolArts, 121(7), 8. https://lsc-pagepro.mydigitalpublication.com/publication/?m=60985&i=736878&p=10&ver=html5
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Numeroff, L., & Bond, F. (2015). If you give a mouse a cookie. Harper Collins.
Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., Kind, S., & Kocher, L. L. M. (2017). Encounters with materials in early childhood education. Routledge.
Patton, R., Sweeny, R. W., Shin, R., & Lu, L. (2020). Teaching digital game design with preservice art educators. Studies in Art Education, 61(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2020.1738165
Peppler, K., & Wohlwend, K. (2018). Theorizing the nexus of STEAM practice. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1316331
Picou, J. (2021, February 11). Knights of the woods. Scratch. https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/485857870/
Resnick, M. (2006). Computer as paintbrush: Technology, play, and the creative society. In D. Singer, R. Golikoff, & K. Hirsh-Pasek (Eds.), Play = learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth (pp. 192–206). Oxford University Press.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1995). Literature as exploration. Modern Language Association. (Original work published 1933)
Smeed, J. (2012). The grumpy dragon and the angry dragon: From storytelling to storymaking. Storytelling, Self, Society, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505340.2012.635092
Sweeny, R. (2022). Review of the book Critical digital making in art education, by A. D. Knochel, C. Liao, & R. M. Patton, Eds. International Journal of Education Through Art, 18(2), 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00101_5
Wing, J. M. (2017). Computational thinking’s influence on research and education for all. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/922
Adobe. (n.d.). How to use, and break, the rule of thirds. https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/photography/discover/rule-of-thirds.html
Albers, J. (2017). Preliminary course: Albers; concerning fundamental design. In H. Bayer, W. Gropius, & I. Gropius (Eds.), Bauhaus, 1919‒1928 (pp. 116‒123). Museum of Modern Art. (Original work published 1938)
Allen, S. (2019). Master Fibonacci: The man who changed math. Fibonacci Inc.
Areljung, S. (2023). Five ways of integrating arts and science: A framework for planning and analyzing arts–science education in early childhood. Studies in Art Education, 64(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2022.2154522
Barr, A. H., Jr. (2017). Preface. In H. Bayer, W. Gropius, & I. Gropius (Eds.), Bauhaus, 1919‒1928 (pp. 1–10). Museum of Modern Art. (Original work published 1938)
Bayer, H., Gropius, W., & Gropius, I. (2017). Bauhaus, 1919‒1928. Museum of Modern Art. (Original work published 1938) https://doi.org/10.2307/1574173
Bell, C. (1913). Post-impressionism and æsthetics. The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs, 22(118), 226–230.
Brown, D. (2006). The Da Vinci code. Doubleday.
Bullot, N. J., Seeley, W. P., & Davies, S. (2017). Art and science: A philosophical sketch of their historical complexity and codependence. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 75(4), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12398. Top of FormBottom of Form
Burnard, P., & Colucci-Gray, L. (Eds.). (2020). Why science and art creativities matter: (Re)configuring STEAM for future-making education. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004421585
Caplin, S. (2008). Art and design in Photoshop. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080928289
Clapp, E. P., & Jimenez, R. L. (2016). Implementing STEAM in maker-centered learning. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000066
Cohen, E., & Lloyd, S. (2014). Disciplinary evolution and the rise of the transdiscipline. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 17, 189‒215. https://doi.org/10.28945/2045
Dietrich, P., & Knieper, T. (2022). (Neuro)aesthetics: Beauty, ugliness, and ethics. PsyCh Journal, 11(5), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.478
Freeland, C. (2001). But is it art? Oxford University Press.
Herro, D., Quigley, C., & Cian, H. (2019). The challenges of STEAM instruction: Lessons from the field. Action in Teacher Education, 41(2), 172‒190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2018.1551159
Hunter-Doniger, T., & Walkup, N. (Eds.). (2024). STEAM Education: An interdisciplinary look at art in the curriculum. National Art Education Association.
Kim, H. (2022). Re‐framing Anni Albers and Bauhaus. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 41(3), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12423
Lai, A. (2024, April 05). Reviewing and reimagining research on STEAM education. [Slide presentation]. The 2024 National Art Education Association Convention, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873
Marples, C. R., & Williams, P. M. (2022). The golden ratio in nature: A tour across length scales. Symmetry, 14(10), 2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14102059
Marshall, J. (2014). Transdisciplinarity and art integration: Toward a new understanding of art-based learning across the curriculum. Studies in Art Education, 55(2), 104–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2014.11518922
Mertler, C. A. (2019). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (6th ed.). Sage.
Miller, J. A. (2019). Elementary school. In E. Lupton & J. A. Miller (Eds.), The ABC’s of [triangle, square, circle]: The Bauhaus and design theory. (pp. 10‒27). Princeton Architectural Press.
Pirrie, A. (2020). Where science ends, art begins? Critical perspectives on the development of STEAM in the new climatic regime. In P. Burnard & L. Colucci-Gray (Eds.), Why science and art creativities matter: (Re)configuring STEAM for future-making education (pp. 19–34). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004421585_003
Siebenbrodt, M., & Schöbe, L. (2009). Bauhaus. Parkstone International.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 5 | 5 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Statement | Cookie Settings | Accessibility | Legal Notice | Sitemap | Copyright © 2016-2025