Chapter 7 The Buoyancy of Hope

Social Collaboration and Hope-Building as Insulation from Isolation, Stress, and Procrastination in the Writing Process

In: Writing Hope Found in Uncertain Times
Author:
Sean Brady
Search for other papers by Sean Brady in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Overview

While much of the existing scholarship regarding student writing centers on “self-efficacy” as a key variable, positing hope as an ideal writing mindset points towards even greater student growth because it accounts for the social collaboration necessary at so many steps of the writing process. In order to help student writers overcome the cognitive and emotional stresses that writing can lead to, there are several strategies that educators can use to infuse hope into their writing classrooms. Many strategies focus on the social collaborative nature of writing, a focus that is even more paramount in the wake of a global pandemic that has ushered in a new era of education which is more physically isolated than ever before. For students who exhibit low levels of hope about their writing situation, strategies like model analysis can help students find confidence by “borrowing” rhetorical moves from effective samples. One of the most effective hope building strategies for all students is process mapping, which situates the classroom as a network of fellow writers sharing struggles and approaches. This strategy also can help normalize the messiness that is inherent in most writing endeavors, relieving the pressure to follow a fictional singular “correct” or linear way to write which at worst can lead students to lose hope or disengage from the writing task entirely. Lastly, changing attitudes towards revision as an essential and collaborative part of the writing process can help students not only produce better work but more importantly gain agency and hope.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Writing Hope Found in Uncertain Times

Teaching English Language Arts in Search of Hope Moments

  • Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4), 287310. doi.org/.

  • Camfield, E. (2016). Mediated-efficacy: Hope for “helpless” writers. Journal of Developmental Education, 39(3), 211. www.jstor.org/stable/44987414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256273. doi.org/.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.

  • Ekholm, E., Zumbrunn, S., & Conklin, S. (2015). The relation of college student self-efficacy toward writing and writing self-regulation aptitude: Writing feedback perceptions as a mediating variable. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(2), 197207. doi.org/.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klassen, R. (2002). Writing in early adolescence: A review of the role of self-efficacy beliefs. Educational Psychology Review, 14(2), 173203. doi.org/.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 129. doi.org/.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sieben, N. (2016). Teaching writing hope for a just writing society. The English Record, 67(1), 99121.

  • Villalon, J., & Calvo, R. A. (2011). Concept maps as cognitive visualizations of writing assignments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 16-27. www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.14.3.16.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: The history of the development of higher mental functions (cognition and language: A series in psycholinguistics). (Robert W. Rieber, Ed.). (Marie J. Hall, Trans.) Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zumbrunn, S., Marrs, S., & Mewborn, C. (2016). Toward a better understanding of student perceptions of writing feedback: A mixed methods study. Reading and Writing, 29(2), 349370. doi.org/.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 152 152 12
Full Text Views 1 1 0
PDF Views & Downloads 1 1 0