3 Homeric Constructions, Their Productivity, and the Development of Epic Greek

In: Language Change in Epic Greek and Other Poetic Traditions
Author:
Chiara Bozzone
Search for other papers by Chiara Bozzone in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Andersen, Øivind and Dag T.T. Haug, eds. 2012. Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Aronoff, Mark. 1980. “The Relevance of Productivity in a Synchronic Description of Word-Formation.” In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical Morphology, 7182. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baayen, R. Harald. 1989. “A Corpus-Based Approach to Morphological Productivity. Statistical Analysis and Psycholinguistic Interpretation.” PhD diss., Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baayen, R. Harald. 1992. “Quantitative Aspects of Morphological Productivity.” In Geert E. Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991, 109149. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bozzone, Chiara. 2010. “New Perspectives on Formularity.” In Stephanie W. Jamison, H. Craig Melchert, and Brent Vine (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, 2744. Bremen: Hempen.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bozzone, Chiara. 2014a. “Constructions: A New Approach to Formularity, Discourse, and Syntax in Homer.” PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bozzone, Chiara. 2014b. “How do Epic Poets Construct their Lines? A Study of the Verb προσέειπεν in Homer, Hesiod, Batrachomyomachia, Apollonius Rhodius, and Quintus Smyrnaeus.” Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Philological Association. https://www.academia.edu/5553227/How_do_Epic_Poets_Construct_their_Lines_A_Study_of_the_Verb_προσέειπεν_in_Homer_Hesiod_Batrachomyomachia_Apollonius_Rhodius_and_Quintus_Smyrnaeus. Last accessed on June 12, 2024.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bozzone, Chiara. 2016. “The Mind of the Poet: Cognitive and Linguistic Perspectives.” In Federico Gallo (ed.), Omero: quaestiones disputatae (Ambrosiana Graecolatina 5), 79106. Milano-Roma: Bulzoni.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bozzone, Chiara. 2021. “Homer’s Living Language: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Formularity, Dialect, and Creativity in Oral-Traditional Poetry.” Habilitation Thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bozzone, Chiara. 2022. “Homeric Formulas and their Antiquity: A Constructional Study of ἀνδροτῆτα καὶ ἥβην.” Glotta 98: 3367.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bozzone, Chiara. 2024. Homer’s Living Language: Formularity, Dialect, and Creativity in Oral-Traditional Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Branchaw, Sherrylyn. 2010. Survival of the Strongest: Strong Verbs in the History of English, Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bybee, Joan. 2015. Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Cannon, Garland Hampton. 1988. Historical Change and English Word-Formation. New York: Peter Lang.

  • Cassio, Albio Cesare. 2016. “Overlong Syllables in the Epic ‘Adonius’ and the Compositional Stages of Greek Hexameter Poetry.” In Federico Gallo (ed.), Omero: quaestiones disputatae (Ambrosiana Graecolatina 5), 3142. Milano-Roma: Bulzoni.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Danek, Georg. 2012. “The Doloneia Revisited.” In Andersen and Haug 2012, 106121.

  • Edwards, Mark W. 1986. “Homer and Oral Tradition. The Formula, Part I.” Oral Tradition 1/2: 171230.

  • Edwards, Mark W. 1988. “Homer and Oral Tradition. The Formula, Part II.” Oral Tradition 3 (1/2): 1160.

  • Fisher, Ronald. 1945. “A New Test for 2×2 Tables.” Nature 156: 388.

  • Fortson, Benjamin W. IV. 2010. Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction, 2nd edition. New York: Blackwell.

  • Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hackstein, Olav. 2002. Die Sprachform der homerischen Epen. Faktoren morphologischer Variabilität in literarischen Frühformen, Tradition, Sprachwandel, sprachliche Anachronismen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hackstein, Olav. 2010. “The Greek of Epic.” In Egbert Bakker (ed.), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, 401423. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hackstein, Olav and Ryan Sandell. 2022. “The Rise of Colligations: English can’t stand and German nicht ausstehen können.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28: 6090.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hainsworth, John Bryan. 1968. The Flexibility of the Homeric Formula. Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Hainsworth, John Bryan. 1978. “Good and Bad Formulae.” In Bernard C. Fenik (ed.), Homer: Tradition and Invention, 4150. Leiden: Brill.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haug, Dag. 2002. Les phases de l’évolution de la langue épique. Trois études de linguistique homérique. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoekstra, Arie. 1965. Homeric Modifications of Formulaic Prototypes: Studies in the Development of Greek Epic Diction. Amsterdam and London: North-Holland.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Janko, Richard. 1982. Homer, Hesiod and the Hymns: Diachronic Development in Epic Diction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Janko, Richard. 2012. “πρῶτον τε καὶ ὕστατον αἰὲν ἀείδειν. Relative Chronology and the Literary History of the Early Greek Epos.” In Andersen and Haug 2012, 2043.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kiparsky, Paul. 2017. “Formulas and Themes.” In Frog (ed.), Formula: Units of Speech, ‘Words’ of Verbal Art, 155163. Helsinki: Folklore Studies, University of Helsinki.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. “The Rule Controversy: a Cognitive Grammar Perspective.” Centre for Research in Language Newsletter (University of California, San Diego)4.3: 415.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lord, Albert. 1960. The Singer of Tales. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • McConnell, Tom. 2019. “Chronology, Dialect and Style: Studies in the Distribution of Linguistic Archaisms in Early Greek Hexameter Poetry.” PhD diss., University of Oxford.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mos, Maria. 2010. “Complex Lexical Items.” PhD diss., Universiteit Tilburg.

  • OED = “Oxford English Dictionary Online”. www.oed.com. Last accessed on June 12, 2024.

  • Passa, Enzo. 2016. “L’epica.” In Albio Cesare Cassio (ed.), Storia delle lingue letterarie greche2, 139196. Firenze: Le Monnier.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pearson, Karl. 1900. “On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling.” Philosophical Magazine Series 5 50: 157175.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rau, Jeremy. 2010. “Greek and Proto-Indo-European.” In Egbert Bakker (ed.), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language 171–188. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Russo, Joseph. 1966. “The Structural Formula in the Homeric Verse.” Yale Classical Studies 20: 217240.

  • Sandell, Ryan. 2015. “Productivity in Historical Linguistics. Computation Perspectives on Word-Formation in Ancient Greek and Sanskrit.” PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, A.K. 2001. “The Role of Frequency in the Specialization of the English Anterior.” In Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, 361382. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tomasello, Michael. 2009. “The Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition.” In Edith L. Bavin (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language, 6987. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Traugott. Elizabeth. 2004. “Exaptation and Grammaticalization.” In Minoji Akimoto (ed.), Linguistic Studies Based on Corpora, 133156. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Visser, Edzard. 1988. “Formulae or Single Words? Towards a New Theory of Oral Verse-Making.” Würzburger Jahrbücher für Altertumswissenschaft 14: 2137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • West, Martin L. 1997. “‘Homer’s Meter’.” in I. Morris and B. Powell (eds.), A New Companion to Homer, 218237. Leiden: Brill.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yates, Frank. 1934. “Contingency Tables Involving Small Numbers and the χ 2 Test.” Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1: 217235.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zeldes, Amir. 2012. Productivity in Argument Selection: From Morphology to Syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 256 256 117
Full Text Views 2 2 1
PDF Views & Downloads 3 3 2