Chapter 4 The Ethics of Love: a Husserlian Point of View

In: Phenomenologies of Love
Author:
Susi Ferrarello
Search for other papers by Susi Ferrarello in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). “Modern Moral Philosophy,Philosophy, 33, 119.

  • Atkinson, R. F. (1965). Sexual Morality. London: Hutchinson & Co.

  • Bernet, R. (1994). “An Intentionality Without Subject or Object?Man and World, 27, 213255.

  • Brochard, V. (1901). “Ancient and Modern Ethics,Review Philosophique, 51.

  • Collins, E. (1994). Love, Human and Divine: The Heart of Christian Ethics, Moral Traditions & Moral Arguments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drummond, J. (2018). “Husserl’s Middle Period and the Development of His Ethics,” in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Phenomenology, ed. D. Zahavi. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 135154.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Englander, M., Ferrarello, S. (eds.) (2022). Empathy and Ethics. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Ferrarello, S. (2015). Husserl’s Ethics. New York: Bloomsbury.

  • Ferrarello, S. (2021). “Meaning-Making Activity in the Emotional Experience of Border Line Personality DisordersPsychopathology, 2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fletcher, J. F. (1966). Situation Ethics: The New Morality. Louisville and London: Westminster John Knox Press.

  • Frankena, W. (1973). “The Ethics of Love Conceived as an Ethics of Virtue,The Journal of Religious Ethics, 1, 2136.

  • Hahn, C. J. (2009). The Concept of Personhood in the Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl. Doctoral Dissertation: Marquette University.

  • Harrison, B. (1985). “Making the Connections: Essays,” in Feminist Social Ethics, ed. C. S. Robb. Boston: Beacon Press.

  • Heinämaa, S. (2019). “Two Ways of Understanding Persons: A Husserlian Distinction,Phenomenology and Mind, 15, 92103.

  • Husserl, E. ([1939] 1985). Erfahrung und Urteil: Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. Revised and ed. L. Landgrebe. Hamburg: Felix Mayer Verlag. In English: Experience and Judgement: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic. Trans. J.S. Churchill & K. Ameriks. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Husserl E. (2012). Einleitung in die Philosophie. Vorlesungen 1916–1920, ed. H. Jacobs. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York and London: Springer. Abridged as Hua-Mat IX.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Husserl, E. (2013). Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie: Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte, Metaphysik, Späte Ethik, Texte aus dem Nachlass (1908–1937), Husserliana XLII, eds. R. Sowa and T. Vongehr. Dordrecht: Springer. Abridged as Hua 42.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kant, I. (1996). Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Abridged as MS.

  • Kant, I. (1999). Correspondence in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge University Press. Abridged as AA.

  • Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. A.W. Wood. New Haven: Yale University Press. Abridged as G.

  • Kant, I. (2006). Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Trans. R.B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Abridged as VA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kierkegaard, S. ([1847] 1995). Works of Love, Kierkegaard’s writingsXVI. Trans. H.V. Hong & E.H. Hong. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Levinas, E. ([1961] 1988). Totalité et infini: essai sur l’extériorité. Paris: Kluwer. In English: Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Trans. A. Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lewis, T., Amini, F., Lannon, R. (2000). A General Theory of Love. New York: Random House.

  • Mayo, B. (1958). Ethics and the Moral Life. London: Macmillan and Company.

  • Melle, U. (2002). “Edmund Husserl: From Reason to Love,” in The Phenomenological Approaches to Moral Philosophy, eds. J. Drummond & L. Embree. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 229248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Melle, U. (2007). “Husserl’s Personalistic Ethics,Husserl Studies, 23, 115.

  • Murdoch, I. (1968). The Nice and the Good. London: Chatto and Windus.

  • Nygren, A. (1953). Agape and Eros. Trans. P.S. Watson. London: S.P.C.K.

  • Outka, G.H. (1972). Agape: An Ethical Analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Pascal, B. (1941). Pensees / The Provincial Letters. Trans. W.F. Trotter. New York: Modern Library.

  • Post, S.G. (1990). Theory of Agape: On the Meaning of Christian Love. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.

  • Prichard, H. A. (1949). Moral Obligation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Ross, W.D. (1930). The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Scheler, M. (2010). Ordo Amoris, Trans. L. Iannascoli. Rome: Aracne.

  • Sidgwick, H. (1907). The Methods of Ethics. Macmillan and Company, Limited.

  • Stephen, L. (1882). The Science of Ethics. London: Smith, Elder and Company.

  • Tillich, P. (1954). Love, Power, and Justice; Ontological Analyses and Ethical Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Williams, B., Smart, J. J. C. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 50 50 13
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Views & Downloads 1 1 0