How does European adoption of precision agriculture compare to worldwide trends?

In: Precision agriculture '19
Authors:
J. Lowenberg-DeBoer Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, UK TF10 8NB, United Kingdom.

Search for other papers by J. Lowenberg-DeBoer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
B. Erickson Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.

Search for other papers by B. Erickson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

European politicians sometimes complain that farmers are lagging on precision agriculture (PA) adoption. The objective of this study was to compare European PA adoption with other industrialised countries in existing studies that used a variety of methodologies. The data showed that global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) guidance is being adopted by mechanised farms worldwide. In Europe, guidance adoption is slightly lower than in the Americas and Australia probably because of smaller farms and the prevalence of horticultural and grazing-based livestock farms. In contrast, variable rate technology (VRT) fertiliser adoption is lagging almost everywhere, but in parts of Europe this is at the upper end of the worldwide range.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 73 52 20
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Views & Downloads 0 0 0