The cost of the conversion of L-methionine precursors in mammals and birds
In: Energy and protein metabolism and nutritionSearch for other papers by J. van Milgen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D.I. Batonon-Alavo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Y. Mercier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R. Ferrer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A. Toscan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R. Martin-Venegas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
To fulfil the requirements for methionine, animal diets are widely supplemented with synthetic methionine sources such as L-methionine (L-Met), DL-methionine (DL-Met), and DL-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid (DL-OH-Met). The objective of this study is to calculate the energy cost of the different conversion steps leading to L-Met and to propose energy equivalence values for DL-Met and DL-OH-Met, relative to that of L-Met. The conversion of DL-OH-Met to L-Met involves a nitrogen-sparing effect, because excess nitrogen can be used for the transformation of DL-OH-Met to L-Met, rather than being excreted as urea or uric acid Consequently, the ME-to-GE ratio of DL-OH-Met is 109% in mammals and 114% in birds, compared to the value of DL-Met. Because of differences in metabolism and the formation of hydrogen peroxide in the conversion to L-Met, the NE-to-ME ratios are 96% for DL-Met and 100% for DL-OH-Met in both mammals and birds. The conversion of DL-OH-Met to L-Met is therefore energetically less costly than the conversion of DL-Met. The stoichiometric approach presented here only considers the biochemical conversion steps, without considering the cost of transport and further transformation steps.