Impact of dietary potassium levels on muscle glycogen concentration

In: Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition
Authors:
F.A.P. Alvarenga NSW Department of Primary Industries, Beef Industry Centre of Excellence, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Search for other papers by F.A.P. Alvarenga in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
I.J. Lean NSW Department of Primary Industries, Beef Industry Centre of Excellence, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Search for other papers by I.J. Lean in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
P. McGilchrist NSW Department of Primary Industries, Beef Industry Centre of Excellence, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Search for other papers by P. McGilchrist in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the impact of dietary potassium on muscle glycogen concentrations in an effort to determine which pathway is driving the increased incidence of dark cutting in beef cattle. Eighteen Angus steers, approximately 15 months old, with an average live weight of 441±28 kg were used. The animals were randomly split into Low (1.5%), Medium (2.7%) and High (3.8%) dietary potassium (K) levels. The diets were balanced to compare the three different K levels, with minerals and metabolizable energy remaining constant for an average daily gain of 1 kg according to NRC (2016). Muscle biopsy 1 on day 0 were taken from the Longissimus (LT), Semitendinosus (ST) and Semimembranosus (SM) muscles. On day 3, the steers were exercised for 120 minutes before the biopsies were taken, while on days 6 and 9 biopsies were also taken. Glycogen and lactate concentrations were measured for all biopsies. There were no effect of K treatment on glycogen and lactate concentrations for the three analyzed muscles. However, the glycogen concentration values for SM was about 24.2 and 18.7% greater than ST and LT, respectively. The lactate concentration was on average 43.7% higher in biopsy 1 compared with the average of biopsies 2, 3 and 4 for LT, while for ST and SM, biopsy 1 was on average 25.0% higher than the average for biopsies 2, 3 and 4.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 45 29 8
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Views & Downloads 3 0 0