Pornography as Language: From Discourse of Domination to Heretical Subversion

In: Sexual Politics of Desire and Belonging
Author:
Kateřina Lišková
Search for other papers by Kateřina Lišková in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Censorship of sexually explicit imagery is currently being called for, not by conservatives, but paradoxically by feminists. In various places throughout Europe, feminist groups have launched campaigns against pornography; campaigns which they conceive in terms of crimes against women, discrimination, humiliation, and especially the silencing of women by men. Anti-porn feminists declare the domination of women to be the only, unfailing, and all-powerful effect pornography has always had, and the only it ever can have. Not only do these efforts reproduce “man-woman,” “either-or” binaries, they also construct women as mute by definition - unable to use language in order to enhance their own agency. This paper explores the capacity of porn to impose silence, the unexpected results a discourse of domination may trigger, and the other ways a “woman” can use language. My analysis of feminist anti-porn arguments - both current European and older American examples - is based on Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of language and symbolic power.

Citation Info

  • Collapse
  • Expand