Get Access to Full Text

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



This article asks whether or not Indonesia’s national human rights law regime can withstand the rise of political Islam in contemporary Indonesia. If it cannot, using Alfred Stepan’s democratic theory of the ‘twin tolerations’, the article argues that the ideological ramifications for Indonesia’s nascent democracy are inherently illiberal and undemocratic. The findings of this article are based on two landmark blasphemy cases: the Indonesian Constitutional Court’s 2009-2010 material review of the country’s Blasphemy Law and the May 2017 decision of the North Jakarta State Court to convict the former governor of Jakarta, Basuki ‘Ahok’ Tjahaja Purnama, of blasphemy. Analysing both Ahok’s legal defence, as well as the judgment of the court, what becomes clear is that, as long as the Blasphemy Law prevails in contemporary Indonesia to the extent that it is used to stifle both public criticism of religion and mere doctrinal disagreement, the country’s national human rights law regime will effectively remain dormant indefinitely.

The Asian Yearbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law

Volume 2, 2018 - Islamic Law and its Implementation in Asia and the Middle East


Table of Contents
Index Card


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 203 200 25
Full Text Views 166 164 0
PDF Downloads 19 18 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
Related Content