Grassroots Level Awareness about Religion at the European Court of Human Rights

in The European Court of Human Rights and the Freedom of Religion or Belief
Get Access to Full Text

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Table of Contents
Index Card
References
  • AdamsJ.Argument in Defense of the Soldiers in the Boston Massacre Trials (December 1770).

  • AdamsM.Waarom het EHRM Noodzakelijk Dynamisch Is, En Democratisch Bovendien’ in J.Gerards and A.Terlouw (eds.) Amici Curiae. Adviezen aan het Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens (Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publisher2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AdharR.Is Secularism Neutral?25Ratio Juris (2013).

  • AdlerM.Expressive Theories of Law: A Skeptical Overview148University of Pennsylvania Law Review (2000).

  • AhmadF.The Making of Modern Turkey (London: Routledge1993).

  • AlasaniaG. and N.GelovaniIslam and Religious Education in Turkey5:2IBSU Scientific Journal (2011).

  • AlidadiK. and M.-C.FobletsFraming Multicultural Challenges in Freedom of Religion Terms. Limitations of Minimal Human Rights for Managing Religious Diversity in Europe30Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights (2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AlidadiK.Religion Equality and Employment in Europe – The Case for Reasonable Accommodation (Oxford: Hart2017).

  • AlterK.et al.How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts79:1Law and Contemporary Problems (2016).

  • AltinayA.G.The Myth of the Military Nation: Militarism Gender and Education in Turkey (New York: Palgrave Macmillan2004).

  • AltiparmakK.Execution of the Judgment of Hasan ve Eylem Zengin v. Turkey (Monitoring Report) (2013).

  • AmbrusM.Comparative Law Method in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the Light of the Rule of Law2Erasmus Law Review (2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AnagnostouD. (ed.) The European Court of Human Rights: Implementing Strasbourg’s Judgments onDomestic Policy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press2013a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AnagnostouD.Politics, Courts and Society in the Domestic Implementation and Practice of the ECtHR’s case law’ in D.Anagnostou (ed.) The European Court of Human Rights: Implementing Strasbourg’s Judgments on Domestic Policy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press2013b).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AnagnostouD. and Y.GrozevHuman Rights Litigation and Restrictive State Implementation of Strasbourg Court Judgments: The Case of Ethnic Minorities from Southeast Europe16:3European Public Law (2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AnagnostouD. and E.Psychogiopoulou (eds.) The European Court of Human Rights: Implementing Strasbourg’s Judgments on Domestic Policy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press2013a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AnagnostouD. and E.PsychogiopoulouUnder What Conditions Can ECtHR Rulings Promote Rights-Expansive Policy Change? Religious and Ethnic Minorities in Greece’ in D.Anagnostou (ed.) The European Court of Human Rights: Implementing Strasbourg’s Judgments on Domestic Policy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press2013b).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AndersonE. and R.PildesExpressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement148University of Pennsylvania Law Review (2000).

  • ArnardóttirO.M.The Differences that Make a Difference: Recent Developments on the Discrimination Grounds and the Margin of Appreciation under Article 14 of the European Convention of Human Rights14Human Rights Law Review (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AtabakiT. and E.J.Zürcher (eds.) Men of Order: Authoritarian Modernization under Ataturk and Reza Shah (London: I.B. Tauris2004).

  • AzakU.Islam and Secularism in Turkey: Kemalism Religion and the Nation State (London: I.B. Tauris2010).

  • BarberiniG.Religious Freedom in the Process of Democratization of Central and Eastern European States’ in S.FerrariC.W.Durham and E.A.Sewell (eds.) Law and Religion in Post-Communist Europe (Leuven: Peeters2003).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BardakciM.A.Freyberg-InanC.Giesel and O.Leisse (eds.) Religious Minorities in Turkey: Alevi Armenians and Syriacs and the Struggle to Desecuritize Religious Freedom (London: Palgrave Macmillan2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BarnettL.Freedom of Religion and Religious Symbols in the Public Sphere (Canada: Library of Parliament revised 2008).

  • BaslarK.The Fifty Years of the Constitutional Court of Turkey (1962–2012)3:4Law & Justice Review (2012).

  • BaubérotJ.The Evoultion of Secularism in France. Between Two Civic Religions’ in Linell E.Cady and Elizabeth ShakmanHurd (eds.) Comparative Secularisms in a Global Age (New York: Palgrave-MacMillan2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BearmanP.J.Th.BianquisC.E.BosworthE.Van Donzel and W.P.Heinrichs (eds.) The Encyclopaedia of Islam Second Edition (Leiden: Brill1997).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BelelieuC.The Headscarf as a Symbolic Enemy of the European Court of Human Rights’ Democratic Jurisprudence: Viewing Islam Through a European Legal Prism in Light of the Sahin judgment12Colombia Journal of European Law (2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BeltránJ.F.J.J.Moreso and D.M.PapayannisNeutrality and Theory of Law (Dordrecht: Springer2013).

  • BennouneK.Secularism and Human Rights: A Contextual Analysis of Headscarves, Religious Expression, and Women’s Equality Under International Law45Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (2006–7).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BenvenistiE.Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards31New York University Journal of International Law and Policy (1998–1999).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BergerP.G.Davie and E.FokasReligious America Secular Europe? A Theme and Variations (London: Ashgate Press2008).

  • BerkesN.The Development of Secularism in Turkey (London: Hawk & Company1964).

  • BerryS.E.A “Good Faith” Interpretation of the Right to Manifest Religion? The Diverging Approaches of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Committee37Legal Studies (2017a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BerryS.E.Religious Freedom and the European Court of Human Rights’ two Margins of Appreciation12: 23Religion and Human Rights (2017b).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BerryS.E.A Tale of Two Instruments: Religious Minorities and the Council of Europe’s Rights Regime30Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights (2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BielefeldtH.N.GhaneaM.WienerFreedom of Religion or Belief: An International Law Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BijsterveldS.vanDissenting Opinions in Religiezaken voor het Europees Hof (i): De Grote Kamer6(3) Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en Beleid (2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BijsterveldS.vanDissenting Opinions in Religiezaken voor het Europees Hof (ii): De Gewone Kamer7(1) Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en Beleid (2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BlackburnS.Group Minds and Expressive Harm60Maryland Law Review (2001).

  • BlittR.C.Russia’s Orthodox Foreign Policy: The Growing Influence of the Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping Russia’s Policies Abroad33University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law (2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BoggA.Only Fools and Horses: Some Sceptical Reflections on the Right to Work’ in V.Mantouvalou (ed.) The Right to Work (Oxford: Hart Publishing2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BonnerM.Jihad in Islamic History: Doctrines and Practice (Princeton: Princeton University Press2006).

  • BonthuysE.Irrational Accommodation: Conscience, Religion and Same-Sex Marriages in South Africa125The South African Law Journal (2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BornhoffJ.“The Rights and Freedoms of Others”: The ECHR and its Peculiar Category of Conflicts between Individual Fundamental Rights’ in EvaBrems (ed.) Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights (Antwerp/Oxford: Intersentia2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BossetP.Mainstreaming Religious Diversity in a Secular and Egalitarian State: The Road(s) Not Taken in Leyla Şahin v Turkey’ in E.Brems (ed.) Diversity and European Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BossuytM.The Court of Strasbourg Acting as an Asylum Court8European Constitutional Law Review (2012).

  • BossuytM.J.Guide to the ‘Travaux Préparatoires’ of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff1987).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BovenT.vanCategories of Rights’ in D.MoeckliS.Shah and S.Sivakumaran (eds.) International Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press20142nd edition).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BowenJ.R.Why the French Don’t Like Headscarves: Islam the State and Public Space (Princeton: Princeton University Press2007).

  • BöweringG.P.Crone and M.Mirza (eds.) The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought (Princeton: Princeton University Press2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BratzaN.The “Precious Asset”: Freedom of Religion under the European Convention of Human Rights14:2Ecclesiastical Law Review (2012a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BratzaN.The “Precious Asset”: Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights’ in M.Hill (ed.) Religion and Discrimination Law in the European Union (Trier: European Consortium for Church and State Research2012b).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrauchJ.A.The Dangerous Search for an Elusive Consensus: What the Supreme Court Should Learn from the European Court of Human Rights52Howard Law Journal (2008–09).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrauchJ.A.The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of Law11Columbia Journal of European Law (2004–2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BremsE. (ed.) The Experiences of Face Veil Wearers in Europe and the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2014).

  • BremsE.Above Children’s Heads: the Headscarves Controversy in European Schools from the Perspective of Children’s Rights14(2) International Journal of Children’s Rights (2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BremsE.Face Veil Bans in the European Court of Human Rights: The Importance of Empirical Findings22Journal of Law and Policy (2013–2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BremsE.Human Rights: Minimum and Maximum Perspectives9Human Rights Law Review (2009).

  • BremsE.Smart Human Rights Integration’ in E.Brems and S.Ouald Chaib (eds.) Fragmentation and Integration in Human Rights Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers2018).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BremsE. and L.LavrysenProcedural Justice in Human Rights Adjudication: The European Court of Human Rights35Human Rights Quarterly (2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BremsE.et al.Le Port de Signes Religieux Dans L’espace Public: Verité à Strasbourg, Erreur à Genève?Journal des Tribunaux (2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BremsE.Human Rights: Universality and Diversity (The Hague/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers2001).

  • BriandA.La Séparation des Églises et de l’État: Rapport fait au nom de la Commission de la Chambre des Députés (Paris: Édouard Cornély et Cie. Éditeurs 1905).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BribosiaE.et al.Same-Sex Marriage – Building an Argument before the ECtHR in Light of the U.S. Experience32:1Berkeley Journal of International Law (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BribosiaE.J.Ringelheim and I.RoriveReasonable Accommodation for Religious Minorities: A Promising Concept for European Antidiscrimination Law?7Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law (2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrownN.J.Sharia and State in the Modern Muslim Middle East29:3International Journal of Middle East Studies (1997).

  • BrownW. and R.ForstThe Power of Tolerance: A Debate (New York: Columbia University Press2014).

  • BuergenthalT.Book Review81American Journal of International Law (1987).

  • BurgW.van derThe Expressive and Communicative Functions of Law, Especially with Regard to Moral Issues20Law and Philosophy (2001).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BürliN.Amicis Curiae as a Means to Reinforce the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights’ in S.FlogaitisT.Zwart & J.Fraser (eds.) The European Court of Human Rights and its Discontents Turning Criticism into Strength (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CagaptayS.Islam Secularism and Nationalism in Modern Turkey: Who Is a Turk? (London: Routledge2006).

  • ÇakirR.I.Bozan and B.TaluImam Hatip Liseleri: Efsaneler ve Gerçekler (Imam Hatip Schools: Legends and Reality) (TESEV – Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CallamardA.The Expression of Religious Beliefs: In the Name of Pluralism, although Not Quite Religious12Religion & Human Rights (2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CaloZ.R.Pluralism, Secularism and the European Court of Human Rights26Journal of Law and Religion (2010).

  • Cañamares ArribasS.La Cruz de Estrasburgo. En Torno a la Sentencia Lautsi v. Italia, del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos22Revista General de Derecho Canónico y Derecho Eclesiástico (2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CañamaresS.Churches, Religious Autonomy and Employment Law in Spain, the European Court of Human Rights, and the United States57Journal of Church and State (2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CariolouL.The Right Not to be Offended by Members of the British National Party: An Analysis of Serco Ltd v Redfearn in the Light of the European Convention of Human Rights36Industrial Law Journal415 (2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CarozzaP.G.The Problematic Applicability of Subsidiarity to International Law and Institutions61:1American Journal of Jurisprudence (2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CarterS.L.The Resurrection of Religious Freedom?107Harvard Law Review (1993).

  • CevaE.Why Toleration Is Not the Appropriate Response to Dissenting Minorities’ Claims23European Journal of Philosophy (2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ChanJ.Legitimacy, Unanimity, and Perfectionism29:1Philosophy & Public Affairs (2000).

  • ChavkinW.et al.Regulation of Conscientious Objection to Abortion: An International Comparative Multiple-Case Study19Health and Human Rights Journal (2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chélini-PontB. and T.J.GunnDieu en France et aux États-Unis: Quand les mythes font la loi (Paris: Berg International2005).

  • ChristiansL.-L.Background Study for the Workshop on Europe (Expert Workshop on the Prohibition of Incitement to National Racial or Religious Hatred OHCHR 9 and 10 February 2011Vienna).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ChristoffersonJ.Fair Balance: Proportionality Subsidiarity and Primarity in the ECHR (Oxford: Oxford University Press2009).

  • ChristouT. and J.P.Raymond (eds.) European Court of Human Rights Remedies and Execution of Judgments (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CinarA.Modernity Islam and Secularism in Turkey: Bodies Places and Time (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press2005).

  • CismasI.The Intersection of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights and Civil and Political Rights’ in E.RiedelG.Giacca and C.Golay (eds) Economic Social and Cultural Rights in International Law. Contemporary Issues and Challenges (Oxford: Oxford University Press2014a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CismasI.Religious Actors and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press2014b).

  • CizreÜ. (ed.) Almanac Turkey 2005: Security Sector and Democratic Oversight (N.P: Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV)2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ClayerN.An Imposed or a Negotiated Laiklik? The Administration of the Teaching of Islam in Single-Party Turkey’ in M.AymesB.Gourisse and Massicard (eds.) Order and Compromise: Government Practices in Turkey (Leiden: Brill2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CollinsH.Is there a Human Right to Work’ in V.Mantouvalou (ed.) The Right to Work (Oxford: Hart Publishing2015).

  • ConnorsJ.Article 28’ in M.A.FreemanC.Chinkin and B.Rudolf (eds.) CEDAW Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press2012).

  • CopsonA.Secularism (Oxford: Oxford University Press2017).

  • CornellS.E.Turkey: Return to Stability?3:4Middle Eastern Studies (1999).

  • CorralB.Some Constitutional Thoughts about the Islamic Full Face Veil Ban in Europe7Vienna Journal of Constitutional International Law (2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CorsoL.Should Empathy Play any Role in the Interpretation of Constitutional Rights?27Ratio Juris (2014).

  • CostaJ.-P. and G.Bedouelle. Les Laïcités à la française (Paris: Presses universitaires de France1998).

  • CrenshawK.Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist PoliticsUniversity of Chicago Legal Forum (1989).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CumperP. and T.Lewis“Taking Religion Seriously”? Human Rights and Hijab in Europe – Some Problems of Adjudication24Journal of Law and Religion (2008–2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CumperP. and T.LewisEmpathy and Human Rights: The Case of Religious Dress18Human Rights Law Review (2018).

  • CumperP. and T.LewisIntroduction: Freedom of Religion and Belief – The Contemporary Context’ in P.Cumper and T.Lewis (eds.) Religion Rights and Secular Society (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CurtisM.K.A Unique Religious Exemption from Antidiscrimination Law in the Case of Gays? Putting the Call for Exemptions for Those Who Discriminate Against Married or Marrying Gays in Context47Wake Forest Law Review (2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DaiX.International Institutions and National Policies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2007).

  • DanchinP.Islam in the Secular Nomos of the European Court of Human Rights32Michigan Journal of International Law (2011).

  • DanchinP.The Evolving Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Protection of Religious Minorities’ in E.A.Cole and P.Danchin (eds.) Protecting the Human Rights of Religious Minorities in Eastern Europe (New York: Columbia University Press2002).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DanchinP.D. and E.Cole (eds.) Protecting the Human Rights of Religious Minorities inEastern Europe (New York: Columbia University Press2002).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DanchinP.G.Of Prophets and Proselytes: Freedom of Religion and the Conflict of Rights in International LawHarvard International Law Journal (2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DavieG.Understanding Religion in Europe: A Continually Evolving Mosaic’ in P.Cumper and T.Lewis (eds.) Religion Rights and Secular Society (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DavisD.Britain Must Defy the European Court of Human Rights: Fragmentation of the International Order, Division in Europe and the Right to Individual Petition’ in S.FlogaitisT.Zwart & J.Fraser (eds.) The European Court of Human Rights and its Discontents Turning Criticism into Strength (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DavisK.The Veil That Covered France’s Eye: The Right to Freedom of Religion and Equal Treatment in Immigration and Naturalization ProceedingsNevada Law Journal (2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De FreitasL.V.The Judicial Activism of the European Court of Justice’ in L.P.Coutinhoet al. (eds.) Judicial Activism (Switzerland: Springer International Publishing2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Lourdes PeroniM.Minorities Before the European Court of Human Rights: Democratic Pluralism Unfolded’ in J.Boulden & W.Kymlicka (eds.) International Approaches to Governing Ethnic Diversity (Oxford: Oxford University Press2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Lourdes PeroniM.Religion and Culture in the Discourse of the European Court of Human Rights: The Risks of Steretyping and Naturalising10International Journal of Constitutional Law (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DepaigneV.Legitimacy Gap – Secularism Religion and Culture in Comparative Constitutional Law (OxfordOxford University Press2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DoganerY.The Law on Headdress and Regulations on Dressing in the Turkish Modernization51Bilig 51 (2009).

  • DraghiciC.The Strasbourg Court between European and Local Consensus: Anti-Democratic or Guardian of Democratic ProcessPublic Law (2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DrzemczewskiA.The Sui Generis Nature of the European Convention on Human Rights29International and Comparative Law Quarterly (1980).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DunneK.A.Addressing Religious Intolerance in Europe: The Limited Application of Article 9 of the European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental FreedomsCalifornia Western International Law Journal (1999).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DurhamW.C.Freedom of Religion: The United States Model42American Journal of Comparative Law Supp. (1994).

  • DurhamW.C.R.TorfsD.M.Kirkham and C.Scott (eds.) Islam Europe and Emerging Legal Issues (Aldershot: Ashgate2012).

  • DzehsiarouK.Does Consensus Matter? Legitimacy of the European consensus in the case law of the ECHRPublic Law534 (2011).

  • DzehtsiarouK. and A.GreeneLegitimacy and the Future of the European Court of Human Rights: Critical Perspectives from Academia and Practitioners’ 12 German Law Journal (2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DzehtsiarouK. and A.GreeneRestructuring the European Court of Human Rights: preserving the right of individual petition and promoting constitutionalismPublic Law (2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EagletonT.The Illusions of Postmodernism (Oxford: Blackwell1996).

  • EdwardsS.S.M.No Burqas We’re French! The Wide Margin of Appreciation and the ECtHR Burqa Ruling26Denning Law Journal (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EligurB.The Mobilization of Political Islam in Turkey (New York: Cambridge University Press2010).

  • Elkayem-LevyC.Womens’ Rights and Religion – The Missing Element in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights35University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ElverH.The Headscarf Controversy: Secularism and Freedom of Religion (New York: Oxford University Press2012).

  • EspositoJ.L. and E.E.Shahin (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Islam and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press2013).

  • EvansC.Individual and Group Religious Freedom in the European Court of Human Rights: Cracks in the Intellectual Architecture26Journal of Law and Religion (2010a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EvansC.Introduction’ in P.CaneC.Evans and Z.Robinson (eds.) Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2011a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EvansC.Speech that Undermines Gender Equality’ in I.Hare and J.Weinstein (eds.) Extreme Speech and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press2009a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EvansC.The “Islamic Headscarf” in the European Court of Human Rights7Melbourne Law Journal (2006).

  • EvansC. and A.HoodReligious Autonomy and Labour Law: A Comparison of the Jurisprudence of the United States and the European Court of Human RightsOxford Journal of Law and Religion (2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EvansC. and C.ThomasChurch-State Relations in the European Court of Human RightsBrigham University Law Review (2006).

  • EvansC.Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press2001).

  • EvansM.D.Challenging Conventional Assumptions: The Case for a Preventive Approach to the Protection of the Freedom of Religion or Belief’ in M.EvansP.Petkoff and JulianR. (eds.) The Changing Nature of Religious Rights Under International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EvansM.D.Freedom of Religion and the European Convention on Human Rights: Approaches, Trends and Tensions’ in P.CaneC.Evans and Z.Robinson (eds.) Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2011b).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EvansM.D.From Cartoons to Crucifixes: Current Controversies Concerning the Freedom of Religion and the Freedom of Expression before the European Court of Human Rights’26:1Journal of Law and Religion (2010b).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EvansM.D.Historical Analysis of Freedom of Religion or Belief as a Technique of Resolving Religious Conflict’ in T.LindholmW.C. DurhamJr. B. G.Tahzib-Lie (eds.) Facilitating Freedom of Religion A Deskbook (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EvansM.D.Lautsi v. Italy: An Initial Appraisal6:3Religion & Human Rights (2011c).

  • EvansM.D.Neutrality in and after Lautsi v. Italy’ in J.Temperman (ed.) The Lautsi Papers: Multidisciplinary Reflections on Religious Symbols in the Public School Classroom (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EvansM.D. and P.PetkoffA Separation of Convenience? The Concept of Neutrality in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights36Religion State and Society (2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EvansM.D.Manual on the Wearing of Religious Symbols in Public Areas (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff2009b).

  • EvansM.D.Religious Liberty and International Law in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1997).

  • EvansM.D.Freedom of Religion and the European Convention on Human Rights; Approaches, Trends and Tensions’ in P.CaneC.Evans and Z.Robinson (eds.) Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FadelM.State and Sharia’ in R.Peters and P.J.Bearman (eds.) The Ashgate Research Companion to Islamic Law (Farnham: Ashgate2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FerrariA. and S.Pastorellivi (eds.) The Burqa Affair Across Europe (Farnham: Ashgate2013).

  • FerrariS.State-Supported Display of Religious Symbols in the Public Space52Journal of Catholic Legal Studies (2013).

  • FerrariS. and S.Pastorelli (eds.) Public Space: Religion in Public Spaces: A European Perspective (Abingdon: Routledge2012).

  • FialaC.et al.Yes we Can! Successful Examples of Disallowing “Conscientious Objection” in Reproductive Health Care21The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care (2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FobletsM.C. and K.AlidadiThe RELIGARE Report: Religion in the Context of the European Union: Engaging the Interplay between Religious Diversity and Secular Models’ in M.-C.FobletsK.AlidadiJ.Nielsen and Z.Yanasmayan (eds.) Belief Law and Politics. What Future for a Secular Europe? (Farnham: Ashgate2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FokasE.Comparative Susceptibility and Differential Effects on the Two European Courts: A Study of Grasstops Mobilizations around Religion5:3Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FokasE.Directions in Religious Pluralism in Europe: Mobilizations in the Shadow of European Court of Human Rights Religious Freedom Jurisprudence4:1Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2015a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FokasE.Pluralism and Religious Freedom in Majority Orthodox Countries’ ELIAMEP Working paper No. 49/2014 (2014).

  • FokasE.The European Court of Human Rights at the Grassroots Level: Who Knows What About Religion at the ECtHR, and to What Effects?45:3–4Religion State and Society (2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FokasE.The Legal Status of Religious Minorities: Exploring the Impact of the European Court of Human RightsSocial Compass (2018).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FokasE.The Secular Court? Trends in the United States Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights Compared’ in A.Day and M.Lovheim (eds.) Modernities Memory Mutations: Grace Davie and the Study of Religion (London: Ashgate2015b).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FrankenL.Liberal Neutrality and State Support for Religion (Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing2016).

  • FraserN.Rethinking Recognition3New Left Review (2000).

  • FredmanS.Emerging from the Shadows: Substantive Equality and Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights16Human Rights Law Review (2016a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FredmanS.Substantive Equality Revisited14(3) International Journal of Constitutional Law712 (2016b).

  • FyrnysM.Expanding Competences by Judicial Lawmaking: The Pilot Judgment Procedure of the European Court of Human Rights12German Law Journal (2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GalanterM.The Radiating Effects of Courts’ in K.O.Boyum and L.M.Mather (eds.) Empirical Theories about Courts (New York: Longman1983).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GaleottiA.E.Toleration as Recognition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2002).

  • GarahanS.A Right to Discriminate? Widening the Scope for Interference with Religious Rights in Ebrahimian v France5Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GardnerC.A Road Cut through the Law to Get after Orbán?3Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2014).

  • GedicksF.M. and P.AnnicchinoCross, Crucifix, Culture: An Approach to the Constitutional Meaning of Confessional Symbols13First Amendment Law Review (2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GerardsJ.Pluralism, Deference and the Margin of Appreciation17(1) European Law Journal (2011).

  • GerardsJ.The Scope of ECHR Rights and Institutional Concerns: The Relationship between Proliferation of Rights and the Caseload of the ECtHR’ in E.Brems and J.Gerards (eds.) Shaping Rights in the ECHR The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GerardsJ. and J.FleurenImplementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Judgments of the ECtHR in National Case-Law: A Comparative Analysis (Antwerpen: Intersentia2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GhaneaN.Religion, Equality and Non-Discrimination’ in J.WitteJr. and M.C. Green (eds.) Religion and Human Rights: An Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GibsonJ.et al.On the Legitimacy of National High Courts92:2American Political Science Review (1998).

  • GibsonJ.L. and G.A.CaldeiraKnowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court71:2The Journal of Politics (2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GibsonM.The God “Dilution”? Religion, Discrimination and the Case for Reasonable Accommodation72Cambridge Law Journal (2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrabenwarterC.European Convention on Human Rights. Commentary (Münich: Beck – Hart – Nomos – Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrayJ.Pluralism and Toleration in Contemporary Political Philosophy48Political Studies (2000).

  • GreenawaltK.Religious Toleration and Claims of Conscience28Journal of Law and Politics (2013).

  • GreerS. and L.Wildhaber‘Revisiting the Debate about “Constitutionalising” the European Court of Human Rights’12:4Human Rights Law Review (2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GreerS.The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements Problems and Prospects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2006).

  • GrossA.M.Reinforcing the New Democracies: The European Convention on Human Rights and the Former Communist Countries – A Study of the Case Law7European Journal of International Law (1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrozevY.Political Opposition and Judicial Resistance to Strasbourg Case Law regarding Minorities in Bulgaria’ in D.Anagnostou (ed.) The European Court of Human Rights: Implementing Strasbourg’s Judgments on Domestic Policy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GuerlacO.The Separation of Church and State in France23:2Political Science Quarterly (1908).

  • GunnT.J.Deconstructing Proportionality in Limitations Analysis19Emory International Law Review (2005).

  • GunnT.J.Religious Freedom and Laicite: A Comparison of the United States and France’ 2004 Brigham Young University Law Review (2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GunnT.J.Adjudicating rights of conscience under the European Convention on Human Rights’ in: J.van derVyver and J.WitteJr. (eds.) Religious Human Rights in Global Perspective: Legal Perspectives (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GunnT.J.Secularism, the Secular, and Secularization’ in JaimeContreras and MartínezdeCodes (eds.) Trends of Secularism in a Pluralistic World (Madrid: Iberoamericana2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GunnT.J.The Complexity of Religion and the Definition of Religion under International Law16Harvard Human Rights Journal (2003).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GunnT.J.The Separation of Church and State versus Religion in the Public Square: The Contested History of the Establishment Clause’ in T.J. Gunn and J.WitteJr. (eds.) No Establishment of Religion: America’s Original Contribution to Religious Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HakeemY.SAS v France: Supporting “Living Together” or Forced Assimilation?3International Human Rights Review (2014).

  • HaleemA.Covernance: Feminist Theory, the Islamic Veil, and the Strasbourg Court’s Jurisprudence on Religious Dress-Appearance Restrictions5DePaul Journal of Women Gender and the Law (2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HallaqW.Can the Shari’ah Be Restored?’ in Y. Y.Haddad and B. F.Stowasser (eds.) Islamic Law and the Challenges of Modernity (Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HallaqW.B.Sharī’a: Theory Practice Transformations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2009).

  • HammarbergT.Human Rights in Europe: No Grounds for Complacency (Council of Europe Publishing2011).

  • HanioğluM.Ş.Atatürk: An Intellectual Biography (Princeton: Princeton University Press2011).

  • HarmsenR.The European Convention on Human Rights after Enlargement5:4The International Journal of Human Rights (2001).

  • HarrisD.J.et al.Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press2014).

  • HatzisN.Neutrality, Proselytism, and Religious Minorities at the European Court of Human Rights and the U.S. Supreme Court49Harvard International Law Journal (2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HawkingsD. and W.JacobyPartial Compliance: A Comparison of the European and Inter-American Courts for Human Rights6Journal of International Law and International Relations (2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HeldC.C.The New Saarland41:4Geographical Review (1951).

  • HelferL. and A.-M.SlaughterToward a Theory of Effective Supra-national Adjudication107Yale Law Journal (1997).

  • HelferL. and E.VoetenInternational Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe68International Organization (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HelferL.R.Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime19:1European Journal of International Law (2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HellmanD. and S.Moreau (eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Discrimination Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press2013).

  • HenrardK.Duties of Reasonable Accommodation on Grounds of Religion in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: A Tale of (Baby) Steps Forward and Missed Opportunities14International Journal of Constitutional Law (2016a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HenrardK.How the European Court of Human Rights’ Concern Regarding European Consensus Tempers the Effective Protection of Freedom of Religion4Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HenrardK.The European Court of Human Rights, Ethnic and Religious Minorities and the Two Dimensions of the Right to Equal Treatment: Jurisprudence at Different Speeds?34Nordic Journal of Human Rights (2016b).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herlin-KarnellE.The Function of Subsidiarity in Area of Freedom, Security and Justice Law: Some Preliminary Thoughts1Europarättslig Tidskrift (2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HeydD.Is Toleration a Political Virtue?’ in M.Williams and J.Waldron (eds.) Toleration and Its Limits (New York: New York University Press2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HillM.Religious Symbolism and Conscientious Objection in the Workplace: An Evaluation of Strasbourg’s Judgment in Eweida and others v United Kingdom15Ecclesiastical Law Journal (2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HillebrechtC.Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2015).

  • HoekstraV.Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2003).

  • Hollander-BlumoffR.The Psychology of Procedural Justice in the Federal Courts63Hastings Law Journal (2011).

  • HortonJ.Toleration as a Virtue’ in DavidHeyd (ed.) Toleration—An Elusive Virtue (Princeton: Princeton University Press1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HortonJ.Why the Traditional Conception of Toleration Still Matters14Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HowardE.Law and the Wearing of Religious Symbols: European Bans on the Wearing of Religious Symbols in Education (Oxford: Routledge2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HulkoW.The Time- and Context-contingent Nature of Intersectionality and Interlocking Oppressions24Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work (2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HuneeusA.Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights14:3Cornell International Law Journal (2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hunter-HeninM.Believing in Negotiation: Reflection in Law’s Regulation of Religious Symbols in State Schools’ in F.Guesnetet al. (eds.) Negotiating with Religion. Cross-disciplinary Perspectives (Abingdon: Routledge2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hunter-HeninM.Living Together in an Age of Religious Diversity: Lessons from Baby Loup and S.A.S.’ 4:1Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hunter-HeninM.Why the French don’t like the Burqa: Laicite, National Identity and Religious Freedom61International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IgnatieffM.The Return of Sovereignty243The New Republic (2012).

  • ItzcovichG.One, None and One Hundred Thousand Margins of Appreciations: The Lautsi Case13Human Rights Law Review (2013).

  • JamalA.A.Considering Freedom of Religion in a Post-Secular Context: Hapless or Hopeful?6Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JanssenH.Wie Geschoren Wordt Moet Stilzitten. Maar Hoe Luidt het Advies aan de Kapper’ in J.Gerards and A.Terlouw (eds.) Amici Curiae. Adviezen aan het Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens (Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publisher2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JenkinsG.Political Islam in Turkey: Running West Heading East? (New York: Palgrave Macmillan2008).

  • JonesP.Toleration, Religion and Accommodation23European Journal of Philosophy (2015).

  • JoppkeC.Double Standards? Veils and Crucifixes in the European Legal Order1European Journal of Sociology97 (2013).

  • JoppkeC.Pluralism v. Pluralism: Islam and Christianity in the European Court of Human Rights’ in J. L.Cohen and C.Laborde (eds.) Religion Secularism and Constitutional Democracy (New York: Columbia University Press2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JordanP.Russia’s Accession to the Council of Europe and Compliance with European Human Rights Norms11Demokratizatsiya (2003).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JusicA.Constitutional Changes and the Incremental Reductions of Collective Religious Freedom in Hungary10Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law (2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KaminisY. and M.TsapogasPorisma 11155.02.2.3 (20.11.2002)6To Syntagma (2002).

  • KarpatK.H.Military Interventions: Army-Civilian Relations in Turkey Before and After 1980’ in M.Heper and A.Evin (eds.) State Democracy and the Military: Turkey in the 1980s (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter1988).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KellerH. and A.Stone Sweet (eds.) A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford: Oxford University Press2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KellerH.A.Fischer and D.KühneDebating the Future of the European Court of Human Rights after the Interlaken Conference: Two Innovative Proposals21:4European Journal of International Law (2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KerrL.The Conversation between Strasbourg and National Courts − Dialogue or Dictation?44Irish Jurist (2009).

  • KiskaR.Hate Speech: A Comparison between the European Court of Human Rights and the United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence25:1Regent University Law Review (2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KislowiczH.Law, Religion, and Feeling Included/Excluded: Case Studies in Canadian Religious Freedom Litigation30Canadian Journal of Law and Society (2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KiviorgM.Collective Religious Autonomy versus Individual Rights: a Challenge for the ECtHR?39Review of Central and Eastern European Law (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KlarmanM.How Great Were the “Great” Marshall Court Decisions?87:6Virginia Law Review (2001).

  • KokerT.The Establishment of Kemalist Secularism in Turkey2Middle East Law and Governance (2010).

  • KortewegA.C. and G.YurdakulThe Headscarf Debates: Conflicts of National Belonging (Stanford: Stanford University Press2014).

  • KoukouzelisK.Neutrality, Religious Symbols and the Question of a European Public Space4Politics in Central Europe (2008).

  • KratochivílJ.The Inflation of the Margin of Appreciation by the European Court of Human Rights29Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights (2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KrawietzB. and H.Reifeld (eds.) Islam and the Rule of Law: Between Sharia and Secularization (Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung and Zentrum Moderner Orient2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KruuseH.Conscientious Objection to Performing Same-Sex Marriage in South Africa28International Journal of Law Policy and The Family (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KurbanD. and H.GulalpA Complicated Affair: Turkey’s Kurds and the European Court of Human Rights’ in D.Anagnostou (ed.) The European Court of Human Rights: Implementing Strasbourg’s Judgments on Domestic Policy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KuruA.T.Passive and Assertive Secularism: Historical Conditions, Ideological Struggles, and State Policies toward Religion59:4World Politics (2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KuruA.T.Secularism and State Policies toward Religion: The United States France and Turkey (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KyritsisD. and S.TsakyrakisNeutrality in the Classroom11International Journal of Constitutional Law (2013).

  • LabordeC.Female Autonomy, Education and the Hijab9Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (2006).

  • LangerL.Panacea or Pathetic Fallacy? The Swiss Ban on Minarets43Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2010).

  • LeachP.et al.Responding to Systemic Human Rights Violations: An Analysis of Pilot Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and Their Impact at National Level (Antwerp: Intersentia2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeggA.The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (Oxford: Oxford University Press2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeighI.Balancing Religious Autonomy and Other Human Rights under the European Convention1Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeighI.Damned if They Do, Damned if They Don’t: The European Court of Human Rights and the Protection of Religion from Attack17Res Publica (2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeighI.New Trends in Religious Liberty and the European Court of Human Rights12Ecclesiastical Law Journal (2010).

  • LeighI.Reversibility, proportionality, and conflicting rights: Fernández Martínez v. Spain’ in S.Smet and E.Brems (eds.) When Human Rights Clash at the European Court of Human Rights: Conflict or Harmony (Oxford: Oxford University Press2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeighI.The European Court of Human Rights and Religious Neutrality’ in G.D’CostaM.EvansT.Madood and J.Rivers (eds.) Religion in a Liberal State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeighI. and R.AdharPost-Secularism and the European Court of Human Rights75Modern Law Review (2012).

  • LeighI. and A.HamblerReligious Symbols, Conscience, and the Rights of Others3Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2014).

  • LernerN.How Wide the Margin of Appreciation? The Turkish Headscarf Case, the Strasbourg Court, and Secularist Tolerance13Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolutions (2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LetsasG.The Truth in Autonomous Concepts: How To Interpret the ECHR15(2) European Journal of International Law279 (2004).

  • LetsasG.Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation26Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (2006).

  • LetsasG.A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press2007).

  • LewisT.What Not to Wear: Religious Rights, the European Court, and the Margin of Appreciation56International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LockT.Religious Freedom and Belief Discrimination in Germany and the United Kingdom: Towards a Common European Standard?38(5) European Law Review (2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LoenenM.L.P. and L.VickersMore is Less? Multiple Protection of Human Rights in Europe and the Risks of Erosion of Human Rights Standards’ in S.Morano-Foadi and L.Vickers (eds.) Fundamental Rights in the EU: A Matter for Two Courts (Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • López-SidroA.Libertad Religiosa y Juramento en el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. El Caso Dimitras y Otros Contra Grecia24Revista General de Derecho Canónico y Derecho Eclesiástico del Estado (2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LugatoM.The “Margin of Appreciation” and Freedom of Religion: Between Treaty Interpretation and Subsidiarity52Catholic Legal Studies (2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LykesV.A. and J.T.RichardsonThe European Court of Human Rights, Minority Religions, and New versus Original Member States’ in J. T.Richardson and F.Bellanger (eds.) Legal Cases New Religious Movements and Minority Faiths (Farnham: Ashgate2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacDougallB.Refusing to Officiate at Same-Sex Civil Marriages68Saskatchewan Law Review (2006).

  • MadsenM.R.Rebalancing European Human Rights: Has the Brighton Declaration Engendered a New Deal on Human Rights in Europe?Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MadsenM.R.The Challenging Authority of the European Court of Human Rights: From Cold War Legal Diplomacy to the Brighton Declaration and Backlash79:1Law and Contemporary Problems (2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MaherJ.Eweida and Others: A New Era for Article 9?63International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2014).

  • MahoneyP.Marvellous Richness of Diversity or Invidious Cultural Relativism?19Human Rights Law Journal (1998).

  • ManciniS.The Power of Symbols and Symbols of Power: Secularism and Religion as Guarantors of Cultural Convergence30(6) Cardozo Law Review (2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ManciniS. and M.RosenfeldUnveiling the Limits of Tolerance. Comparing the Treatment of Majority and Minority Religious Symols in the Public Square’ in L.Zucca and C.Ungureanu (eds.) Law State and Religion in the New Europe. Debate and Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MangoA.Atatürk (Woodstock, New York: Overlook Press2000).

  • MarshallJ.Conditions for Freedom? European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate30Human Rights Quarterly (2008).

  • MarshallJ.Freedom of Religious Expression and Gender Equality69Modern Law Review (2006).

  • MarshallJ.S.A.S. v France: Burqa Bans and the Control or Empowerment of Identities15Human Rights Law Review (2015).

  • MartensS.K.Commentary’ in M.K.Bulterman and M.Kuijer (eds.) Compliance with Judgments of International Courts (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers1996).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martínez-TorrónJ.Conscientious Objections: Protecting Freedom of Conscience beyond Prejudice’ in S.Ferrari (ed.) Routledge Handbook on Law and Religion (Abingdon: Routledge2015a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martínez-TorrónJ.Freedom of Expression versus Freedom of Religion in the European Court of Human Rights’ in A.Sajó (ed.) Censorial Sensitivities: Free Speech and Religion in a Fundamentalist World (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martínez-TorrónJ.Islam in Strasbourg: Can Politics Substitute for Law?’ in C.Durhamet al. (eds) Islam Europe and Emerging Legal Issues (Ashgate2012a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martínez-TorrónJ.Los Testigos de Jehová y la Cuestión de los Honores a la Bandera en México117Gaceta de la Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos (2000).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martínez-TorrónJ.State Neutrality and Religious Plurality in Europe’ in W.C. DurhamJr. and D.Thayer (eds.) Religion Pluralism and Reconciling Difference (Abington: Routledge 2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martínez-TorrónJ.Strasbourg’s Approach to Religion in the Pluralist Democracies of Europe’ in R.Griffith-Jones & M.Hill (eds.) Magna Carta Religion and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2015b).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martínez-TorrónJ.The (Un)protection of Individual Religious Identity in the Strasbourg Case Law2Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2012b).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martínez-TorrónJ.Religion and Law in Spain (Alphen aan de Rijn: Wolters-Kluwer2013).

  • Martínez-TorrónJ.Religión derecho y sociedad (Granada: Comares1999).

  • MassicardE.Variations in the Judicialization of the Alevi Issue – From Turkey to Europe64:4Revue française de science politique (2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MawhinneyA.et al.Religious Education and Religious Liberty: Opt-outs and Young People’s Sense of Belonging’ in M.Hunter-Henin (ed.) Law Religious Freedoms and Education in Europe (London: Ashgate2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MawhinneyA.The Opt-Out Clause: Imperfect Protection for the Right to Freedom of Religion in Schools2Education Law Journal (2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCannM.Law and Social Movements: Contemporary Perspectives2:1Annual Review of Law and Social Science (2006).

  • McCannM.Reform Litigation on Trial17:4Law & Social Inquiry (1992).

  • McCannM.Rights at WorkPay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press1994).

  • McCreaR.De Facto Secularism in a Diversifying Religious Environment: The Changing Relationship between State and Religion in Europe’ in R.Uitz (ed.) Religion in the Public Sphere. Perspectives on Secularism (The Hague: Eleven International Publishing2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCreaR.Secularism before the Strasbourg Court: Abstract Constitutional Principles as a Basis for Limiting Rights79Modern Law Review (2016).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCreaR.The Ban on the Veil and European Law13Human Rights Law Review (2013).

  • McCreaR.The Consequences of Disaggregation and the Impossibility of a Third Way’ in C.Laborde and A.Bardon (eds.) Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGoldrickD.A Defence of the Margin of Appreciation and an Argument for its Application by the Human Rights Committee65International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2016a).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGoldrickD.Extreme Religious Dress: Perspectives on Veiling Controversies’ in I.Hare and J.Weinstein (eds.) Extreme Speech and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGoldrickD.Religion and Legal Spaces: in Gods we Trust; in the Church we Trust, but need to verify12Human Rights Law Review (2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGoldrickD.The Development and Status of Sexual Orientation Discrimination under International Human Rights Law Human Rights Law ReviewHuman Rights Law Review (2016b).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGoldrickD.The Islamic Headscarf Debate in Europe (Hart: Oxford2006).

  • McGoldrickD.Religious Rights and the Margin of Appreciation’ in P.Agha (ed.) Human Rights Between Law and Politics – The Margin of Appreciation in Post-National Contexts (Oxford: Hart2017).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McMillanJ.F.Christianity in France from the Restoration to the Separation of Church and State, 1815–1905’ in S.Gilley and B.Stanley (eds.) World Christianities c.1815–c.1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MendusS.Toleration and the Limits of Liberalism (London: MacMillan1989).

  • MerdjanovaI.Rediscovering the Umma Muslims in the Balkans between Nationalism and Transnationalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press2013).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meseguer VelascoS.Símbolos religiosos en colegios públicos: ¿hacia dónde camina la jurisprudencia europea?5Anuario Jurídico Villanueva (2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MirzaM.A.SenthilkumaranZ.Ja’farLiving Apart Together – British Muslims and the Paradox of Multiculturalism (London: Policy Exchange2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MoeC.Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey6:1The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law (2003).

  • MoeckliD.Of Minarets and Foreign Criminals: Swiss Direct Democracy and Human Rights11 Human Rights Law Review (2011).

    • Export Citation
  • MoeckliD.Exclusion From Public Space (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2016).

  • MoonR.The Supreme Court of Canada’s Attempt to Reconcile Freedom of Religion and Sexual Orientation Equality in the Public Schools’ in D.RaysideC.Wilcox (eds.) Faith Politics And Sexual Diversity (Vancouver: UBC Press2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MowbreyA.The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart Publishing2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MurdochJ.Freedom of Thought Conscience and Religion: A Guide to the Implementation of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Human rights handbooks 9 Council of Europe2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Navaro-YashinY.Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey (Princeton: Princeton University Press2002).