In Defence of Policy Incoherence – Illustrations from EU External Migration Policy

in EU External Migration Policies in an Era of Global Mobilities: Intersecting Policy Universes
Get Access to Full Text

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


The issue of EU policy coherence has attracted tremendous attention from academics and policy makers. Alongside much conceptual querying of what policy coherence means, there is a continuous lamenting of the lack of policy coherence, and the need for more is stressed. Political scientists analyse the decision-making procedures and conclude that different EU institutions, bodies and agencies do not coordinate, resulting in policy coherence. Legal scientists bemoan the incoherent EU legal order and argue for further Treaty reform. This chapter takes the case of the EU (external) migration policy to show that this widespread incoherence is a normal and inevitable feature of EU governance in this field, and of any pluralistic, democratic and rule of law based system of government. Divergent interests, values, and actors can only be accommodated in policies by allowing for some degree of policy incoherence, it is thus the condition upon which EU policy making is premised. The chapter argues that the dominant preoccupation with policy coherence should be reappraised, and advances a broad notion of coherence embedded in the Rule of Law.

Table of Contents
Index Card


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 137 137 17
Full Text Views 38 38 0
PDF Downloads 10 10 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0