Science Education as a Material Issue?

Exploring the Role of Materiality in Science Education through the Lens of Baradian Theory

in Critical Issues and Bold Visions for Science Education
Get Access to Full Text

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



In what ways can human-matter intra-action as a teaching lens frame science-teaching learning in the classroom?

Applying Karen Barad’s post humanist theory, we explore how techno-scientific practices allow us to investigate the rich context of education in the making. Such perspectives lead us to argue for a focus on how material-discursive practice emerge through the intra-activity between human and matter agents as a source of locally intelligible phenomena. Traditional humanist models of teaching and learning locate agential responsibility in a specific human agent, which serves to separate the world of education into dichotomies: the teacher from the taught, the knower from the known, the self from other, and the object from the subject. Baradian theory challenges us to focus instead on intra-actions, which do not assume pre-existing object agents but accepts that it is through specific intra-actions that phenomena in all their complexity emerge. We must work from the perspective that agential responsibility, which constitutes responsibly embodied engagement in a material world, and recognize that there are consequences, possibilities, and responsibilities for intra-actions. Drawing on examples from co-teaching, self-assessment and emergent classroom practice, we use Barad’s theory, specifically her notions of agential realism, diffraction and entanglement, to propose models of practice that make intra-actions the focus with the goal of making learning more ethical, affective and inclusive.