Abbreviations

AB

Appellate Body

Add.

Addendum/a

AFDI

Annuaire français de droit international

AFJICL

African Journal of International and Comparative Law

AJIL

American Journal of International Law

ALI

American Law Institute

ANPA

Gabonese Fisheries Enforcement Agency

Arb Intl

Arbitration International

ario 2011 ilc Articles on the Responsibility of International OrganizationsARSIWA

2001 ILC Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts

ASIL

American Society of International Law

ATCA

Alien Tort Claims Act

ATS

Alien Tort Statute

AUILR

American University International Law Review

AULR

American University Law Review

Berkeley J Intl L

Berkeley Journal of International Law

BIICL

British Institute of International and Comparative Law

BIT/s

Bilateral Investment Treaty/Treaties

BJIL

Berkeley Journal of International Law

BYBIL

British Yearbook of International Law

CARU

Administrative Commission of the River Uruguay

CETA

Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement

CIA

Central Intelligence Agency

CJEU

Court of Justice of the European Union

CJICL

Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law

CLCs

Contingent Liberalization Commitments

CLR

Columbia Law Review

Co.

Company

COMESA

Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa

Corp.

Corporation

Corr.

Corrigendum/a

DCF

Discounted Cash Flow

DDG

Deputy Director General

DSB

Dispute Settlement Body

e.g.

exempli gratia

EC

European Community

ECHR

European Convention on Human Rights

ECtHR

European Court of Human Rights

ed./eds.

editor/s

edn.

edition

EEZ

Exclusive Economic Zone

EJIL

European Journal of International Law

Emory ILR

Emory International Law Review

EPA

Economic Partnership Agreement

et al.

et alii

et seq.

et sequentia

EU

European Union

FAO

Food and Agriculture Organization

FET

Fair and Equitable Treatment

FMV

Fair Market Value

FSC

Foreign Sales Corporations

FTA

Free Trade Agreement

FYROM

Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

GATT

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

GC

Grand Chamber

GMOs

Genetically Modified Organisms

GVCs

Global Value Chains

GYBIL

German Yearbook of International Law

HILJ

Harvard International Law Journal

HJIL

Harvard Journal of International Law

HLR

Harvard Law Review

HNS

Hazardous and Noxious Substances

HRC

UN Human Rights Committee

i.e.

id est

IACtHR

Inter-American Court of Human Rights

Ibid.

Ibidem

ICC

International Criminal Court

ICJ

International Court of Justice

ICJ Rep.

International Court of Justice Reports

ICLQ

International and Comparative Law Quarterly

ICSID

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes

ICTR

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

ICTY

International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia

IIA/s

International Investment Agreement/s

ILA

International Law Association

ILC

International Law Commission

ILM

International Legal Materials

IMF

International Monetary Fund

IMLI

International Maritime Law Institute

IMT

International Military Tribunal

ipa

Investment Protection Agreement

IPOA-IUU

International Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing

ISA

International Seabed Authority

ITLOS

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

itlos Rep.

itlos Reports

IUU

Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated

IYBIL

Italian Yearbook of International Law

JDI

Journal du droit international

JENRL

Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law

JICJ

Journal of International Criminal Justice

JIDS

Journal of International Dispute Settlement

JIEL

Journal of International Economic Law

JILP

New York University Journal of International Law and Politics

JLS

Journal of Legal Studies

JWIT

Journal of World Investment and Trade

JWT

Journal of World Trade

LGDJ

Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence

LJIL

Leiden Journal of International Law

LLC

Limited Liability Company

LOSC

1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

MAS

Mutually Agreed Solution

Melbourne jil

Melbourne Journal of International Law

MERCOSUR

El Mercado Común del Sur

MFN

Most Favored Nation

MJIL

Michigan Journal of International Law

MPA

Marine Protected Area

NAFTA

North American Free Trade Agreement

NGOs

Non-Governmental Organizations

NILR

Netherlands International Law Review

No./Nos.

Number/s

Nord J Intl L

Nordic Journal of International Law

NYBIL

Netherlands Yearbook of International Law

OECD

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

OJ

Official Journal of the European Communities

para./paras.

paragraph/s

PCA

Permanent Court of Arbitration

PPI

Producer Price Index

PSCs

Private Security Companies

PSM Agreement

2009 Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing

PTA

Preferential Trade Agreement

RBDI

Revue belge de droit international

RCADI

Recueil des cours de l’ Académie de la Haye

RCDIP

Revue critique de droit international privé

RGDIP

Revue générale de droit international public

RIAA

Review of International Arbitral Awards

RQDI

Revue québécoise de droit international

SAYIL

South African Yearbook of International Law

SCC

Stockholm Chamber of Commerce

SCJIL

Santa Clara Journal of International Law

SCS

Southern Cross Security

SDGs

Sustainable Development Goals

SDRs

Special Drawing Rights

SFPA

Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement

SRFC

Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission

SSCS

Sea Shepherd Conservation Society

TBT

Technical Barriers to Trade

TDM

Transnational Dispute Management

TRIPs

Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights

TTIP

Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

Tulane MLJ

Tulane Maritime Law Journal

ucla jelp

University of California, Los Angeles Journal of Environmental Law and Policy

uclr

University of Cincinnati Law Review

UK

United Kingdom

UN

United Nations

UNCITRAL

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law

UNCTAD

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

UNEP

United Nations Environment Programme

UNGA

United Nations General Assembly

UNGA

United Nations General Assembly

UNPROFOR

United Nations Protection Force

unts

United Nations Treaty Series

US/USA

United States of America

USMT

United States Military Tribunal

v.

versus

VCLT

1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

VCLT-II

1986 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations

VirgJIL

Virginia Journal of International Law

VJIL

Vanderbilt Journal of International Law

Vol.

Volume

WTO

World Trade Organization

WTO DSU

WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding

WTR

World Trade Review

YBIEL

Yearbook of International Environmental Law

YILC

Yearbook of the International Law Commission

YJIL

Yale Journal of International Law

YLJ

Yale Law Journal

ZaöRV

Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht

Table of Contents
Index Card
References
  • Certain Questions Relating to the Settlers of German Origin in the Territory Ceded by Germany to Poland Advisory Opinion of 10 September 1923 pcij Series B No. 6.

  • Factory at Chorzów (Germany v. Poland) (Jurisdiction) Judgment of 26 July 1927 pcij Series A No. 9.

  • Oscar Chinn Case (UK v. Belgium) Judgment of 12 December 1934 pcij Series A/B No. 63.

  • –Judgment of 12 December 1934.

  • –Separate Opinion of M. Anzilotti.

  • Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Guinea v. Congo) (Merits) Judgment of 30 November 2010 [2010] icj Rep. 639.

  • Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Guinea v. Congo) (Preliminary Objections) Judgment of 24 May 2007 [2007] icj Rep. 582.

  • Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro) Judgment of 26 February 2007 [2007] icj Rep. 43.

  • Barcelona Traction Light & Power Company Ltd. (Belgium v. Spain) (Second phase) Judgment of 5 February 1970 [1970] icj Rep. 6.

  • –Separate Opinion of Judge Fitzmaurice 64.

  • Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro) (Merits) Judgment of 26 February 2007 [2007] icj Rep. 43.

  • Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) (Merits) Judgment of 19 December 2005 [2005] icj Rep. 168.

  • Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. usa) (Merits) Judgment of 27 June 1986 [1986] icj Rep. 14.

  • Case Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay) Judgment of 20 April 2010 [2010] icj Rep. 14.

  • Case Concerning US Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (usa v. Iran) Judgment of 24 May 1980 [1980] icj Rep. 3.

  • Corfu Channel case (UK v. Albania) (Merits) Judgment of 9 April 1949 [1949] icj Rep. 4.

  • Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) Judgment of 13 July 2009 [2009] icjRep. 213.

  • Elettronica Sicula S.p.A. (elsi) (usa v. Italy) Judgment of 20 July 1989 [1989] icj Rep. 15.

  • Fisheries Jurisdiction (Spain v. Canada) (Jurisdiction) Judgment of 4 December 1998 [1998] icj Rep. 432.

  • Gabcíkovo-Nagymaros Case (Hungary/Slovakia) Judgment of 25 September 1997 [2007] icj Rep. 7.

  • Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany/Italy Greece intervening) Judgment of 3 February 2012 [2012] icj Rep. 99.

  • Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943 (Italy v. France UK and usa) (Preliminary Objections) Judgment of 1954 [1954] icj Rep. 19.

  • Nuclear Tests Cases (Australia v. France) Judgment of 20 December 1974 [1974] icj Rep. 253.

  • Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal) Judgment of 20 July 2012 [2012] icj Rep. 422.

  • Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations Advisory Opinion of 11 April 1949 [1949] icj Rep. 174.

  • Abu Zubaydah v. LithuaniaECtHR Application No. 46454/11 (communicated to the Lithuanian Government on 14 December 2012).

  • Al Nashiri v. Romania ECtHR Application No. 33234/12 (communicated to the Romanian Government on 18 September 2012).

  • Al-Nashiri v. Poland ECtHR Judgment of 24 July 2014 Application No. 28761/11.

  • Cruz Varas and Others. v. Sweden ECtHR Judgment of 20 March 1991 Application No. 15576/89.

  • El-Masri v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of fyrom ECtHR [GC] Judgment of 13 December 2012 Application No. 39630/09.

  • Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. PolandECtHR Judgment of 24 July 2014 Application No. 7511/13.

  • Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia ECtHR [GC] Judgment of 8 July 2004 Application No. 48787/99.

  • Loizidou v. Turkey ECtHR Judgment of 18 December 1996 Application No. 15318/89.

  • Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey ECtHR Judgment of 4 February 2005 Application Nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99.

  • Nasr and Ghali v. Italy ECtHR Judgment of 23 February 2016 Application No. 44883/09.

  • Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom ECtHR Judgment of 17 January 2012 Application No. 8139/09.

  • Saadi v. ItalyECtHR Judgment of 28 February 2008 Application No. 37201/06.

  • Soering v. United Kingdom ECtHR [GC] Judgment of 7 July 1989 Application No. 14038/88.

  • Tsirlis and Kouloumpasv. GreeceECtHR Judgment of 29 May 1997 Application Nos. 19233/91 and 19234/91.

  • Case of Ximenes-Lopes v. Brazil (Merits Reparation and Costs)IACtHR Judgment of 4 July 2006 Series C No. 149.

  • Velasquez-Rodriguez v. Honduras IACtHR Judgment of 29 July 1988 Series C No. 4.

  • Mohammed Alzery v. Sweden Human Rights Committee Decision of 10 November 2006 Communication No. 1416/2005 CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005.

  • Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadić icty Appeals Chamber Judgment of 15 July 1999 Case No. IT-94-1-A.

  • Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadićicty Trial Chamber Judgment of 7 May 1999 Case No. IT-94-1-T.

  • The Prosecutor v. Alfed Musema ictr Trial Chamber I Judgment of 27 January 2000 Case No. ICTR-96-13-T.

  • In re Alfried Felix Alwyn Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach and Eleven Others (The Krupp Trial)imt Judgment of 30 June 1948 Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases 15 (1948): 620.

  • In re Carl Krauch and Twenty-Two Others (The I.G. Farben Trial) Judgment of 29 July 1948 Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases 15 (1948): 668.

  • In re Flick and Others imt Judgment of 22 December 1947 Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases 14 (1947): 266.

  • Judgment of the Nuremberg Tribunal imt Judgment of 1 October 1946 Trial of the Major War Criminals 1 (1947): 171.

  • European Parliament and European Commission v. Council of the European Union Joined Cases No. C-103/12 and No. C-165/12 cjeu [GC] Judgment of 26 November 2014 ECLI:EU:C:2014:2400.

  • European Parliament and European Commission v. Council of the European Union Joined Cases No. C-103/12 and No. C-165/12 cjeu Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston Opinion of 15 May 2014 ECLI:EU:C:2014:334.

  • Case Concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile/European Union) itlos Case No. 7.

  • Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC) ITLOS Advisory Opinion of 2 April 2015 [2015] itlos Rep. 4.

  • Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with respect to Activities in the AreaITLOS Seabed Disputes Chamber Advisory Opinion of 1 February 2011 [2011] ITLOS Rep. 10.

  • Southern Bluefin Tuna (New Zealandv. Japan; Australiav. Japan) (Provisional Measures) ITLOS Order of 27 August 1999 [1999] ITLOS Rep. 280.

  • The M/V ‘Norstar’ Case (Panama v. Italy) (Preliminary Objections) ITLOS Judgment of 4 November 2016 Case No. 25 available at: <https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.25/Preliminary_Objections/Judgment/C25_Judgment_04.11.16_orig.pdf>.

  • The M/V ‘Saiga’ (No. 2) Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea) ITLOS Judgment of 1 July 1999 [1999] ITLOS Rep. 10.

  • The M/V ‘Virginia G’ Case (Panama/Guinea-Bissau) ITLOS Judgment of 14 April 2014 [2014] ITLOS Rep. 4.

  • –Judgment of 14 April 2014.

  • –Separate Opinion of Judge Paik.

  • Chile – Measures affecting the Transit and Importing of Swordfish WTO Discontinuance by Agreement of the Parties on 28 May 2010 G/L/367/Add.1.

  • European Communities – Regime for the Importation Sale and Distribution of Bananas – Recourse to Arbitration by the European Communities under Article 22(6) of the DSU Decision by the Arbitrators of 9 April 1999 WT/DS27/ARB.

  • European Communities – Regime for the Importation Sale and Distribution of Bananas – Recourse to Arbitration by the European Communities under Article 22(6) of the DSU Decision by the Arbitrators of 24 March 2000 WT/DS27/ARB/ECU.

  • European Communities – The ACP-EC Partnership Agreement – Recourse to Arbitration Pursuant to the Decision of 14 November 2001 Award of the Arbitrator of 1 August 2015 WT/L/616.

  • European Union – Measures on Atlanto-Scandian Herring WTO Discontinuance due to Settlement of Dispute on 21 August 2014 G/L/1058/Add.1.

  • United States – Anti-Dumping Act of 1916 – (Original Complaint by the European Communities) – Recourse to Arbitration by the United States under Article 22(6) DSU Decision by the Arbitrators of 24 February 2004 WT/DS136/ARB.

  • United States – Continued Suspension of Obligations in the EC – Hormones Dispute WTO Appellate Body Report circulated on 16 October 2008 WT/DS320/AB/R.

  • United States – Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from ChinaWTO Appellate Body Report adopted on 11 March 2011 WT/DS379/AB/R.

  • United States – Import Measures on Certain Products from the European Communities WTO Appellate Body Report circulated on 11 December 2000 WT/DS165/AB/R.

  • United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products WTO Appellate Body Report adopted on 12 October 1998 WT/DS58/AB/R.

  • Amoco International Finance Corporation v. Iran Iran – US Claims Tribunal Award of 14 July 1987 Award No. 310-56-3 Iran-US Claims Tribunal Reports 15 (1987): 189.

  • Flexi-Van Leasing Inc. v. The Islamic Republic of Iran Iran – US Claims Tribunal Award of 13 October 1986 Award No. 259-36-1 Iran-US Claims Tribunal Reports 12/ III (1986): 335.

  • Hyatt International Corporation v. The Islamic Republic of Iran Iran – US Claims Tribunal Interlocutory Award of 17 September 1985 Award No. 54-134-1 Iran-US Claims Tribunal Reports 9/ II (1985): 72.

  • Kenneth P. Yeager v. The Islamic Republic of Iran Iran – US Claims Tribunal Award of 2 November 1987 Award No. 324-10199-1 Iran-US Claims Tribunal Reports 17/IV (1987): 104.

  • Schering Corporation v. The Islamic Republic of Iran Iran – US Claims Tribunal Award of 16 April 1984 Award No. 122-38-3 Iran-US Claims Tribunal Reports5/I (1984): 361.

  • Tippetts Abbett McCarthy Stratton v. tamms-affa Consulting Engineers of Iran Iran – US Claims Tribunal Award of 22 June 1984 Award No. 141-7-2 Iran-US Claims Tribunal Reports 6/II (1984): 219.

  • ADC Affiliate Limited and ADC & ADMC Management Limited v. Hungary ICSID Award of 2 October 2006 ICSID Case No. ARB/03/16.

  • American Manufacturing & Trading Inc. v. Zaire ICSID Award of 21 February 1997 icsid Case No. ARB/93/1.

  • Asian Agricultural Products Ltd (AAPL) v. Sri Lanka ICSID Award of 27 June 1990 icsid Case No. ARB/87/3.

  • AWG Group Ltd. v. Argentina UNCITRAL Decision on Liability of 30 July 2010.

  • Azurix Corp. v. Argentina ICSID Award of 14 July 2006 ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12.

  • Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A.S. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan ICSID Award of of 27 August 2009 ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29.

  • BG Group Plc. v. Argentina UNCITRAL Final Award of 24 December 2007.

  • Camuzzi International S.A. v. Argentina ICSID Decision on Objection to Jurisdiction of 11 May 2005 ICSID Case No. ARB/03/2.

  • Cargill Incorporated v. United Mexican States ICSID Award of 18 September 2009 ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/05/2.

  • CMS Gas Transmission Company v. ArgentinaICSID Annulment Decision of 25 September 2007 ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8.

  • CMS Gas Transmission Company v. ArgentinaICSID Award of 12 May 2005 ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8.

  • CMS Gas Transmission Company v. ArgentinaICSID Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction of 17 July 2003 ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8.

  • Compañiá de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal v. ArgentinaICSID Award of 20 August 2007 ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3.

  • Consortium RFCC v. Royaume du Maroc ICSID Award of 22 December 2003 ICSID Case No. ARB/00/6.

  • Continental Casualty Company v. Argentina ICSID Award of 5 September 2008 ICSID Case No. ARB/03/9.

  • Dame Mossé (France v. Italy) Arbitral tribunal Decision of 17 January and 6 October 1953 RIAA 13 (1953): 486.

  • EDF International S.A. SAUR International S.A. and León Participaciones Argentinas S.A. v. Argentina ICSID Award of 11 June 2012 ICSID Case No. ARB/03/23.

  • El Paso Energy International Company v. ArgentinaICSID Award of 31 October 2011 ICSID Case No. ARB/03/15.

  • Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets L.P. v. ArgentinaICSID Decision on Jurisdiction of 14 January 2004 ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3.

  • Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets L.P. v. ArgentinaICSID Annulment Decision of 30 July 2010 ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3.

  • Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets L.P. v. Argentina ICSID Award of 22 May 2007 ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3.

  • Eritrea v. Yemen Arbitral tribunal Award of 17 December 1999 RIAA 22 (1999): 335.

  • Finnish Shipowners (Finland/UK) Arbitral tribunal Decision of 9 May 1934 RIAA 3 (1934): 1479.

  • GAMI Investments Inc. v. Mexico UNCITRAL (NAFTA) Award of 15 November 2004.

  • Glamis Gold Ltd. v. The United States of America UNCITRAL Award of 8 June 2009.

  • Gustav FW Hamester GmbH & Co KG v. Republic of Ghana ICSID Award of 18 June 2010 ICSID Case No. ARB/07/24.

  • Helnan International Hotels A/S v. The Arab Republic of Egypt ICSID Award of 3 July 2008 ICSID Case No. ARB/05/19.

  • Impregilo S.p.a. v. Pakistan ICSID Award of 22 April 2005 ICSID Case No. ARB/03/03.

  • In the Matter of an Arbitration before an Arbitral Tribunal Constituted under Annex VII to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea between the Republic of the Philippines and the People’s Republic of ChinaPCA Award on Merits of 12 July 2016 available at: <http://www.pcacases.com/pcadocs/PH-CN%20-%2020160712%20-%20Award.pdf>.

  • In the Matter of the Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration (Republic of Mauritius v. United Kingdom) PCA Award of 18 March 2015 available at: <https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/MU-UK%2020150318%20Award.pdf>.

  • International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v. The United Mexican States UNCITRAL Award of 26 January 2006.

  • International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v. United States of America UNCITRAL (NAFTA) Submission of the United States of America 21 May 2004.

  • Jan de Nul N.V. and Dredging International N.V. v. Arab Republic of Egypt ICSID Award of 6 November 2008 ICSID Case No. ARB/04/13.

  • Joseph Charles Lemire v. Ukraine ICSID Decision on Jurisdiction and Liability of 14 January 2010 ICSID Case No. ARB/06/18.

  • LG&E v. ArgentinaICSID Award of 25 July 2007 ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1.

  • LG&E v. ArgentinaICSID Decision on Liability of 3 October 2006 ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1.

  • Marvin Feldman v. Mexico ICSID Award of 16 December 2002 ICSID Case No. ARB/99/1.

  • Marvin Roy Feldman Karpa v. United Mexican States ICSID Award of 16 December 2002 ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/1.

  • Metalclad Corporation v. The United Mexican States icsid Award of 30 August 2000 icsid Case No. ARB (AF)/00/2.

  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America UNCITRAL Final Award on Jurisdiction and Merits of 3 August 2005 reproduced in: ILM 44 (2005): 1345.

  • Mondev International Ltd. v. United States of America ICSID Award of 11 October 2002 ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/2.

  • MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. & MTD Chile S.A. v. Chile ICSID Decision on Annulment of 21 March 2007 ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7.

  • MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. v. Chile ICSID Award of 25 May 2004 ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7.

  • MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. v. Chile ICSID Decision on Annulment of 21 March 2007 ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7.

  • National Grid P.L.C. v. Argentina UNCITRAL Award of 3 November 2008.

  • Norwegian Shipowners’ Claims (Norway v. USA) Arbitral tribunal Award of 13 October 1922 RIAA 1 (1922): 307.

  • Nykomb Synergetics Technology Holding AB v. Latvia SCC Award of 16 December 2003.

  • Parkerings-Compagniet AS v. Lithuania ICSID Award of 11 September 2007 ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8.

  • Philip Morris Brands Sàrl Philip Morris Products S.A. and Abal Hermanos S.A. v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay (formerly FTR Holding SA Philip Morris Products S.A. and Abal Hermanos S.A. v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay) ICSID Award of 8 July 2016 ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7.

  • Plama Consortium Limited v. Bulgaria ICSID Award of 27 August 2008 ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24.

  • Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Canada UNCITRAL (NAFTA) Interim Award of 26 June 2000.

  • Review Panel established under the Convention on the Conservation and Management of High Seas Fishery Resources in the South Pacific Ocean PCA Findings and Recommendation of the Review Panel of 5 July 2013 available at: <https://www.pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/2082>.

  • S.D. Myers Inc. v. Canada UNCITRAL Award of 21 October 2002.

  • S.D. Myers Inc. v. CanadaUNCITRAL Partial Award of 13 November 2000.

  • Sempra Energy International v. ArgentinaICSID Annulment Decision of 29 June 2010 ICSID Case No. ARB/02/16.

  • Sempra Energy International v. Argentinaicsid Award of 28 September 2007 icsid Case No. ARB/02/16.

  • SGS Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Philippines icsid Decision on Jurisdiction of 29 January 2004 icsid Case No. ARB/02/6.

  • Southern Bluefin Tuna Case between Australia and Japan and between New Zealand and Japan Arbitral tribunal established under Annex vii of the losc Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of 4 August 2000 riaa 23 (2000): 1.

  • Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed S.A. v. The United Mexican States icsid Award of 29 May 2003 icsid Case No. ARB (AF)/00/2.

  • Telenor Mobile Communications A.S. v. Hungary ICSID Award of 13 September 2006 icsid Case No. ARB/04/15.

  • The Atlanto-Scandian Herring Arbitration (The Kingdom of Denmark in respect of the Faroe Islandsv. The European Union) pca available at: <https://www.pcacases.com/web/view/25>.

  • Tokios Tokelés v. Ukraine icsid Award of 26 July 2007 icsid Case No. ARB/02/18.

  • Tokios Tokelés v. Ukraine icsid Decision on Jurisdiction of 29 April 2009 icsid Case No. ARB/02/18.

  • Total S.A. v. Argentina icsid Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction of 25 August 2006 icsid Case No. ARB/04/01.

  • Total S.A. v. Argentina icsid Decision on Liability of 27 December 2010 icsid Case No. ARB/04/01.

  • Tulip Real Estate Investment and Development Netherlands B.V. v. Republic of Turkey icsid Award of 10 March 2014 icsid Case No. ARB/11/28.

  • Waste Management Inc. v. United Mexican States icsid Award of 30 April 2004 icsid Case No. ARB(AF)/00/3.

  • Bauman v. Daimler-Chrysler Court of Appeals 9th Circuit Decision of 18 May 2011 644 F.3d 909.

  • Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp. Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit Decision of 8 July 2011 654 F. 3d 11.

  • Flomo v. Firestone Natural Rubber Co. llc Court of Appeals 7th Circuit Decision of 11 July 2011 43 F. 3d 1013.

  • AlexandrowiczG.The Law-making Functions of the Specialized Agencies of the United Nations (Sydney: Angus and Robertson1973).

  • AlstonPh. (ed.) Non-State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press2005).

  • AmerasingheC.An Assessment of the ilc’s Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations” in: M.Ragazzi (ed.) Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff2013) 71.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AustH.-A.Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2011).

  • BagwellK.P.C.Mavroidis and R.W.StaigerThe Case for Tradable Remedies in wto Dispute Settlement System” in: S.J.Evenett and B.M.Hoekman (eds.) Economic Development and Multilateral Trade Cooperation (Washington, DC: Palgrave McMillan and The World Bank2005) 395.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BarnfieldCl. Free Trade Sovereignty Democracy: The Future of the World Trade Organization (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute2001).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BeckerG.Policies to Promote the Development Dimension of fdi” in: unctad (ed.) The Development Dimension of fdi: Policy and Rule-Making Perspectives (New York, NY and Geneva: UN2003) unctad/ite/iia/2003/4 141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BinderChr. “Changed Circumstances in Investment Law: Interfaces between the Law of Treaties and the Law of State Responsibility with a Special Focus on the Argentine Crisis” in: Chr.Binderet al. (eds.) International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford: Oxford University Press2009) 608.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BirnieP. and A.BoyleInternational Law and the Environment (Oxford: Oxford University Press20022nd edn.).

  • BirnieP.A.Boyle and C.RedgwellInternational Law and the Environment (Oxford: Oxford University Press20093rd edn.).

  • BjorklundA.K.Emergency Exceptions: State of Necessity and Force Majeure” in: P. MuchlinskiF.Ortino and Chr.Schreuer (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press2008) 459.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BoonK.The Role of lex specialis in the Articles of the Responsibility of International Organizations” in: M.Ragazzi (ed.) Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff2013) 135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BourgeoisJ.Some Reflections on the wto Dispute Settlement System from a Practitioner’s Perspective” in: J.H.J.Bourgeois (ed.) Trade Law Experienced: Pottering about in the gatt and the wto (London: Cameron May2005) 39.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrowerCh. and J.BrueschkeThe Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff1998).

  • BrownB.imf Governance, the Asian Financial Crisis and the New International Financial Architecture” in: S.Yee and W.Tieya (eds.) International Law in the Post-cold War (London: Routledge2001) 131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrownlieI.Principles of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press20087th edn.).

  • BrownlieI.System of the Law of Nations: State Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press1983).

  • CarreauD.Le Fonds Monétaire International (Paris: Pedone1970).

  • CarreauD.Le système monétaire international: aspects juridiques (Paris: A. Colin1972).

  • CarreauD. and P.JuillardDroit international économique (Paris: Dalloz2007).

  • CarreauD. and P.JuillardDroit international économique (Paris: lgdj20104th edn.).

  • CasseseA.International Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press2003).

  • ChengB.General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (London: Stevens and Sons Ltd.1953).

  • Cherif BassiouniM.International Criminal Justice in Historical Perspective: The Tension between States Interests and the Pursuit of International Justice” in: A.Cassese (ed.) The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press2009) 131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cherif BassiouniM.The Subjects of International Criminal Law: Ratione Personae” in: M.Cherif Bassiouni (ed.) International Criminal Law Vol. I (Leiden: Brill20083rd edn.) 41.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ChestermanS. and Ch.Lehnardt (eds.) From Mercenaries to Market (Oxford: Oxford University Press2007).

  • ChurchillR. and V.LoweThe Law of the Sea (Manchester: Manchester University Press19993rd edn.).

  • ClaphamA.The Question of Jurisdiction under International Criminal Law over Legal Persons: Lessons from the Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court” in: M.Kamminga and S.Zia-Zarifi (eds.) Liability of Multinational Corporations under International Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International2000) 139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ClaphamA.Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press2006).

  • CombacauJ.Obligations de résultat et obligations de comportement: quelques questions et pas de réponse” in: D.Bardonnetet al. (eds.) Mélanges offerts à Paul Reuter Le droit international: unité et diversité (Paris: Pedone1981) 181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CondorelliL.The Rules of Attribution: General Considerations” in: J.Crawfordet al. (eds.) The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press2010) 221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CortenO.Article 52” in: O.Corten and P.Klein (eds.) Les Conventions de Vienne sur le droit des traités. Commentaire article par article Vol. iii (Bruxelles: Bruylant2006) 1867.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CrawfordJ. (ed.) Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press20128th edn.).

  • CrawfordJ.State Responsibility” in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law available at: <http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1093>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CrawfordJ.State Responsibility – The General Part (Oxford: Oxford University Press2013).

  • CrawfordJ.The Creation of States in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press20072nd edn.).

  • CrawfordJ.The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction Text and Commentaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2002).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CrawfordJ. and S.OllesonThe Nature and Forms of International Responsibility” in: M.Evans (ed.) International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press20103rd edn.) 441.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CullenP.Privatized Maritime Security in Governance in War-torn Sierra Leone” in: C.Berube and P.Cullen (eds.) Maritime Private Security: Market Responses to Piracy Terrorism and Waterborne Security Risks in the 21st Century (London: Routledge2012) 101.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • d’ArgentP.Compliance, Cessation, Reparation and Restitution in the Wall Advisory Opinion” in: P.-M.Dupuyet al. (eds.) Völkerrecht als Wertordnung – Common values in International Law Festschrift für/Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat (Kehl: N.P. Engel Verlag2006) 463.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • d’ArgentP.Reparation, Cessation, Assurances and Guarantees of Non-Repetition” in A.Nollkaemper and I.Plakokefalos (eds.) Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law: An Appraisal of the State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2014) 208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DahmGVölkerrecht Vol. iii (Stuttgard: Kohlhammer1961).

  • DaveyW.J.Evaluating wto Dispute Settlement: What Results Have Been Achieved Through Consultations and Implementation of Panel Reports?” in: Y.TaniguchiA.Yanovich and J.Bohanes (eds.) The wto in the 21st Century: Dispute Settlement Negotiations and Regionalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2007) 98.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DawidowiczM.Third Party Countermeasures in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2017).

  • deJongeA.Transnational Corporations and International Law: Accountability in the Global Business Environment (Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • deSchutterO.The Accountability of Multinationals for Human Rights Violations in European Law” in: Ph.Alston (ed.) Non-State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press2005) 227.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DetterI.Law-making by International Organizations (Stockholm: P.A. Norstedt and Söner1965).

  • DiasR.W.M.Jurisprudence (London: Butterworths19855th edn.).

  • DolzerR. and Chr.SchreuerPrinciples of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press20122nd edn.).

  • DolzerR. and M.StevensBilateral Investment Treaties (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers1995).

  • DouglasZ.Other Specific Regimes of Responsibility: Investment Treaty Arbitration and icsid” in: J.CrawfordA.Pellet and S.Olleson (eds.) The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press2010) 815.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DouglasZ.Property, Investment, and the Scope of Investment Protection Obligations” in: Z.DouglasJ.Pauwelyn and J.E.Viñuales (eds.) The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press2014) 363.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DouglasZ.The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2009).

  • DupuyP.-M.Droit international public (Paris: Dalloz19984th edn.).

  • DupuyP.M.La responsabilité internationale des états pour les dommages d’origine technologique et industrielle (Paris: Pedone1977).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DupuyR.-J.The Area as the Common Heritage of Mankind” in: R.-J.Dupuy and D.Vignes (eds.) A Handbook on the New Law of the Sea Vol. 1 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff1991) 579.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EdwardsR.International Monetary Collaboration (Dobbs Ferry: Transnational Publishers Inc.1985).

  • EthierW.Punishments and Dispute Settlement in Trade Agreements (Copenhagen: epru2001).

  • faoThe State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2016 (Rome: fao2016).

  • FroweinJ. and K.Oellers-FrahmArticle 65” in: A.Zimmermanet al. (eds.) The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press20122nd edn.) 1605.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GardnerJ.Justifications and Reasons” in: J.GardnerOffences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press2007) 91.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GoldJ.Guidelines on Conditionality, Decision No. 6056 (79/38) (2 March 1979)” in: imf (ed.) Selected Decisions of the International Monetary Fund 25th Issue (Washington, DC: imf2000) 128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GoldJ.Interpretation of the IMF and International Law Vol. 4 (The Hague/Boston: Kluwer Law International1996).

  • GoldJ.The Standby Arrangements of the IMF (Washington, DC: imf1970).

  • GrossmanG.H.H.Horn and P.C.MavroidisWould’ve or Should’ve? Impaired Benefits Due to Copyright Infringement” in: H.Horn and P.C.Mavroidis (eds.) The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO Case-law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2003) 294.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrossmanG.M.H.Horn and P.C.MavroidisPrinciples of World Trade Law: National Treatment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2012).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GuilfoyleD.Article 91” in: A.Proelss (ed.) United Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Commentary (Baden-Baden: Hart/Beck/Nomos2017) 692.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HanqinX.Transboundary Damage in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2003).

  • HornH. and P.C.MavroidisInternational Trade: Dispute Settlement” in: A.Guzman and A.O.Sykes (eds.) Handbook on International Trade (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing2007) 177.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HorsefiledJ.K. (ed.) The International Monetary Fund 1945-1965: Twenty Years of International Monetary Cooperation Vol. ii Analysis (Washington, DC: imf1969).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HudecR.E.Thinking About The New Section 301: Beyond Good and Evil” in: J.Bhagwati and H.Patrick (eds.) Aggressive Unilateralism: America’s 301 Policy and The World Trading System (Ann Arbor, Michigan: Michigan University Press1990) 111.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HudecR.E.Enforcing International Trade Law (New Hampshire: Butterworths1993).

  • imf (ed.) Selected Decisions of the International Monetary Fund 8th Issue (Washington, DC: imf1976).

  • JacksonJ.H.World Trade and the Law of the gatt (Indianapolis, IA: Bobbs-Merril1969).

  • JacksonM.Complicity in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press2015).

  • JenningsR.Sovereignty and International Law” in: G.Kreijen (ed.) State Sovereignty and International Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press2002) 27.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JohnsFl.Theorizing the Corporation in International Law” in: A.Orford and Fl.Hoffmann (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press2016) 635.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JørgensenN.The Responsibility of States for International Crimes (Oxford: Oxford University Press2003).

  • KaraviasM.Corporate Obligations under International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press2013).

  • KentinE.Economic Crisis and Investment Arbitration: The Argentina Cases” in: Ph.Kahn and Th.Wälde (eds.) New Aspects of International Investment Law (Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers2007) 629.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KessieE.The Early Harvest Negotiations in 2003” in: F.Ortino and E-UPetersmann (eds.) The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International2004) 115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KhamsiK.Compensation for Non-expropriatory Investment Treaty Breaches in the Argentine Gas Sector Cases: Issues and Implications” in: M.Waibelet al. (eds.) The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (The Hague/Boston: Kluwer Law International2010) 165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KlabbersJ.(I Can’t Get No) Recognition: Subjects Doctrine and the Emergence of Non-State Actors” in: J.Petman and J.Klabbers (eds.) Nordic Cosmopolitanism: Essays in International Law for Martti Koskenniemi (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers2003) 37.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KnappU. and E.MartensArticle 102” in: B.Simma (ed.) The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press2002) 1277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KramerM.H.Rights Without Trimmings” in: M.H.KramerN.E.Simmonds and H.Steiner (eds.) A Debate Over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries (Oxford: Oxford University Press1998) 7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KruegerA.A New Approach to Sovereign Debt Restructuring (Washington, DC: imf2002).

  • LauterpachtE.Gentlemen’s Agreement” in: W.Flummeet al (eds.) International Law and Economic Order: Essays in Honour of P.A. Mann on the Occasion of his 70thBirthday (München: Beck1977) 381.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LawrenceR.Z.Crimes and Punishment: Retaliation Under the WTO (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics2003).

  • LeanzaU. and M.-C.CaraccioloExclusive Economic Zone” in: D.AttardM.Fitzmaurice and N.Martinez (eds.) IMLI Manual on International Maritime Law: The Law of the Sea (Oxford: Oxford University Press2014) 178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LefeberR.Transboundary Environmental Interference and the Origin of State Liability (The Hague: Kluwer Law International1997).

  • LehnardtCh.Private Military Companies and State Responsibility” in: S.Chesterman and Ch.Lehnardt (eds.) From Mercenaries to Market (Oxford: Oxford University Press2007) 139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LowenfeldA.International Economic Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press20082nd edn.).

  • LubellN.Extraterritorial Use of Force against Non-State Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press2010).

  • MannH.The Right of States to Regulate and International Investment Law: A Comment” in: unctad (ed.) The Development Dimension of FDI: Policy and Rule-Making Perspectives (New York, NY and Geneva: UN2003) unctad/ite/iia/2003/4 211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MavroidisP.C.Amicus Curiae Briefs Before the wto: Much Ado About Nothing” in: A.vonBogdandyP.C.Mavroidis and Y.Meny (eds.) European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (Leiden: Kluwer Law International2004) 317.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MavroidisP.C.Dispute Settlement in the wto: Mind over Matter” in: K.Bagwell and R.W.Staigers (eds.) Handbook of Commercial Policy (Amsterdam: Elsevier2016) 333.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MavroidisP.C.The Regulation of International Trade Vol. 2: The WTO Agreements on Trade in Goods (Cambridge, MA: mit Press2016b).

  • MilanovicM.Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law Principles and Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MomtazD.State Organs and Entities Empowered to Exercise Elements of Governmental Authority” in: J.Crawfordet al. (eds) The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press2010) 237.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MorrisV. and M.ScharfAn Insider’s Guide to the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: Documentary History and Analysis Vol. I (New York, NY: Transnational Publishers1995).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MouyalL.W.International Investment Law and the Right to Regulate: A Human Rights Perspective (Abingdon: Routledge2016).

  • MuchlinskiP.Multinational Enterprises and the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press20072nd edn.).

  • NandanS.N. and Sh.Rosenne (eds.) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary Vol. 2 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers1993).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NordquistM. (ed.) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary Vol. vi (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers2002).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NortonP.M.Back to the Future: Expropriation and the Energy Charter Treaty” in: Th.Wälde (ed.) The Energy Charter Treaty: An East-West Gateway for Investment & Trade (The Hague/Boston: Kluwer Law International1996) 365.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OlsonM.The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press1965).

  • OppenheimL.International Law: A Treatise Vol. I (London: Longmans, Green and Company19122nd edn.).

  • PapastavridisE.Rescuing Migrants at Sea: The Responsibility of States under International Law” in: G.S.Goodwin-Gill and Ph.Weckel (eds.) Migration and Refugee Protection in the 21stCentury. International Aspects (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers2015) 269.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PapastavridisE.The Use of ‘Ship-Riders’ to Assert Jurisdiction over Piracy and Armed Robbery Off Somalia: Is the Gulf of Aden the Caribbean?” in: M.Mejiaet al. (eds.) Piracy at Sea WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs 2 (Berlin: Springer Verlag2013) 47.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PelletA.Article 38” in: A.Zimmermanet al. (eds.) The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press20122nd edn.) 833.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PelletA.The Definition of Responsibility in International Law” in: J.CrawfordA.Pellet and S.Olleson (eds.) The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press2010) 1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perezcano DiazH.Damages in Investor-state Arbitration” in: Y.Derains and R.Kreindler (eds.) Evaluation of Damages in International Arbitration (Paris: icc2006) 113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PlakokefalosI.Transboundary Pollution in Public International Law (Athens: Nomiki Bibliothiki Publishers2011) (in Greek).

  • QuiricoO.The Criminal Responsibility of Private Military and Security Company Personnle under International Humanitarian Law” in: F.Francioni and N.Ronzitti (eds.) War by Contract: Human Rights Humanitarian Law and Private Contractors (Oxford: Oxford University Press2011) 423.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RatnapalaS.Jurisprudence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2009).

  • ReinischA.Privileges and Immunities” in: J.Klabbers and A.Wallendahl (eds.) Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar2011) 132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ReinischA.International Organizations Before National Courts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2000).

  • RipinskyS. and K.WilliamsDamages in International Investment Law (London: biicl2008).

  • RoseD.C.The Moral Foundation of Economic Behavior (New York, NY: Oxford University Press2011).

  • RosenbergD.Le principe de souverainete des Etats sur leurs ressources naturelles (Paris: lgdj1983).

  • RoucounasE.Practice as Relevant Factor for the Responsibility of International Organizations” in: M.Ragazzi (ed.) Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff2013) 159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SalandP.International Criminal Law Principles” in: R.Lee (ed.) The International Criminal Court- The Making of the Rome Statute- Issues Negotiations Results (The Hague: Kluwer Law International1999) 189.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SaldarriagaA. and M.KantorCalculating Damages: Arbitrators, Counsel, and Experts Can Do Better Than They Have in the Past” in: K.W.LuG.Verheyen and Sr.Perera (eds.) Investing with Confidence: Understanding Political Risk Management in the 21st Century (Washington, DC: The World Bank Group2009) 196.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SalmonJ. (ed.) Dictionnaire de droit international public (Bruxelles: Bruylant2001).

  • SchabasW.The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute (Oxford: Oxford University Press2010).

  • SchellingTh.The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press1960).

  • SchillSt.W.The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2009).

  • SchønbergS.Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press2000 reprint 2003).

  • SchreuerC.et al.The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press20092nd edn.).

  • SicilianosL.-A.Les réactions décentralisées a l’illicite: Des contre-mesures a la légitime défense (Paris: lgdj1990).

  • SingerP.Corporate Warriors. The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry (Cornell: Cornell University Press2003).

  • SornarajahM.The International Law on Foreign Investment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2004).

  • SornarajahM.The Settlement of Foreign Investment Disputes (The Hague/Boston: Kluwer Law International2000).

  • StiglitzJ.Globalization and its Discontents (New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company2002).

  • SzurekS.Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in the ilc Articles on State Responsibility: Force Majeure” in: J.CrawfordA.Pellet and S.Olleson (eds.) The International Law of Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press2010) 475.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TitiA.The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law (Baden-Baden: Nomos and Hart Publishing2014).

  • TzanakopoulosA.Disobeying the Security Council. Countermeasures against Wrongful Sanctions (Oxford: Oxford University Press2011).

  • unctadScope and Definition (New York, NY: UN1999).

  • VoulgarisN.Allocating International Responsibility between International Organizations and Member States (London: Hart Publishing, forthcoming2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VreelandF.The International Monetary Fund: Politics of Conditional Lending (London: Routledge2007).

  • WeisburgH. and Chr.RyanMeans to be Made Whole: Damages in the Context of International Investment Arbitration” in: Y.Derains and R.Kreindler (eds.) Evaluation of Damages in International Arbitration (Paris: icc2006) 165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WenarL.Rights” in: E.N.Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive Fall 2015 edition) available at: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/rights/>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WerleG. and Fl. JessbergerPrinciples of International Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press20143rd edn.).

  • WhiteG.Nationalisation of Foreign Property (London: Stevens and Sons1961).

  • WilliamsE.Private Armed Guards in the Fight against Piracy” in: E.Papastavridis and K.Trapp (eds.) Crimes at Sea/Hague Academy of International Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff2014) 339.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WilliamsonJ.A Short History of the Washington Consensus” in: N.Serra and J.E.StiglitzThe Washington Consensus Reconsidered: Towards a New Global Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press2008) 15.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WilsonA.Beyond Unocal” in: O.deSchutter (ed.) Transnational Corporations and Human Rights (Oxford: Hart Publishing2006) 43.

  • WolfrumR.State Responsibility for Private Actors: An Old Problem of Renewed Relevance” in: M.Ragazzi (ed.) International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Brill2005) 423.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WolfrumR.Die Internationalisierung staatsfreier Raeume (London: Springer1984).

  • World BankGuidelines on the Treatment of Foreign Direct Investment” in: World Bank (ed.) Legal Framework for the Treatment of Foreign Investment: Report to the Development Committee and Guidelines on the Treatment of Foreign Direct Investment Vol. ii (Washington, DC: World Bank1992) 33.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yannaca-SmallC.Definition of Investor and Investment in International Investment Agreements” in: oecdInternational Investment Law: Understanding Concepts and Tracking Innovations (Paris: oecd2008) 7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZerkJ.Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility: Limitations and Opportunities in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AddoM. and N.GriefDoes Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights Enshrine Absolute Rights?EJIL9/3 (1998): 510.

  • AkehurstM.B.International Liability for Injurious Consequences Arising Out of Acts Not Prohibited by International LawNYBIL16 (1985): 3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AlexandrovSt.A.The ‘Baby Boom’ of Treaty Based Arbitrations and the Jurisdiction of icsid Tribunals: Shareholders as ‘Investors’ and Jurisdiction Ratione TemporisLaw and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals4 (2005): 19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AlvarezJ.E. and K.KhamsiThe Argentine Crisis and Foreign Investors: A Glimpse into the Heart of the Investment RegimeYearbook on International Investment Law and Policy [2009]: 379.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AmorosoD.Moving Towards Complicity as a Criterion of Attribution of Private Conducts: Imputation to States of Corporate Abuses in the US Case-lawLJIL24 (2011): 989.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AntonopoulosC.Force by Armed Groups as Armed Attack and the Broadening of the Self-DefenceNILR55/2 (2008): 159.

  • BagwellK.P.C.Mavroidis and R.W.StaigerAuctioning Countermeasures in the wtoJournal of International Economics73 (2008): 309.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barstow MagrawD.Transboundary Harm: The International Law Commission’s Study of ‘International Liability’AJIL80 (1986): 305.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BeckerG.Crime and PunishmentJournal of Political Economy76 (1968): 169.

  • BeckerM.A.Request for an Advisory Opinion Submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (srfc)AJIL109 (2015): 851.

  • BernheimD.B. and M.WhinstonMultimarket Contact and Collusive BehaviorRAND Journal of Economics21 (1990): 1.

  • BowettD.W.Jurisdiction: Changing Patterns of Authority over Activities and ResourcesBYBIL53 (1982): 1.

  • BownCh.P. and B.Hoekmanwto Dispute Settlement and the Missing Developing Country Cases: Engaging the Private SectorJIEL8 (2005): 861.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BoyleA.E.State Responsibility and International Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Arising out of Acts not Prohibited by International Law: A Necessary Distinction?ICLQ39 (1990): 1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BronckersM.C.E.J. and N.van denBroekFinancial Compensation in the wto: Improving Remedies in wto Dispute SettlementJIEL8 (2005): 101.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrowerC.N. and M.OttolenghiDamages in Investor State Arbitration” (2007) 6 TDM6 (2007): 1.

  • BrownlieI.International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United NationsRCADI255 (1995): 9.

  • BrunnéeJ.Of Sense and Sensibility: Reflections on International Liability Regimes as Tools for Environmental ProtectionICLQ53 (2004): 351.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burke-WhiteW.W. and A.vonStadenInvestment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment TreatiesVirgJIL48 (2008): 307.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BuschM. and E.ReinhardtBargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Early Settlement in gatt/wto DisputesFordham International Law Journal24 (2001): 158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BuschM. and E.ReinhardtDeveloping Countries and gatt/wto Dispute SettlementJWT37/4 (2003): 719.

  • CanovaTh.Banking and Financial Reform at the Crossroads of the Neoliberal ContagionAUILR14/6 (1999): 1571.

  • CaronD.D.The ilc Articles on State Responsibility: The Paradoxical Relationship between Form and AuthorityAJIL96 (2002): 857.

  • CasseseA.The Nicaragua and Tadić Tests Revisited in Light of the icj Judgment on Genocide in BosniaEJIL18/4 (2007): 694.

  • ChatterjeeCh.The Use of the Discounted Cash Flow Method in the Assessment of CompensationJournal of International Arbitration10 (1993): 19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ChurchillR.R.Facilitating (Transnational) Civil Liability Litigation for Environmental Damage by Means of Treaties: Progress, Problems and Prospects’YBIEL12 (2001): 3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cogliati-BantzV.P.Current Legal Developments The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China)International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law31 (2016): 759.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collins-WilliamsT. and R.WolfeTransparency as Trade Policy Tool: the wto’s Cloudy WindowsWTR9 (2010): 551.

  • ColsonD.A. and P.HoyleSatisfying the Procedural Prerequisites to the Compulsory Dispute Settlement Mechanisms of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention: Did the Southern Bluefin Tuna Tribunal Get it Right?Ocean Development of International Law34 (2003): 59.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CrawfordJ.Investment Arbitration and the ilc Articles on State ResponsibilityICSID Review25 (2010): 127.

  • CrawfordJ.The ilc’s Articles of Diplomatic ProtectionSAYIL31 (2006): 19.

  • CremadesB.M. and I.MadalenaParallel Proceedings in International ArbitrationArb Intl24/4 (2008): 507.

  • CrivellaroA.Consolidation of Arbitral and Court Proceedings in Investment DisputesLaw and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals4 (2005): 371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CrookJ.Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law: US Courts of Appeals Uphold Corporate Alien Tort Statute LiabilityAJIL105/4 (2011): 775.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CrookJ.Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law: US Government Supreme Court Brief Backs Corporate ats LiabilityAJIL106/2 (2012): 360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CunibertiG.Parallel Litigation and Foreign Investment Dispute SettlementICSID Review21 (2006): 381.

  • DavenportT.Legal Implications of the South China Sea Award for Maritime Southeast AsiaAustralian Yearbook of International Law26 (2016): 65.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • deFrouvilleO.Affaire Ahmadou Sadio Diallo c. République démocratique du Congo. Exceptions préliminaires: Le roman inachevé de la protection diplomatiqueAFDI53 (2007): 291.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • denHeijerM.Procedural Aspects of Shared Responsibility in the European Court of Human RightsJIDS4 (2013): 361.

  • DenzaE.A Note on IntertankoELR33 (2008): 870.

  • DominicéC.L’immunité de juridiction et d’exécution des organisations internationalesRCADI187 (1984): 145.

  • DumberryP.The Legal Standing of Shareholders before Arbitral Tribunals: Has any Rule of Customary International Law Crystallised?Journal of International Law and Practice18 (2010): 353.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DupuyP.M.La contribution du principe de non-discrimination a l’élaboration du droit international de l’environnementRQDI7 (1991–2): 135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DupuyP.-M.Reviewing the Difficulties of Codification: On Ago’s Classification of Obligations of Means and Obligations of Result in Relation to State Responsibilityejil10 (1999): 371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EdesonW.The International Plan of Action on Illegal Unreported and Unregulated Fishing: The Legal Context of a Non-Legally Binding InstrumentInternational Journal of Marine and Coastal Law16 (2001): 603.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EulissR.The Feasibility of the imf’s Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism: An Alternative Statutory Approach to Mollify American ReservationsAUILR19/1 (2003): 107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FawcettJ.Trade and Finance in International LawRCADI123 (1968): 215.

  • FoleyV.J. and C.R.NolanThe Erika Judgment-Environmental Liability and Places of Refuge: A Sea Change in Civil and Criminal ResponsibilityTulane MLJ33 (2008): 41.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ForceseCr.atca’s Achilles Heel: Corporate Complicity, International Law and the Alien Tort Claims ActYJIL26/2 (2001): 487.

  • FraileL.Lessons from Latin America’s Neo-liberal Experiment: An Overview of Labour and Social Policies since the 1980International Labour Review148/3 (2009): 215.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FreestoneD.International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Case 21Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy1 (2016): 131.

  • GaoJ.The itlos Advisory Opinion for the srfcChinese Journal of International Law14 (2015): 735.

  • GarrascoE. and M.Ayhan CaseIncome Distribution and the Brettow Wood Institutions: Promoting and Enabling Environment for Social DevelopmentTransnational Law and Contemporary Problems6/1 (1996): 1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GaskellN.J.J.The Amoco Cadiz: (I) Liability IssuesJENRL3 (1985): 169.

  • GlendonM.A.Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political DiscourseSocial Contract Journal2 (1991): 62.

  • GoldJ.ConditionalityIMF Pamphlet Series31 (1979): 1.

  • GoldJ.sdrs, Currencies and Gold: Seventh Survey of New Legal Developmentsimf Pamphlet Series44 (1987): 1.

  • GoldJ.The Legal Character of the Fund’s Stand-by Arrangements and Why it MattersIMF Pamphlet Series35 (1983): 23.

  • GoldieL.F.E.Liability for Damage and the Progressive Development of International LawICLQ14 (1965): 1189.

  • GoodmanC.Rights, Obligations, Prohibitions: A Practical Guide to Understanding Judicial Decisions on Coastal State Jurisdiction over Living Resources in the Exclusive Economic ZoneInternational Journal of Marine and Coastal Law32 (2017): 1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GourgourinisA.General/Particular International Law and Primary/Secondary Rules: Unitary Terminology of a Fragmented SystemEJIL22/4 (2011): 993.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GraefrathB.Complicity in the Law of International ResponsibilityRBDI29 (1996): 370.

  • GriebelJ. and M.PlückenNew Developments Regarding the Rules of Attribution? The International Court of Justice’s Decision in Bosnia v. SerbiaLJIL21/3 (2008): 601.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GuntripE.The Common Heritage of Mankind: An Adequate Regime for Managing the Deep Seabed?Melbourne JIL4 (2003): 376.

  • GuzmanA.T.Global Governance and the wtoHJIL45 (2004): 303.

  • HandlG.State Liability for Accidental Transnational Environmental Damage by Private PersonsAJIL74 (1980): 525.

  • HenckelsC.Indirect Expropriation and the Right to Regulate: Revisiting Proportionality Analysis and the Standard of Review in Investor-State ArbitrationJIEL15 (2012): 223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HessbrueggeJ.The Historical Development of the Doctrines of Attribution and Due Diligence in International LawJILP36/4 (2004): 265.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HexnerE.Interpretation of Public International Organization of their Basic InstrumentsAJIL53/2 (1959): 341.

  • HigginsR.The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International LawRCADI176 (1982): 259.

  • HohfeldW.N.Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial ReasoningYLJ26 (1917): 710.

  • HohfeldW.N.Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial ReasoningYLJ23 (1913): 16.

  • HornH.L.Johannesson and P.C.MavroidisThe wto Dispute Settlement System (1995–2010): Some Descriptive StatisticsJWT45 (2011): 1107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IshikawaY.The EU-Faroe Islands Herring Stock Dispute at the wto: the Environmental Justification” (ASIL Insights18/4 14 February 2014) available at: <https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/18/issue/4/eu-faroe-islands-herring-stock-dispute-wto-environmentaljustification>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JaguschSt. and N.DuclosCompensation for the Breach of Relative Standards of Treaty ProtectionJWIT10 (2009): 515.

  • JenkinsR.E. and J. WatryKastnerRunning Aground in a Sea of Litigation: A Case Comment on the Exxon Valdez LitigationUCLA JELP18 (1999–2001): 151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JenksW.Liability for Ultra-hazardous Activities in International LawRCADI177 (1966): 99.

  • JenningsR.General Course on Principles of International LawRCADI121 (1967): 323.

  • JenningsR.State Contracts in International LawBYBIL37 (1961): 156.

  • JonesO.R.Implausible Deniability: State Responsibility for the Actions of Private Military FirmsConnecticut Journal of International Law24 (2008): 239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JoynerC.Legal Implications of the Concept of the Common Heritage of MankindICLQ35 (1986): 190.

  • KelsonJ.M.State Responsibility and the Abnormally Dangerous ActivityHILJ13 (1972): 197.

  • KinleyD. and J.TadakiFrom Talk to Walk: The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International LawVJIL44/4 (2004): 931.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KleinN.S.Multilateral Disputes and the Doctrine of Necessary Parties in the East Timor CaseYJIL21 (1996): 305.

  • KopelaS.Historic Titles and Historic Rights in the Law of the Sea in the Light of the South China Sea ArbitrationOcean Development and International Law48 (2017): 181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KoremenosB.If Only Half of International Agreements Have Dispute Resolution Provisions, Which Half Needs Explaining?JLS36 (2007): 189.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KremmydasN.The Cross-conditionality Phenomenon: Some Legal AspectsThe International Lawyer23/3 (1989): 651.

  • KurtzJ.Adjudging the Exceptional at International Investment Law: Security, Public Order and Financial CrisisICLQ59 (2010): 325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KurtzJ.The Paradoxical Treatment of the ilc Articles on State Responsibility in Investor-State ArbitrationICSID Review25 (2010): 200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LefeberR.The Legal Significance of the Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol: The Result of a Paradigm Evolution” (2012) Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012–87, Centre for Environmental Law and Sustainability Research Paper No.2012-02.

    • Export Citation
  • LehnardtCh.Individual Liability of Private Military Personnel under International Criminal LawEJIL19 (2008): 1015.

  • LetsasG.Strasbourg’s Interpretive Ethic: Lessons for the International LawyerEJIL21 (2010): 509.

  • LeventhalH. et al.The Nuremberg VerdictHLR60/6 (1947): 857.

  • LimãoN. and K.ShaggiTariff Retaliation versus Financial Compensation in the Enforcement of International Trade AgreementsJournal of International Economics76 (2008): 48.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiuN. and E.KirkThe European Union’s Potential Contribution to Protect Marine Biodiversity in the Changing Arctic: A RoadmapInternational Journal of Marine and Coastal Law30 (2015): 255.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LosariJ.J. and M.Ewing-ChowA Clash of Treaties: The Lawfulness of Countermeasures in International Trade Law and International Investment LawJWIT16 (2015): 274.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LoweV.Corporations as International Actors and International Law MakersIYBIL14 (2004): 23.

  • LoweV.Precluding Wrongfulness or Responsibility: A Plea for ExcusesEJIL10 (1999): 405.

  • MahmoodM.S.H.Mondialisation et souveraineté de l’EtatJDI3 (1996): 611.

  • MannF.A.The Doctrine of Jurisdiction in International LawRCADI111 (1964): 1.

  • ManshipF.Collateral Damage of the imf’s Global Economic Relief: A Case Study of ZimbabweEmory ILR24/2 (2010): 821.

  • MavroidisP.C.Remedies in the wto Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard PlaceEJIL11 (2000): 763.

  • MavroidisP.C. and D.J.NevenEl Mess in Telmex: a Comment on Mexico – Measures Affecting Telecommunications ServicesWTR5 (2006): 271.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MavroidisP.C. and R.WolfeFrom Sunshine to a Common Agent: the Evolving Understanding of Transparency in the wtoThe Brown Journal of World Affairs21 (2015): 117.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MendezM.The Legal Effect of Community Agreements: Maximalist Treaty Enforcement and Judicial Avoidance TechniquesEJIL21 (2010): 83.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MengW.P.The Hormone Conflict between the eec and the United States within the Context of gattMJIL11 (1990): 819.

  • MilanovićM.State Responsibility for Acts of Non-state Actors: A Comment on Griebel and PlückenLJIL22/2 (2009): 307.

  • MillsA.Rethinking Jurisdiction in International LawBYBIL84 (2014): 187.

  • Morgan-FosterJ.The Relationship of imf Structural Adjustment Programs to Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: the Argentina Case RevisitedMichigan JIL24/2 (2003): 577.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MorssJ.R.The Legal Relations of Collectives: Belated Insights from HohfeldLJIL22 (2009): 289.

  • MoslerH.Die Erweiterung des Kreises der VölkerrechtsubjekteZaöRV22 (1962): 1.

  • MπρεδήμαςA.Μνημόνιο, Stand-by Arrangement (ΔΝΤ), και Συμφωνία Δανεισμού στα Κράτη Μέλη της Ευρωζώνης και η Σύναψή τους υπό το Πρίσμα του Διεθνούς και Συνταγματικού ΔικαίουΤο Σύνταγμα [2010]: 703.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NelsonT.G.When the Lights Went Out: The Strange Death and Stranger Afterlife of the Barcelona Traction CaseLes Cahiers de l’Arbitrage4 (2011): 939.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NollkaemperA.Dual Attribution: Liability of the Netherlands for Conduct of Dutchbat in SrebrenicaJICJ9/5 (2011): 1143.

  • NollkaemperA.Systemic Effects of International Responsbility for International CrimesSCJIL8/1 (2010): 313.

  • NollkaemperA. and D.JacobsShared Responsibility in International Law: A Conceptual FrameworkMJIL34/2 (2013): 359.

  • OkowaPh. “Procedural Obligations in International Environmental AgreementsBYBIL67 (1996): 275.

  • OrellanaM.A.The Swordfish Dispute between the EU and Chile at the itlos and the wtoNord J Intl L71 (2002): 55.

  • OrganC.The Juridical Nature of the Stand-by Arrangements of the International Monetary Fund: Legal Taxonomy and BeyondAFJICL2/3 (1990): 423.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OsiekeE.The Legal Validity of ultra vires Decisions of International OrganizationsAJIL77/2 (1983): 239.

  • PaparinskisM.Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State ResponsibilityEJIL24 (2013): 617.

  • ParraA.R.The Scope of New Investment Laws and International InstrumentsTransnational Corporations4 (1995): 37.

  • PaustJ.The Reality of Private Rights, Duties and Participation in the International Legal ProcessMJIL25/4 (2004): 1229.

  • PauwelynJ.Enforcement and Countermeasures in the wto: Rules are Rules— Toward a More Collective ApproachAJIL94 (2000): 335.

  • PelletA.2013 Lalive Lecture: The Case Law of the icj in Investment ArbitrationICSID Review28 (2013): 223.

  • PetersmannE-UInternational Competition Rules for the gattmto World Trade and Legal SystemJWT27 (1993): 35.

  • PetersmannE-UNon-violation Complaints in Public International Trade LawGYBIL34 (1991): 175.

  • Pisillo-MazzeschiR.Responsabilité de d’état pour violations des obligations positives relatives aux droits de l’hommeRCADI333 (2009): 297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PlakokefalosI.Seabed Disputes Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area Advisory OpinionJournal of Environmental Law24/1 (2012): 133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PlakokefalosI.Shared Responsibility Aspects of the Dispute Settlement Procedures in the Law of the Sea ConventionJIDS4/2 (2013): 385.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ProtopsaltisP.M.The Challenge of the Barcelona Traction Hypothesis: Barcelona Traction Clauses and Denial of Benefits Clauses in bits and iiasJWIT11 (2010): 561.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rajesh BabuR.State Responsibility for Illegal, Unreported and Unrelated Fishing and Sustainable Fisheries in the eez: Some Reflections on the itlos Advisory Opinion of 2015Indian Journal of International Law55 (2005):239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RamasastryA.Corporate Complicity: From Nuremberg to Rangoon: An Examination of Forced Labour Cases and their Impact on the Liability of Multinational CorporationsBJIL20/1 (2002): 91.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ReinischA.Necessity in Investment ArbitrationNYBIL41 (2010): 137.

  • RigauxFr. “Des dieux et des héros. Réflexions sur une sentence arbitraleRCDIP67 (1978): 435.

    • Search Google Scholar