The Struggle Is Real

Metacognitive Conceptualizations, Actions, and Beliefs of Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers

in Teachers’ Professional Development in Global Contexts
Get Access to Full Text

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

Abstract

Metacognition has recently re-emerged as a central focus of educational initiatives. Developing students’ metacognition can improve academic performance by increasing their self-regulation across learning domains. Research has consistently shown that explicit instruction about metacognitive processes is necessary for developing metacognitive thinking. However, teacher readiness and understandings to do so, have not been studied extensively leaving a significant gap in our understanding of teachers’ knowledge of metacognition and beliefs. This sequential explanatory mixed methods study compared pre-service (n = 43) and in-service (n = 45) teachers’ metacognitive beliefs and reported teaching practices. Data were collected through a questionnaire that informed subsequent semi-structured interviews. Non-parametric statistical tests elucidated differences across teaching samples, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed. Both in-service and pre-service teachers reported struggling to implement metacognition. In-service teachers demonstrated practical, concrete knowledge, as well as creative classroom integration of metacognition while pre-service conceptualizations lacked coherence pointing to specific areas where additional support is needed.

Table of Contents
Index Card
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 74 74 4
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0