Foreword

In: Expanding the Rainbow
Author: R. F. Plante
Free access

In a previous life, far removed from the one I now live, I was hired to teach courses in “the sociology of the family.” Sexualities-specific gigs were few and far between, and it seemed that courses on “the family” would at least offer an opportunity to teach and think about relationships, intimacies, and connections. Unfortunately, 20+ years ago, these courses seemed to traffic in unexamined assumptions, not least of which was evident in the definite article “the.” Textbooks and related materials were organized around the argument that there was a hegemonic “family,” and by inference, one primary set of relationships, roles, connections, and paths into and out of these relationships. Anyone wishing to learn about multiplicities of intimacies, families in the plural, relationships, and selves had to search hard for even a little information.

This book – an extensive exploration of multiple aspects and forms of relationships, intersections, identities, paths, experiences, and sociocultural contexts – is delightfully removed from the sociology of intimacies of the past. It is a timely, fundamentally necessary volume. How do we live, love, desire, and choose within our contexts? How do we narrate ourselves and our relationships? How do we make sense of who we are, how we share our lives, and how we create connections with others? How do we understand and navigate barriers, challenges, and structural inequalities?

Several things would seem to be useful in a nuanced, sensitive exploration of these issues. First, application and development of empirical and theoretical frames so that thinker/activists within and beyond the ‘full range of the rainbow’ can find one another. Second, clarity about the ways in which intimate and sexual citizenship is both a micro- and macro- sociological project, ever changing but always grounded in entangled social contexts. And finally, an acknowledgment of the pleasures and pains involved in (re)developing the language, systems, and structures that underlie relationships and identities.

Let’s address theoretical and empirical frames first. As the contributions to this volume make clear, community seems to be a basic building block for enabling us to find one another and find ourselves. As a scholar-activist, and to the extent that I desire any public, social change regarding expanded understandings of relationships, it is vital to connect with others. Sociologists know all too well the pitfalls of overgeneralization (“an n of one does not a sample make” was drilled into us in methods classes). Multiple sources and forms of data, from autoethnographic to focus group to quantitative to interview, add textured layers of knowledge to the still exploratory data on most aspects of relationships across and within the rainbow. A community of scholar-activists, adding to the fund of knowledge and action, will help advance our collective goals and understanding.

To this end, acknowledgment of the complexities of intimate, sexual citizenship is warranted. In imagining sexual and intimate citizenship as a privilege, or a right, perhaps, we can envision the best-case scenarios of individuals and groups, freed to live authentically. Still, we cannot help but see complexities still to be disentangled. In what ways is the privilege of intimate/sexual citizenship still mired within an unequal world and unequal nations? What disrupts individuals from finding space, time, and resources to create and live in the relational spaces that nurture them? How do things like race, ethnicity, class, health, age, place, and spirituality matter? In what ways do complex bureaucracies, stagnant social institutions, and antiquated customs block us from finding each other, our selves, and our relational, romantic, familial, sexual and communal bonds?

There is pleasure and pain in these journeys, and in those described so critically in this book. The authors and editors utilize a range of tools to illuminate communities, stories, and struggles. We carve out spaces for connection, for seeing ourselves reflected online and ‘in real life,’ for using our voices to narrate our experiences. We see the limitations of those spaces and of our selves. We name the pain, or try to – stigma, shame, isolation, depression, loneliness, aloneness, fear, sadness. We chase the pleasures – a sense of unity, connection, belonging; self-awareness; choices, friendships, meanings, intensities; love, acceptance, feelings. In the pages that follow, we are called to speak, listen, hear, see, think, reflect, and feel. In acknowledging the beauty of the full range of the rainbow, we acknowledge our connections with each other as much as we recognize the varied scholarship, activism, and arguments herein.

Expanding the Rainbow

Exploring the Relationships of Bi+, Polyamorous, Kinky, Ace, Intersex, and Trans People

Series: 

  • Introduction
  • Allen, L. (2015). Queer pedagogy and the limits of thought: Teaching sexualities at university. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(4), 763775.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baber, K., & Murray, C. (2001). A postmodern feminist approach to teaching human sexuality. Family Relations, 50(1), 2333.

  • Becker, J. (2018, August). Using trans and intersex scholarship in a non gender/sexuality course. Paper presented at the sexualities pre-conference meeting of the American Sociological Society. Philadelphia, PA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coston, L. (2018, August). Using trans and intersex scholarship and activities in the intro to sociology classroom. Paper presented at the sexualities pre-conference meeting of the American Sociological Society, Philadelphia, PA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Costello, C. G. (2018, August). Introducing intersex issues and advocacy in the sociology classroom. Paper presented at the sexualities pre-conference meeting of the American Sociological Society, Philadelphia, PA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, N. J. (2004). Taking sex seriously: Challenges in teaching about sexuality. Teaching Sociology, 33, 1631.

  • Forstie, C. (2018, August). What do you mean, my pronouns? First-day activities in the classroom. Paper presented at the sexualities pre-conference meeting of the American Sociological Society. Philadelphia, PA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Galbreath, B. J. (2012). An argument for teaching a human sexuality course within the context of a women and gender studies program. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 7(1), 6277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, J. (1998). ‘Rock the boat, don’t tip the boat over’: A classroom activist’s perspective on women’s studies. Conflict, and Community Building, Atlantis, 22, 2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hemphill, S., & Copulsky, D. (2019). Relationship yes/no/maybe list.

  • Henry, A. (1993–1994). There are no safe spaces: Pedagogy as powerful and dangerous terrain. Action in Teacher Education, 15, 4.

  • Hidalgo, D. A. (2016). Teaching spaces of possibility: Cultivating safe, relaxed, and challenging classrooms. In K. Haltinner & R. Pilegram (Eds.), Teaching gender and sex in contemporary America. Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoang, K. K. (2018). Gendering carnal ethnography: A queer reception. In D. Compton, T. Meadow, & K. Schilt (Eds.), Other, please specify: Queer method in sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Kunkel, C. A. (2016). From protest to praxis or being real in the classroom. In K. Haltinner & R. Pilegram (Eds.), Teaching gender and sex in contemporary America. Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ludlow, J. (2004). From safe space to contested space in the feminist classroom. Transfromations: The New Jersey Project Journal, 15, 1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meadow, T. (2018). The mess: Vulnerability as ethnographic practice. In D. Compton, T. Meadow, & K. Schilt (Eds.), Other, please specify: Queer method in sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, A., & Lucal, B. (2009). The pedagogy of (in)visibility: Two accounts of teaching about sex, gender, and sexuality. Teaching Sociology, 37(3), 257268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Penley, C. (2013). A feminist teaching pornography? That’s like Scope’s teaching evolution. In T. Taormino et al. (Eds.), The feminist porn book: The politics of producing pleasure. New York, NY: CUNY Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schilt, K. (2018). The ‘not sociology’ problem: Identifying the strategies that keep queer work at the disciplinary margins. In D. Compton, T. Meadow, & K. Schilt (Eds.), Other, please specify: Queer method in sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schilt, K., Meadow, T., & Compton, D. (2018). Introduction: Queer work in a straight discipline. In D. Compton, T. Meadow, & K. Schilt (Eds.), Other, please specify: Queer method in sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Serano, J. (2016). Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. New York, NY: Seal Press.

  • Valerio, N. L. (2001). Creating safety to address controversial issues: Strategies for the classroom. Multicultural Education, Spring.

  • Wacquant, L. (2005). Carnal connections: On embodiment, apprenticeship, and membership. Qualitative Sociology, 38(4), 445474.

  • Wagner, L. M., et al. (2017). Teaching philosophies guiding sexuality instruction in U.S. colleges and universities. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(1), 4461.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wentling, T. (2016). Critical pedagogy: Disciplining classroom hegemony. In K. Haltinner & R. Pilegram (Eds.), Teaching gender and sex in contemporary America. Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 7 4 2
PDF Views & Downloads 0 0 0