Chapter 5 Matthew and Paul on Torah Observance: Is Matthew’s Gospel Anti-Pauline, Pro-Pauline, or Un-Pauline?

In: “To Recover What Has Been Lost”: Essays on Eschatology, Intertextuality, and Reception History in Honor of Dale C. Allison Jr.
Author:
Lidija Novakovic Baylor University

Search for other papers by Lidija Novakovic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

This essay seeks to offer a contribution to the ongoing discussion about the relationship between Matthew and Paul. I reject the usual juxtaposition of the law-observant Matthew with the law-free Paul and propose that they differ only with regard to the extent of Torah observance that they expect from their respective audiences. More specifically, I argue that the main difference between Matthew and Paul pertaining to Torah observance is whether the commandments that function as Jewish identity markers are applicable to non-Jewish Christ-followers. I conclude that viewing Matthew’s Gospel as an un-Pauline composition not only offers the most satisfactory explanation of their different views on Torah observance in ethnically mixed Christian communities but also reflects their different visions of how Gentiles will join Israel in the end time. Unlike Paul, who presumes that Jews and non-Jews will participate in universal salvation by preserving their specific identities, Matthew envisions the inclusion of Gentiles into the chosen people through proselytism.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 664 93 11
Full Text Views 37 2 0
PDF Views & Downloads 78 6 1