In this article, I describe the internal structure, surface distribution, and scope possibilities for comparative phrases in Syrian Arabic. Comparative phrases may show surface displacement from their scalar associate in this language, subject to certain restrictions. The restrictions on surface displacement match those on scope construal, suggesting that scope construal involves covert displacement. Further, the restrictions on displacement are shown to be at work in ‘Comparative Deletion’, an ellipsis process operative in clausal comparatives. Comparative Deletion is shown to suspend barriers to movement involved in the semantic derivation of clausal comparative constructions, as reported previously for English. However, I show that attempts in the literature to reduce the barrier-suspending effect of Comparative Deletion to ellipsis in general do not extend to Syrian Arabic. Rather, the Arabic facts suggest that the suspension of constraints on movement under Comparative Deletion is unique to comparative constructions.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abu Kwaik, Kathrein, and Motaz Saad, and Stergios Chatzikyriakidis, and Simon Dobnik. 2018. Shami: a corpus of Levantine Arabic dialects. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation 3645–3652.
Abusalim, Nimer. 2016. The semantics of comparatives: A degree nominal analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Delaware.
Al-Bitar, Ahmad. 2019. The superlative in English and Arabic. Master’s thesis, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen.
Algryani, Ali. 2012. The syntax of ellipsis in Libyan Arabic. Doctoral Dissertation, Newcastle University.
Badawi, Elsaid, and Michael Carter, and revised by Maher Awad Adrian Gully. 2015. Modern written Arabic: a comprehensive grammar. New York: Routledge.
Baltin, Mark. 1987. Do antecedent-contained deletions exist? Linguistic Inquiry 18:579–596.
Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Pancheva. 2004. Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35:1–46.
Bhatt, Rajesh, and Shoichi Takahashi. 2007. Direct comparisons: Resurrecting the direct analysis of phrasal comparatives. In Proceedings of SALT XVII, ed. by T. Friedman and M. Gibson, 19–36. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Bouton, L.F. 1970. Antecedent contained pro-forms. In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 154–167. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Bresnan, Joan. 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4:275–343.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal syntax, ed. by Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
Chung, Sandra, and William Ladusaw. 2004. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Corver, Norbert. 1997. Much-support as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 28:119–164.
Cowell, Mark. 1964. A reference grammar of Syrian Arabic. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Cresswell, Max. 1976. The semantics of degree. In Montague grammar, ed. by Barbara Partee, 261–292. New York: Academic Press.
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 1978. Comparatives and free relatives in Arabic. Recherches Linguistique de Vincennes 7:47–88.
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 1999. Arabic modifying adjectives and DP structures. Studia Linguistica 53:105–154.
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 2012. Key features and parameters in Arabic grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Fox, Danny. 2002. Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33:63–96.
Grano, Thomas, and Stuart Davis. 2017. Universal markedness in gradable adjectives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36:131–147.
Hazout, Ilan. 1995. Comparative ellipsis and Logical Form. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13:1–37.
Heim, Irene. 1983. File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness. In Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, ed. by Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow, 164–189. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Ms., University of Texas, Austin.
Heim, Irene. 2001. Degree operators and scope. In Audiatur vox sapientiae. a festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, ed. by Caroline Fery and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 214–239. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Heim, Irene. 2006. Little. In Proceedings of SALT 16, ed. by Masayuki Gibson and Jonathan Howell, 35–58. Washington, D.C.: Linguistic Society of America.
Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Kachakeche, Zeinab, and Gregory Scontras. 2020. Adjective ordering in Arabic: Post-nominal structure and subjectivity-based preferences. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 5:419–430.
Kennedy, Chris. 1997. Antecedent contained deletion and the syntax of quantification. Linguistic Inquiry 28:662–688.
Kennedy, Chris, and Jason Merchant. 2000. Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18:89–146.
Klein, Ewan. 1980. A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4:1–45.
Larson, Richard, and Franc Marušič. 2004. On indefinite pronoun structures with APs: reply to Kishimoto. Linguistic Inquiry 35:268–287.
May, Robert. 1985. Logical form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
McNabb, Yaron, and Christopher Kennedy. 2011. Extraction and deletion in Palestinian Arabic comparatives. In Perspectives on Arabic linguistics, ed. by Ellen Broselow and Hamid Ouali, 149–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Merchant, Jason. 1999. The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Rullmann, Hotze. 1995. Maximality in the semantics of wh-constructions. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Schwarzschild, Roger. 2006. The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax 9:67–110.
Seuren, Pieter. 1973. The comparative. In Generative Grammar in Europe, ed. by Ferenc Kiefer and Nicholas Ruwet, 528–564. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Shlonsky, Ur. 2002. Constituent questions in Palestinian Arabic. In Themes in Arabic and Hebrew syntax, ed. by Jamal Ouhalla and Ur Shlonsky, 137–160. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Solt, Stephanie. 2009. The semantics of adjectives of quantity. Doctoral Dissertation, City University of New York, New York.
Solt, Stephanie. 2015. Q-adjectives and the semantics of quantity. Journal of Semantics 32:221–273.
Soltan, Usama. 2020. On null objects in Egyptian Arabic: An argument ellipsis analysis. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 12:204–259.
von Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3:1–77.
Wilson, Cameron E. 2021. The most, the fewest and the least: On the relative readings of quantity superlatives. Semantics and Pragmatics 14:1–46.
Wright, William. 1981. A grammar of the Arabic language. Beirut: Librairie du Liban, 3rd edition.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 89 | 89 | 3 |
Full Text Views | 12 | 12 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 28 | 28 | 0 |
In this article, I describe the internal structure, surface distribution, and scope possibilities for comparative phrases in Syrian Arabic. Comparative phrases may show surface displacement from their scalar associate in this language, subject to certain restrictions. The restrictions on surface displacement match those on scope construal, suggesting that scope construal involves covert displacement. Further, the restrictions on displacement are shown to be at work in ‘Comparative Deletion’, an ellipsis process operative in clausal comparatives. Comparative Deletion is shown to suspend barriers to movement involved in the semantic derivation of clausal comparative constructions, as reported previously for English. However, I show that attempts in the literature to reduce the barrier-suspending effect of Comparative Deletion to ellipsis in general do not extend to Syrian Arabic. Rather, the Arabic facts suggest that the suspension of constraints on movement under Comparative Deletion is unique to comparative constructions.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 89 | 89 | 3 |
Full Text Views | 12 | 12 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 28 | 28 | 0 |