An Introductory Note to Noam Agmon's “Materials and Language” with Special Attention to the Issue of Biliteral Roots

in Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Biliteral roots have been, and still are controversial. Because Noam Agmon's paper, to which this note is an introduction, assumes the reality of biliteral roots, the issue is revisited. Several important arguments in support of the biliterality of C1C2C2 and C1C1C2 verbs were put forth in the course of the past thirty years. They are reviewed here, along with the criticisms they have triggered. It is concluded that the evidence weighs in favor of recognizing synchronically active biliteral roots subjected to templatic pressure. It is further suggested that a by-product of Agmon's study and findings is a time frame for the emergence of templatic morphology in the Middle East.

An Introductory Note to Noam Agmon's “Materials and Language” with Special Attention to the Issue of Biliteral Roots

in Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics

Sections

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 14 14 2
Full Text Views 33 33 23
PDF Downloads 6 6 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0