Empirical and Theoretical Arguments in Favor of the Discontinuous Root in Semitic Languages

in Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This paper argues for the existence of a discontinuous root morpheme in the Semitic languages. Although this notion is often used in the analysis of these languages, it has been claimed in some surface-oriented studies to be a mere theoretical artifact. The first part of this paper presents two arguments from the realm of verbal inflection. It is shown that no surface form can serve consistently as the base for other forms in either Modern Hebrew or Chaha, two Semitic languages. It is further argued that some morphophonological processes in Chaha must be regarded as applying to the root. Applying such processes to the surface stem would result in incorrect forms. The second part of the paper treats discontinuous effects in nominal formations. It is argued that agentive nouns in Modern Hebrew can be built either on another noun or on the root. Without the notion of the root, one is obliged to list all the cases which we propose are root-derived. Such listing obscures the entirely regular and consistently predictable form of root-derived agentives.

Empirical and Theoretical Arguments in Favor of the Discontinuous Root in Semitic Languages

in Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics

Sections

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 24 24 2
Full Text Views 86 86 9
PDF Downloads 9 9 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0