Save

Empirical and Theoretical Arguments in Favor of the Discontinuous Root in Semitic Languages

In: Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics
Authors:
Ya'ar Hever
Search for other papers by Ya'ar Hever in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Noam Faust
Search for other papers by Noam Faust in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

This paper argues for the existence of a discontinuous root morpheme in the Semitic languages. Although this notion is often used in the analysis of these languages, it has been claimed in some surface-oriented studies to be a mere theoretical artifact. The first part of this paper presents two arguments from the realm of verbal inflection. It is shown that no surface form can serve consistently as the base for other forms in either Modern Hebrew or Chaha, two Semitic languages. It is further argued that some morphophonological processes in Chaha must be regarded as applying to the root. Applying such processes to the surface stem would result in incorrect forms. The second part of the paper treats discontinuous effects in nominal formations. It is argued that agentive nouns in Modern Hebrew can be built either on another noun or on the root. Without the notion of the root, one is obliged to list all the cases which we propose are root-derived. Such listing obscures the entirely regular and consistently predictable form of root-derived agentives.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 283 29 3
Full Text Views 120 8 0
PDF Views & Downloads 80 27 0