Examining the Distinctiveness of Antecedents to Trust in Government

Evidence from South Korea

in African and Asian Studies
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Approaches to understanding trust in government are likely to be incomplete if they are only applied to trust and not government as well. As such, this study builds upon existing attempts to understand trust in government by deconstructing the terms trust and government and assessing the relationships among the various components within South Korea. To analyse the antecedents of trust in government, multiple regression analyses are used to assess The Social Trust Public Opinion Survey (2004), which addresses current trust levels across society, markets, institutions, and government. Our findings suggest the significance of determinants of trust vary by area of government.

Examining the Distinctiveness of Antecedents to Trust in Government

Evidence from South Korea

in African and Asian Studies

Sections

References

BouckaertG.Van de WalleS. Comparing Measures of Citizen Trust and User Satisfaction as Indicators of ‘Good Governance’: Difficulties in Linking Trust and Satisfaction Indicators International Review of Administrative Sciences 2003 69 3 329 343

BraithwaiteV. Communal and exchange trust norms: Their value base and relevance to institutional trust Trust and governance 1998 1 46 74

BraithwaiteJ.MakkaiT. Trust and compliance* Policing and Society: An International Journal 1994 4 1 1 12

CarnevaleD. G.WechslerB. Trust in the Public Sector Individual and Organizational Determinants Administration & Society 1992 23 4 471 494

CitrinJ. Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government The American Political Science Review 1974 68 3 973 988

ChoudhuryE. Trust in Administration: An Integrative Approach to Optimal Trust Administration and Society 2008 40 6 586 620

ChristensenT.LægreidP. Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography Public Performance & Management Review 2005 28 4 487 511

CooperC. A.KnottsH. G.BrennanK. M. The importance of trust in government for public administration: The case of zoning Public Administration Review 2008 68 3 459 468

FukuyamaF. Social capital, civil society and development Third world quarterly 2001 22 1 7 20

GoldfinchS.GauldR.HerbisonP. The Participation Divide? Political Participation, Trust in Government, and E‐government in Australia and New Zealand Australian Journal of Public Administration 2009 68 3 333 350

GordonMargaret Public trust in government: the US media as an agent of accountability? International Review of Administrative Sciences 2000 66 297 310

HardinR. BraithwaiteV. A. Trust in Government Trust & Government 1998 New York, NY Russell Sage Foundation 9 27

HeintzmanR.MarsonB. People, service and trust: is there a public sector service value chain? International Review of Administrative Sciences 2005 71 4 549 575

HetheringtonM. J. The political relevance of political trust American Political Science Review 1998 791 808

ImT.ChoW.PorumbescuG.ParkJ. Internet, Trust in Government, and Citizen Compliance Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2012 mus037

JobJ. How is trust in government created? It begins at home, but ends in the parliament Australian Review of Public Affairs 2005 6 1 1 23

KampenJ. K.De WalleS. V.BouckaertG. Assessing the Relation Between Satisfaction with Public Service Delivery and Trust in Government. The Impact of the Predisposition of Citizens Toward Government on Evalutations of Its Performance Public Performance & Management Review 2006 29 4 387 404

KeeleL. Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government American Journal of Political Science 2007 51 2 241 254

KimS. E. The Role of Trust in the Modern Administrative State An Integrative Model Administration & Society 2005 37 5 611 635

KimS. Public Trust in Government in Japan and South Korea: Does the Rise of Critical Citizens Matter? Public Administration Review 2010 70 5 801 810

KleinerM.LeeY. Works Councils and Unionization: Lessons from South Korea Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 2002 36 1 1 16

LaPorteT.MetlayD. Hazards and Institutional Trustworthiness: Facing a Deficit of Trust Public Administration Review 1996 56 4 341 347

LipskyM. Street Level Bureaucracy and the Analysis of Urban Reform Urban Affairs Review 1971 6 4 391 409

LeeA. Down and Down We Go: Trust and Compliance in South Korea Social Science Quarterly 2003 84 2 329 343

LeeS. Trust and Civic Participation in Korea International Studies Review 2000 3 2 59 77

LuhmannN. GambettaDiego ‘Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives’ Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations 2000 electronic edition Department of Sociology, University of Oxford 94 107 chapter 6

MizrahiS.Vigoda-GadotE.CohenN. Trust, participation, and performance in public administration Public Performance & Management Review 2009 33 1 7 33

NyeJ. NyeJ.Jr.ZelikowP.KingD. Introduction: The decline of confidence in government Why people don’t trust government 1997 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press 1 18

OrrenG. NyeJoseph S.Jr.ZelikowPhilip D.KingDavid C. Fall from Grace: The Public’s Loss of Faith in Government Why People Don’t Trust Government 1997 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press 1 18

PorumbescuGregory A. Assessing the Link Between Online Mass Media and Trust in Government: Evidence From Seoul, South Korea Policy & Internet 2013 5 4 418 443

PutnamR. Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America PS: Political Science and Politics 1993 28 4 664 683

PutnamR. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community 2000 New York Simon and Schuster

RaineyH. G. Understanding and managing public organizations 1997 ( 2nd ed.) San Francisco Jossey-Bass

RothensteinB.StolleD. HoogheM.StolleD. Social Capital, impartiality, and the welfare state: An institutional approach Generating Social Capital: The role of voluntary associations institutions and government policy 2002 New York, NY Palgrave

RotterJ. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust Journal of Personality 1967 35 651 665

RuscioK. Trust, democracy, and public management: A theoretical argument Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1996 6 3 461 477

RuscioK. Jay’s Pirouette, Or Why Political Trust is not the Same as Personal Trust Administration and Society 1999 31 5 639 657

StipakB. Citizen Satisfaction with Urban Services: Potential Misuse as a Performance Indicator Public Administration Review 1979 39 1 46 52

ThomasC. Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees Administration and Society 1998 30 2 166 193

UslanerE. Social Capital and the Net Communications of the ACM 2000 43 12 60 64

UslanerE. Trust in the Knowledge Society Presentation for the Conference on Social Capital Cabinet of the Government of Japan 2003 March 24-25

UslanerE. Where You Stand Depends Upon Where Your Grandparents Sat: The Inheritability of Generalized Trust Public Opinion Quarterly 2008 72 4 725 740

Van de WalleS. Measuring Bureaucratic Quality in Governance Indicators Presentation for the 8th Public Management Research Conference September 29th-October 1st 2005

Van de WalleS.KampenJ. K.BouckaertG. Deep impact for high impact agencies?: Assessing the Role of Bureaucratic Encounters in Evaluations of Government Public Performance & Management Review 2005 28 4 532 549

Vigoda-GadotE.YuvalF. Managerial quality, administrative performance and trust in governance revisited: A follow-up study of causality International Journal of Public Sector Management 2003 16 7 502 522

WangX.Wan WartM. When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers’ perceptions Public Administration Review 2007 67 2 265 278

YangK.HolzerM. The performance–trust link: Implications for performance measurement Public Administration Review 2006 66 1 114 126

1

Christensen and Laegried (2005) take a similar approach to assessing trust in government. However our approach is distinct from theirs in that we assess trust in government at the same level of government (central) as opposed to different levels.

Figures

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 50 50 14
Full Text Views 5 5 5
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0