Attitudes toward Human Rights

Modal and Individual Personalities in Taiwan

in African and Asian Studies
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

The issue of human rights has gained attention in Taiwan, and this study represents a breakthrough regarding the use of an interdisciplinary research approach that includes a psychological focus. We utilized multiscale questionnaires to test the attitudes toward human rights from different perspectives. The results showed that the following: (1) The modal personalities of Taiwan, namely the authoritarian and dogmatic personalities, are not conducive to the development of human rights; (2) civil liberalism and globalism are good for the development of individual personalities, while patriotism and nationalism are not entirely bad, but support civil constraint; and (3) individuals in favor of civil liberalism are in the minority and face more difficulty in adapting to the Taiwanese environment. Our recommendation is that leaders who are strong in civil liberalism must be elected to encourage a culture of “obedience” and “disparate layout” for the development of human rights in Taiwan.

Sections
References
  • AltemeyerB. ‘The other “thoritarian personality” ’ Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1998 30 47 92

  • BeerF.A. ‘Controlling Nuclear Weapons: The Evolution of Morality, Politics, and Science’ The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 1984 20 4 323 342

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BellC. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions 1997 Oxford Oxford University Press

  • BurgerJ.M. Personality 2000 5th ed Belmont, CA Thomson

  • CohrsJ.C.MaesJ.MoschnerB.KielmannS. ‘Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives’ Political Psychology 2007 28 4 441 469

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CronbachL.J. ‘Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests’ Psychometrika 1951 16 297 334

  • DershowitzA. Rights from Wrongs: A Secular Theory of the Origins of Rights 2004 New York Basic Books

  • Diaz-VeizadesJ.WidamanK.F.LittleT.D.GibbsK.W. ‘The Measurement and Structure of Human Rights Attitudes’ The Journal of Social Psychology 1995 135 3 313 328

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FeiX.T. Rural China 1991 Hong Kong Joint

  • FrommE. Escape from Freedom 1941 New York Farrar & Rinehart

  • FukuyamaF. Trust the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity 1995 New York Free Press

  • HangT.T. LeeY.Y.YangK.S. ‘Chinese National Personality and Several Problems of Research Methods’ Chinese Characteristics 1991 Taipei Laurel 423 454

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HawangS.D. ‘An Analysis of Political Attitudes of College Students in Taiwan’ Soochow Journal of Political Science 1998 9 171 202

  • HsuK.Y. ‘The Relationship between Chinese Dialectical Thinking and the Implicit Theory of Personality-Behavior Association’ Chinese Journal of Psychology 2006 48 3 291 313

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HuangL.L. ‘M Shape vs. Bell Shape: The Ideology of National Identity and Its Psychological Basis in Taiwan’ Chinese Journal of Psychology 2007 49 4 451 470

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HwangK.K.HuangL.L. ‘Influence of Authoritarian and Dogmatic Personality upon the Perception of the us De-recognition of the Republic of China’ Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica 1979 48 155 196

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KostermanR.FeshbachS. ‘Toward a Measure of Patriotic and Nationalistic Attitudes’ Political Psychology 1989 10 2 257 274

  • LandmanT. ‘Measuring Human Rights: Principle, Practice, and Policy’ Human Rights Quarterly 2004 26 4 906 931

  • LeeY.R. ‘A Survey of the Current Situation of Human Rights Development in Taiwan on the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 2008 5 4 189 199

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeungM.T. ‘Human Rights, State Sovereignty and Solidarist Theories of Humanitarian Intervention’ Taiwan Political Science Review 2010 14 2 77 133

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiaoB. ‘Re-examining Human Rights in Taiwan’ Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 2008 5 4 235 245

  • LintonR. The Study of Men 1936 New York Appleton Century Crofts

  • LintonR. The cultural Background of Personality 1945 New York Appleton-Century

  • LuoJ.D.YehY.C. The Game of Trust in Chinese 2007 Beijing Social Science Academic Press

  • McFarlandS.MathewsM. ‘Who Cares about Human Rights?’ Political Psychology 2005 26 3 365 385

  • MillerW.E.ShanksJ.M. The New American Voters 1996 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press

  • NeumayerE. ‘Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights?’ The Journal of Conflict Resolution 2005 49 6 925 953

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OdinkaluC.A. ‘Back to the Future: The Imperative of Prioritizing for the Protection of Human Rights in Africa’ Journal of African Law 2003 47 1 1 37

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ParsonsT. Societies; Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives 1966 Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall

  • PervinL.A.CervoneD.JohnO.P. Personality: Theory and Research 2004 9th ed New York Wiley

  • QiX.F. ‘Relationship Network & Its Impact on Government Relationship’ Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 2008 61 5 670 675

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RokeachM. The Open and Closed Mind: Investigations into the Nature of Belief Systems and Personality Systems 1960 New York Basic Books

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SanfordR.N.AdornoT.W.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD.J. AdornoT.W.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD.J.SanfordR.N. ‘The Measurement of Implicit Antidemocratic Trends’ The Authoritarian Personality 1950 New York Norton 222 279

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchultzD.P.SchultzS.E. Theories of Personality 2009 9th ed Belmont, CA Wadsworth

  • SinghP.N.HuangS.C.ThompsonG.C. ‘A Comparative Study of Selected Attitudes, Values, and Personality Characteristics of American, Chinese, and Indian Students’ Journal of Social Psychology 1962 57 1 123 132

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmithA.H. Chinese Characteristics 1894 4th ed New York Fleming H. Revell

  • SoloveD.J. The Future of Reputation: Gossip Rumor and Privacy on the Internet 2007 New Haven, CT Yale University Press

  • VasakK. VasakK. ‘Human Rights: As a Legal Reality’ The International Dimension of Human Rights 1982 Westport, CT Greenwood Press 1 47

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VincentR.J. Nonintervention and International Order 1974 Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press

  • WangY.J.ChouS.F. ‘Disparate Layout of Trust of City Residences’ Tianfu Xinlun 2009 2 102 105

  • WuN.T. ‘Family Socialization and Ideologies: Generation Difference in Party Identification among Taiwan’s Voters’ Taiwanese Sociological Review 1999 3 53 85

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • XiaoZ.S.LuoB.LiZ.H. ‘Theoretical Probe into the Innovative Routing of anti-corruption System under Difference Sequence Pattern’ Journal of Guangzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 2008 7 10 8 12

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Figures
  • View in gallery
    Framework for research on Attitudes toward Human Rights in Taiwan.
  • View in gallery
    Model of concentric circles: the behavior rule in disparate layout.
Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 152 72 0
Full Text Views 211 211 0
PDF Downloads 10 10 0
EPUB Downloads 1 1 0