Attitudes toward Human Rights

Modal and Individual Personalities in Taiwan

in African and Asian Studies
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The issue of human rights has gained attention in Taiwan, and this study represents a breakthrough regarding the use of an interdisciplinary research approach that includes a psychological focus. We utilized multiscale questionnaires to test the attitudes toward human rights from different perspectives. The results showed that the following: (1) The modal personalities of Taiwan, namely the authoritarian and dogmatic personalities, are not conducive to the development of human rights; (2) civil liberalism and globalism are good for the development of individual personalities, while patriotism and nationalism are not entirely bad, but support civil constraint; and (3) individuals in favor of civil liberalism are in the minority and face more difficulty in adapting to the Taiwanese environment. Our recommendation is that leaders who are strong in civil liberalism must be elected to encourage a culture of “obedience” and “disparate layout” for the development of human rights in Taiwan.

Attitudes toward Human Rights

Modal and Individual Personalities in Taiwan

in African and Asian Studies

Sections

References

AltemeyerB. ‘The other “thoritarian personality” ’ Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1998 30 47 92

BeerF.A. ‘Controlling Nuclear Weapons: The Evolution of Morality, Politics, and Science’ The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 1984 20 4 323 342

BellC. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions 1997 Oxford Oxford University Press

BurgerJ.M. Personality 2000 5th ed Belmont, CA Thomson

CohrsJ.C.MaesJ.MoschnerB.KielmannS. ‘Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives’ Political Psychology 2007 28 4 441 469

CronbachL.J. ‘Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests’ Psychometrika 1951 16 297 334

DershowitzA. Rights from Wrongs: A Secular Theory of the Origins of Rights 2004 New York Basic Books

Diaz-VeizadesJ.WidamanK.F.LittleT.D.GibbsK.W. ‘The Measurement and Structure of Human Rights Attitudes’ The Journal of Social Psychology 1995 135 3 313 328

FeiX.T. Rural China 1991 Hong Kong Joint

FrommE. Escape from Freedom 1941 New York Farrar & Rinehart

FukuyamaF. Trust the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity 1995 New York Free Press

HangT.T. LeeY.Y.YangK.S. ‘Chinese National Personality and Several Problems of Research Methods’ Chinese Characteristics 1991 Taipei Laurel 423 454

HawangS.D. ‘An Analysis of Political Attitudes of College Students in Taiwan’ Soochow Journal of Political Science 1998 9 171 202

HsuK.Y. ‘The Relationship between Chinese Dialectical Thinking and the Implicit Theory of Personality-Behavior Association’ Chinese Journal of Psychology 2006 48 3 291 313

HuangL.L. ‘M Shape vs. Bell Shape: The Ideology of National Identity and Its Psychological Basis in Taiwan’ Chinese Journal of Psychology 2007 49 4 451 470

HwangK.K.HuangL.L. ‘Influence of Authoritarian and Dogmatic Personality upon the Perception of the us De-recognition of the Republic of China’ Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica 1979 48 155 196

KostermanR.FeshbachS. ‘Toward a Measure of Patriotic and Nationalistic Attitudes’ Political Psychology 1989 10 2 257 274

LandmanT. ‘Measuring Human Rights: Principle, Practice, and Policy’ Human Rights Quarterly 2004 26 4 906 931

LeeY.R. ‘A Survey of the Current Situation of Human Rights Development in Taiwan on the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 2008 5 4 189 199

LeungM.T. ‘Human Rights, State Sovereignty and Solidarist Theories of Humanitarian Intervention’ Taiwan Political Science Review 2010 14 2 77 133

LiaoB. ‘Re-examining Human Rights in Taiwan’ Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 2008 5 4 235 245

LintonR. The Study of Men 1936 New York Appleton Century Crofts

LintonR. The cultural Background of Personality 1945 New York Appleton-Century

LuoJ.D.YehY.C. The Game of Trust in Chinese 2007 Beijing Social Science Academic Press

McFarlandS.MathewsM. ‘Who Cares about Human Rights?’ Political Psychology 2005 26 3 365 385

MillerW.E.ShanksJ.M. The New American Voters 1996 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press

NeumayerE. ‘Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights?’ The Journal of Conflict Resolution 2005 49 6 925 953

OdinkaluC.A. ‘Back to the Future: The Imperative of Prioritizing for the Protection of Human Rights in Africa’ Journal of African Law 2003 47 1 1 37

ParsonsT. Societies; Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives 1966 Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall

PervinL.A.CervoneD.JohnO.P. Personality: Theory and Research 2004 9th ed New York Wiley

QiX.F. ‘Relationship Network & Its Impact on Government Relationship’ Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 2008 61 5 670 675

RokeachM. The Open and Closed Mind: Investigations into the Nature of Belief Systems and Personality Systems 1960 New York Basic Books

SanfordR.N.AdornoT.W.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD.J. AdornoT.W.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD.J.SanfordR.N. ‘The Measurement of Implicit Antidemocratic Trends’ The Authoritarian Personality 1950 New York Norton 222 279

SchultzD.P.SchultzS.E. Theories of Personality 2009 9th ed Belmont, CA Wadsworth

SinghP.N.HuangS.C.ThompsonG.C. ‘A Comparative Study of Selected Attitudes, Values, and Personality Characteristics of American, Chinese, and Indian Students’ Journal of Social Psychology 1962 57 1 123 132

SmithA.H. Chinese Characteristics 1894 4th ed New York Fleming H. Revell

SoloveD.J. The Future of Reputation: Gossip Rumor and Privacy on the Internet 2007 New Haven, CT Yale University Press

VasakK. VasakK. ‘Human Rights: As a Legal Reality’ The International Dimension of Human Rights 1982 Westport, CT Greenwood Press 1 47

VincentR.J. Nonintervention and International Order 1974 Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press

WangY.J.ChouS.F. ‘Disparate Layout of Trust of City Residences’ Tianfu Xinlun 2009 2 102 105

WuN.T. ‘Family Socialization and Ideologies: Generation Difference in Party Identification among Taiwan’s Voters’ Taiwanese Sociological Review 1999 3 53 85

XiaoZ.S.LuoB.LiZ.H. ‘Theoretical Probe into the Innovative Routing of anti-corruption System under Difference Sequence Pattern’ Journal of Guangzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 2008 7 10 8 12

Figures

  • View in gallery
    Framework for research on Attitudes toward Human Rights in Taiwan.
  • View in gallery
    Model of concentric circles: the behavior rule in disparate layout.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 97 97 13
Full Text Views 9 9 9
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0