Bureaucratic Acquiescence as an Institutional Strategy in the African Union
In: African and Asian StudiesSearch for other papers by Lynda Chinenye Iroulo in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Oheneba A. Boateng in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The paper conceptualizes acquiescence as a strategy bureaucrats adopt to deal with contestation between themselves and political leaders. The literature on bureaucratic politics argues that policy outcomes result from a game of bargaining between bureaucrats and political leaders. These actors employ diverse strategies like bargaining for more authority, exploiting loopholes, challenging the political class, and, at other times, using the threat of resignation to implement their preferred priorities. However, we advance the above argument by introducing another strategy that bureaucrats use, acquiescence. We analyze African Union (AU) bureaucratic politics through speeches, press releases, and secondary materials. The paper argues that rather than opting for standard bureaucratic strategies, AU bureaucrats acquiesce because the institutional structure, material resources, and the AU solidarity norm make it difficult for them to do otherwise. Acquiescence is the reluctant acceptance of decisions in bureaucratic politics in the form of silence or an absence of protest. We show examples of AU institutional reform and the Burundi crisis debates, where acquiescence can explain decision-making outcomes in the organization. We conclude that acquiescence is a relevant conceptual tool in explaining the outcomes of bureaucratic politics in the AU and can be generalized to investigate institutional politics in other international organizations within and outside of the continent.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abrahamsen, Rita. 2020. “Internationalists, Sovereigntists, Nativists: Contending Visions of World Order in Pan-Africanism.” Review of International Studies 46 (1): 56–74.
-
African Union. 2000. “Constitutive Act of the African Union.” Addis Ababa: Organisation of African Unity. https://au.int/sites/default/files/pages/34873-file-constitutiveact_en.pdf.
-
Akokpari, John, Angela Ndinga-Muvumba, and Timothy Murithi, eds. 2008. The African Union and Its Institutions. South Africa: Fanele.
-
Allison, Graham T. 1969. “Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” American Political Science Review 63 (3): 689–718.
-
Allison, Graham T., and Morton H. Halperin. 1972. “Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications.” World Politics 24: 40–79. doi: 10.2307/2010559.
-
Amate, C. O. 1986. Inside the OAU: Pan-Africanism in Practice. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
-
AU Press Release. May 9, 2015. “The African Union Dispatches a High-Level Delegation to Burundi.” African Union. https://au.int/en/newsevents/20150509/african-union-dispatches-high-level-delegation-burundi.
-
AU PSC communiqué. December 2015. PSC/PR/COMM.(DLVX). http://www.peaceau.org/en/article/communique-of-the-565th-meeting-of-the-psc-on-the-situation-in-burundi.
-
Barnett, Michael N, and Martha Finnemore. 2012. Rules for the World: International Organization and Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
-
Baurmann, Michael. 1999. “Solidarity as a Social Norm and as a Constitutional Norm.” In Solidarity, edited by Kurt Bayertz, 243–272. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
-
Bedzigui, Yann. 2017. “28th AU Summit: AU Reform Can’t Be Fast-Tracked.” ISS Africa. https://issafrica.org/iss-today/28th-au-summit-au-reform-cant-be-fast-tracked.
-
Boateng, Oheneba A. 2017. “Membership Accession in the African Union: The relationship between enforcement and compliance, and the case for differential membership.” South African Journal of International Affairs 24 (1): 21–39.
-
Cambridge Dictionary. 2022. “Acquiescence.” Cambridge University Press. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/acquiescence.
-
Chan, Phil C. W. 2004. “Acquiescence/Estoppel in International Boundaries: Temple of Preah Vihear Revisited.” Chinese Journal of International Law 3 (2): 421–439.
-
Cilliers, Jakkie. 2014. Salim Ahmed Salim: Son of Africa. Durban: Institute for Security Studies.
-
Crisis Group. 2016. “The African Union and the Burundi Crisis: Ambition versus Reality.” Crisis Group. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/burundi/african-union-and-burundi-crisis-ambition-versus-reality.
-
Deng, Francis M., Sadikiel Kimaro, Terrence Lyons, Donald Rothchild, and WIlliam I. Zartman. 1991. Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
-
Dersso, Solomon. 2016. “To Intervene or Not to Intervene? An Inside View of the AU’s Decision-Making on Article 4(h) and Burundi.” World Peace Foundation. https://sites.tufts.edu/reinventingpeace/2016/03/01/to-intervene-or-not-to-intervene-an-inside-view-of-the-aus-decision-making-on-article-4h-and-burundi/.
-
Dirar, Luwam. 2016. “Norms of Solidarity and Regionalism: Theorizing State Behavior Among Southern African States.” Michigan State International Review 24 (3): 58.
-
Glas, Aarie, and Emmanuel Balogun. 2020. “Norms in Practice: People-Centric Governance in ASEAN and ECOWAS.” International Affairs 96 (4): 1015–1032.
-
Halperin, Morton H., Priscilla A. Clapp, and Arnold Kanter. 2006. Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
-
Han, Yuna, and Sophie T. Rosenberg. 2021. “Claiming Equality: The African Union’s Contestation of the Anti-Impunity Norm.” International Studies Review 23 (3): 726–751.
-
Hirschmann, Gisela. 2021. “International Organizations’ Responses to Member State Contestation: From Inertia to Resilience.” International Affairs 97 (6): 1963–1981.
-
Holsti, Ole R. 1972. “Book Reviews: Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis.” Western Political Quarterly 25 (1): 136–140.
-
Igbokwe-Ibeto, C. 2019. “African Bureaucracy and Public Administration: Analyzing the Normative Impediments and Prospects.” Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review 7. https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v7i1.323.
-
International Crisis Group. 2016. “The African Union and the Burundi Crisis: Ambition versus Reality.” International Crisis Group, https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/burundi/african-union-and-burundi-crisis-ambition-versus-reality.
-
Jobson, Elissa. 2016. “The African Union Tried and Failed on Burundi. Now It’s Time to Try Again.” Crisis Group. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/burundi/african-union-tried-and-failed-burundi-now-its-time-try-again.
-
Jones, Christopher M. 2017. Bureaucratic Politics and Organizational Process Models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Karbo, Tony, and Tim Murithi. 2018. The African Union: Autocracy, Diplomacy and Peacebuilding in Africa. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
-
Kioko, Ben. 2003. “The Right of Intervention under the African Union’s Constitutive Act: From Non-Interference to Non-Intervention.” Revue Internationale de la Croix-Rouge/International Review of the Red Cross 85 (852): 807–826.
-
Krasner, Stephen D. 1972. “Are Bureaucracies Important? (Or Allison Wonderland).” Foreign Policy 7: 159–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/1147761.
-
Krylova, Yulia. 2018. “Bureaucratic Politics.” In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, edited by Ali Farazmand, 1–6. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
-
Lotze, Walter. 2013. “Building the Legitimacy of the African Union: An Evolving Continent and Evolving Organization.” In Legitimating International Organizations, edited by Zaum Dominik, 111–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
MacGibbon, I. C. 1954. “The Scope of Acquiescence in International Law.” British Yearbook of International Law 31: 143.
-
March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” International Organization 52 (4): 943–969.
-
Marque Antuness, Nuno Sérgio. “Acquiescence.” In Oxford Public International Law. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [MPEPIL]. https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1373.
-
Mbiti, John S. 1969. African Religions and Philosophy. London: Heinemann.
-
Moe, Terry M. 1984. “The New Economics of Organization.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (4): 739–777.
-
Montgomery, John. D. 1986. “Bureaucratic Politics in Southern Africa.” Public Administration Review 46 (5): 407–413.
-
Murithi, Timothy. 2016. The African Union: Pan-Africanism, Peacebuilding and Development. London: Routledge.
-
Museveni, Yoweri. 1986. “President Museveni of Uganda, 22nd Ordinary Session of the OAU Assembly of Heads of State and Government.” Addis Ababa: Organisation of African Unity.
-
Nathan, James A., and James K. Oliver. 1978. “Bureaucratic Politics: Academic Windfalls and Intellectual Pitfalls.” Journal of Political & Military Sociology 6 (1): 81–91.
-
Ncube, Swikani. 2019. “The Burundi Crisis and the Mirage of an African Governance Architecture.” South African Journal of International Affairs 26 (3): 349–366.
-
Nienhüser, Werner. 2008. “Resource Dependence Theory—How Well Does It Explain Behavior of Organizations?” Management Revue 19 (1/2): 9–32.
-
Organisation of African Unity. 1963. “Charter of the Organisation of African Unity.” Addis Ababa: OAU.
-
Organisation of African Unity. 1990. “Report of the Secretary-General on the Fundamental Changes Taking Place in the World and Their Implication for Africa.” Addis Ababa: OAU.
-
Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 2005. “Developing Resources Dependence Theory: How Theory Is Affected by Its Environment.” In Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Polhemus, James H. 1974. “The Provisional Secretariat of the O.A.U., 1963–4.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 12 (2): 287–295.
-
Söderbaum, Fredrik. 2004. “Modes of Regional Governance in Africa: Neoliberalism, Sovereignty Boosting, and Shadow Networks.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 10 (4): 419–436.
-
Tieku, Thomas Kwasi. 2012. “Collectivist Worldview: Its Challenge to International Relations.” In Africa and International Relations in the 21st Century, edited by Scarlett Cornelissen, Fantu Cheru, and Timothy M. Shaw, 36–50. International Political Economy Series. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
-
Tieku, Thomas Kwasi. 2021 “Punching above Weight: How the African Union Commission Exercises Agency in Politics.” Africa Spectrum 56 (3): 254–273.
-
Tranow, Ulf. 2019. “Solidarity as a System of Norms.” In Solidarity in Open Societies, edited by Jörg Althammer, Bernhard Neumärker, and Ursula Nothelle-Wildfeuer, 25–55. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
-
Vandeginste, Stef. 2015. “Burundi’s Electoral Crisis—Back to Power-Sharing Politics as Usual?” African Affairs 114 (457): 624–636.
-
Wass, Jack. 2017. “Jurisdiction by Estoppel and Acquiescence in International Courts and Tribunals.” British Yearbook of International Law 86 (1): 155–195.
-
Welz, Martin. 2020. “Reconsidering Lock-in Effects and Benefits from Delegation: The African Union’s Relations with Its Member States through a Principal–Agent Perspective.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33 (2): 159–178.
-
Witt, Antonia. 2019a. “Between the Shadow of History and the ‘Union of People’: Legitimating the Organisation of African Unity and the African Union.” In International Organizations under Pressure: Legitimating Global Governance in Challenging Times, edited by Klaus Dingwerth, Antonia Witt, Ina Lehmann, Ellen Reichel, and Tobias Weise, 98–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Witt, Antonia. 2019b. “Where Regional Norms Matter: Contestation and the Domestic Impact of the African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance.” Africa Spectrum 54 (2): 106–126.
-
Woodman, Gordon R. 1971. “Acquiescence in English Law and the Customary Land Law of Ghana and Nigeria.” Journal of African Law 15 (1): 41–59.
-
Yan, Song. 2021. “Acquiescence and Its Role in the Settlement of Island Disputes: ‘Silence May Also Speak,’ but to What Extent?” Chinese Journal of International Law 20 (3): 499–532.
-
Yihdego, Zeray. 2011. “The African Union: Founding Principles, Frameworks and Prospects.” European Law Journal 17 (5): 568–594.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 625 | 499 | 35 |
| Full Text Views | 419 | 19 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 394 | 38 | 0 |
Bureaucratic Acquiescence as an Institutional Strategy in the African Union
In: African and Asian StudiesSearch for other papers by Lynda Chinenye Iroulo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Oheneba A. Boateng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The paper conceptualizes acquiescence as a strategy bureaucrats adopt to deal with contestation between themselves and political leaders. The literature on bureaucratic politics argues that policy outcomes result from a game of bargaining between bureaucrats and political leaders. These actors employ diverse strategies like bargaining for more authority, exploiting loopholes, challenging the political class, and, at other times, using the threat of resignation to implement their preferred priorities. However, we advance the above argument by introducing another strategy that bureaucrats use, acquiescence. We analyze African Union (AU) bureaucratic politics through speeches, press releases, and secondary materials. The paper argues that rather than opting for standard bureaucratic strategies, AU bureaucrats acquiesce because the institutional structure, material resources, and the AU solidarity norm make it difficult for them to do otherwise. Acquiescence is the reluctant acceptance of decisions in bureaucratic politics in the form of silence or an absence of protest. We show examples of AU institutional reform and the Burundi crisis debates, where acquiescence can explain decision-making outcomes in the organization. We conclude that acquiescence is a relevant conceptual tool in explaining the outcomes of bureaucratic politics in the AU and can be generalized to investigate institutional politics in other international organizations within and outside of the continent.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 625 | 499 | 35 |
| Full Text Views | 419 | 19 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 394 | 38 | 0 |