Diet preferences of a Western giant's (Lord Derby's) eland group in a Sahelian dry habitat

In: Animal Biology
Gérard Galat IRD, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Département Ressources Vivantes, Route des Pères Maristes – Dakar, Senegal, and 911 avenue Agropolis, BP 64501, 34394 Montpellier cedex, France

Search for other papers by Gérard Galat in
Current site
Google Scholar
Anh Galat-Luong UICN, Commission de Survie des Espèces, 2 Cantagrils, 34380 Argelliers, France;, Email:

Search for other papers by Anh Galat-Luong in
Current site
Google Scholar
, and
Jerzy J. Nizinski IRD, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR Bioemco, Interactions biologiques dans les sols, 5 rue du Carbone, 45072 Orléans cedex 2, France

Search for other papers by Jerzy J. Nizinski in
Current site
Google Scholar
View More View Less
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



The diet of the critically endangered Western giant eland (Tragelaphus derbianus derbianus Gray, 1847) has never been studied. We studied the food preferences of a Western giant eland group translocated from its native Sudanian habitat to a wildlife reserve in a Sahelian area in relation to the abundance of food in the new habitat. The study generated the first qualitative and quantitative data on this eland subspecies' diet. The translocated group fed only on 33 different plant species available in its new habitat. Isoberlinia doka, and Julbernadia sp., two species eaten by the other eland subspecies did not occur here. The food preference for most ligneous species did correspond to their high availability in the translocation area (like Acacia seyal, 32.56% versus 28.26% abundance in the new habitat, Acacia ataxacantha, 19.7% versus 17.03%, and Azadirachta indica, 7.11% versus 4.71%; only Grewia bicolor, 7.48% versus 10.14% did not). In contrast, the food preference for many herbaceous species did not, as some were preferred (like Merremia pentaphylla, 35.41% versus 11.01%, and Peristrophe bicalyculata, 2.58% versus 0.00%), and others avoided (like Corchorus tridens, 1.72% versus 2.20%, Cucumis melo, 0.43% versus 5.73%, and Abutilon ramosum, 0.21% versus 7.05%). The most eaten Cassia tora (42.7%) was also the most abundant (36.56%). Our data will provide conservation managers with information on how to protect the species' natural environment and to make appropriate management decisions with respect to the proclamation of protected areas or the identification of core zones, mainly for future (re)introduction of satellite populations.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 492 61 13
Full Text Views 142 2 0
PDF Views & Downloads 13 3 0