Reproductive activity of Adenomera aff. hylaedactyla (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in a coastal area of Brazil

in Animal Biology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

We conducted studies on the reproductive ecology of an undescribed species, here referred to as Adenomera aff. hylaedactyla, in São Gonçalo do Amarante, Ceará, Brazil. Active sampling took place over a whole year, while searches for underground chambers were also made every two weeks during one reproductive season. The reproductive pattern was seasonal, with breeding occurring only in wetter months (January to May) and peak activity in April and mainly at night. Calling activity of males was influenced by air humidity, temperature and rainfall. The species showed a reproductive pattern consistent with that described for the genus Adenomera, whose main features of reproduction are underground chambers and foam nests. Adenomera aff. hylaedactyla has no aquatic stage of tadpole development, consistent with reproductive mode 32, which encompases foam nest construction in subterranean chambers and complete development of endotrophic tadpoles in the chambers. These natural history data not only contribute to the understanding of reproductive strategies in anurans, but also provide information for developing effective conservation strategies.

Reproductive activity of Adenomera aff. hylaedactyla (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in a coastal area of Brazil

in Animal Biology

Sections

References

AichingerM. (1987) Annual activity patterns of anurans in a seasonal neotropical environment. Oecologia71583-592.

AnguloA.CocroftR.B.ReichleS. (2003) Species identity in the genus Adenomera (Anura: Leptodactyidae) in southeastern Peru. Herpetologica59490-504.

BernardeP.S.KokubumM.N.C.MachadoR.A.AnjosL. (1999) Uso de habitats naturais e antrópicos em uma localidade no estado de Rondônia, Brasil (Amphibia, Anura). Acta Amaz.29555-562.

BertoluciJ.RodriguesJ.T. (2002) Seasonal patterns of breeding activity of Atlantic Rainforest anurans at Boracéia, Southeastern Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia23161-167.

Borges-LeiteM.J.RodriguesJ.F.M.Borges-NojosaD.M. (2014) Herpetofauna of a coastal region of northeastern Brazil. Herpetol. Notes7405-413.

CardosoA.J.HaddadC.F.B. (1992) Diversidade e turno de vocalização de anuros em comunidade neotropical. Acta Zool. Lilloana4143-105.

CastroA.S.F.MoroM.F.MenezesM.O.T. (2012) O complexo vegetacional da zona litorânea no Ceará: Pecém, São Gonçalo do Amarante. Acta Bot. Bras.26108-124.

CrumpM.L. (1971) Quantitative analysis of the ecological distribution of a tropical herpetofauna. Occ. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas31-62.

De la RivaI. (1996) The specific name of Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylidae) in the Paraguay River basin. J. Herpetol.30556-558.

DixonJ.R.HeyerW.R. (1968) Anuran succession in a temporary pond in Colima, Mexico. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci.67129-137.

DonnellyM.GuyerC. (1994) Patterns of reproduction and habitat use in an assemblage of Neotropical hylid frogs. Oecologia98291-302.

DownieJ.R.SmithJ. (2003) Survival of larval Leptodactylus fuscus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) out of water: developmental differences and interspecific comparisons. J. Herpetol.17107-115.

DuellmanW.E.TruebL. (1986) Biology of Amphibians. McGraw-HillNew York.

DuellmanW.E. (1989) Tropical herpetofauna communities: patterns of community structure in neotropical rainforest. In: Harmelin-VivenM.L.BouliereF. (Eds.) Vertebrates in Complex Tropical Systems Ecological Studies pp.  61-68. Springer-VerlagNew York.

FouquetA.CassiniC.S.HaddadC.F.B.PeachN.RodriguesM.T. (2014) Species delimitation, patterns of diversification and historical biogeography of the Neotropical frog genus Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylidae). J. Biogeog.41855-870.

Garcia-RutledgeE.J.NarinsP.M. (2001) Shared acoustic resources in an old world frog community. Herpetologica57104-116.

GiarettaA.A.KokubumM.N.C. (2004) Reproductive ecology of Leptodactylus furnarius Sazima & Bokermann, 1978, a frog that lay eggs in underground chambers (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Herpetozoa16115-126.

GosnerK.L. (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica16183-190.

HaddadC.F.B.PradoC.P.A. (2005) Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. BioScience55207-217.

HeyerW.R. (1978) Systematics of the fuscus group of the frog genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Natur. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles County Sci. Bull.291-85.

HeyerW.R. (1984) The systematic status of Adenomera griseigularis Henle, with comments on systematic problems in the genus Adenomera (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Amphibia-Reptilia597-100.

HeyerW.R.RandA.S.CruzC.A.G.PeixotoO.L.NelsonC.E. (1990) Frogs of Boracéia. Arq. Zool.31231-410.

HeyerW.R.DonnellyM.A.McDiarmidR.W.HayekL.C.FosterM.S. (1994) Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution PressWashington and London.

HödlW. (1977) Call differences and calling site segregation in anuran species from Central Amazonian floating meadows. Oecologia28351-363.

HoffmannM.BrooksT.M.ButchartS.H.M.CarpenterK.E.ChansonJ.CollenB.CoxN.A.DarwallW.R.T.D.DulvyN.K.HarrisonL.R.KatariyaV.PollockC.M.QuaderS.RichmanN.I.RodriguesA.S.L.TognelliM.F.ViéJ.C.AguiarJ.M.AllenD.J.AllenG.R.AmoriG.AnanjevaN.B.AndreoneF.AndrewP.OrtizA.L.A.BaillieJ.E.M.BaldiR.BellB.D.BijuS.D.BirdJ.P.Black-DecimaP.BlancJ.J.BolañosF.BolivarG.W.BurfieldI.J.BurtonJ.A.CapperD.R.CastroF.CatulloG.CavanaghR.D.ChanningA.ChaoN.L.CheneryA.M.ChiozzaF.ClausnitzerV.CollarN.J.CollettL.C.ColletteB.B.FernandezC.F.C.CraigM.T.CrosbyM.J.CumberlidgeN.CuttelodA.DerocherA.E.DiesmosA.C.DonaldsonJ.S.DuckworthJ.W.DutsonG.DuttaS.K.EmslieR.H.FarjonA.FowlerS.FreyhofJ.GarshelisD.L.GerlachJ.GowerD.J.GrantT.D.HammersonG.A.HarrisR.B.HeaneyL.R.HedgesS.B.HeroJ.M.HughesB.HussainS.A.IcocheaJ.M.IngerR.F.IshiiN.IskandarD.T.JenkinsR.K.B.KanekoY.KottelatM.KovacsK.M.KuzminS.L.MarcaE.LamoreuxJ.F.LauM.W.N.LavillaE.O.LeusK.LewisonR.L.LichtensteinG.LivingstoneS.R.LukoschekV.MallonD.P.McGowanP.J.K.McIvorA.MoehlmanP.D.MolurS.AlonsoA.M.MusickJ.A.NowellK.NussbaumR.A.OlechW.OrlovN.L.PapenfussT.J.Parra-OleaG.PerrinW.F.PolidoroB.A.PourkazemiM.RaceyP.A.RagleJ.S.RamM.RathbunG.ReynoldsR.P.RhodinA.G.J.RichardsS.J.RodríguezL.O.RonS.R.RondininiC.RylandsA.B.MitchesonY.S.SanciangcoJ.C.SandersK.L.Santos-BarreraG.SchipperJ.Self-SullivanC.ShiY.ShoemakerA.ShortF.T.Sillero-ZubiriC.SilvanoD.L.SmithK.G.SmithA.T.SnoeksJ.StattersfieldA.J.SymesA.J.TaberA.B.TalukdarB.K.TempleH.J.TimminsR.TobiasJ.A.TsytsulinaK.TweddleD.UbedaC.ValentiS.V.DijkP.P.VeigaL.M.VelosoA.WegeD.C.WilkinsonM.WilliamsonE.A.XieF.YoungB.E.AkçakayaH.R.BennunL.BlackburnT.M.BoitaniL.DublinH.T.FonsecaG.A.B.GasconC.LacherT.E.Jr.MaceG.M.MainkaS.A.McNeelyJ.A.MittermeierR.A.ReidG.M.RodriguezJ.P.RosenbergA.A.SamwaysM.J.SmartJ.SteinB.A.StuartS.N. (2010) The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science3301503-1509.

IUCN (2014) Red List of Threatened Species. Accessed January 20 2014 at www.iucnredlist.org.

KokubumM.N.C.GiarettaA.A. (2005) Reproductive ecology and behaviour of a species of Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylidae) with endrotrophic tadpoles: systematic implications. J. Nat. Hist.391745-1758.

KokubumM.N.C.SousaM.B. (2008) Reproductive ecology of Leptodactylus aff. hyleadactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from an open area in northern Brazil. S. Am. Herpetol.315-21.

LutzB. (1947) Trends towards non-aquatic and direct development in frogs. Copeia1947242-252.

MeninM.AlmeidaA.P.KokubumM.N.C. (2009) Reproductive aspects of Leptodactytus hylaedactylus (Anura: Leptodactylidae), a member of the Leptodactylus marmoratus species group, with a description of tadpoles and calls. J. Nat. Hist.432257-2270.

MercolliC.YanoskyA.A.DixonJ.R. (1995) Natural history of Adenomera hylaedactyla (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in the Eastern Chaco of Argentina. Bull. Md. Herpetol. Soc.31117-129.

PombalJ.P. (1997) Distribuição espacial e temporal de anuros (Amphibia) em uma poça permanente na Serra de Paranapiacaba, Sudeste do Brasil. Rev. Brasil. Biol.57583-594.

PombalJ.P.HaddadC.F.B. (2005) Estratégias e modos reprodutivos de anuros (Amphibia) em uma poça permanente na Serra de Paranapiacaba, Sudeste do Brasil. Pap. Avulsos de Zool.45201-213.

PradoC.P.A.UetanabaroM.HaddadC.F.B. (2005) Breeding activity patterns, reproductive modes, and habitat use by anurans (Amphibia) in a seasonal environment in the Pantanal, Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia26211-221.

R Development Core Team (2014) R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna. Accessed January 20 2014 at http://www.R-project.org/.

RodriguezL.O.DuellmanW.E. (1994) Guide to the Frogs of the Iquitos Region Amazon Peru. Univ. Kansas Natural History MuseumLawrence, KS.

Rossa-FeresD.C.JimJ. (1994) Distribuição sazonal em comunidades de anfíbios anuros na região de Botucatu, São Paulo. Rev. Bras. Biol.54323-334.

VasconcelosT.S.Rossa-FeresD. (2005) Diversidade distribuição espacial e temporal de anfíbios anuros (Amphibia Anura) na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo Brasil.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    A male of Adenomera aff. hylaedactyla. This figure is published in colour in the online version.

  • View in gallery

    Number of Adenomera aff. hylaedactyla individuals vocalizing throughout the day for the duration of the study.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 24 24 7
Full Text Views 9 9 5
PDF Downloads 3 3 2
EPUB Downloads 1 1 0