Sexual size and shape dimorphism in the Near Eastern fire salamander, Salamandra infraimmaculata (Caudata: Salamandridae)

in Animal Biology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Sexual dimorphism, phenotypic difference between males and females of the same species, has been demonstrated in many invertebrates and vertebrates. In many of these studies, which were especially conducted on amphibians, female individuals were reported to be larger than males. However, this does not necessarily mean that this also applies to body shapes. Therefore, in this study, a total of 31 characters of body size and body shape were measured and analyzed in the Near Eastern fire salamander, in order to understand whether these characters differ between female and male individuals. The results suggest that there is a significant difference between the sexes in terms of both body size and some body shapes (e.g. arm and leg length, arm diameter, cloacal proportions) in this fire salamander. I conclude that both sexual size and shape dimorphism need to be taken into account to help understand an organism’s life-history traits, ecology, population dynamics and behavior.

Sexual size and shape dimorphism in the Near Eastern fire salamander, Salamandra infraimmaculata (Caudata: Salamandridae)

in Animal Biology



AltunışıkA.ÖzdemirN. (2013) Body size and age structure of a highland population of Hyla orientalis Bedriaga, 1890, in Northern Turkey. Herpetozoa2649-55.

AltunışıkA.ErgülT.GülÇ.ÖzdemirN.TosunoğluM. (2014) A skeletochronological study of the smooth newt Lissotriton vulgaris (Amphibia: Urodela) from an island and a mainland population in Turkey. Ital. J. Zool.81381-388.

AltunışıkA.ÖzdemirN. (2015) Life history traits in Bufotes variabilis (Pallas, 1769) from 2 different altitudes in Turkey. Turk. J. Zool.39153-159.

AnderssonM. (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton University PressPrinceton.

BakkegardK.A.GuyerC. (2004) Sexual size dimorphism in the Red Hills Salamander, Phaeognathus hubrichti (Caudata: Plethodontidae: Desmognathinae). J. Herpetol.388-15.

BlankL.BlausteinL. (2012) Using ecological niche modeling to predict the distributions of two endangered amphibian species in aquatic breeding site. Hydrobiologia693157-167.

BooksteinF.L. (1985) Morphometrics in Evolutionary Biology: the Geometry of Size and Shape Change With Examples From Fishes. Academy of Natural Sciences of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia, PA.

BruceR.C. (1993) Sexual size dimorphism in Desmognathine salamanders. Copeia1993313-318.

ButlerM.A.LososJ.B. (2002) Multivariate sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Ecol. Monogr.72541-559.

CadedduG.GiacomaC.CastellanoS. (2012) Sexual size dimorphism in the Tyrrhenian tree frog a life-history perspective. J. Zool.286285-292.

CastanetJ.PintoS.LothM.M.LamotteM. (2000) Âge individuel, longévité et dynamique de croissance osseuse chez un amphibien vivipare, Nectophrynoides occidentalis (Anoure, Bufonidé). Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. Biol. Anim.2111-17.

ColleoniE.DenoëlM.Padoa-SchioppaE.ScaliS.FicetolaG.F. (2014) Rensch’s rule and sexual dimorphism in salamanders: patterns and potential processes. J. Zool.293143-151.

CoxR.M.KellyS.L.John-AdlerH.B. (2003) A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Evolution571653-1669.

DarwinC. (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. MurrayLondon.

FairbairnD.J. (1997) Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys.28659-687.

FairbairnD.J.BlanckenhornW.U.SzékelyT. (Eds) (2007) Sex Size and Gender Roles. Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University PressNew York.

Gomez-MestreI.PyronR.A.WiensJ.J. (2012) Phylogenetic analyses reveal unexpected patterns in the evolution of reproductive modes in frogs. Evolution663687-3700.

GuillaumetA.CrochetP.A.GodelleB. (2005) Phenotypic variation in Galerida larks in Morocco: the role of history and natural selection. Molecular Ecology143809-3821.

HanX.FuJ. (2013) Does life history shape sexual size dimorphism in anurans? A comparative analysis. BMC Evol. Biol.131-11.

IvanovićA.SotiropoulosK.FurtulaM.DžukićG.KalezićM.L. (2008) Sexual size and shape evolution in European newts (Amphibia: Caudata: Salamandridae) on the Balkan Peninsula. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res.46381-387.

KalezićM.L.DžukićG.ÐorovićA.AleksićI. (2000) Body size, age and sexual dimorphism in the genus Salamandra. A study of the Balkan species (Amphibia, Urodela, Salamandridae). Spixiana23283-292.

KupferA. (2007) Sexual size dimorphism in amphibians: an overview. In: FairbairnD.J.BlanckenhornW.U.SzékelyT. (Eds) Sex Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University PressNew York.

LabusN.CvijanovićM.VukovT. (2013) Sexual size and shape dimorphism in Salamandra salamandra (Amphibia, Caudata, Salamandridae) from the central Balkans. Arch. Biol. Sci.65969-975.

LiaoW.B. (2013) Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in a frog obeys the inverse of Rensch’s rule. Evol. Biol.40493-499.

LiaoW.B.ChenW. (2012) Inverse Rensch-rule in a frog with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Naturwissenschaften99427-431.

LiaoW.B.LiuC.W.MeriläJ. (2015) Andrew meets Rensch: sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch’s rule in Andrew’s toad (Bufo andrewsi). Oecologia177389-399.

LiaoW.B.ZengY.YangD. (2013a) Sexual size dimorphism in anurans: roles of mating system and habitat types. Front. Zool.1065.

LiaoW.B.ZengY.ZhouC.Q.JehleR. (2013b) Sexual size dimorphism in anurans fails to obey Rensch’s rule. Front. Zool.1010.

LindenforsP.GittlemanJ.L.JonesK.E. (2007) Sexual size dimorphism in mammals. In: FairbairnD.J.BlanckenhornW.U.SzékelyT. (Eds) Sex Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism pp.  16-26. Oxford University PressOxford.

MonnetJ.M.CherryM.I. (2002) Sexual size dimorphism in anurans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B2692301-2307.

OlgunK.ÜzümN.AvcıA.MiaudC. (2005) Age, size and growth of the southern crested newt Triturus karelinii (Strauch 1870) in a population from Bozdağ (western Turkey). Amphibia-Reptilia26223-230.

PapenfussT.DisiA.Rastegar-PouyaniN.DeganiG.UgurtasI.SparreboomM.KuzminS.AndersonS.SadekR.Hraoui-BloquetS.GasithA.ElronE.GafnyS.KiliçT.GemE.KayaU. (2009) Salamandra infraimmaculata. The Iucn Red List of Threatened Species 2009: E.T59466a11927871. Downloaded on 16 September 2016.

PetersS.E.AulnerD.A. (2000) Sexual dimorphism in forelimb muscles of the bull- frog, Rana catesbeiana: a functional analysis of isometric contractile properties. J. Exp. Biol.2033639-3654.

RantaE.LaurilaA.ElmbergJ. (1994) Reinventing the wheel: analysis of sexual dimorphism in body size. Oikos70313-321.

Rastegar-PouyaniN.FattahiiR. (2015) Sexual dimorphism in Trachylepis vittata (Olivier, 1804) (Sauria: Scincidae) in the Zagros Mountains, western Iran. Turkish J. Zool.3959-65.

ReinhardS.RennerS.KupferA. (2015) Sexual dimorphism and age of Mediterranean salamanders. Zoology11819-26.

ReymentR.A.BlackithR.E.CampbellN.A. (1984) Multivariate Morphometrics. Academic PressLondon.

RomanoA.BruniG.PaolettiC. (2009) Sexual dimorphism in the Italian endemic species Salamandrina perspicillata (Savi, 1821) and testing of a field method for sexing salamanders. Amphibia-Reptilia30425-434.

SchäubleiC.S. (2004) Variation in body size and sexual dimorphism across geographical and environmental space in the frogs Limnodynastes tasmaniensis and L. peronii. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society8239-56.

ShineR. (1978) Sexual size dimorphism and male combat in snakes. Oecologia33269-277.

ShineR. (1979) Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the Amphibia. Copeia1979297-306.

ShineR. (1988) The evolution of large body size in females – a critique of Darwin’s fecundity advantage model. Am. Nat.131124-131.

StillwellR.C.BlanckenhornW.U.TederT.DavidowitzG.FoxC.W. (2010) Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity affect variation in sexual size dimorphism in insects: from physiology to evolution. Annu. Rev. Entomol.55227-245.

WellsK.D. (2007) The Ecology and Behaviour of Amphibians. Chicago University PressChicago.

XiongJ.LiuX.XhangX.LiM.MinY. (2016) Sexual dimorphism of the Jilin Clawed Salamander, Onychodactylus zhangyapingi, (Urodela: Hynobiidae: Onychodactylinae) from Jilin Province, China. Asian Herpetol. Res.7220-226.

ZhangX.XiongJ.L.LvY.Y.ZhangL.SunY.Y. (2014) Sexual size and shape dimorphism in the Wushan salamander, Liua shihi (Liu, 1950) (Urodela: Hynobiidae). Ital. J. Zool.81(3) 369-373.


  • View in gallery

    Sexual dimorphism of Salamandra infraimmaculata (N=16 females and N=14 males). Some selected dimorphic characters are shown: (A) lower leg length (LLL2); (B) upper arm length (UAL); (C) upper arm diameter (UAD); (D) cloacal length (CL). Males (□) have significantly larger sizes for each of these traits than females (○).

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 23 23 2
Full Text Views 10 10 5
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 2 2 1