Habitat heterogeneity as a local and regional-scale driver of primate assemblage structure in northernmost Brazilian Amazonia

in Animal Biology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

We performed line transect surveys in two fishbone human settlements (defined as clearings cut through forests in a fishbone pattern, extending along secondary roads from a main road) in different vegetation types, as well as in one protected area. A total of 410 sightings of eight primate species were recorded in the three study areas. The mean total primate abundance was 3.28 groups/10 km walked, and there were significant differences between areas with different plant physiognomies. The abundance of the larger primate species Alouatta macconnelli and Ateles paniscus (Atelidae) was higher in the dense ombrophilous forests of the Entre Rios human settlement, whereas those of all the other species were higher in the forest mosaics of the Novo Paraíso human settlement and Viruá National Park. The habitat generalist Sapajus apella presented the highest abundances in all the areas. No significant differences were detected in relative biomass between study areas. Additionally, no significant differences were detected in the overall abundances or relative biomasses of the hunted species (Sapajus apella, Alouatta macconnelli, Ateles paniscus, and Chiropotes chiropotes) between study areas. Human impact has been recognized as shaping primate assemblages. However, in this study, primates were not part of the dietary repertoire of the non-Amazonian immigrants inhabiting the fishbone human settlements. Thus, although the primate assemblages varied considerably at the regional and local level, they were shaped by habitat heterogeneity, which allowed the competing species to coexist through habitat segregation.

Sections

References

BennettC.L.LeonardS.CarterS. (2001) Abundance, diversity, and patterns of distribution of primates on the Tapiche river in Amazonian Peru. Am. J. Primatol., 54, 119-126.

BranchL.C. (1983) Seasonal and habitat differences in the abundance of primates in the Amazon (Tapajós) National Park, Brazil. Primates, 24, 424-431.

BrumM.D.C. (2011) Partição de recursos em assembleias de primatas neotropicais: uma comparação entre dois tipos vegetacionais da Amazônia. Thesis, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia/Fundação Universidade do Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas.

BucklandS.T.AndersonD.R.BurnhamK.P.LaakeJ.L. (1993) Distance Sampling. Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Chapman and Hall, London.

ChapmanC.A.StruhsakerT.T.SkorupaJ.P.SnaithT.V.RothmanJ.M. (2010) Understanding long-term primate community dynamics: implications of forest changes. Ecol. Appl., 20, 179-191.

ChessonP.L.HuntleyN. (1989) Short-term instabilities and long-term community dynamics. Tree, 4, 293-298.

ChessonP.L.RosenzweigM. (1991) Behaviour, heterogeneity and the dynamics of interacting species. Ecology, 72, 1187-1195.

ChiarelloA.G. (1999) Effects of fragmentation of the Atlantic forest on mammal communities in south-eastern Brazil. Biol. Conserv., 89, 71-82.

ConnellJ.H. (1980) Diversity and the evolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past? Oikos, 35, 131-138.

DiamondJ.M. (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: CodyM.L.DiamondJ.M. (Eds) Ecology and Evolution of Communities, pp.  342-444. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

EisenbergJ.F.RedfordJ.K. (2000) Mammals of the Neotropics: the Central Neotropics: Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Brazil. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

EMBRAPA (2006) Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária – Embrapa Solos. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Available at http://www.agrolink.com.br/downloads/sistema-brasileiro-de-classificacao-dos-solos2006.pdf. Accessed on 10 October 2016.

EmmonsL.H.FeerF. (1997) Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: a Field Guide. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

GalettiM.GiacominiH.C.BuenoR.S.BernardoC.S.S.MarquesR.M.BovendorpR.S. (2009) Priority areas for the conservation of Atlantic forest large mammals. Biol. Conserv., 142, 1229-1241.

Governo do Estado de Roraima (2005) Estrutura agrária do Estado de Roraima – Secretaria de Estado da Agricultura e Abastecimento de Roraima, Instituto de Terras e Colonização do Estado de Roraima, ITERAIMA, Roraima. Available at www.senado.gov.br/sf/comissoes/cre/ap/AP_20071121_EstruturaAgrariaRoraima.pdf. Accessed on 15 April 2011.

HaugaasenT.PeresC.A. (2005) Primate assemblage structure in Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests. Am. J. Primatol., 67, 243-258.

HigginsM.A.RuokolainenK.TuomistoH.LlerenaN.CardenasG.PhillipsO.L.VasquezR.RasanenM. (2011) Geological control of floristic composition in Amazonian forests. J. Biogeography, 38, 2136-2149.

HigginsM.A.AsnerG.P.AndersonC.B.MartinR.E.KnappD.E.TupayachiR. (2015) Regional-scale drivers of forest structure and function in north western Amazonia. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0119887. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0119887.

HillK.PadweJ.BejyvagiC.BepurangiA.JacugiF.TykuarangiR.TykuarangiT. (1997) Impact of hunting on large vertebrates in the Mbaracayu reserve, Paraguay. Conserv. Biol., 11, 1339-1353.

IBGE (2009) Vegetação. Available at ftp://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/mapas/tematicos/tematico_estadual/RR_solos.df. Accessed on 10 November 2012.

IUCN (2016) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed on 02/02/2016.

KaseckerT.P. (2006) Efeito da estrutura do habitat sobre a riqueza e composição de comunidades de primatas da RDS Piagaçu-Purus, Amazônia Central, Brasil. Thesis, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia/Fundação Universidade do Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas.

KristiansenT.SvenningJ.C.EiserhardtW.L.PedersenD.BrixH.KristiansenS.M.KnadelM.GrandezC.BalslevH. (2012) Environment versus dispersal in the assembly of western Amazonian palm communities. J. Biogeography, 39, 1318-1332.

LehmanS.M. (2000) Primate community structure in Guyana: a biogeographic analysis. Int. J. Primatol., 21, 333-351.

LehmanS.M. (2004) Biogeography of the primates of Guyana: effects of habitat use and diet on geographic distribution. Int. J. Primatol., 25, 1225-1242.

LehmanS.M.SussmanR.W.Phillips-ConroyJ.PrinceW. (2006) Ecological biogeography of primates in Guyana. In: LehmanS.M.FleagleJ.G. (Eds) Primate Biogeography, pp.  105-130. Springer, New York.

LeviT.ShepardG.H.Jr.Ohl-SchachererJ.WilmersC.C.PeresC.A.YuD.W. (2011) Spatial tools for modeling the sustainability of subsistence hunting in tropical forests. Ecol. Appl., 21(5), 1802-1818.

MacArthurR.LevinsR. (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat., 101, 377-385.

MeloA.R.A.GadelhaJ.R.SilvaM.N.D.SilvaA.P.Jr.Mendes PontesA.R. (2015) Diversity, abundance and the impact of hunting on large mammals in two contrasting forest sites in northern Amazon. Wildl. Biol., 21(5), 234-245.

Mendes PontesA.R. (1997) Habitat partitioning among the primates of Maraca Island, Roraima, Brazilian Amazonia. Int. J. Primatol., 18, 131-157.

Mendes PontesA.R. (1999) Environmental determinants of primate abundance in Maraca Island, Roraima, Brazilian Amazonia. J. Zool., 247, 189-199.

Mendes PontesA.R.LaymeV.M.G.MagnussonW.E.MarigoL.C. (2010) Mamíferos de Médio e Grande Porte do Estado de Roraima, Extremo Norte da Amazônia Brasileira. In: BarbosaR.I.MeloW.F. (Eds) Roraima: homem, ambiente e ecologia, pp.  603-630. Fundação do Meio Ambiente, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Roraima, Roraima, Brazil.

Mendes PontesA.R.PaulaM.D.MagnussonW.E. (2012) Low primate diversity and abundance in northern Amazonia and its implications for conservation. Biotropica, 44, 834-839.

MittermeierR.A.RylandsA.B.BoubliJ.P. (2015) Ateles paniscus. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/2283/0. Accessed on 29/12/2015.

Muller-DomboisD.EllenbergH. (1974) Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Naughton-TrevesL.MenaJ.L.TrevesA.AlvarezN.RadeloffV.C. (2003) Wildlife survival beyond park boundaries: the impact of slash-and-burn agriculture and hunting on mammals in Tambopata, Peru. Conserv. Biol., 17, 1106-1117.

PalminteriS.PowekkG.V.N.PeresC.A. (2011) Regional-scale heterogeneity in primate community structure at multiple undisturbed forest sites across south-eastern Peru. J. Trop. Ecol., 27, 181-194.

PeresC.A. (1997) Primate community structure in twenty Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests. J. Trop. Ecol., 13, 385-405.

PeresC.A. (1999) Effects of subsistence hunting and forest types on the structure of Amazonian primate communities. In: FleagleJ.G.JansonC.ReedK. (Eds) Primate Communities, pp.  268-283. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

PeresC.A. (2000) Effects of subsistence hunting on vertebrate community structure in Amazonian forests. Conserv. Biol., 14, 240-253.

PeresC.A.DolmanP. (2000) Density compensation in Neotropical primate communities: evidence from 56 hunted and nonhunted Amazonian forests of varying productivity. Oecologia, 22, 175-189.

PetersonA.T.SoberónJ.PearsonR.G.AndersonR.P.Martinez-MeyerE.NakamuraM.BastosM. (2011) Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

PillayR.JohnsinghA.J.T.RaghunathR.MadhusudanM.D. (2011) Patterns of spatiotemporal change in large mammal distribution and abundance in the southern Western Ghats, India. Biol. Conserv., 144, 1567-1576.

PlumptreA.J.JohnsA.G. (2001) Changes in primate communities following logging disturbance. In: FimbelR.A.GrajalA.RobinsonJ.G. (Eds) The Cutting Edge: Conserving Wildlife in Logged Tropical Forests, pp.  71-92. Columbia University Press, New York.

PomaraL.Y.RuokolainenK.TuomistoH.YoungK.R. (2012) Avian composition co-varies with floristic composition and soil nutrient concentration in Amazonian upland forests. Biotropica, 44, 545-553.

PomaraL.Y.RuokolainenK.YoungK.R. (2014) Avian species composition across the Amazon River: the roles of dispersal limitation and environmental heterogeneity. J. Biogeography, 41, 784-796.

ReyesA.F.A. (2013) Abundância relativa, padrões de atividade e uso de habitat de onça-pintada e onça-parda no norte da Amazônia brasileira. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brasil.

RistJ.Milner-GullandE.J.CowlishawG.RowcliffeJ.M. (2009) The importance of hunting and habitat in determining the abundance of tropical forest species in equatorial Guinea. Biotropica, 41, 700-710.

RossettiD.F. (2014) The role of tectonics in the late quaternary evolution of Brazil’s Amazonian landscape. Earth-Sci. Rev., 139, 362-389.

RoveroF.MtuiA.S.KitegileA.S.NielsenM.R. (2012) Hunting or habitat degradation? Decline of primate populations in Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania: an analysis of threats. Biol. Conserv., 146, 89-96.

ShepherdG.J. (2006) Fitopac – manual do usuário. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas.

SiemersB.M. (2000) Seasonal variation in food resources and forest strata use by brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in a disturbed forest fragment. Fol. Primatol., 71, 181-184.

Souza-MazurekR.R.D.PedrinhoT.FelicianoX.HilárioW.GeroncioS.MarceloE. (2000) Subsistence hunting among the Waimiri Atroari Indians in central Amazonia, Brazil. Biodiv. Conserv., 9, 579-596.

SussmanR.W.Phillips-ConroyJ. (1995) A survey of the distribution and diversity of the primates of Guyana. Int. J. Primatol., 16, 761-792.

ThoisyB.RenouxF.JulliotC. (2005) Hunting in northern French Guiana and its impact on primates. Oryx, 39, 149-157.

TuomistoH.RuokolainenK.RuokolainenK.KalliolaR.LinnaA.DanjoyW.RodriguezZ. (1995) Dissecting Amazonian biodiversity. Science, 269, 63-66.

TuomistoH.RuokolainenK.Yli-HallaM. (2003) Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of western Amazonian Forests. Science, 299, 241-244.

WiensJ.A. (1977) On competition and variable environments. Am. Sci., 65, 590-597.

Figures

  • Study areas, in the north of the Brazilian Amazon: (1) Viruá National Park (with the PPBio grid), (2) Novo Paraíso settlement, (3) Entre Rios settlement (images from Google Earth, version 6.1); and the study transects (adapted from Melo et al., 2015).

    View in gallery
  • Abundance (groups/10 km) of primate species in the three study areas: Novo Paraíso (NP) settlement, Viruá National Park (PARNA Viruá) and Entre Rios (ER) settlement in northernmost Brazilian Amazonia.

    View in gallery
  • Relative biomass (kg/10 km) of primate species in the three study areas: Novo Paraíso (NP) settlement, Viruá National Park (PARNA Viruá) and Entre Rios (ER) settlement in northernmost Brazilian Amazonia.

    View in gallery
  • Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on primate abundance in the three study areas (V1-3 = PARNA Viruá; NP1-3 = Novo Paraíso settlement; ER1-3 = Entre Rios settlement) in northernmost Brazilian Amazonia.

    View in gallery
  • Biplot for the first and second CCA axes, respectively CCA1 and CCA2, based on primate abundance in the three localities studied (V = PARNA Viruá; NP = Novo Paraíso settlement and ER = Entre Rios settlement) in northernmost Brazilian Amazonia.

    View in gallery
  • Relative biomass of the four most hunted species in the settlements (Melo, 2015) recorded in PARNA Viruá and at the Novo Paraíso settlement in northernmost Brazilian Amazonia. Note that the values expressed on the y-axis are indicated below each graph.

    View in gallery

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 11 11 7
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0